Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
oh well, we still have the
http://www.sunriseconsultinggroup.net/scg/
to marvel at
and the Webstite typo is still there too
ah, nice some things never change
i don't understand the frequently mentioned opinion here that Chin is the guy "who can turn this around as he has done it before", and things like that.
IMHO Chin is a notorious underachiever, and if you look back at posts from 3-4 years ago was even viewed as a joker and a puppet by people who worked with him.
And besides that, he never did anything much in the first place for SNRS while he was in charge, its not like he pulled off a 0,0001-0,002 run a year ago or so
who knows,
but the last PR was on sep 9 2011
since then it has traded like this all the time
weeks of 0 volume, then 1 or 2 days of anything between 25 - 100 M traded for no reason, and then again a few weeks of 0 volume
you can't call that accumulation or anything significant
most likely a sell below 0,0001
or your own buy :p
every time after such a one off surge , comments were here about "something happening ! who would be so stupid to buy this if there was no value"..
but i never saw those same posters saying anything when the next 30 trading days were 0 :)
Maybe it is one believer who has to wait for his monthly pay check to blow it all on SNRS
the wait continues.
hmm, really, you are still keeping us in suspense with last year's
lcam17
Monday, November 21, 2011 9:40:57 AM
Re: cliffke99 post# 47172
Post # of 48300
something is going to happen today.....
at least soon it will be the one year anniversary of the last PR, something to look forward to.
Kind of reminds me of these very suitable lyrics
"'Cause every time it rains,
You're here in my head,
Like the sun coming out--
Ooh, I just know that something good is gonna happen.
And I don't know when,
But just saying it could even make it happen."
Saw this posted on the snrs board
http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/colorado/codce/1:2012cv01336/133399/31/
im surprised that SNRS didn't put out a PR yet saying they have exclusive rights to produce and market a solar charger for the Higgs particle. Any day, I guess.
Great argument. Where is the evidence that barack obama is NOT their current ceo. Where is the evidence that they are not sitting on 100 million of cash. where is the evidence they are NOT going to take over Nokia. Where is the evidnce that APPLE is NOT going to introduce a 10c per share buyout offer?
Thats the whole point, they have lied and misrepresented things since day one. Probaly last 5 years they were just messing, but now they promised to do it the proper way , right?
If a company has lied and not followed up on any pr in 5 years, when last pr is nearly a year ago, when status has gone back to junk because they refuse to file , when volume on 9 out of 10 days is 0, then yeah, who knows what else they have lined up !
Oh yes, and sorry, cant proide you with 100% certainty that the sun will come up tomorrow eithere, but the odds are strongly stacked up in favour of that.
Will be happy to hear your positives . dont see the point in making up positives . I think all was a fair judgement of snrs in past 3 years. If there are positives, feel free to share them and attract new investors.
a bunch ? did you follow this stock last year from jan 2011 till may or so ?
some days it moved over a billion shares and barely got to 0,0002 to fall back soon enough.
Seems most people think that you can buy at 0,0001 and when the asks for a split second goes to 0,0002 you can sell millions into that with a 0,0001X0,0002 . very unlikely
and people also forget that when it did get to 0.0005 briefly in 2005, we didn't even have 1/3 of the current AS and OS.. so that also relates to just 0.0002 or less if you consider market cap - even though I know on pinks market cap is not the driving force.
But still, even for the biggest optimist, 60 million or 70 million or 80 million is not going to move this.
And excuse me, but WHAT PR campaign ? did you see what they put out last year ? They nearly got ALL buzz words and hype words in their pr, associations with Apple, ipad, solar energy, etc etc, and even that failed to excite people. Even when at that time, they were "fully reporting" with pinks. Now they are close to caveat emptor again.
What more can they try ? Something more exciting than previous year's campaign ? A so called oil business in the Pacific, is not really going to excite people I think .
And people who think 500$ is literally next to nothing for gambling, then the financial crisis seems indeed only to be going over in Europe and not in the US, lol
agreed,
nobody forced to them to put out a PR with such specific timeframe.
This is what happens every time.
If you bring out a plan, you need to have something in place to roll it out in SYNCH with what you promised.
Especially when it is all in your own hands as a company, like releasing a shareholder letter.
Just no excuses here.
It is not the first time, and unfortunately not even the second, third or fourth time it happens EXACTLY in this way.
live and learn !
been in RTGV now 3 years or more
i don't think they *ever* did anything but under-achieve, for 3 years each run of anticipation was followed by a watered down version of what could have been/what was led to believe.
and even that watered down version was always weeks/months late in execution and including at least one nasty surprise AND a couple of business trips from Linda to NY, London, Paris wherever, supposed to make us believe she was rubbing shoulders with the giants in media and finance.
