Retired
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Inference being?
Please be advised that the lofty close of above .01 was predicated upon the euphoria created by the company's release of the following information: From 10/27/22. "This means US shareholders can buy and sell. The restriction for US buyers has been lifted. Shareholders are also advised to do their own Due Diligence and hence ignore nonsense, opinions, and misinformation."
As we are all aware, we (US shareholders) are NOT able to buy and sell as per said company missive. The CE dismissal is a carrot still dangling juuuuuust a little out of reach.
One cannot help but observe the irony of being told that we can now buy and sell in one sentence and in the very next sentence be told to: From 10/27/22. "This means US shareholders can buy and sell. The restriction for US buyers has been lifted." Then, in the very next sentence be told: "Shareholders are also advised to do their own Due Diligence and hence ignore nonsense, opinions, and misinformation."
FACT
Today is Saturday.
"One has to be very close to the kramers to know their dealings"
Inference being?
I guess that makes it official, then. Good to know. It's always a pleasure having a pleasant tete-a-tete without the seemingly obligatory caps and lol's.
One would think that her expertise would be called for in the matter. Nest-ce pas?
Is the CE dropped yet? Maybe I missed it.
No one is doubting Atty Fritz's credentials. But, even if she is still on the 'payroll', I'm guessing even she is having trouble making a "silk purse from a sow's ear". All IMO, of course.
Misinformation -- I.E., "according to rules from OTCM the CE will be removed."
The irony of Linda not "fixing things" when she had the chance is that, predicated upon their stellar K's and Q's as well as other misc fundamentals, is that there wouldn't be a chance in hell of their survival, let alone the possibility of a huge payday. IMO, of course.
Given the fact that LP added in one of his posts that it might take a little longer than expected for the CE drop shortly after the 10/27 bulletin, I'd say that's certainly a good guess. Going forward, one might proffer that dotting i's and crossing t's class at Harvard be re-visited.
Truth is, the company's words looked great to just about everyone, myself included. Wouldn't it be a gas if those words had been totally accurate?
Repeat: From 10/27/22. "This means US shareholders can buy and sell. The restriction for US buyers has been lifted. Shareholders are also advised to do their own Due Diligence and hence ignore nonsense, opinions, and misinformation."
Repeat: From 10/27/22: "On 10/26/2022, FINRA processed a Form 211 relating to the initiation of priced quotations of DBMM, which means that the submitting broker-dealer has demonstrated to FINRA compliance with FINRA Rule 6432 and therefore has met the requirements under that rule to initiate a quotation for DBMM within four days of 10/26/2022.
Repeat: the removal of the Caveat Emptor follows a careful process. No amount of misinformation will change that.
Misinformation, Linda?
The MARKET can't do crabs until the Fed removes the shackles.
Quote: "Just opinions with no evidence."
Agreed! That's what this entire thread is -- day after day after day. Pro and con, back and forth. The final say is in nobody's hands but the Fed.
"Prove me wrong"!
...1 ...2 ...3
Well, here's a gut-wrenching scenario for consideration; What if, prior to a final ruling by the SEC, the Kramer crew files for bankruptcy and cannot cover?
And yet, when "logic and inference" is utilized in defense of arguments opposite the popular 'moass' prediction, said points are dismissed immediately. Until such time as final rulings actually take place, all posted logic and inference -- pro and con -- are little more than hyperbole. All IMO, of course.
We KNOW that Kramers naked shorted our beloved do-nothing "company"? Musta missed it. Link, please.
Totally accurate. I doubt there are many here who would disagree. At one time, it seemed to have promise, but the 'emperor's clothes' dissolved rather quickly. 1....2....3....
Quote: "a decade is a long time waiting." Sure is. One of these days, you'll see for yourself. Lol.
Ah, but when The Disruptor finally arrives (as guaranteed over a decade ago), no MOASS will be necessary.
Not to worry -- Linda still has that "disruptor" in her back pocket that she hasn't used yet.
I'm not sure that "longest in history" without making a single cent would really be accurate, n'est pas? Close, though. Very close.
"Longest in history"? Link, please.
So very pithy!
Until such time as the truth manifests itself, how exactly is an opinion true or false?
Oh wow! LOL! That was a real knee slapper!
"Stay tuned". It'll show. Always does.
IMO, if everyone here were to agree on your very first, and very accurate sentence; i.e.,
Quote:
CE coming down soon!
Fact? Opinion? Whimsy? Wishful thinking?
Oh pu-leeeze! You're inferring that the Rico act is going to be invoked here? Better hope not. That would only add years to a final consummation. IMO, of course. Please note that IMO isn't used very much here these days.
Would be interested in viewing those documents, please.
As is probably 90% of the daily conversations here. Hearsay and conjecture.
Inference being?
Also to be seen, or at least proffered is the ever-popular 'CE removal a mere formality'.
The post he was referring to was in answer to Post 253053 indicating that it had gone to a penny on the CN market TODAY. The last time this hit a cent was as a result of a highly successful pump that fell flat once again. Kind've a dbmm trademark.
Huzzah! Totally sensible idea! Am predicting it will not happen, tho.
Well, THIS shareholder IS worried about it and am not necessarily one of the "one's" (sic) betting on the dreaded revocation.