Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
No...they were not free........you purchased the "right to receive". Maybe that in itself is a good legal study...eh?
He didn't:
Not exactly by that means....but YES. If you purchase a car(or similar by example) that was stolen, and that fact becomes known by interested parties.....you're out of a car and cash.
You would have to file against said party that sold you the car.
Ha!....maybe not. Look ...I do not know how anyone perceived that comment from The Fos...to be anything other than:
It would be nice if that next gen bomber would have a use for a DGU
....and so it goes...
I think that their small scale gasification "gig" is alive and well. I was merely trying to point out the barriers to entry with regards to the DOD.....et al... politics.
The DGU is an entirely new thing in the military. It has never existed in the field before except for a trial by other.
More going on now than ever before.....in my opinion.
Ha!.....oh the hypocrisy.
Thinking many are taking that the wrong way. Saw it last night....and didn't read it as some did. With that being said..I moved on from the DGU thing a long time ago.......especially when the Company announced the bidding on biomass. And when I say..."moved on"....I am not referring to it being dead. I just understand that the barriers to gain Federal..Local..et al...!Government(ie.DOD) acceptance is very difficult. Everyone here should already understand that and accept it. Look at the bottom of this brief:
http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/2015/10/27/northrop-grumman-wins-usaf-bomber-contract/74661394/
http://www.corporationwiki.com/Texas/Midland/recom-operating-co-lp/39322607.aspx
Discount Materials, LLC is Recom Resource Recovery
https://www.facebook.com/RecomResourceRecovery
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/replies.aspx?msg=105823310
The company you want to find a website for doesn't have one(except for the recomtx site). they are oil guys.
?...why. I think they get it. Though they may put forth an opinion.....it's a sub penny equity. How much weight is that compared to the rest? Nil,................
Better update:
http://www.mininggazette.com/page/content.detail/id/548784/Warden-plant-reports-high-HCl-emissions.html?nav=5006
Not to read into things....but the timing? Hoping is was part of a punch list. ;)
From memory....they changed the access to certain information like those that placed interest....definitely fits..eh?
:).....oh I get it. You said this:
Save him for Cinci...want to see the kid play a full one..but who knows.
They took out the "partnering with Grumman" off the business description part......maybe some/we can play that as a detriment.
only wishing
Sons a bitches!........damn em' all!!!
I jinxed myself last night:
other way around :)...:
Hope your not mad that I played you a little...;). You and the Bull have been the feeders here........and I've gotten lazy.
thanks buddy
Wonder who that new shareholder of record is? It was 75....now 76. Maybe I'm stretching...eh?...it would have to be restricted......so can they sell preferred shares and be exempt from REG D
Need to look that one up....or maybe it's known prior to the change but before Reg D became in play.
Shareholders of Record 75 a/o Jan 12, 2015
Shareholders of Record 76 a/o Oct 20, 2015
....I'm sure it's nothing..but when you get little to nil information............run with it eh?
No it wasn't...........gotcha'!!! ;)
This is what it was on Oct 2nd(last cache):
SIC - Industry Classification 4950 - Sanitary Services
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:myTWWxsd2PUJ:www.otcmarkets.com/stock/CRQE/profile+&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
Today:
SIC - Industry Classification 4931 - Electric and other services combined
.....I think they are getting ready..:)
Well that is interesting. Was this updated as well......don't remember this before:
SIC - Industry Classification 4931 - Electric and other services combined
https://www.osha.gov/pls/imis/sic_manual.display?id=950&tab=description
Are they ready?
They can not issue shares for conversions due to Reg D. I do not believe they can convert preffered to common as well. So what ever it was before the last quarterly was due....if all applies...would be the same count.
?...so the issuer didn't intend to pay the dividend on those shares issued...yet "bought" them back(or portion thereof) with a due bill attached. And you are also saying that :
There is roughly $4,000,000.00 missing. That was the promise to pay(promissory note)herein referred to as the "due bill". The seller was obligated to pay that due bill to the buyer. The original seller was the issuer Calissio. The "one" buyer was Nobilis Consulting. That buyer was then obligated to pay the "due bill" when sold(to the next buyer). In this example, the money never passed through Nobilis. That is why the issuer was supposed to wire to Nobilis...of course...they didn't.
The apparent wire that was apparently canceled:
ref: http://www.scribd.com/doc/283948668/COR-Clearing-LLC-v-Calissio-Resources-Group-Inc-Et-Al-Doc-22-6-Filed-05-Oct-15#scribd
I fully understand the process..... and still scratch my head as to why this was allowed to proceed given all the time to study such before the ex-date. Most damning with regards to solvency...
Why was the share price not adjusted for the cash dividend?
How do you subtract .011 from .0025(roughly). You can not in this environment because you would have a negative share price. I don't care what type of cash dividend it is. That by definition is insolvency. Adjustments for dividends is basic balance sheet knowledge. Everyone that owns..etc.. dividend paying equities understands this....and knows what follows after the ex-date.
Attack my knowledge all you want(that's your skewed opinion). There is money missing..and that "missing part" has everything to do with "clearance and settlement".
?.... again, the misdirection:
Marketplace?...I guess you do not understand sarcasm.
No...the Defendant that defaulted has to pay:
In front of more than few:
And what type of people...would that be....and by what means?
Ha!....hoping....eh? Hoping for zero news....but possibly another job offer via the issuer or some other little tidbit floating out there(but wait til November). Hell..... anything et al.....just don't file .....and no news release.
A given...and noted within the Motion to appoint receiver. As it would benefit the Transfer Agent:
Ha!...I would say both.
If so....they will know by tomorrow.
I would have been surprised if they had responded to you. The only mention found regarding the conference was two tweets by the Foss...https://twitter.com/fosgittr
He may have had to ask before such..?...;)
It's not a question of "what are they doing", as much as, how do I fit in with "it" as an owner of common shares? They are quiet for a reason..be it plural.
You didn't read it. Again....learn what is involved.
The point is and was......things take time. It is much more complicated than just merely flipping a switch.