Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Once again, you haven't answered my question. You continue to deflect your responses from the facts as they exist. You are a fraud, and a poor one at that. And your petty response to that will be that BDGR is the fraud. Wrong again. I'll ask one more time, answer the question I asked. Failing to do this proves my prior statements. Go one, prove me wrong, answer the qusetion, what does SOX have to do with BDGR? Good night to all and here's to a productive Monday!
The audit was not being done for approval by you or me. From the start the audit was being compiled for other business purposes, which probably have changed, a common occurence in business, especially in this case. If you are paying attention to the rumors posted lately, then it might be possible to connect the dots. By the way, I've answered your question, now would you answer one of the many questions I've asked you and never got a reply. Let's just take the last one posed to you. What does SOX have to do with BDGR?
OMDA is a dead issue, he can't pay his lawyers, prior posts have indicated his involvement with illegal activities. The stock is a scam. He is a scammer. Obviously, based on some of the recent posts, Barry is not.
Thanks for the accurate information. Its hard to come by on this board.
Badrguy, how does Sarbannes-Oxley apply in BDGR's case?
Take it easy Yankee, he's not worth the effort. Is Yankee07 in relation to this years race?
More than interesting, then you must know some of the same thing that Local Oil knows.
Local, you seem to be very assured on your statements about RM out JAL in, along with a potential buyout. I expect you are gleaning this information from the local area. Do you know if Lanza and crew are receptive to all of this?
Local Oil, what are ORRI's. Thanks
Hi CT, I'm back.
"No comment" Very interesting comment.
Hi CT, I'm back.
"No comment" Very interesting comment.
Maybe we can get dragonman to add all those up for us.
On this OMDA hubbub, refer back to post # 3436 and then my two posts #3443 & 44. I've said for awhile that Barnett was a scammer and its over for him. Someone talked about the payment for the summary judgement concerning OMDA/BDGR. Those posts and PR's were Barnett related, I really wonder if they were valid, no one offered me substantiation of that. Also CT, what is your post #3658 in reference to, I think you might have gotten into some of badrguy's KoolAid.
I've heard that Lanza has about 10 million, Anderson owns the preferred, but this has not been confirmed. Also, rumors that Lanza has a money problem.
Even I do not think badrguy is that mentally deficient to short bdgr. Just my opinion. I am open to debate on this.
Are we all having a good weekend? All of a sudden everyone is an expert on insider trading. I have some more inside info for all of you. I've heard that RM has filed court papers indicating that he is the father of Anna Nicole Smith's baby. Seems logical to me since we all know he wasn't drilling anything in Louisiana. Keep smiling, better days will come.
TBird, the releases I have seen have referred to an email campaign, it was not clear whether it was by individuals or companies. I suspect that a company like RedChip could fall into the type of area that they are investigating. Then it would be a case of if there was a conspiracy between the company and the so called analyst company. It will be interesting to watch and I wonder what took so long with the SEC based on what I see is rampant amoung the "PK's".
With all due respect, you have not answered the question I asked. And to all out there, too much focus on the past is not going to prepare you for the future. You cannot fix what is passed only determine what the future will hold. I could be as bitter as many of you, but I am more concerned about how to handle today and tomorrow. Let's hope for a good weekend to all.
Thanks for making my case.
Have you done the comparisons yet?
T-Bird, it looks as if the suspension has to do with email spam with individuals who are trying to pump various stocks through email solicitations. The 35 stocks were targeted by this email spam campaign. Trading has been suspended for 10 days. At this time it is unknown if any of the activity is associated between the spammers and the particular companies.
CT, I believe that is a listing of the SEC filings for the company, probably Petrol. I too am a little bit confused on what the relationship is to BDGR at present. 8k's are usually done with changes in the corporation, 10 k's are accounting filings. The 8k's are filed with the SEC on changes in the corporation related to different events in the corporate structure, some of the descriptions are listed at the bottom of that post. I wonder if this person knows something?