Oh well, still, I will stay in this stock :)
because i just know the day i *do* sell, they will hit a homerun, more likely by sheer luck than vision, but still, a homerun
well, hard to say
there was a confirmed name change document which was filed, but never PRed, but that is all which happened here in past 6 months.
There was a brief period of excitement because apparently there was an Australian company with same name, but it was quickly put to rest when someone contacted that company, who said they had nothing to do with this.
So that is all :
- september 2011 : new CEO announced
- february 2012 : name change document filed
remember this post ?
of course now the hopefuls will say "but wasn't there a name change in february ??" Guess it is that 120 days "quiet period" again or something ;)
Posted by: khah94
In reply to: None Date:2/2/2012 4:37:26 PM
Post #47508 of 48153
THIS IS FROM SNRS YAHOO BOARD:
I found Chin's phone number on the Investors Hub message board and finally got ahold of him this morning. He claims there will be an announcement in February about an acquisition, although he stated he is no longer with the company and not to bother him anymore.
that's a good one
do some on a DD on a company who last released a PR 9 months ago, saying there will be a new CEO
and who filed for a name change 4 months ago, and didn't even inform shareholders.
such a company is really worth doing DD and a hidden gem, i'm sure.
The point is indeed that no matter what they rename it, and which "hot sector" they want to associate themselves with (by name), when they have no assets or cash, and are just a shell, it hardly matters.
the last DD done here led to some hype about "an Australian company taking over", because they happened to have a similar name. Few weeks later, it only needed one mail to that Australian company to be sure there was no link.
or googling the phone number and finding that 2 years ago some other company shared the same number etc etc
No last time this happened was a few weeks ago. Suddenly few trades, immediate excitement, anticipation, no news from company and next day again flatline.
Really dont think a company announcing a ceo change 10 months ago , is suddenly going to be active again before summer.
And about nobody throwing money at worthless stock, what was 2010 and first half of 2011 then ? Was there ever any word which was not invented or causing this to have any worth even when it was trading?
smart strategy indeed !!
we are right on course for being the penny play of the year 2023 !
yes and ? you need to spend money before you can earn money.
This is always the argument here to have hope
wait, the solar business is hot !!
wow, did you see how much Apple sells !
petrol prices are crazy !!
all true, but when this company never actually owns something, it's not worth much is it ?
I also know petrol prices are high. What is stopping you or me then to start our own pink company and acquire something apparently for free (as most people on pinks here somehow seem to think that is how it happens) , and start raking in the cash ?
When you are not *in* the business, you don't make a single penny.
companies are going out of business and bankrupt every day at an increasing number, but somehow we are supposed to be believe that a company with 0$ cash, and with a simple name change under their belt (even after 4 months not officially announced) is going to be $$$$ just because their new name has the word Petrol in it ?
The time when pinks went berserk just because a company had a certain keyword in their name, is far behind us.
how time flies
can't believe it is now exactly 1 year ago already when SNRS started its biggest PR frenzy ever, only to grow silent days after. Imagine that today babies are already being born who were conceived *AFTER* the most recent pr of this company... Good luck keeping the faith.
====
Sunrise Consulting Group, Inc. to Close Sale of Provisional PatentMarketwire(Wed, Jun 1)
Sunrise Consulting Group, Inc. Plans for Buyback of Shares at a Premium (Tue, May 31)
Sunrise Consulting Group, Inc. Receives Contract for Exclusive Sales and Marketing Rights for USA (Tue, May 31)
Sunrise Consulting Group, Inc. Solar Products to Hit Apple Retail Stores(Fri, May 27)
Sunrise Consulting Group, Inc. Accepts Offer in Multi-Million Dollar Term SheetMarketwire(Thu, May 26)
Sunrise Consulting Group, Inc. Positions Itself to Become the New Leader in the Wired Mobile Phone Headset Industry (Thu, May 26)
Sunrise Consulting Group, Inc. to Make a Major Announcement Tonight (...)
there is nothing
this pops up time and over again every few months
just the two phone numbers are the same for both sunrise and this byte launch
http://www.stockgoodies.com/m/groups/view/SNRS-Sunrise-Consulting-Group-Inc
probably both companies just share(d) an office or a suite somewhere in CA. As address and phone is the same, but that is common among many pinks. Just one token guy hired to handle calls for a few dozen companies often.
ah, the old timeS. how hilarious it was that bottom picture, where you get one random photo as a bonus of the guy with his family or whatever, which was never intended to be there, but they didn't even bother to notice or change it :)
well you can hope so, and i often hear on pinks things like "it will run again at some point, they will have to blow life in it, they want to make money also" etc
well i can tell you, when i check even my list here on ihub of boards i have added through the years, i see a fair few which haven't had a single post anymore since 2010 or 2011..let alone any price movement.
