Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I believe everyone got theirs already I know i did!
Where does it say there will be news over the next month?
May 25, 2010 02:33 ET Ulysses Diversified Holdings Corporation Increases Their Authorized Common Shares in Anticipation of Acquisition
WILMINGTON, DE--(Marketwire - May 25, 2010) - Ulysses Diversified Holdings Corp. (PINKSHEETS: UDHC), a diversified holding Company, announces that it has increased the Company's authorized common shares from 100,000,000 shares to 200,000,000 shares.
The Company has taken this action in anticipation of a pending acquisition opportunity that may or may not require the use of all or some of the additional authorized securities as part of the transaction.
The Company will not utilize any of the increased authorized shares for any other purposes other than the aforementioned pending acquisition.
Negotiations have been underway for some time regarding the acquisition with both Companies maintaining a mutually agreed upon nondisclosure status during the due diligence period.
The Company also reports that the current outstanding shares are approximately 99,000,000 common shares, which incorporates roughly 48,000,000 to 50,000,000 of restricted shares and 2,000,000 preferred shares.
Acquisition overview: The Company, keeping with its desire to maintain the lowest possible outstanding share structure, will only utilize the minimum required shares for the acquisition with any non required shares being retired by way of a resolution reducing the authorized common shares with the Secretary of State Delaware.
Well Ed Hayter is in charge of the Kinderview certs here at UDHC so all Hayter info is on topic
Looks like Ed Hayter sued the SEC for publishing information
U.S. District Court
Eastern District of New York (Brooklyn)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:10-cv-01530-CBA -VVP
Hayter v. Securities And Exchange Commission
Assigned to: Judge Carol B. Amon
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky
Cause: 05:552 Right to Privacy Act
Date Filed: 04/07/2010
Jury Demand: Plaintiff
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff
Ed Hayter represented by Sam P. Israel
1 Liberty Plaza, Office 2330
New York, NY 10006
212-201-5345
Fax: 212-201-5343
Email: smisrael@aol.com
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
V.
Defendant
Securities And Exchange Commission
Date Filed # Docket Text
04/07/2010 1 COMPLAINT against Securities And Exchange Commission Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Ed Hayter. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Davis, Kimberly) (Entered: 04/07/2010)
04/07/2010 Summons Issued as to Securities And Exchange Commission, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Davis, Kimberly) (Entered: 04/07/2010)
04/07/2010 FILING FEE: $ 350.00, receipt number 4653013369 (Davis, Kimberly) (Entered: 04/07/2010)
Area codes
Main article: List of Illinois area codes
From 1947 until 1988, the Illinois portion of the Chicago metro area was served by a single area code, 312, which abutted the 815 area code. In 1988 the 708 area code was introduced and the 312 area code became exclusive to the city of Chicago.
It became common to call suburbanites "708'ers", in reference to their area code.
The 708 area code was partitioned in 1996 into three area codes, serving different portions of the metro area: 630, 708, and 847.
At the same time that the 708 area code was in trouble, the 312 area code in Chicago was also exhausting its supply of available numbers. As a result, the city of Chicago was divided into two area codes, 312 and 773. Rather than divide the city by a north/south area code, the central business district retained the 312 area code, while the remainder of the city took the new 773 code.
In 2002, the 847 area code was supplemented with the overlay area code 224. In February 2007, the 815 area code (serving outlying portions of the metro area) was supplemented with the overlay area code 779. In October 2007, the overlay area code 331 was implemented to supplement the 630 area with additional numbers.
Plans are in place for overlay codes in the 708, 773, and 312 regions as those area codes become exhausted in the future.
312 Chicago - City (The Loop and central neighborhoods, e.g. the Near North Side)
773 Chicago - City (Everywhere else within the city limits, excluding central area)
872 Chicago - City (overlay for 312 & 773, effective November 7, 2009)
847/224 (North and Northwest Suburbs)
630/331 (Outer Western Suburbs)
708 (South and Near West Suburbs)
815/779 (Far Northwest/Southwest Suburbs; Joliet)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_metropolitan_area
maybe some of you have such a small amount of kinderview shares coming it's not worth the company the postage to mail out
I got ALL my certificates... Called Kinderview they state company is NOT public so certs cannot be traded anyways (for now)
Trades 5/5/10
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=trades&symbol=UDHC
BUYS 636,075 / SELLS 758,187
Total Volume 1,394,262
I thought you already owned 10 million shares here?
EVXA chart please!
