That would make sense since they’re not a provider or smart phone maker.

He’s given back many years of his salary as CEO!

Agreed, we were told many times that the RBR is the big one

I appreciate the clarity, I thought the district judge was informed. My bad!

Why would the judge who will rule on the case be in the dark about the settlement talks, that makes no sense. The magistrate is just assisting the judge with some of these procedures but Donato is informed through the magistrate.

We don’t know who initiated these settlement hearings, I don’t think they were court ordered but if someone can show me proof it was, I would appreciate it. If this was requested by the defendants then this could be a big deal for VP. This could be more than just your normal NDCA bullshit settlement talks

Please take notice that the Settlement conference and pre-settlement telephone conference are
VACATED; parties shall report to Judge DeMarchi by email regarding status of discussions no later than 5/25/2023.

From the filing!

Based on the recent filings that both parties are to email DiMarchi by the 25th regarding their discussions. This seems like they are talking to each other privately not in court. So we really don’t know what it means but it is very interesting. We’ll have to wait and see!

The fact that she started to sell way before any negotiations tells me she may know nothing. As long as she files there is no illegal activity. Like DB says people are free to buy, hold or sell. Im holding, but that’s just me!

Building a nice base here.

Happy Mother’s Day to all the mom shareholders of VPLM!

It’s the range for next week a low of.04 then onto a high of .30 by the end of the week. Joking, but really could happen!

Does VPLM and TMUS have a hearing in early June about the expert witness testimony? I can’t remember.

Volume has really picked up the past 30 minutes. Big Blocks!

Can you post an example so we can compare

Yeah I got plenty this was just a little more icing.

That’s the plan, hope it works out, exciting times for sure

I have a few open orders lower for another 250k in case that happens.

Agreed that was my take on the filing too.

I can only go by the filing, not saying it’s right or wrong. Waco does push for settlement and that’s why 95 plus pct of Waco’s cases settle before trial. Another reason the settlement pct is so high is that Waco does Claim Construction and Discovery which will determine the strength of the case before trial.

Did anyone watch the YouTube video with PeterPenny? He talked about his strategy based on the chart for an entry point to be long.

Don’t bet what you can’t afford to lose in this arena. NLST is a QB also and it is quite volatile like VPLM. There’s no safety net here, that’s only for the FDIC insured punks..

That was for the 606 patent in Waco then the case was stayed. So that’s probably why it was never mentioned again,. Maybe on there 10K for 2023.

Think about it, if it was small why not wait till July to settle? Why ask for 45 days? Why is Amzn looking to get into the phone biz in India? VP does have the India RBR patent! Why bring in Parrish if it’s small, Hudnell could’ve handled that. I’m sure Parrish doesn’t come cheap. So I’m not convinced this will be only for MG. Just my take and I’ve been here since 2013.

Huawai or Samsung could be hiring social media trolls!

I appreciate your posts, we’ve been on this road for miles and miles so don’t stop now. This is big and we know it, Parrish isn’t there to dismiss with or without prejudice, Hudnell could’ve handled that. You bring a guy like Parrish in cause it’s either a big license or a buyout. I’m sure his Rolodex has all the contacts to shop any offer around. IMO

That T-trade won’t be the closing price on record. The chart is showing .0118 or .0117 it’s hard to tell exactly as TD doesn’t let me zoom into the chart on tablet.

They file lawsuits in West and East Texas cause the Judges follow the constitution. They do claim construction first so they can understand the patents better. It’s really not “favorable” I would call it fair.

Now Judge Albright believes that if you own IP then you are entitled by the constitution to protect your IP, and if you’re gonna lose it will be with a jury trial if requested. I read in one of his cases that he dismissed after claim construction because the patents were very weak. He is fast so if you go to his court you better be ready. Judge Albright does not allow the defendants to use stall tactics and other time consuming motions. I read were he moved the dates up in a case after a defendant filed a mandamus.

I’m just glad that we have him as our Judge cause in Cali the system is rigged and a scam as those judges don’t seem to care about constitutional rights.

THIS COURT FILING IS TOO LEGIT TO QUIT





IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
WACO DIVISION
Case No. 6:21-cv-668-ADA
JOINT MOTION TO STAY
Plaintiff VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. and Defendants Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon.com Services LLC, and
Amazon Web Services, Inc. jointly move the Court to stay the proceeding and all deadlines for forty-five (45)
days. The Parties have reached an agreement in principle to resolve all issues in the case. The Parties wish to
stay the case to avoid further expenditure of the Court’s and Parties’ resources on upcoming deadlines.
For the foregoing reasons, the Parties respectfully request that the Court grant this motion and stay
the proceeding for forty-five (45) days.
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
AMAZON.COM, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
Case 6:21-cv-00668-ADA Document 128 Filed 05/02/23 Page 1 of 3
2
Dated: May 2, 2023
/s/ Lewis E. Hudnell, III
Lewis E. Hudnell, III
lewis@hudnelllaw.com
Nicolas S. Gikkas
nick@hudnelllaw.com
Stanley H. Thompson
stan@hudnelllaw.com
Hudnell Law Group P.C.
800 W. El Camino Real Suite 180
Mountain View, California 94040
T: 650.564.3698
F: 347.772.3034
Sean Franklin Parmenter
sean@parmenterip.com
Parmenter Intellectual Property
Law, PLLC
8980 N Pine Hollow Drive
Cedar Hills, Utah 84062
T: 925.482.6515
William M. Parrish
bparrish@stradlinglaw.com
Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth
500 W. 2nd Street
Austin, Texas 78703
T: 512.788.5020
Attorneys for Plaintiff VoIPPal.com, Inc.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ R. William Sigler
Alan M. Fisch (pro hac vice)
alan.fisch@fischllp.com
R. William Sigler (pro hac vice)
bill.sigler@fischllp.com
Jeffrey M. Saltman (pro hac vice)
jeffrey.saltman@fischllp.com
Lisa N. Phillips (pro hac vice)
lisa.phillips@fischllp.com
FISCH SIGLER LLP
5301 Wisconsin Avenue NW Suite 400
Washington, DC 20015 202.362.3500
M. Craig Tyler
Texas Bar No. 00794762
ctyler@perkinscoie.com
PERKINS COIE LLP
500 W 2nd St, Suite 1900
Austin, TX 78701-4687
Tel: (737) 256-6113
Fax: (737) 256-6300
Daniel T. Shvodian (pro hac vice)
dshvodian@perkinscoie.com
Christopher Kelley (pro hac vice)
ckelley@perkinscoie.com
PERKINS COIE LLP
3150 Porter Drive
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212
Tel: 650.838.4300
Fax: 650.838.4350
Attorneys for Defendants
Amazon.com, Inc.; Amazon.com, Services
LLC; and Amazon Web Services, Inc.

