Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Lucky!
I have an L on my forehead! pfff.
Can I borrow a dozen eggs?
Very unhappy a good product, but Shaw have perhaps more confidence with ECT..
Raphael ace too much company and Shaw are afraid to make an agreement with them
Too much continuation legal against that made fear too
Think of that !!!!!!!!
....Peoples are impatient to wait..
Perhaps that ECT have any agreement
Let that be a lesson to us!
Souvlaki?
Been involved this "company" long time
He is LIER, nothing more
Me love you long time.....
....?
Well according to you he's selling shares/diluting.
30 Million shares at an average of .08 - .12 is 2.4 to 3.6 million$. He can last a long time.
Please enlighten us.
I could use a laugh.
So the OS has gone up by 5,616,666 since 7/11/08.
The total volume since then has been 4,828,829.
What does one have to do with the other?
How does that happen? Did they add to some restricted shares?
Apparently since the float hasn't changed much in 2 months:
64,706,478 as of May 13, 2008
Total Shares on the float: 65,403,745 as of July 11, 2008
So much for ungagging. Sheesh. Wake up people.
Please do.
Mine shows the after hours as a print, delete, print.
OT: This is all I could think of after reading your message :)
What about that post?
I did not have any questions about 504 but since you posted this it has raised some questions for me.
So what you're saying is they could have sold chunks to lenders who might sell off at a later date. I checked the SEC website and I concur that this is possible. Thanks for the lesson.
It was my understanding that 504s were sold to retail right away via the T/A.
I'll send an e-mail to Chad for clarification in this case.
Same except one is html and the other text.
You don't have to waste your time going through 30 additions and deletions and trying to figure out what's what.
My pleasure.
I wish you asked for the link the first time. Easier.
http://www.otcbb.com/OtherDailyList/
Click on "view" next to the time and date...
6 changes for Monday.
I take offense to that.
This is what I posted to Capt.Jim.
Copy and Paste.
"I am not as sure.
I see this stock having problems getting to a penny but that will depend on the 2 other contracts. If they are significant this can pop. And then we can always pray for A/F's (maybe) if we are lucky.
Otherwise, I hope they have a buy-back/cancellation program set up for 2009. That would be a much better showing of faith to the shareholders than an R/S."
I believe they have the best intentions. Otherwise I'm wasting my time and money.
They were hurt, short term.
Long term, I think it will all work out.
hronia polla!
You're going to have to figure that out for yourself. ;)
I agree. Partially.
If they came out and said they were going to raise 900k by selling shares before they did it then everyone would've dumped and the o/s would be closer to 1.5 billion or more. Who would have suffered? Investors. Who would have escaped? Flippers and traders.
IMO Chad did what he did to protect investors as much as possible and raise 900k ASAP.
In the end I think investors will benefit while traders try to take advantage from time to time.
Who is Chad responsible to protect? IMO, investors.
Well if you sign a paper that says...
"If you arrange for 20k sq ft warehouse, etc. etc. etc.... we will extend this contract to you."
...then the negotiating is technically done. At this point Peter would need to just get it done.
Which he seems to be doing.
Those were yesterdays symbol changes.
Well they did use the word "preliminary".
Besides that, I agree.
IF I am right...
Actually, there were 6 symbol changes today.
Or earn a lot more money...
Agreed.
You can always sign a piece of paper that says...
"If you arrange for 20k sq ft warehouse, etc. etc. etc.... we will extend this contract to you."
A contract for a contract.
Preliminary.
I am not as sure.
I see this stock having problems getting to a penny but that will depend on the 2 other contracts. If they are significant this can pop. And then we can always pray for A/F's (maybe) if we are lucky.
Otherwise, I hope they have a buy-back/cancellation program set up for 2009. That would be a much better showing of faith to the shareholders than an R/S.
The word they used was "preliminary".
I don't see it as a lie but rather as "We want to work with you as long as ..."
Announced as pending, not completed.
Again, do not send any PM's to me...
I have no difficulty at all understanding your posts.
I am not trying to be cute or funny.
You are dreaming in color if you think this would be at .10 with 600 mil O/S. Again, I wish, but it ain't happening yet.
All you're doing is complaining about how the company scr@wed you over and did everything wrong.
Peter made a mistake. A HUGE mistake. He made that mistake when he accepted financing from Carnes.
Now he is very competently digging his way out of a hole and he is doing it very well IMO considering all that could have happened.
It's easy to bash Peter and Chad and ask "Why didn't they do this?" and "Why didn't they do that?" when hindsight is 20/20.
I understood your post. What makes you think this could ever have a market cap of 60 mil at this point in time? I wish, but no way.
Maybe in a year or two.
And the contract could not be confirmed without the 900k. They need this money to get the contract.
You're putting the carriage before the horse...
Please do not send me PM's.
If the stock is at .003 at 1 billion then how can it be .10 at 600 million?
Math is your friend.
And private financing is what started this mess. RVGD needs money to get the contract but you expect them to get financing from a bank with no contract.
Again, had you been paying attention you would know that Peter was unable to get financing because he has not been in the US for long enough. That's why he got private financing. And that's why we have a billion shares today.
i mean, the company would be worth a helluva lot more trading at .10 with 600mil os than .003 with over a billion os.
so .003 * 1.66 = .10
It's the new math they teach these days!
I think he meant oxymoron.
Emphasis on ... well you get it.
OT:
I am insulted. I always go straight to the source!
I get my Krispy Kremes straight from Krispy Kreme!
Only if there's a R/S...
Which there won't be....
Hey! Be nice ;)
I'm glad they don't have a Certified Accountant. I prefer a Chartered Accountant.
A business in Canada, like any other business with any business sense, will use the language that is more likely to attract customers.
The only time this is not so is in Quebec at retail (not the web) due to stupid laws created by stupid people.
Your assumptions about Canadian businesses are wrong.
Shares must be scarce...