Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Getting a working phone shouldn't be a problem. For $20 a month, criminals can get a virtual office and phone number pretty much anywhere.
But there is always the last "corporate changes" and website from the last cheap fraudulent PR last July 2011 where imaginary people run imaginary companies. LOL
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=48343652
"The company plans to release more information about its operations, client base, revenues and plans to update OTC Markets "Pink sheets" this month, along with the launch of its Corporate website, currently under development. www.ecowastecontrol.com"
After 8 months it still shows
I guess they could use that number and Brian Zola name (but I suppose they wouldn't be that stupid this time, but nothing would surprise me with this crud). LOL
How coincidental associated web domains just recently expired.
Of course there is always the plagiarized promo posts and the copy and paste pictures from another company on BEHL's last financial (end of 2010) where the "other company" would not admit anything to do with BEHL (in fact just the opposite).
http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=BEHL&id=44582
We could always go back further with great business mergers with themselves and fake and invalid business names. But like I said, $20 now gives them a "number". Throw in a new cheap "secret" web domain, some "secret" "management" and cheap phony PR, along with Pawsons other scams, it's a done deal, sheep sheered. The NO BID-.0001 king is crowned again. LOL
So what? Doesn't mean diddly. Didn't before, won't now. Other than maybe more fraud in the works and Pawson and/or his "little me's" scraping the moldy barrel before everything gets flushed completely (SUFF, CBYI, BEHL, all the same messy gunk). Should RM them all into one big pile and call it DIRT, but that ticker name is too clean of name. LOL
There was no personal insult, just a statement of fact that "hope" or "belief" isn't a investing or trading strategy (at least not a good one). Also just statements of fact that just one "green" trade at the end of the day of red volume is not any good thing.
If any CRWV shareholder is "insulted" by any inconvenient truth being spoken about CRWV, or get "insulted" by others holding the "company" responsible, they may want to consider not being a shareholder. Definitely no reason for more unsuspecting public that hasn't learned the lessons yet to cover for company's irresponsible and fraudulent nature of the stock. It's like a pyramid scheme, somebody will be the one holding the bag, and 99% of the time, the "management" or insiders of a mining or any other scam aren't the ones holding. Those "management" and insiders just keep going off and doing it again.
The less shareholders that fall for any fraud and hold the company like CRWV responsible, the better. In the long run, it will turn into less public holding the bag, more restriction to the ones who perpetrate bad business behaviors, and a better market overall.
Well that's why I said it was "sad" and the word "comical" was used as a derogatory impression against CRWV, not anything personal to any common shareholder. Again though, "hope" is not an investment strategy and any REAL verifiable successful mining from CRWV is extremely unlikely and highly improbable. We all have been taken by some fluffy scam stock at some time (including myself), all one can do is salvage what they have and learn from the lessons as quick as possible. That is the positive about the whole thing.
FINRA has a pretty good article that really hits home for the many upside down shareholders of CRWV. Ironically this article was updated about the same time the CRWV shell was coming into the market again with it's gold P&D. Maybe a little late to consider now for most of any investment, but is still a good article to take into consideration when dealing with this stock and any other Gold related stock. Also one could probably substitute the word "gold" with "oil" and relate in a similar manner. Some notes highlighted in RED for a few quick references.
Protect Yourself
"Gold" Stocks—Some Investments Mine Your Pocketbook
The price of gold bullion—which recently touched an all-time high—has sparked considerable interest in gold investing, not to mention aggressive marketing and advertising of gold investments, including gold stocks. And even a cursory Internet search will pull up numerous websites, blog posts, investment newsletters and social media posts (including YouTube videos and Tweets) devoted to the topic of investing in gold.
But some of the stocks and opportunities being promoted have precious little value, and others are outright frauds. This spring, for example, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) took three separate actions against precious metals firms engaged in various schemes involving investments in gold, silver and other precious metals. In one action, the CFTC charged a precious metals firm in Florida with running a boiler room fraud that bilked investors out of more than $23 million.
As with other commodities, there are prudent and not-so-prudent ways to invest in gold. We are issuing this Alert to warn investors about investment scams that promote the latest "hot" gold stock and to provide information on how to invest wisely in gold.
