Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I don’t have a subscription but I am an investor. I subscribe to the newsletter. Did not get this email. Can anyone post the contents of this email for other investors like me? Thanks.
I think the possibility of new board members already in place is quite plausible.
Ok I think we get it.
This is either bad comedy or a case of psychosis.
Not forgotten. No major developments.
Short positions down over 20% as of 6/29
http://otce.finra.org/ESI
I recall someone posting contact information for LHA including an email address but I can’t recall who. Perhaps an email might help tease out more detail regarding the strategy. Does anyone have that post?
I think you mean you “couldn’t” care less.
I think your last sentence is you being facetious, no?
I would love constant updates too but what are we trying to achieve? Maximum shareholder value or verbal Xanax from Rory so I can sleep tonight without wetting the bed? I really hope this strategy works towards the former. I will wear my Depends tonight to address the latter.
Unless he’s been ordered by others to clam up for now.
Although I loved his SHACs, outside of his PRs, his approach to communicating with the public was a little loosey goosey for some. This silence is deafening and is not necessarily indicative of him tabling any of his previously discussed projects including notifiTV.
Remember, he said that releasing details piecemeal as he has done in the past is being pushed aside for a strategy involving a big PR with full details. I think he is trying to go for a kaboom effect rather than little dribs and drabs. Maybe a kaboom will be more sustainable share price wise than fluff news. Just a thought.
You’re a paying member. PM him. He’d be touched to know that you care and are thinking of him.
You either trust the process or you don’t. He is working with LHA and Donohue. He’s reportedly making deals. He’s said it loud and clear that he wants to blab but he can’t. It sounds like it’s not his choice. What part about that don’t you understand? If this does not sit well, then maybe look elsewhere. Listen, I do and don’t like the silence. I like the restraint but I don’t like that our volume sucks as a result.
Do I trust the process? For now I do. Will this work? I hope so but no guarantee. Until then, bellyaching won’t do much.
If a plug in needs to be downloaded, how come Ask Alice, Ask Rory, and the notifiAIRs of the staff work without downloading one? Doesn’t make sense unless downloading a plug-in is in fact not needed.
I can’t believe for someone who claims that he has been given the bait and switch treatment that you have decided to not be more aggressive in getting a refund. Also, have you tried the term notifiAIR because that’s what it is. Look at the About Us section at nfusz.com and see. Fight for your rights as a direct consumer rather than gripe here where all we do is lend a tin ear and nothing else.
Oh and what does RIF mean again?
I am tending to agree that Rory is being muzzled by some entity besides LHA. Just a hunch since he sounds so deferential in his emails. Knowing Rory’s personality and ego, as far as I can gather, he would only take this attitude with someone who he would consider a bigwig. Just my interpretation.
When you are getting a business moving and momentum is important, whether a startup company or mom-and-pop shop, you don’t take vacations. In fact, you are not even thinking of a vacation. Rory is not on a vacation in my opinion.
Good news: low volume trickling down of price rather than big dump off
Bad news: low volume
Exactly what I was thinking. Certainly some may have left but maybe staffing is getting large enough to the point where some have to be taken off the site. For example, what company has a customer service rep bio on its site (now since gone)? In addition, having Nick Cannon on without any active role reflected poorly.
Looks like Rory, whether you like him or hate him, is a price catalyst himself. His silence is deafening to most of us but outside of iHub, it’s crickets. Hope this is a wise strategy by LHA, assuming that this is the entity that is advising this silent approach.
Honest question. I do not know the answer. But it’s typical for many startups to have high staff turnover. Not necessarily indicative of turmoil. Sometimes people are made an offer that they can’t refuse by another company.
I agree that Rory is a good chunk of why the stock appreciated. On the flipside, the disparity between his words and the revenues is partly what drove the subsequent decline.
I believe Rory wishes to remain transparent but his words only act as an opiate for the investors, to soothe our fears and fuel our wildest imaginations despite the reality. To maintain a stronger investor presence long term, besides the “revenues” mantra and company fundamentals, we need a better filtered stream of communication. Rory is passionate no doubt but that is both a boon and bane. For example, people love him or hate him for the Sheriff Joe video. If a CEOs words are the primary driver of share prices, investors lose focus and the more experienced types become skeptical, even paranoid.
I don’t think we need to know what he does every single day. I don’t need to know who he is thinking about calling or who he may be meeting with unless he is right at the cusp of completing a deal. For example, the Salesforce hint a few weeks ago was nice but what did it serve to achieve? Volumes are still pitiful and share price is low. Now, Rory was just answering a question so I don’t fault him for the response but we as investors shouldn’t become addicted to these hints and clues as positive reinforcement. Heck, Rory even says not to invest based on what he says.
Let the PRs and 8-Ks do the talking. Everything else is fluff to an extent.
Yes, Rory is a part of the reason I invested but I am now more interested in the company and revenues, not as much Rory although I am glad he is the captain of this ship. So I like this restraint and silence, voluntary or not. It gives me a moment to reflect why I am truly investing.