FSNR chart please up about 300% in the last few weeks on no news!
very nice quiet move on FSNR from .17 to .64 in less than one month increase of 276% !!!
already in with average of .005 ALL free shares will be holding long term :)
UDHC website is down...
http://www.udhc.net/
SEC Filing April 21, 2010
Item 3.02 Un-Registered Sales of Equity Securities
In accordance with Rules of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), Freestone Resources, Inc. (OTCBB: FSNR) (the “Company”), announced today it had completed the second closing of a private placement to accredited investors of units consisting of 3,300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. In the second closing, the Company sold the remaining 66 units and received net proceeds of approximately $330,000. To date, the Company has sold all 100 (out of 100) units of the private placement for a total of $500,000. The net proceeds from the private placement will be used by the Company to provide working capital and pay certain liabilities in connection with the acquisition of Earth Oil Services, Inc. The units have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act), or any state securities laws, and were issued in a private placement transaction pursuant to the exemptions from registration provided under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation D and may not be transferred or resold except as permitted by the Securities Act.
http://www.otcmarkets.com/pink/quote/quote.jsp?symbol=fsnr
me likey :)
ok i'm getting in today (on the ask TJG haha) order for 3.75 mil this morning at .0002 just got 1,250,000 & 1,749,000 partials.
sounds reasonable if you can check and come up with that theory
basically by the 93% SHORTED this week only states that overseas people who can short this stock arethe ones in control not the company at this time with them being so quiet and giving their shareholders NO update doesnt help either. Just trying toshow no dilution from the company down here in the double zeros
Short Sell Positions This Week 93% of Total Volume is Short
http://regsho.finra.org/FORFshvol20100406.txt
ADF Regulation SHO Pursuant to a Securities and Exchange Commission request, FINRA has agreed to make reported short sale trade data publicly available
Date|Symbol|ShortVolume|TotalVolume|Market
20100406|UDHC|293900|295000|O
20100405|UDHC|71000|96000|O
This stock has been falling for two years according to the chart, no info, barely any posts, I'm supprised it's even trading anymore...
Short Sell Positions March 2010
http://regsho.finra.org/FORFshvol20100326.txt
Date|Symbol|ShortVolume|TotalVolume|Market
20100329 MONDAY NO SHORT VOLUME
20100326|UDHC|6000|6000|O
20100325|UDHC|10100|36960|O
20100324 t-trade 120,000 @ .007
20100324|UDHC|105000|160000|O
20100323 t-trade 200,000 @ .0063
20100323|UDHC|233000|233000|O
20100322 t-trade 200,000 @ .0073
20100322|UDHC|268700|314600|O
20100319 FRIDAY NO SHORT VOLUME (FYI NO VOLUME THAT DAY)
20100318|UDHC|25000|25178|O
20100317 t-trade 164,000 @ .009
20100317|UDHC|243440|303440|O
20100316 t-trade 45,000 @ .0095
20100316|UDHC|105250|214510|O
20100315|UDHC|85000|248050|O
20100312 FRIDAY NO SHORT VOLUME
20100311 THURSDAY NO SHORT VOLUME
20100310 WEDNESDAY NO SHORT VOLUME (FYI NO VOLUME THAT DAY)
20100309 TUESDAY NO SHORT VOLUME (FYI NO VOLUME THAT DAY)
20100308|UDHC|115000|302500|O
20100305|UDHC|154000|222500|O
20100304|UDHC|30000|165000|O
20100303|UDHC|4000|79000|O
20100302|UDHC|10000|10000|O
20100301|UDHC|60000|85074|O
Ok if you're going there let's get the facts correct as to why Mr. Weiss put this project purchase on hold.
Nevele Deal On Ice
Amid Litigation, Tricon Puts Purchase on Hold
By Brian Rubin February 11, 2010
ELLENVILLE – Seeming to justify the fears and speculation regarding news of a sale of the Nevele Grande Resort, potential buyer Rafi Weiss of Brooklyn-based Tricon Development said in an interview Sunday, February 7, that his company would cease its movement forward to purchase the property, which has been closed since last summer. According to Weiss, the main obstacle to closing the deal revolved around the ongoing litigation between current-owner Joel Hoffman and his former business partner, Mitchell Wolff."We are concerned that by the time all of the fighting ends, and we, who are innocent people who really wanted to sincerely make it work — we're going to end up with a shell of what it [the Nevele] was," said Weiss.
Wolff is seeking a receiver to be appointed to the property in order to satisfy an unpaid $2 million judgment against Hoffman from a lawsuit in New Jersey. However, Wolff, apparently, is looking to have himself appointed as the receiver. Some legal experts have considered such a move a potential conflict of interest.
Weiss, likewise, had never encountered such a situation.
"I didn't think that you could own a piece of property in conjunction with [someone] and also file a lien," he said. "It's the first time I've ever seen it, by the way, and I've been in business for 20 years."
Auction America Realty's Marvin Neuman, who was contracted with selling the resort last summer, raised questions regarding the current question of control over the resort, pointing to the contract between Hoffman and Weiss to work toward a transfer of ownership.