Spotting "Gold" Stock Scams
Many gold-related investment scams involve the stocks of gold mining and/or exploration companies. The stock value is often based on gold reserves that are difficult to estimate, much less verify. While stock promoters regularly cite the potential value of a gold reserve, some statements can be deliberately misleading. For example, in 2010, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) took legal action against a mining company based in Florida for false press releases and other misleading statements associated, in part, with a mining project in Ecuador. The releases claimed the gold reserves were worth more than $1 billion. The SEC noted that the exact value of those reserves could not be known “without further detailed exploration.”
Warning signs related to gold stocks include:
• Price targets or predictions of swift and exponential growth. These predictions often are based on gold reserves, the actual existence and true size of which are next to impossible to verify. A company recently claimed that its mine in Nevada contained “approximately 2.14 million ounces of gold equivalent resources,” with an estimated market value of over $2 billion. Based on these reserves, the company touted in one of its promotions that an investment “Could turn $10,000 into $384,600.”
• References to being a “buyout target” for other mining companies. One company claiming gold reserves valued at more than $112 billion declared in an Internet promotion that it was a “PRIME BUYOUT TARGET” at a buyout price that was 15 to 35 times its current value, which was around a dollar.
• Claims that tie stock performance to the general rise in gold prices. Stock prices tend to rise or fall for a host of reasons, such as overall market conditions, sector performance and an individual company’s earnings. A rise in gold prices does not guarantee a rise in the price of a gold company’s stock—there might be little or no correlation between these two things.
• Scare tactics such as the threat of inflation or an economic meltdown. While some investors might hold gold as a hedge against inflation or economic uncertainty, owning a gold stock does not automatically serve that same function. Scare tactics are often used to push an investor to make a quick decision.
• Speculative claims based on a new reserve’s proximity to an existing reserve. A company recently stated in one of its promotional materials that its mining property could be worth “billions in unrecovered gold” based “on the success of its neighbors.” Without more information, such an assertion amounts to little more than idle speculation.
• A change in the company's name or trading symbol to align it more closely with gold. One company that currently purports to engage in gold mining and exploration was originally incorporated with a business strategy to provide golfing opportunities on private courses to nonmembers. Another’s original focus was to establish health spas in urban areas. Yet another cited its original business plan was to develop, manufacture and sell commercial feed to nurture the Chinese mitten-handed crab. Name changes are reported through SEC Form 8-K, which you can find by using the SEC's EDGAR database.
Fool’s Gold for Lunch
Be wary of “free lunch” programs that purport to provide educational information about gold investing. In June 2010, the SEC charged six individuals with running a Ponzi scheme that bilked more than 3,000 investors out of $300 million. The fraudsters, none of whom were registered to sell securities, claimed to represent an independent financial education firm that had discovered a way to earn up to 36 percent annual returns by investing in mining investments that were “fully collateralized by gold.” Rather than invest the money, the firm’s salesmen used the assets on lavish home renovations, mortgage payments for members of their extended family and the purchase of a luxury fishing resort in South America.
In addition, be mindful of warning signs common to many stock scams:
• Claims that making profits in gold are "easy."
• The use of headlines from respected financial news sources regarding gold, which can easily be taken out of context.
• Mention of the names of major investors or investment institutions that provide an air of credibility.
• Statements about how much easier it is for lower-priced stocks to skyrocket in value in comparison to higher-priced stocks.
• Pressure to invest immediately.
Smart Tips
To avoid potential gold stock scams:
• Investigate before you invest. Never rely solely on information you receive in an unsolicited fax or email. It's easy for companies or their promoters to make exaggerated claims about new products, lucrative contracts, or the company's revenue, profits, or future stock price. Be wary of claims about significant mineral reserves or mining operations in countries far removed from the U.S. that make it difficult to verify such claims through independent research.
• Always ask: "Why me?" Why would a total stranger tell you about a really great investment opportunity? The answer is that there is no such opportunity. In many email, fax and online scams, those who tout the stock are corporate insiders, paid promoters or substantial shareholders who stand to profit handsomely if the company's stock price goes up.
• Read a company's SEC filings, if available. Most public companies file reports with the SEC. Check the SEC's EDGAR database to find out whether the company files with the SEC. Read the reports and verify any information you have heard about the company. But remember that just because a company has registered its securities or has filed reports with the SEC, it doesn't mean that it will be a good investment.