some pinks DO die and never flare up again
the hope or belief that every 0,0001 stock will one day run again, is not based on fact or any theory, but on wishful thinking
but if it ever runs again, then good for those who held on.
and we're back to the 0 trading days
4 in a row and counting..
all rumours were killed, what do we have now ?
still waiting 8 months now since the new CEO came in place, I hope he gets a royal pay check for all what he has done by now
Date Open High Low Close Volume Adj
Close
2012/04/24 - - - - - -
2012/04/23 - - - - - -
2012/04/20 - - - - - -
2012/04/19 - - - - - -
what is the value of such post ?
everyone has their own targets and goals when investing, nothing wrong with that..
it gets tiring to read such things over and over again on boards..
just the same as on youtube you check a video for a song and there are 10000 likes (thumbs up) and 2 people who dont like (thumbs down)
and then 30 of the 35 comments under the clip itself will be about "probably 2 idiots have no brain", "2 people have no taste in music", etc etc
RTGV will do well, but every profit is still a profit. We have been many times in past 3 years at this point where it felt that now things would happen *for sure*, only to be underwhelmed, not saying this time it will be like thsi again, but can you blame the people who have been through that numerous times to now lock in their profits ? i don't think so.
<sigh> yep ! it is </sigh>
you know what i mean anyway. sorry that in europe we use a comma for the decimal position instead of a full stop and i messed up
you managed to completely invalidate my theory now ;)
10,000.00 USD and a bit in 5 months. you are right. H U G E
you have got to be kidding, sorry but what you say is completely opposite of the actual trading volume in past months.
TOTAL VOLUME april so far = 9,625,000 shares
TOTAL VOLUME march = 24,991,198 shares
TOTAL VOLUME february = 28,224,200 shares
TOTAL VOLUME january = 8,500,999 shares
TOTAL VOLUME december = 32,921,125 shares
that is a "grand" total of about 104,262,522 shares
for about 10.000 USD TOTAL dolar volume
and this for a total OS of abouT 34,000,000,000 shares makes it about 0,30% of all shares which traded hands in 5 months
if you call this accumulation, well.. there were days when this thing did 1,8 billion shares in 5 hours.
there are some peopple here who have nearly the same amount of sahres in their portfolio already as traded in past 5 months
it came courtesy of another SNRS board
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=28028739
on this could also read that SIObserver contacted that Australian company and they told him explicitly they had nothing to do with it.
Kudoos to SIO for the DD, always welcome back here :)
hmm their charger for ipad looks nifty and quite nice
http://www.solawerks.com/reserve.html
quite a difference from that miniscule pic SNRS have on their site for their ipad charger
their iphone charger looks similar in design to the one SNRS has, but much cheaper, but as was pointed out here before, could be that the specs from the SNRS one are different and better
thanx for the link, at least things are still happening in the solar charger world
<mod message>
please keep gratuitious stock references about how well stock X did to a minimum. thanx. has no relevance to SNRS. Every month there is some stock which goes up xxx% , please provide any reasons, arguments why SNRS would have anything going for it now to make it go up in near future
so far, only an uncomfired (or lets say, un-PR-ed, as the documents with proof are there-) name change to Nevada by company, while they are still in default there.
As was said before here by someone else, in the past 10 years, they have done a 180 in business plan for about 5 times now, without ever having produced a single cent. Old wine in new bags
and so it was again, much ado about nothing and back to hibernation
no more volume in past 3 days
any link with that australian company , which was very unlikely in the first place, has been denied by that company itself
the small volume which arose for a few days after that was obviously just one or two people hoping to kickstart something by making it seem there was some "interest" again
and so another Easter passes :)
2012/04/06 - - - - - -
2012/04/05 - - - - - -
2012/04/04 - - - - - -
2012/04/03 0.00010 0.00010 0.00010 0.00010 2,000,000 0.00010
2012/04/02 0.00010 0.00010 0.00010 0.00010 4,905,000 0.00010
2012/03/30 0.00010 0.00010 0.00010 0.00010 1,500,000 0.00010
2012/03/29 0.00010 0.00010 0.00010 0.00010 14,934,998 0.00010
2012/03/28 0.00010 0.00010 0.00010 0.00010 1,000,000 0.00010
vol·a·tile /'v?l?tl, [vol-uh-tl, -til or, especially Brit., -tahyl] adjective
4. (of prices, values, etc.) tending to fluctuate sharply and regularly: volatile market conditions.
yap, that sums it up pretty nicely what we have been seeing past weeks for SNRS
fluctuating within a range of 0,0001 - 0,0001 with an average volume of about 200.000 shares per day, and most days just 0 volume.