"If that contract [between Weiss and Hoffman], any part of it, was not appropriate, was illegal, contained anything improper, at that point in time it was the obligation of the judge to clear it up," said Neuman.
"They keep talking about appointing Mitchell Wolff a receiver: a receiver of what? There is no income, there is nothing, the hotel is closed," he added. "I just don't understand how a lien-holder could create such a bottleneck of such a major entity in [the] region. I'm baffled."
A copy of a letter from Wolff's attorney, Craig Hilliard of the Lawrenceville, New Jersey-based law firm Stark & Stark, was obtained by Tricon; the letter suggests that "they don't necessarily want to have us complete our diligence," said Weiss. A call to Hilliard by the Journal on Tuesday was not returned as of press time.
"Given the fact that we have other options, and even though we very much wanted to do the Nevele, we don't want to be splattered with the mud that people are slinging at each other," he said. He also added that his calls to Wolff had not been answered.
The situation regarding current control over the resort is murky as well. Lance Matteson, president of the Ulster County Development Corporation, is looking to the courts to clear things up so getting the property in the hands of new ownership can come back into focus.
"The litigation between the partners is, indeed, an issue that has to be resolved for any buyer to be able to move forward," said Matteson. "We are expecting some clarity on that soon, but the decision has not come down from the judge in that case, so I think once that happens, there will be a little more clarity about who will be operating the Nevele, and who a buyer will be dealing with.
"Our priority is to get jobs back at the Nevele," he added.
Besides the litigation, there were still many obstacles with which Tricon was contending up to this point: the ever-mounting liens against the Nevele property was one, in response to which, Weiss said, "that's all surmountable, that can all be dealt with, and dealt with to everyone's satisfaction," alluding to earlier reported statements he made that said debts owed by the Nevele's current ownership would be paid, and that liens would be satisfied.
Yet another hurdle the would-be-purchasers were working to clear surrounded the facility's sewer plant, which was originally built and installed decades ago. Because the system was shut down during the Nevele's closure last year, restarting it would mean passing muster with more recently passed environmental laws, which the property had been able to circumvent because it had been grandfathered in under older regulations, said Weiss.
However, despite the problems regarding the sewer plant, Weiss said that if the legal situation between Wolff and Hoffman were cleared up, Tricon would be interested in moving ahead with their intention to purchase. Until that time, though, Weiss said that the company will be looking to other opportunities in the area — specifically one in Ulster County that he couldn't name due to a confidentiality clause — that would cause fewer headaches than the Nevele.
"It's a shame, I can tell you that," said Weiss of the legal battle over the resort. "Not even because we may not be involved [in the purchase]. It's a shame that people just cannot resolve their differences, to the point where they're going to destroy each other. That's the pity of it."
http://www.shawangunkjournal.com/2010/02/11/news/1002110.html
If Weiss finally gets the construction started on the "Shoppes by Walmart" you'll be lucky to get any below .015 or so IMO
good luck with that I know someone buying about 2.5 million before it hits .003 again...
Short Sell Positions March 2010
http://regsho.finra.org/FORFshvol20100325.txt
Date|Symbol|ShortVolume|TotalVolume|Market
20100325|UDHC|10100|36960|O
20100324 t-trade 120,000 @ .007
20100324|UDHC|105000|160000|O
20100323 t-trade 200,000 @ .0063
20100323|UDHC|233000|233000|O
20100322 t-trade 200,000 @ .0073
20100322|UDHC|268700|314600|O
20100319 FRIDAY NO SHORT VOLUME (FYI NO VOLUME THAT DAY)
20100318|UDHC|25000|25178|O
20100317 t-trade 164,000 @ .009
20100317|UDHC|243440|303440|O
20100316 t-trade 45,000 @ .0095
20100316|UDHC|105250|214510|O
20100315|UDHC|85000|248050|O
20100312 FRIDAY NO SHORT VOLUME
20100311 THURSDAY NO SHORT VOLUME
20100310 WEDNESDAY NO SHORT VOLUME (FYI NO VOLUME THAT DAY)
20100309 TUESDAY NO SHORT VOLUME (FYI NO VOLUME THAT DAY)
20100308|UDHC|115000|302500|O
20100305|UDHC|154000|222500|O
20100304|UDHC|30000|165000|O
20100303|UDHC|4000|79000|O
20100302|UDHC|10000|10000|O
20100301|UDHC|60000|85074|O
i'm sure someone will accommodate you today
Short Sell Positions March 2010
http://regsho.finra.org/FORFshvol20100324.txt
Todays volume traded does not match.