Alternatives to Gold Stocks
While you may be tempted to invest in a single stock, it is very risky to put all your “golden eggs” in one basket. Investing through a mutual fund or exchange traded fund (ETF) that focuses on gold companies or gold itself can help spread out and potentially lower your risk. Take the time to research fees and other expenses. Review the underlying securities that make up a given fund. You can do so by going to the issuer’s website, reviewing the latest quarterly report showing the fund’s major holdings or, in the case of an ETF, the exchange on which the ETF trades. Research the fund's manager or management team and read the prospectus carefully, and consider enlisting the help of an investment professional before you invest.
If you are considering a mutual fund that focuses on gold, be aware that most gold mutual funds primarily hold mining stocks, many of which are international, but some hold physical gold, as well. Mutual funds do not allow investors to take possession of physical gold.
If you are considering investing in an ETF that focuses on gold, understand its structure, including whether it uses futures strategies—and whether or not it holds the physical gold, invests in gold futures contracts or tracks a gold-related index. Be aware that ETFs that are backed by physical gold are not the same thing as a direct investment in gold. While some ETFs that are backed by physical gold allow individual investors to redeem shares for bullion, the ones that do may only allow physical redemptions under certain limited circumstances. So while they may be effective at offering exposure to gold prices, most are not an efficient way to obtain an ownership interest in physical gold. Therefore, if you are investing in a physical gold ETF, make sure you understand your redemption rights. Depending on its legal structure, a gold commodity ETF can be subject to varying tax treatments. Be sure to check with your tax advisor about the consequences of investing in a gold commodity ETF.
If you are thinking about investing directly in bullion or gold coins, similarly research your options. For a basic how-to overview, questions to ask and additional resources, read the Federal Trade Commission’s Investing in Bullion and Bullion Coins. Investors should be aware that while some gold promoters and dealers deliver what they promise, others don’t. Also, verify that a ready market exists to liquidate personal holdings of bullion and coins at current market prices and the related transaction costs.
Finally, be advised that while legitimate gold and ETF investments may be an acceptable diversification strategy, these investments can be quite volatile. A heavy concentration of gold investments can leave you overly exposed and at risk of losing a substantial percentage of your money.
Touts and outright scams come in many forms and involve many types of investments. Right now, you would do well to avoid unsolicited promotions of low-cost "gold" stocks. They are likely to mine a hole in your pocketbook.
Additional Resources
• Investor Alert, Stock Spams and Scams
• FINRA BrokerCheck
• Commodity Futures Trading Commission Litigation Release, CFTC Charges Florida Firm, American Precious Metals, LLC and Principals, Sammy J. Goldman and Harry Robert Tanner, Jr., with Fraud
• Commodity Futures Trading Commission Fraud Advisory, Precious Metals Fraud
• SEC Litigation Release, SEC Brings Action Against Purported Florida Mining Company and Its President for Fraud
• SEC Release, SEC Charges Perpetrators of $300 Million Ponzi Scheme Involving Purported Gold Mining Investments
• Federal Trade Commission Consumer Alert, Investing in Bullion and Bullion Coins
• Federal Trade Commission Consumer Alert, Investing in Gold? What’s the Rush?
To receive the latest Investor Alerts and other important investor information sign up for Investor News.
Last Updated: 8/24/201
http://www.finra.org/Investors/ProtectYourself/InvestorAlerts/FraudsAndScams/P124119
I'm still waiting for them to round up all the Etrade babies and change that tune. That will set off a whole mine field. It's really not a matter of if, but when IMO. Just common sense.
I've actually have on the record a few hundred thousand at .0015 but they were basically just some quick spikes downward. But for the bulk of shares going for .0016 is definitely the realistic low and the chart is pointing further south.
CAMS is like THRA and others, just has more services denied. Although some SEC suspensions are levied with many of the DTC restricted stocks. But there are actual "all services restricted except CS" on the list. Any of those should probably be included for the "list".
Comical but so sad. That one trade looks so lonely. LOL Really getting pathetic.
I'm NOT WRONG! You happen to be a "believer" and I'm not, so trying to argue the point is a waste of time. I'm not going to start selling water systems to you. My money goes to a much more feasible direction. BUY one, I don't care, I will not. And I suspect neither will the majority of the market considering the heavy competition of the market for the public's money and good systems out there that satisfy the demand.