i think that number doesnt represent anything, it is going up and down day by day almost at random,
whatever it means , it is not "the amount of shares which need to be taken out before it upticks"
hell, if it was that easy then put me up for 1200$ lol
eurm, no, if earlier Pr's/hype about SNRS being the official distribution for solar chargers for the ipad failed to bring it above 0.0002 i don't think a name change to some generic petroleum company will blow it to 0.0005 making it a company with a 15M USD market cap
UNLIKELY
indeed, hardly earth shattering
2012/03/30 0.00010 0.00010 0.00010 0.00010 1,500,000 0.00010
2012/03/29 0.00010 0.00010 0.00010 0.00010 14,934,998 0.00010
2012/03/28 0.00010 0.00010 0.00010 0.00010 1,000,000 0.00010
and today a few more
so still less than 2000 USD traded in 4 days
but at least it has been quite a while since the last time we had 4 days in a row with any volume at all
but seems to me more like someone on ihub or things like that is just buying in a one man effort instead of several people following some rumours or speculation FWIW
after all there is still not a single confirmation or bit of news except that loose bit of info on nevada site, which is now also nearly 6 weeks ago.. they sure move slowly if they are moving at all
Nope, just on nevada site an amendment was published for a name change to pacific petroleum.
Was only found by observant investors by themselves, not a single word from company since papa took over.
At same nevada site, company is still in default and needing to update its list of directors, and on pinksheets.com it still has the stop sign.
Name change happened 5 weeks ago, guess company felt no need to inform its investors. Same ole
i think their proud statement of
"Based from their head office in Brisbane, Pacific Petroleum is a 100% Australian owned and operated company servicing over 2200 businesses across Australia, New Zealand and Papua New Guinea."
is really NOT in line with any plans to become a public company on an american pinks stock exchange of the lowest class :)
like i said before, what on earth would they have to win to do it in that way ?
Australia has its own stock exchange, you know ? If they wish to raise capital, im sure such a company is not going to have themself be acquired by a no good, underachieving, dirty pink.
yes, good to see some volume after a 7 day drought..
but at these prices, anyone could just spend some 1000$ or so to make it look like there is interest again
so lets see if this is followed by some more volume first in next dasy..
Actually, the full legal name of that australian one is
Pacific Petroleum Products Pty Ltd
1628 Ipswich Rd
Rocklea Qld 4106
so not an exact match, and some searching also pulls up
Pacific Petroleum California Inc
http://99centsmenu.com/ppc.aspx
Pacific Petroleum Equipment
http://www.pacificpetro.com/
Pacific States Petroleum Inc
http://www.pacstatespetro.com/aboutus.html
etc, just to show that the combination of these words Pacific and Petroleum is quite a popular one :)
West Pacific Petroleum Inc
Royal Pacific Petroleum Ltd
Pan Pacific Petroleum NL
and wait for it...
Sunset Pacific Petroleum Ltd
http://www.google.com/finance?cid=707565#
;)
website is back up, from their info
http://test.pacificpetroleum.com.au/
Looks less likely now even. They are a family owned business and restribution lubricants and fuels, really doubt a family business in australia of decades in this line of business suddenly would like to go public.
After all main reason for going public is to raise money. Don't see the benefits then of a US exchange over an australian one.
==============================================================
"Our Business
Pacific Petroleum is committed to helping businesses get the job done.
A wholly Australian owned and operated business, Pacific Petroleum is an authorised ExxonMobil distributor for fuels and an authorised importer and distributor of ConocoPhillips lubricants.
Our motto, ‘Energy innovations. Delivered’ describes our vision of constantly delivering improvements with innovative products and services.
Pacific Petroleum has a small company feel but offers big company service that is approachable and personalised. In business for over 40 years, we currently serve more than 2,200 businesses across Australia, New Zealand and Papua New Guinea.
"
Right, some people forget that with 0.0001 technically being lowest price, any company is then automatically valued over 3 million usd from the start, with every uptick adding another 3m. Of course the market isnt logical, but gotta be a mean company to justify such a market cap. Reselling common products, whether it be chinese produced chargers or petroleum products is not going to cut it, im afraid.
Success to this one can only come after a share restructuring, i guess even the strongest believers would have to keep that in mind. It would literally take billions of shares to move this. And there are dozens of pinks in this line of energy business already.
Would need to be quite a shocker to move the flock onto this one.. But who knows
Nice find, but sincerely doubt this is the one. Australian company existing 15 years, supplying petroleum products? Dont think they d have anything to gain by going public on an us exchange.
Check their site through the time machine :
http://web.archive.org/web/20080627013841/http://www.pacificpetroleum.com.au/
Just some combination of words are so common that its likely that a combination already exists somewhere as a company.
Reminds me of the nourtech days, when at least a dozen likely matches were put forward. Because nour meant light or so, if i remember well.
But let us know if u can call them. Will be interesting. I dont know enough about international law if its a problem if two companies carry the same name. I guess not.