As mentioned before, the wording of the report is much different than prior reports, even though Mario is listed below, for the time being. If you look at year to year rev. it is up threefold and I know you all will refer to all the lies, but these are actual numbers. The Jan. & Feb. numbers sucked due in a great part to weather related issues that have been confirmed but multiple sources. CT's projection numbers look to be fairly doable except for the word "present". All of you, calculate a revenue number for '07. Then look at aen,bpg,cnr(a few to start with, if you want more, they do exist) do you own proclaimed DD and then figure out what BDGR's price looks like compared to those based on rev.,shs.out.,and debt. I know the scream will be "not reporting, a pinkie, a scam, whatever". Your wishes were take away the crooks, get audited, become a legitimate "listed" company. Be careful of what you wish for.
Dragonman, I'm starting to understand you, that makes me a little concerned.
My guess is by St.Pat's day. The audit is only one part of many of the problems with BDGR and it is taking a back seat to other issues brought up by you and others on the board that need to be resolved and that I think will be resolved by that date. Again, my guess, and I wish that I could confirm that to keep you quieter but for now you are free to keep doubting.
Trooper, if you look at some of your previous posts, you will understand the flavor of my post. I merely took your post and interpreted the essence of its value. And then your post #3461 contradicts your prior post. Just the facts now, please. And by the way, if you've read my prior posts, I try to keep this all humorous, because as I've said before, life is too serious to take seriously. Enjoy and keep smiling.
Where does their revenue come from, imaginary oil wells. the operators give them money just because they like them. That makes sense, in your world.
OMDA and OMOG are the same and BDGR does have assets.
Here's another interaction with Barnett's MO. Again it has been pasted from another site.
Illinois (MediaPressRelease) May 30, 2006 - -- The lawsuit recently filed against Young Oil Corporation and others by OMDA Oil & Gas, Inc. (OTC Pink Sheets: OMOG) is nothing more than an attempt by OMDA to get their money back after not getting the results they wanted for some of the wells drilled with Young Oil, a company executive said here today.
"Every oil and gas man knows there are no guarantees in well drilling and you don't get your money back if you drill a dry hole. We will not give their money back and we will vigorously defend this baseless suit," said owner and founder Anthony Young, CEO, of Young Oil Corp.
"We have one of the best commercial well to dry hole ratios in the state of Tennessee. Since 1995, we have drilled literally hundreds of producing wells; however, from time to time, dry holes are a fact of life in the oil and gas business," stated Mr. Young.
State of Tennessee Geologist, Ronald P. Zurawski, said, "In 2004, the overall success rate for all drillers in Tennessee was slightly more than 17%."
"This was a one time shot for OMDA. When we gave them the bad news, they cried foul and wanted their money back. We offered to try to resolve the matter but they declined. They told us they weren't interested in doing so," said Mr. Young.
"The next thing we know, they file a lawsuit in Texas accusing us, among a host of other things, of failing to drill wells, some of which their company representatives actually watched being drilled when they toured the field. They have made so many convoluted and twisted allegations of the facts that I look forward to having the truth come out. These distortions have personally greatly offended me and have caused our company harm. We will aggressively defend this lawsuit and take whatever actions and counterclaims that are available," stated Mr. Young.
"OMDA's history appears to be one of making a practice of being in litigation or in announcing transactions and then canceling them. One really wonders what their real business motivations and objectives are, given their track record," Young noted.
Young Oil Corporation is a privately owned oil and gas exploration and production firm, with operations in Kentucky and Tennessee. Anthony Young personally has twice been awarded Oil Man of the Year for his performance and contributions to the oil and gas industry in the State of Tennessee and has been featured in newspapers, television and radio shows
Here's some more info about Barnett. Below is pasted.
At no time had Barnett declared failure with BUCKTV.COM, CSON, DTEV, MLAR, PDVN, CMKX and his association with J. Scott Sitra and Sitra’s SEC complaint to BioTech and Houser. This information would have adversely affected any decisions made by BioTech and Houser regarding any relationship with Barnett, Hamilton and/or Seminario. Barnett fraudulently withheld this damaging information from BioTech and Houser to their detriment.