If they were having such a easy time of it, it sure wouldn't go to a Rent to Own, or be a little pinky stock with fluff $50 Million pink give-a-way schemes. LOL
P.S. Some of my investments are in a private food service business.
That is the subjective question. What exactly "compares" falls into the relatively small market of "believers" about AQLV.
I'm not wrong and totally right, there are good systems that filter water to very acceptable high standards for a lot less. I'm in the market side and that is what counts. The ones who put out the money to buy any system.
AQLV's only issue is how they can "sell" the product and how many of people like me that would "believe" that it is prudent to spend that kind of money when one can get plenty or in the view of the same or better for considerably less in an economy that will not recover for years.
Yep, many of these .0001 have been gotten for almost nothing (cost of filing if that), others for 5 digits under the .0001 (oh yeah, that is the same as "nothing" LOL). One can't even be sure that the piddly amount of shares for .0002 really went for that much. Five digits are being used with this selling and very well might of not gone for that much.
But no common shareholder is getting that and lucky to step over Pawson (or one of his evil "little me") and get the .0001 on a sale. The overwhelming scam and fraudulent NO BID ticker this is just won't allow it. Pawson is trying to get even the mold out of the barrel right now before all his crud gets totally flushed. His "barrel" of mold and gunk is so obvious even to the blind at this point.
"PAWSON people are dumping CBYI shares that he sold in BLOCK discounts. Watch as another huge block come forsale at .0001. If you can get .0001 sell them."
By the way, while I was responding to the post, it happened. Now that's a real crystal ball. LOL
Rent to own? What's next, MLM? There is a big market out there already with good water systems for a lot less. So not only will it be competing against that heavy competition, it has to get into the small market of any "believers" that their system is so much better for 2-3 times the price. Still not much fluff for satisfying the $50 Million pink give-away crowd.
"That bulk suspension order is now seeing SEC litigation:
www.sec.gov/news/press/2012/2012-39.htm
So much for the theory that the suspensions were just a bulk order with no teeth and so much for the theory that no investigations were still active. Yeah, PSGI suspended on same day and just litigated by the SEC.
Who will be next on this list of litigated companies by the so called inept Microcap Fraud Working Group?"
Now the DTC is coming in with even a bigger hammer. LOL But I'm sure more ramblings will continue to say ANWM is "special", "different", and "no comparisons". Attempt to play a "word game" and try to spin yarns into Gold. LOL
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=73088906
A blast from the past. Suspensions on several companies including Advanced Growing Systems, Inc (AGWS, AGWSE). Was one of very few situations back in 7/18/2007 that was able to get DTC services restored. Has lost most all value since then, hasn't had much trading action, and went from STOP sign to Black Skull.
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/suspensions/2012/34-66545.pdf
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=73078950
DTCC action against PSGI
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=73088906
"DTC has suspended all services, except Custody Services, for the below referenced issue. The suspension is effective March 9, 2012."
CUSIP SECURITY NAME
74163K103 Prime Star Group, Inc. (PSGI)
http://www.dtcc.com/downloads/legal/imp_notices/2012/dtc/ope/0311-12.pdf
The company is already on the list and had previously been designated T4T on June 16, 2011 and had been suspended by the SEC and put on the GREY MARKET with a reinstatement on June 21, 2011.
http://www.dtcc.com/downloads/legal/imp_notices/2011/nscc/A7226.pdf
http://www.dtcc.com/downloads/legal/imp_notices/2011/nscc/otc/OTC118.pdf
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=72995405
"DTC has suspended all services, except Custody Services, for the below referenced issue. The suspension is effective March 9, 2012."
CUSIP SECURITY NAME
74163K103 Prime Star Group, Inc. (PSGI)
http://www.dtcc.com/downloads/legal/imp_notices/2012/dtc/ope/0311-12.pdf
The company is already on the list and had previously been designated T4T on June 16, 2011 and had been suspended by the SEC and put on the GREY MARKET with a reinstatement on June 21, 2011.
http://www.dtcc.com/downloads/legal/imp_notices/2011/nscc/A7226.pdf
http://www.dtcc.com/downloads/legal/imp_notices/2011/nscc/otc/OTC118.pdf
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=72995405
I remembered it from that day on the DTCC RSS feed and I also re-posted it on the DTCC Board with a edit that needs to be done when the list is updated with Alchemy Creative, Inc. The newer ticker letters are still restricted, but just noted it due to it trades a few shares every now and then and it goes to the CUSIP number listed.