I personally believe the silence is a good thing. But I do somewhat agree with the sentiment of juggling too many things at once. I do wish that nFusz’ dominance with notifiCRM were a little more firm-footed (at least based on declared revenues) before really spreading its wings elsewhere. Not to say that nFusz can’t multitask but don’t want it to spread its focus too thin.
Newsflash: I am not the CEO.
Until demonstrated otherwise, I am considering Rory to be muzzled. Reason(s) unknown.
When pearsby first posted the emails from Rory, many were thinking it was regarding uplisting but actually my own first thought was a possible buyout or something in that realm. Who really knows outside of insiders...
Did you really? Well, hope you keep posting anyway.
Agree with you. Volume has been frustratingly low. Just need nFusz to give new buyers a reason to buy. We are not there yet but many foresee it happening soon.
Word salad
Tighten up your posts
Selling by insiders: If so, we would know within 2 days since they would have to file an SEC report (based on what some have been saying). So far, nothing, at least nothing in past 2 days.
Selling by Oceanside: Maybe. Maybe they've been selling since $3.04. But they fall in the category of "toxic financiers" (not my label) so theoretically, they are just profit taking all the way without thought of nFusz as a company itself. So their actions do not necessarily indicate the quality of nFusz or the product. They are solely here to make a profit. Allegedly.
Selling by Reddy or private investors in general: Who knows why they invested in the first place? To make a ten-bagger or to be the next Warren Buffett? I don't think any of their actions serve as direct barometers of the company's worth because we don't know what their investing philosophy is at least pertaining to nFusz.
As for reviews, out of all of the apps on the front page (Featured Apps, Staff Picks, etc), only two had more than 4 reviews. What conclusion can be drawn regarding these apps? Why do some featured apps and staff picks have no reviews? Is someone pulling a fast one. Quantity of reviews means little in relation to success of product especially for one as new as notifiCRM. On another note, I think the suiteapp.com site itself could use a big overhaul.
Silence on sales. I agree somewhat that Rory would be yodeling on the mountains if sales numbers were great. But you can't automatically assume the inverse, that silence indicates bad numbers. Logical fallacy. He gave one reason (negotiation leverage) which some here do not buy. Fine. At this point, it's probably moot since it's my impression that he is being muzzled. The next 10Q will put this issue to rest, at least until 3Q.
Ha maybe Rich Bohn
The man is a tweeting dynamo
Regarding seller identity and reason for selling is one big assumption piggybacked on another.
And lack of reviews indicating lack of interest? That’s quite the authoritative sounding conclusion from such a crude analysis.
And silence implying bad sales? Where is the logic in this?
Ted, you are thoughful in your posts more that most but your most recent thoughts are just too full of logical fallacies. Not saying you are wrong but evidence to support your argument are lacking and definitely circumstantial. I think I’ll wait for the next quarterly statement instead...
I suppose so but... when you hear hoofbeats, think horses first, not zebras.
How do you know at what rate Oracle clients’ are adopting notifCRM?
How do you know who is massive selling?
Not knocking you, just trying to learn how you came to these conclusions.
Not surprised by this on a no-news Monday.
Maybe Tues? Maybe next week?
I see how notifiEDU can be seen as similar to notifiCRM. In other words, just an educational version of notifiCRM. The demos have been posted but I wonder if there are other features not yet demonstrated that more firmly distinguishes notifiEDU from notifiCRM. Perhaps these demos will be considered rudimentary eventually as notifiEDU becomes more clarifiied in its features.
In addition, maybe the major differences are in the different analytics related to the interactive video.
We’ll just have to wait and see I suppose...
Confident? Yes. Irrational? I prefer to say premature but I have nothing against it. I think the thoughts and analysis are often (but not always) actually rational and thought out but in reality, still a long ways to go. So what if they express their exuberance? No law against it. I know there have been plenty of posts to the contrary and while they are not to my liking, as long as there are no falsehoods, go for it.
On a different note, I think many are expecting a big announcement this upcoming week. I would be glad if that were the case but nothing is guaranteed. I hope folks are not disappointed if the next week remains news-free. I almost expect that it will be and that’s fine with me.
I seem to recall after Q1 that everyone was dreading, the price took a plunge initially as expected but finished up by EOD.
Maybe the same after Q2?
At the risk of ridicule, can someone explain why there is a www.nfusz.com and app.nfusz.com?
I have heard that there is to be a website overhaul. Is the app version a work in progress to be eventually converted to the www version once finalized? Thanks
Yes indeed. I clicked on tickets icon and it led me to nisd.net so I was misled by that.
Looks like demo although I wonder if it was utilized for a real-world application prior to being relegated to demo status. More examples would be nice indeed, perhaps as school season starts.
Video is from Northside ISD, largest district in San Antonio area. I assume this is a client video and not just a demo.
What’s RIF? Resistance Is Futile?
Did you ask for a refund? How did nFusz handle that process?