I don't see it the evidence is overwhelming there's no diction now

Agreed.

And another thing. The TA gagged is not a justification for the dilution statement

Trying to build a case for this dilution is ridiculous. I really don't see the dilution and I e studied this thing several times. I think there was some on the past due to personnel issue and those people will pay with their time to cure that. Now, I don't see it

My ticker says .0059 next good buy. Is say .0062/3 is safe

And being a long, I'll stick with it to the bitter end. My DD is absolute and this one is only missing a couple pieces to take off. We get news on company performance and get the updated growth and 2014 forecast, this one will go much further than the .04 high. Until then, let the suckers listen to the bloggarbage.

I'll say it straight, if it drops to .0059, I'll buy everything for sale at that price or below, so line m up! Once I buy they stay out until I meet my profit margin.

Glta

If she drops to .0059, my alert will buy them in bulk!

.0063 is a better buy! 600,000 shares

I can but not going to. If we dip to .0059 I might buy quite a few. Holding my position for now.

Paint job starting this morning already. $130 trade....we're screaming now!

Yep, I bought them all!

Just to show you how easy it is to manipulate, I bought the last 586,000 shares. You would have lost that bet miserably! Let's say 5000 shares of OXY.

I just bought 585,000 shares at .0063 and 1,000 at .0075. You think for one minute is loose that bet!

I'm already sitting good at 27,300 shares of OXY, bought them at $59 a whole back. When i goes to it's projected $130 a share, my sell order will be complete! Your 5,000 would have been the Bentley I'd buy after! So I'll say it again PUoSU!

You asked about a bet, I'm in!

Yep. 5000 shares?

Yeah I agree, we're diluting with the volume we have Lolololol cracks me up

Best interest of IFUS? Where do the shareholders fit in?

Why would MMs want to move the pps lower?

Im aware of the issues he had and cudo's for handling it appropriately.

I'd like to see a couple PR's yes, but fins would be even better so we can cross check expenses and costs and see for ourselves if we're making money. Revenues are great unless we're booking a loss. At least we'd know where to fix the problem

I agree that would be significant, but I would need to see the financials see where the costs intersect.

we have a differnce of opinion and lets leave it at that. if the fins are like the pr's promised "at the end of the road" will be right...lol

I dont think the same, but it could be...it may certainly be perceived as such. I've seen legitimate reasons why a company doesn't post.

I did my DD and as said before, not interested in another sales pitch. I know about the product and the potential, want to see the performance now.

yeah but we're not selling at .04 and those who bought then at this price are probably more frustrated than I am....needing the CEO to step up and deal with/manage the stakeholders...apply stakeholder management 101.

I think the system has its own checks and balances. But if I were the CEO (and I have been before), I'd get rid of them by posting fins, do a quality stock buy-back and trade out or convert shares that are restricted.

I don't agree and I'm a shareholder. I think the company NEEDS to have audited financials or it implies there's something to hide. Transparency is paramount in pinkyland, where a legitimate company who's up and coming will tell the shareholders how we're doing. The CEO needs to build trust and confidence with the shareholders or forever be on their dartboard. We have a right to the information and I think a transparent mentality is quite necessary.

I understand the implications on the stocks and such, restricted shares and such, but there's the rest of us.

You want to get away from manipulation, post audited financials. At least the shareholders and the company has a measuring stick to work off of.

You mean when the company posts its revenues we'll see the price jump. We have no idea how these revenues balances against costs and such......

I hope MW steps us and starts giving us the information on a quarterly basis. Right now I'd settle for this year!

Short term? I've been with the company 6 months and have seen zippo besides FB posts. And the FB posts. What are they doing for the pps? I'm not trying to buck my on investment here, just want to see the information from the company.

Peach, with all due respect, I bought into this company fully believing in the product and the company's capability. Enough of the sales pitch already....I've heard enough. I fully know and understand the potential of this company. But! I want to see performance information, plain and simple. I'm not a pumper or a basher (even though some have challenged me on that), I just want a straight answer from the ceo on how we're doing. Good, bad or ugly!

All this is nice hearing it from you, but we want the CEO to step up

Peach I agree with you with one thing to resolve. When will we hear from MW? When will he commit to communicate with us?

Peach I appreciate a your comments. But I look at reality. With all the information posted on FB, we're under a penny. This stock is being manipulated and potentially sabotaged. This is concerning. Volume is low, we've been on a down slide for weeks and this PR.....still not here.

Hate to sound doom n gloom but it's frustrating to watch. Can only hope MW puts some time in to address shareholders.

Paint job or not, this is being manipulated

I wish I could believe that. I still see 80 k as a paint job, someone trying to excite things a bit. No one took the bait and someone sold the other 10k cheap

C'mon a 2000 share sale yesterday at .0096, think about it, a $20 sale... It cost the guy at least $5 to buy them

Looks to me like we had paint jobs high and low today. No reasoning in the trades.

I said that 3 months ago lol

I know this to be false by Finra. I spoke to the SEC about a stick and in reality they may take up to a year to get the balance straight and MMs will usually find a point at its cheapest to correct the balance sheet. EESO was one of those that I personally called about, because the last 100 shares I got stuck with and wondered why I couldn't sell.

At any rate, I wouldn't out too much stock in Finra's posts unless it's barring a stock from being traded.

No offense Peach and no disrespect, we've heard that since August.

I thought the same before, but with all the new information out there, the business should be big enough now to spend the money and at least give us a schedule of events:

1. By.........financials posted
2. By.........financials audited
3. By ........2013 in review with executive summary
4. By........,2014 forecast
5. By........risk and at risk business
6. By........stock profile

These type things

Either way, it's an essential for a publically traded company.

Quite frankly I don't care what the hang up is, I want the information, good bad or indifferent