Just noticed CAMS did not get on the list. It wasn't just T4T but All services except CS on 2/27/12.
http://www.dtcc.com/downloads/legal/imp_notices/2012/dtc/ope/0282-12.pdf
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=72599925
Also when the next list is edited a small notation with ACHM CUSIP 01374L109, add the ticker ALMY next to it (still DTC restricted, just the newer letters, trades every now and then.)
There is no "life" here. Still a NO BID stock that goes for less than the ask of .0001, and just lack of liquidity and lack of activity for the normal investor or trader. The volume just continues to be low and sporadic. Just like Pawson's other stock CBYI, both stocks of his are just NO BID and only are in the process of trying to sheer sheep and SCAM the last .0001 (and below) by fraudulent means.
This is a bad joke of a DTCC restricted ticker and the multiple phony attempts of "business" will not keep it going and will die at some point. As per documented fact, each attempt at the "new" business fraudulent facade keeps getting smaller and smaller reaction and a smaller and smaller market that restricts trading even more.
BEHL is DTCC restricted as of March 31, 2011 and has been exited from CNS and is designated trade for trade.
http://www.dtcc.com/downloads/legal/imp_notices/2011/nscc/a7188.pdf
To this day of March 8, 2012, those restricted services have NOT BEEN RESTORED.
It has been at a NO BID status for some time and a empty shell with no real business since later part of 2010. It is currently an "inactive stock" as described by normal market analysis and still an empty debt ridden shell with a 15 BILLION Authorized Share structure. Many shares have been sold or traded at below the ask of .0001 pps.
Extreme caution and a good reality check is strongly advised when trying to trade these type of garbage tickers. The results are overwhelmingly not in the public's favor and are usually just filled with statistical losses.
"3 TO 1 DKGR sells today and no ticker change, whats wrong with this picture?"
Looks like a perfect match for whats going on here. LOL
I got least some of what you were asking. Your exact words about your complaint was about "never shows any proof of what will happen". And I responded that if you were "wanting irrefutable proof on some future event, one will have to wait for it to become documented history"
I also talked about that so much that has been stated by BB, myself, and others has come true and became documented history. Pretty good odds.
And just to clarify for any future discussion, some scam ridden statements or some phony business filing at some state is not any real business buying the shell. That has already been done twice already with the very same fraudulent tactics and lies with this shell, and has been done with Pawson's other shells. All just with what seems endless supply of .0001 shares and bs promo tactics trying to get more new sheep and continue to shear any old money that doesn't want to learn from the past fraud.
That's not any "new" real business that is actually buying the shell and doing something with it. So I still stand by my description of the odds.
Pawson does keep using the same tactics. Names and deals that never happen, but he is the .0001 NO BID king, and it's all he knows. All it ever becomes is some transfer that never materializes. Jee, has it been really been that long for yet another "turn around". Not doing enough over at his other SCAM Calbay? LOL
Here is one description of the so called 100% plays in the kingdom of .0001 stocks.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=72938473
Lot of truth in the opinion. And Pawson plays are just at the very bottom of all the garbage. But maybe it will give just one more chance for the smart ones that have learned or realized to get the heck out (although most are just so upside down in the thing there is nothing profitable about it).
No, there is lack of factual foundation to that any or all of the back taxes are paid. That is what is needed, not the other way around. It is what is called proper disclosure and true transparency. Something that would show up on financials which there is total lack of for MXXH. PR's are not factual foundation! MXXH also has no valid record of a legal entity doing business in Texas. That also needs documents from the "company" proving otherwise. There will be a document that DOESN'T say VOID at Delaware.