Volume: 160,000 vs. Volume: 280,000
A difference of 120,000 shares
That difference would be the volume traded in after hours trading = Volume: 120,000
Date|Symbol|ShortVolume|TotalVolume|Market
20100324 t-trade 120,000 @ .007
20100324|UDHC|105000|160000|O
20100323 t-trade 200,000 @ .0063
20100323|UDHC|233000|233000|O
20100322 t-trade 200,000 @ .0073
20100322|UDHC|268700|314600|O
20100319 FRIDAY NO SHORT VOLUME (FYI NO VOLUME THAT DAY)
20100318|UDHC|25000|25178|O
20100317 t-trade 164,000 @ .009
20100317|UDHC|243440|303440|O
20100316 t-trade 45,000 @ .0095
20100316|UDHC|105250|214510|O
20100315|UDHC|85000|248050|O
20100312 FRIDAY NO SHORT VOLUME
20100311 THURSDAY NO SHORT VOLUME
20100310 WEDNESDAY NO SHORT VOLUME (FYI NO VOLUME THAT DAY)
20100309 TUESDAY NO SHORT VOLUME (FYI NO VOLUME THAT DAY)
20100308|UDHC|115000|302500|O
20100305|UDHC|154000|222500|O
20100304|UDHC|30000|165000|O
20100303|UDHC|4000|79000|O
20100302|UDHC|10000|10000|O
20100301|UDHC|60000|85074|O
thanks for the link
tani since you are a free member and cannot reply privately how can you get to this site to see this list?
http://regsho.finra.org/FORFshvol20100323.txt
I'm sure you can sell them on the bid it is currently at .0065 17,960 shares would give you a loss of ($53.88)
$116.74 in lieu of $170.62 at .0095
the fact that someone just hit the ask for 100,000 five times more than what he has at .008 speaks even louder
the ask is only .008
Short Sell Position
http://regsho.finra.org/FORFshvol20100323.txt
The volume traded does not match.
Volume: 233,000 vs. Volume: 433,000
A difference of 200,000 shares
That difference would be the volume traded in after hours trading = Volume: 200,000
Date|Symbol|ShortVolume|TotalVolume|Market
20100323|UDHC|233000|233000|O
Mar 23, 2010 UDHC Updates Status of KinderView Share Distribution
NEW YORK, NY--(Marketwire - March 23, 2010) - Ulysses Diversified Holdings Corporation (PINKSHEETS: UDHC) today reports the status of the KinderView share distribution balance for those shareholders who are eligible and maintain their Ulysses shares in a brokerage account.
The Company to date has sent all required documentation to the DTCC as requested. The DTCC has informed Ulysses that the distribution request is currently in underwriting and will inform Ulysses upon its completion as to when the remaining distribution of KinderView shares will be to those shareholders who hold their Ulysses shares in brokerage accounts.
The Company is aware that some shareholders that did not hold their Ulysses shares in a brokerage account and who have already received their KinderView shares have had some concerns regarding the lack of the printed cusip number on their certificates. The Company assures those shareholders that this should not be of concern as KinderView is a privately held company (does not trade) only maintains one class of common stock of which a cusip number (49457P 208) has been assigned for that class of stock by the cusip bureau and will apply only to that class of common stock exclusively regardless of it being visible on the certificate or not.
Ulysses assures all of its shareholders that it is working diligently to complete the distribution of the KinderView shares as it continues to pursue a range of business opportunities.
This press release does not constitute an offer of any securities for sale. This press release contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ. All forward-looking statements in this press release are based on information available to the company as of the date hereof, and the company undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this press release.
Contact:
Ulysses Diversified Holdings Corporation
Investor Relations Department
www.udhc.net
(800) 402-8770
http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/Ulysses-Diversified-Holdings-Corporation-Updates-Status-KinderView-Share-Distribution-1136310.htm
I like this part
The Company assures those shareholders that this should not be of concern as KinderView is a privately held company (does not trade) only maintains one class of common stock of which a cusip number (49457P 208) has been assigned for that class of stock by the cusip bureau and will apply only to that class of common stock exclusively regardless of it being visible on the certificate or not.
I like the fact that he is NOT pumping the stock with a bunch of bogus PR's like Clayton did. He put out a few PR's right after he took over UDHC (so he says) and has his first asset for the company now it's all a waiting game until he can get the ball (I mean MALL) rolling LOL!
If you click on the link at the bottom of the post you can see that the date is Monday November 9th, 2009
Then agaain the article did say demolition would begin before the end of 2009 (which never happened) & the construction was expected to start in the first quarter of 2010 (which I also see will not happen as he only has twelve days left)
The empty shopping complex will be razed before the end of the year, with work expected to start on the new center - known as the Shoppes by Walmart - in the first quarter of 2010, Weiss said.
Too bad cooldove isnt here selling me his millions of shares again in the .005 range that other stock ran over 600% very quickly maybe we can get this one to go too :)
I have been buying at the bid today and yes at .009 that 500k trade though was not mine but others were. I will try and add more to my accounts as long as they give them to me at the bid with such a small float I dont see it going much lower but we will see. I have bought shares on the ask as well just not always :)