1. 106. Now we come to OMDA Oil and Gas, Inc., (”OMOG”) another one of Barnett’s failures with Adam Barnett its “Chairman” and Jones OMOG’s attorney.
107. Under Barnett’s and Jones leadership the company stock has gone from a high of $.04 per share to sub-penny averaging around $.0045 per share. The Outstanding shares have gone from 800 million to 1.609 BILLION, possibly up to 2.5 Billion and now OMOG is additionally issuing 50 million of “Preferred Shares”. The dilution of this stock is disastrous. A gigantic Barnett failure. OMOG is in at least three (3) separate civil litigation cases due to Barnett’s lack of knowledge of the oil industry and lack of management experience.
108. Barnett and Jones have egregiously mislead this Court regarding Barnett’s past which is disastrous. Barnett’s “oil experience” was being a “cook” at “Outback Steakhouse and Bennigans”. Operating an oil cooker for fried foods according to Barnett & Jones is stellar qualifications to being a “Chairman” of OMDA Oil and Gas, Inc. (Source: Barnett sworn deposition in the Houston, TX Dist Court case cited above.
ADDITIONAL FRAUD BY BARNETT & JONES
BARNETT CANNOT REMEMBER THE
DISPARAGING WORDS AND ALLEGATIONS IN THIS LAWSUIT
109. Houser realleges and incorporates by reference all allegations and facts previously stated in paragraphs 1-108 and set forth herein.
110. Barnett and Jones are perpetrating a fraud upon this Court by making scores of specious false allegations about Houser in the original petition, 2nd Amended Petition, 3rd Amended Petition and the false Contempt allegations, yet Barnett is unable to recall just one disparaging remark made by Houser under oath in this action.
111. On March 7, 2006, at 9:15AM, in Miami, Florida, Barnett at a “Videotaped Deposition” in the 215th District Court of Harris Co, Tex Case No 2005-23020 captioned: OMDA Oil and Gas, Inc., v Joe Lanza, et al, BARNETT UNDER OATH AND PENALTIES OF PERJURY COULD NOT REMEMBER ANY SIGNIFICANT DETAILS OF THIS LAWSUIT WHICH WERE SO “DISPARAGING” THAT JONES AND BARNETT BROUGHT THIS
I would like to thank one member of this board for all his efforts.
Call Barry and ask him. It is not a secret and in the bigger picture it is only a small piece of a bigger picture.
My guess is that he will finish the job he was brought in to do.
With a preface to all this, let me first state that we are in a debate here about who is the better scammer.
#20 PR(reliability on all these are questionable on both sides) OMOG acquired wells for notes and cash. No stock involved. This would indicate to me that the stock in question has nothing to do with this unless the notes were converted at another time. The question then becomes, if Barnett took control, did he not know or account for the assets he was taking control of. Was there signed agreements on control and on assets acquired? Do the notes still exist and are they being paid on by OMDA? If the court or anyone else is throwing out stock that by prior statements has nothing to do with the purchase of this property where is the connection, when unless you converted the notes into some stock, payment, or lack of payment on the notes would determine ownership. I do not believe your statemnt is correct on the Feb.7th PR. The statement is not about BDGR backing out of the properties, but eliminating any further payments on it to Lanza.
My question to all is, If the stock that was ruled to be invalid was issued to Lanza for payment on notes on wells or payment for wells, who now owns the wells? The post by tchauncy was interesting but it is only part of plaintiff's description on their lawsuit, I want to see what the judge has said and not from a PR statement from OMDA whose transparency is somewhat less reliable than BDGR's past management(this means pre-Barry). And if OMDA had to sell a mere 350,000,000 shares for legal expenses, their legitimate oil production plans must have hit a snag.
derek, am I accurate, my stock service states the float on sogn is 10.8 million shares.
I could care less about the guilty part, but I think the rest of your thoughts are fairly reasonable.
If the shares were received as a gift, who gave the gift? Also when they retired the shares at the end of September, how come there was no reaction in the stock price? Like you said any reduction on O/S should enhance stock value.
Derek5098, why did Seifer retire stock and then issue himself more stock? Just curious.
snowcrow, where were you able to access the summary documents on this hearing?