The 25% is "working interest" which is not the same as just plain "interest". Royalty payments (Gouger's Pegasus Oil Field Leasing perhaps?, again no disclosure or terms stated), along with operating expenses being paid to Gouger as Tejones and then through Pegasus Cementers above the $200,000 worth of stock are in there, but not 25% of any gross profits. Nothing as far as the terms are being disclosed or stated on any financial statement or anywhere else for that matter. Nothing is transparent about what kind of deal Gouger is getting like how much stock in amount of shares? How much discount? Convertibility? All one has is no income, no assets, no operations, no financials. When one has to use "For all we know" statements, then that is one big red flag.
Gouger continues to get violations on his "operations" of pos wells (four more just this last Monday) from the Texas State RRC authorities. He also has some deal as "adviser" which yet again is not disclosed or any transparency.
The foolishness of this much time with not beginning any well drilling is just ridiculous. This is not the only public company that he is doing this with (or not doing in these cases). Has promised "well drilling" long ago with his other RS'd stock TOMI (previously BNPD, BNPDD). He supposedly got paid $1.8 Million in a stock deal for "oil business" with DKGR with an imaginary company that never materialized. Civil litigation with other public companies.
In FACT, there has not been even one public company that Gouger has done anything but losses with for shareholders and has nothing but "oil projects" that have never materialized.
Fees for renewing some permit is a simple form mailing and are very minimal to the share amounts or dollars being stated here and a non issue. Didn't bother Gouger before, and it won't bother him again for any renewal.
As far as any real substance on any real oil well in the future, there will have to be financials, and records with the state RRC authorities (I guess there is no public interest for the last statements from the "company" about the Recycle business that never materialized).
Again, there will need to be some "professional awareness" help beyond another fluff PR for anything to happen in the magnitude of "penny" range, and maybe even yet again "new" management of the shell. LOL Even if this thing gets the help it needs, it easily could NOT get to anything close to that penny. Waiting for it may just be renewing vows mistakenly made with the stock in the first place and not using hard learned lessons.
Well, say hello to Rip Van Winkle for me, and remember to trim the beard every now and then. Wanting irrefutable proof on some future event, one will have to wait for it to become documented history. Like so much has with this ticker. "Bad fate" has already come to pass, and to get any share structure change and debt removal that can make this "enticing" will make shareholders value worse than if they just call the broker and get rid of it for whatever cost now.
That's if it didn't have the restrictions that the DTC has on it. That alone will destroy "enticement" that no RS can get away from. Fees and restrictions will be increasing for these types of stocks, that is already happening and in "black and white" and "red". Deletion of the ticker may be the best thing that could happen depending on how each Broker will handle it in the future.
But the odds are tremendously stacked against this thing. Computing the exact odds or time sequence is impossible, but a general description of those bad odds can be made by just intelligence, common sense, and by what is available that has now become history.
Maybe all one can do is just "wait and watch" and the costs of doing anything with it are too great depending which broker someone is using. But most of the "watching" has already been done for this story, and for a sequel or another story to rise out of the ashes is extremely doubtful and extraordinarily unlikely.
For quite some time, one can be reading this board and seeing all the projections and "claims" by such people like BB, myself, and others have indeed come to pass. With regards to the couple of current ones that may be in the process and just take more time, the odds are real good that they may indeed come to pass. Since so many other "claims" have been "supported" by becoming factual history.
MM's coming in on a NO BID ticker only on the Ask side of the equation is not always a good thing. This ticker goes for less than .0001 and in the five digits all the time at this point. There are some "not so good" reasons for seeing some place holders. When you see some at the Bid side, that may be reason to be happy due to then some could get rid of them for that amount with more ease. Even though there would be a lot of competition for them and quickly go to NO BID again. But at least it might be something more to talk about.
Strange things have happened, and sometimes it takes years and years for a ticker to be completely deleted. Many just dwindle to nothing or inactivity (as described by market terminology as in "Security traded relatively infrequently, either on an exchange or over the counter. The low volume makes the security illiquid , and small investors tend to shy away from it." or "A security that trades in very small volume on a daily basis. See:Illiquid.") for a very long time.
There are just too many factors of documented debt, market ineligibility, and horrific share structure for this to be any canidate for some life renewing shell sale. Some things like BEHL are just not in anyone's cards.
Sorry, ran out of time to play, more important things to do and I've gotten bored with having fun with the foolish defense of ANWM. I found an answer (even though I already knew it).
"Why the continuous pump and cheap lipstick on a scammy SEC and DTC nailed GREY SHEET pos shell?"
