Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Sir you are about 20 years away from a turnkey system. That would make zero sense because all the components of the SHMP system can be purchased by anyone. So what exactly are they buying from SHMP. If you told me they want to pay SHMP to sell the sensors. That would make sense. Maybe even the exclusive distributor. That may make sense. Until the system is proven which it is not, Niterra's interest is sensors. Period
I agree for Niterra to sell ammonia sensors, not to be in the shrimp growing and selling business which is what's been insinuated here. There is more. Niterra is still testing their sensors and wanted to test them in an indoor aquaculture system.
Have you ever met him in person. I'm not his agent so I don't care if you think he looks 105. I met him in person. That is what I believe
Utah, can you appreciate the absurdity of your own post. Maybe you can explain to the board how the interview went. Better yet, can you provide one piece of reliable data on how Niterra chose SHMP to teach them how to grow shrimp. That would be like a 400 lb. guy with 40 percent body fat getting the head trainer job as the personal trainer at Golds Gym.
Look at post 111133. Very fair
I met him. Not transgender but probably has had plastic surgery. The man is 79 and looks 65
I believe the stock is worth a trade here for a significant percentage return. Fundamentals are still horrible but I am strongly considering buying the stock as if tests that 1 penny price 1 more time. I will announce if I do. This is only my opinion and is not meant to be investment advise. It is simply my opinion. I am waiting for a 1 penny entry.
I do try to keep it light. I wish some would lighten up. When they starting talking about auto inject, I just imagined all possibilities. In fact, I actually believe Niterra should experiment on the automatic head choppers. Watch the movie polar express. Provides some vision and especially for the holidays.
LMFAO. Is it impossible like Niterra can cause their spark plugs to electrocute the water and then we won't use hydreneais any more and we can get the cost below $15 a pound. I actually think they should zip tie spark plugs to shrimp tails and then we'll probably take care of all the water problems. In fact, maybe the spark plugs can run the remote controls and then the shrimp can be just guided to the production facility to chop their heads off. I'm actually starting to get this Niterra thing. If Niterra can sell a spark plug for every shrimp, I now have clarity on Niterra's interest. Someone should have told me about this plan.
Do you mean I mean like finally after 6 years.
Yes and you're going to get yourself banned. Maybe permanently. Good luck
You're going to get yourself banned again
By the way, you also advance a false narrative here regarding the preferred stock. However and if there comes a day when you and your pal Franny want to have an honest discussion about the preferred stock, please let me know.
If you're a sophisticated investor and really know what you're doing, you have much more of an issue with what management did with the preferred stock as opposed to a false address. That would be my prudent advice.
Listen, I do have an issue with him personally attaching management and using issues like suicide in vain. As far as the address. I believe it's a poor example of satire.
I agree on the cancellation. Buy outs are normal. And what the hell is the difference. You are in penny land. Few Harvard MBA's are running these companies. The lease has zero to do with the future success of the company.
What the hell does that mean?
But what you are explaining is contractual. Mortgages are recorded because it's a lien. I own commercial real estate. Trust me. It is not necessary to record a lease. I also just checked for the heck of it with two friends who rent major commercial space. I asked them if they had any knowledge that their lease was recorded. Answer. Probably not. You are splitting eyelashes. This issue has little to do with the success of the company.
Yes but see your last sentence. A honest seller has to disclose all leases and a buyer unless he is represented by a moron would ask for all leases so yes you can do what you're suggesting but most do not do it. A mortgage is always recorded. A lease is not in many cases.
A lease is a contract. It is not highly unusual to have a buyout clause in a lease. In fact and in city areas, very common. But the terms would have to be in the lease
We have a new expert. Would you like to analyze the preferred stock transaction with me investor real?
Thin like a Rockette. A Christmas joke
I don't think so. Of course, if there was some consideration paid, yea. However and after they were exchanged, who would he have bought them from. Who was the legal owner after the sham transaction. I don't think you are correct on D.
I think should have answered the preferred questions. Now we roasted.
Yes. And your answer is?
So who owns the Preferred currently. Or are you frightened to answer that question too.
A. A Martian
B. Elvis
C. SHMP
D. Easterling
And so if SHMP owns the preferred as Franny believes, it would be listed as an asset which it's not. Each time he opines, something weird happens. I smell roasted shrimp.
Franny whenever your and your pal UF post false information on the preferred, the stock goes down. There is some seller like FIFE AND GHS thinking how can someone actually believe it's a short. Actually I take that back, you never believed that.
Most ridiculous post yet. Plainly absurd. If they own it, then it should be listed as an asset in the Asset Section of the balance sheet. Of course, you have no clue so you will disagree
So that becomes legally tricky. Simply it was an exchange after you put aside the sham. The preferred for the common. So the preferred should have been cancelled. Just look at it this way. If I exchange a debenture on the books for common, the debenture (which is a security) gets cancelled.
The executives are playing with a legal inferno by continuing to use the preferred.
Although it is virtually impossible to pierce the corporate veil in Nevada, this may form a basis to do so.
I asked for your math, not your opinion. Do you know the name of the person who painted the tape. Do you know what brokerage firm sold it for them. Do you know if they needed to take a tax loss. No you don't. You see, I can play that game too. By the way, I believe you were roasted fairly well today on this board.
Utah. Since I like these executives and don't want them to get in trouble, sort of a dumb request on your part. If 15 idiots call the SEC, they will look into it, be careful what you ask for
I am going to answer it shortly. I have three other questions on the Preferred
LDD, what was the date of the 8K. Only have 3 questions after that.
I never reply to my own posts but have to admit, that is funny. Mr. Math, love it.
You are correct. In the fund world, that is a pimple on a dog's oss.
Hey Mr. Math. You were all Gidfy when the stock hit $1.80. In fact, you were giving people math lessons. My math says down 33% in 7 days. How is my math?
Correct. This is the guy who analyzes court hearingS but can't properly conclude that Niterra, a very small VC has not invested in SHMP
You sir have to understand that after the preferred stock sham, I do go beyond press releases and 8K's. You sir have an agenda to advance. I don't. If I did, I would post the information I don't.
Correct see my post.