Also, remember, JMW said "returning 4B to JPM would cause her bankruptcy". So, this 4B offset JPM's anything beyond 1.9B of purchasing price. Also, she said it's fair and reasonable.

After all, she got a new name of "LIBR". Rosencrap is guilty as well as her.

We did not hear Chiron for a long long long time. Did he still with us by using a different name?

Thanks for your information. GLTU

Do we have any interests in Long Beach Mortgage Inc.

According to CWG, Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Inc. belongs to JPM, almost 95% of the trusts under these two names. I am pretty confused how could escrow holders get benefits?

Thanks

If so, according to the exhibit, money will go back to JPM. Is it right?

Do you know who owns Washington Mutual Mortgage
Security Corporation? Thanks

LG, BBANBOB, I got both your messages. Thanks

That is the reason that I am worry 75/25 rule is void. Appreciate your comments.

LG! Question?

One of the minor concern is that all P, K, U are still individually listed but not lump together. The broker is doing so is easily to determined who is who for future distribution. In other words, the preferreds are capped. This is one of the AC point.

Of course, AC says that all the assets will not be returned to LT.

By the way, I have 80% of preferreds, and 20% of commons.

Yup, you may be right because there are so many other drug chain stores around.

FTC won the war, it gave her the face already. IMHO, she should not bock the new deal by selling 1/2 stores to Walgreen.

Possibly, Amazon?

Yes, I understand your points. However, AC means all equities are going through DTC direct to individuals. They are not going back to LT. Therefore, there is no 75/25 rules applied.

I may miss something.

Question?

According to AC, safe harbor is in wmiic. So, there is nothing back to LT. So, the 75/25 rule is void.

Can JMW make any ruling on wmiic, such as how to distribute equities in what ways?

TKS

It's indirect link. MBS is back as equities. Shareholders are owners of equities.

We knew it's nothing to do us here. But, you never know who are on the those lists of WBS individually.

I think the redaction on PAA is in original global settlement. I might be wrong. But I do remember redaction in somewhere.

I now know why. Someone is going back to JMW and crying on her shoulder for compensation. Why, because of this examiner. LOL

Do you know why people start talking about examiner's report?

Tks

Do you know why is he doing that? Nobody could change a bit after release or not.

The loan JPM had before seizing WMB was $0.61trillion. So, the amount from WMI and WMB were $0.56 T (1.17 - 0.61).

The reason is that someone has to manage the service (not own it) because WMB's seized. JPM is the best candidate.

Yes, stoxjock said it's true.

Those people, who did not sign the release, got nothing to pay.

I hope you're right. It also clear my confusion of two figures $299B and $151B. If so, Wow......

Weirded, I key in keystoner, the system automatically changes to keystones. Sorry again.

Sorry, should be keystones.

From the exhibit provided by keystones, You add the original balance under "WaMu" is closed to $86B. Amazing...

Also, if JPM are the owner of the WMB's MBS, why there is expenses gets involved in the future. The prior expenses are all showed Zero, probably, the charges from JPM went to FDIC already.

Following 2221's viewpoints, who are those thousands beneficiaries. Definitely, they are individual investors, not institution investors.

In this case, why judge like to talk to beneficiaries as the escrow holders.

I think ricket Gregory is Cotton.

I interpreted your point #6 as follow, IMHO

This judge is very smart. Instead of mentioning tens of thousand shareholders. He rather used hundreds thousand "beneficiaries". Because the returned assets are huge, yourself as shareholders, the benefits extend to all your relatives.

So, the judge implied smartly about the big assets are going to be returned and benefit everyone as you hit a lottery.

Judge Chapman may have to revise POR in terms of waterfall theory. Instead of give our portion to senior securities, either put us into class 3, or ???

I think, IMHO, senior guys are fighting with Judge now.

Thanks for your excellent DD.

Question: Why is there a difference in numbers between FDIC and JPM 299B vs 151B respectively?

Thank you.

By the way, do you know DB is receiving 3B or paying ?

Thanks

s4, but, I never go to google board.

Thanks

What is his name in FEMA board?

Thanks a lot. You are the poster since Lehman BK in 2008, wow, 9 years, glad, you did not drop us. Thanks