I merely posted a quote from the SEC and gave proper reference to it. Such a simple common sense answer, since I knew no "company" appointed jester would ever answer such a question with any realistic response.
Never mind, I believe I found my answer. Right in the last public "news" story for ANWM on Ihub. LOL
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=news&symbol=ANWM
All I'm doing is asking you to apply some of your vast amount of knowledge and abilities to answering my question. Unless one is too busy helping "new" management picking up all the gold nuggets lying around or writing up some next "transparent" and so informative PR (I'm getting shivers and goose bumps just waiting for it). LOL
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=72957336
Why the continuous pump and cheap lipstick on a scammy SEC and DTC nailed GREY SHEET pos shell? LOL
"was told 4 t0 6 weeks from the 28th of feb untill trading starts"
Maybe that will give Gouger time to take care of all the filings with the State of Nevada and State of Texas that he needs to do.
At least take care of all the violations with the State RRC authorities on the pos wells. Gouger (Tejones) got 4 more state violations given to him yesterday 3/5/12 on different wells on top of what he already has. So I wouldn't say that is the right direction. LOL
ANWM is nothing "special" and is nothing new in the world of scammy pinks. Continuing to put cheap lipstick on it or skirting around the issues will not clean all the dirty laundry that comes with the shell. There is nothing different about ANWM that would pull it out of the detrimental stats of the DTC restrictions and SEC suspensions.
What do you mean "what does this mean"? ANWM didn't "start with a SEC suspension, no stock does. It got suspended for irresponsible and dubious business practices. Past CEO and insiders have been charged and convicted of fraud. The stock has only floated and been pumped along on irrisponsible promotional tactics.
There has been no income, no product, no financials for years. No, merely stating things in fluff PR's and message board pumps are not income or product. Pretty much "lack of adequate or accurate public info" is involved in all scams and all suspensions. This thing isn't going to come up with 5 years of financials or transparency (or it would of done it, nor is it doing it). So the "management" and insiders have an attorney, they need one. I would say all "managements" and insiders of scammy stocks that are hammered by the SEC and DTCC would need one.
The DTCC and the SEC has removed this POS from the general market. It has crud for liquidity and is worthless.
Clear enough? But, I will expect just more of the same cheap lipstick and trying to deflect off the real issues. That is barking up the wrong a$$ tree here and quite suspicious.
The bottom line is (which was the subject);
"Still no liquidity or ability to trade or invest in any proper manner. Also it was still a true statement and reference for how a ticker can trade at any given pps, but when there is no liquidity or ability by the general population to get anything, then the ticker is worthless.
"There is literally hundreds of examples of no or very low liquidity issues with the DTC restricted stocks and include better "pps" than ANWM. Just the pps doesn't do anything for the common shareholder."
I know, I just wanted to clarify. LOL
"In times like these, it helps to remember that there has always been times like these" "Good day" -- Paul Harvey
That address has been used so much, it immediately rang bells.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/msgsearch.aspx?SearchStr=15111%20N.%20Hayden%20Rd
That's only in 2011-12
OK I'll have to edit that $1.51 statement. The one stock in question did actually get that on a close way back when it was doing very little liquidity, sporadic volume, etc similar to ANWM trading action. But then it did trade lower than that after a period of time still with lousy liquidity problems.
It was reorganized, suspended by the SEC, and new CUSIP restricted by the DTC. Criminal charges were made against CEO and insiders and statements to reason of no income, no product, no transparency, and criminal promotion were listed. Again similar to what has happened with ANWM. All several years ago.
It even still pops off some trades these days every now and then with no more than a few thousand shares, and usually only in the hundreds of shares at .0001 but in the last six months there has been a couple of instances at .003 and .0012. It is so sporadic it's not much to look at and most days it's just ZERO volume (under the newer CUSIP and symbols).
Both CUSIPS are still DTC restricted, but the newer one is barely "there". Still no liquidity or ability to trade or invest in any proper manner. Also it was still a true statement and reference for how a ticker can trade at any given pps, but when there is no liquidity or ability by the general population to get anything, then the ticker is worthless.
There is literally hundreds of examples of no or very low liquidity issues with the DTC restricted stocks and include better "pps" than ANWM. Just the pps doesn't do anything for the common shareholder.