Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Same as AGCZ which own 25% of NWGC (and NWGC owns 75% of AGCZ). I think the PPS is at this level (for both AGCZ and NWGC) is their financial isn't audited.....
you seem to forget the 1B shares at an average of 0.004-0.0045 he DUMPED in 1-2 month to raised $3.5M which he used all for 'administration'
Nothing wrong with selling shares to get funding but look at the rate (debt amount per share) he is selling it at. Just between you and me, they have actually got an agreement for a $20M funding (from selling them shares of course but don't BMSN has drawn on those funding) with South Ridge (which some consider as a toxic financer)
Don't think BMSN is a scam, just poorly managed by Koos, some of his decision.....
100M AAA voting shares to the board of director, which Koos is the only member of the board (BMSN is HIS!!!!!!).....how do you think he had the voting rights to apply for inreasing the A/S withouting going through the common share holders votes.....I am just pointing out the fact that Koos likes to use common shares to pay(i.e. how he is paying Min)......Koos may have changed (ask DarkKnight).
What do you expect, Koos to sell his boat and house to pay Min, we all know Koos like to use the common shares to settle his legal bills and debt (even for small ones such as $10K debt), and he has no issue with diluting 1B shares (at an average PPS of .0045) in 1-2 months to raise $3.5M and use it all for 'administration', just ask DarkKnight.....he has changed.
Yes, we know Koos like to use the common shares to settle his legal bills and debt (even for small ones such as $10K debt), and he has no issue with diluting 1B shares (at an average PPS of .0045) in 1-2 months to raise $3.5M and use it all for 'administration', just ask DarkKnight.....he has changed.
Where are all the pumpers...........
.10+ means a market capital of $200M+......damn I like those PM insult from VGMILLER...
Hint, hint....just between you and me it took 1 year for Medistem ERC IND to be approved (with several peer review publication and animal testing)....I know different drug and company.
That daily chart looks strange, ENTB went from .001 to .0015 with less than 1M shares trade in that period.
They have $1M in debt and around $6M in asset, not zero debt......
But they already have taken this into account (i.e the administration/tax/salary cost), hence the actual posted profit is around $400K for the quarter, so if gold is half the price, this means the amount is now around $200K profit so around $1M profit a year (plus they have $6M in asset) and their market capital is $1.4M?
Issue is the 1.2B shares (70% of the O/S) owned by NWGC, given AGCZ owns 20% of NWGZ O/S and they have a much lower O/S than AGCZ, both companies should merge so the SS becomes more reasonable.
You knew that didn't you Meach2.........
Great find??? That is to do with their old BMSN business (he has sold those asset as it is no longer delcare in the financial report...I didn't see it).
The problem is picking how low it will go before it does this......
You mean the "Millions" of dollar BMSN spent in acquiring the Min's licensing, the 8K specify what he gets is in common shares so ask yourself if they spent $3M in administration cost last quarter (by diluting 1B shares and increasing the O/S from 200M to 1.2B at around .0004 during that period, where did this cash raising go........and thanks vgmiller3 for the personal insult.
I know, but how is this possible??? that is why some ppls were saying "short squeeze" ever since the daily volume were 80-100M+, come on 50% were shorted on a 100M+ trading day??? Like other poster said it is very expensive to short OTC stocks, who believe this??? Do you??? Look at the history yourself.....
Historical Short Selling Data For BMSN
Date VolShorted High Low Close Chg ShortVol RegularVol
loading ...
Jun-26 50.23% 0 0 0 NA 58,704,609 116,880,709
Jun-25 25.00% 0 0 0 NA 20,365,031 81,444,112
Jun-24 58.95% 0 0 0 NA 29,537,515 50,106,598
Jun-21 40.30% 0 0 0 NA 27,335,642 67,829,033
Jun-20 30.19% 0 0 0 NA 17,415,843 57,679,913
Jun-19 32.88% 0 0 0 NA 14,437,684 43,904,995
Jun-18 41.95% 0.01 0 0 NA 65,892,514 157,091,951
Jun-17 48.09% 0 0 0 NA 79,280,329 164,859,946
Jun-14 38.59% 0 0 0 NA 29,646,659 76,816,646
Jun-13 42.00% 0 0 0 NA 94,571,529 225,163,461
Jun-12 42.53% 0 0 0 NA 36,183,283 85,075,477
Jun-11 35.07% 0 0 0 NA 10,081,768 28,744,916
Jun-10 58.33% 0 0 0 NA 15,723,978 26,957,000
Jun-07 66.01% 0 0 0 NA 25,044,188 37,939,182
Jun-06 28.56% 0 0 0 NA 3,732,886 13,069,448
Jun-05 52.55% 0 0 0 NA 11,811,153 22,476,295
Jun-04 49.54% 0 0 0 NA 14,658,265 29,591,291
Jun-03 34.83% 0 0 0 NA 7,988,494 22,936,602
May-31 29.19% 0 0 0 NA 7,830,162 26,829,365
May-30 24.74% 0 0 0 NA 3,666,670 14,819,909
May-29 28.24% 0 0 0 NA 5,493,178 19,449,484
May-28 57.01% 0 0 0 NA 12,424,797 21,792,368
From memory when there is large volumes it always reported 50% of the 100M+ shares traded are shorted...check the history. No way this is correct.
There is no way 58M (nearly half) the trades were shorted. When there is a large volume day almost half are shorted, who believes that...does anyone have an answer????
Honestly, don't think it will happen.
Get funds, wait for 00teens and average down
Me waiting for 00teens like you.....don't know if it will come.
What about 1s.....everyone here should sell to lower the pps to .001 so I can get in again!!!
You guys are the same person posting?....
He has always file the financial report to be current, look at ENTB (it was up to date and on OTCQB until only recently), that is how he operates (but still got sue and had to hand over 100M of BMSN restricted shares as part of the settlement).
What? That is BS and you know it? That means they own more than 5% of O/S which hasn't been declared to SEC?????
You forgetting that at that time there were only 1B-1.2B O/S, now it is 2B O/S.
So what if the gold price drops 50%, instead of around the $1M-2M actual profit they make a year it will be $500K-1M and given their asset is worth $6M (with debt of $1M) and the current market captial is only $1.5M???
They should merge AGCZ with NWGC as NWGC already owns 70% of AGCZ (1.2B shares) and AGCZ owns 20% of NWGC, given the O/S of AGCZ is very high (due to the 1.2B shares own by NWGC), and NWGC O/S is very low, merging them will consolidate the new SS into a reasonable/medium O/S size. We all know Gold price is currently dropping, so merging them will decrease administration/labor cost and attract new investor with new SS. Why aren't they thinking of doing this (they already own a substantial amount of the others company)????????
Well, maybe lucky then.....but then Koos has done the same thing over and over again 3 or 4 times, should of played it like he did but the next time there are no more shares to dilute (only 20M left) so will be interesting.
No, he is smart, he knows how Koos works.....release news (8K about the Min patent), pump/promotion then dilute the remaining shares till A/S is reached (think there was around 200M before now only 20M left)
I just read his post more closely, has anyone else verify that the O/S is now 1.98B.....I think that is why he is saying that Koos is diluting the last 100M shares.
Someone (I think DarkKnight) posted this was going to be promoted this week.....how do you know the last 100M shares were diluted?
Someone (think it was DarkKnight) posted this was going to be promoted this week, hope he play this as such.