Then went back down to a dollar and change then ran back up to 6.00 after the Samsung verdict.

We really need to sticky this! Greenback shared this on Wednesday!

THIS COURT FILING IS TOO LEGIT TO QUIT





IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
WACO DIVISION
Case No. 6:21-cv-668-ADA
JOINT MOTION TO STAY
Plaintiff VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. and Defendants Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon.com Services LLC, and
Amazon Web Services, Inc. jointly move the Court to stay the proceeding and all deadlines for forty-five (45)
days. The Parties have reached an agreement in principle to resolve all issues in the case. The Parties wish to
stay the case to avoid further expenditure of the Court’s and Parties’ resources on upcoming deadlines.
For the foregoing reasons, the Parties respectfully request that the Court grant this motion and stay
the proceeding for forty-five (45) days.
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
AMAZON.COM, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
Case 6:21-cv-00668-ADA Document 128 Filed 05/02/23 Page 1 of 3
2
Dated: May 2, 2023
/s/ Lewis E. Hudnell, III
Lewis E. Hudnell, III
lewis@hudnelllaw.com
Nicolas S. Gikkas
nick@hudnelllaw.com
Stanley H. Thompson
stan@hudnelllaw.com
Hudnell Law Group P.C.
800 W. El Camino Real Suite 180
Mountain View, California 94040
T: 650.564.3698
F: 347.772.3034
Sean Franklin Parmenter
sean@parmenterip.com
Parmenter Intellectual Property
Law, PLLC
8980 N Pine Hollow Drive
Cedar Hills, Utah 84062
T: 925.482.6515
William M. Parrish
bparrish@stradlinglaw.com
Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth
500 W. 2nd Street
Austin, Texas 78703
T: 512.788.5020
Attorneys for Plaintiff VoIPPal.com, Inc.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ R. William Sigler
Alan M. Fisch (pro hac vice)
alan.fisch@fischllp.com
R. William Sigler (pro hac vice)
bill.sigler@fischllp.com
Jeffrey M. Saltman (pro hac vice)
jeffrey.saltman@fischllp.com
Lisa N. Phillips (pro hac vice)
lisa.phillips@fischllp.com
FISCH SIGLER LLP
5301 Wisconsin Avenue NW Suite 400
Washington, DC 20015 202.362.3500
M. Craig Tyler
Texas Bar No. 00794762
ctyler@perkinscoie.com
PERKINS COIE LLP
500 W 2nd St, Suite 1900
Austin, TX 78701-4687
Tel: (737) 256-6113
Fax: (737) 256-6300
Daniel T. Shvodian (pro hac vice)
dshvodian@perkinscoie.com
Christopher Kelley (pro hac vice)
ckelley@perkinscoie.com
PERKINS COIE LLP
3150 Porter Drive
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212
Tel: 650.838.4300
Fax: 650.838.4350
Attorneys for Defendants
Amazon.com, Inc.; Amazon.com, Services
LLC; and Amazon Web Services, Inc.

That was some battle today in .08’s! Looking forward to Monday!

It could just be filling small gap from yesterday. We should bounce!

Amazon Strikes Deal With VoIP-Pal To End Patent Row

By Hailey Konnath
May 3, 2023, 10:08 PM EDT

Amazon and VoIP-Pal said Tuesday that they've reached a tentative agreement to resolve a dispute over patents covering wireless communications technology, according to a motion filed in Texas federal court....


Full article: law 360

This is the first of many more to come!

They’ll have cash from settlement and no more diluting to continue the fight.

This should be a sticky so investors can find it easier. One down and another 7 in court and 50 plus infringers who have received letters from VP!

It was heavy support at .03 and it held, now settlement with AMZN should really get this moving. Higher highs coming. And I believe we’ll see more write ups about Amzn and VPLM! This is just the beginning. Safe travels

Yes and .01 when noone wanted this!
Stef07
Re: Aloe18 post# 115625
Thursday, April 20, 2023 4:45:09 PM
Post# of 116003 Go
A double bottom will typically indicate a bullish reversal which provides an opportunity for investors to obtain profits from a bullish rally. After a double bottom, common trading strategies include long positions that will profit from a rising security price.

Basically a big butt bounce! I did buy another 50 block at support .0303 yesterday..GLTU

Smart money is buying now!