Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
If I'm putting odd's on it, I'd day less than 5%. It's going to depend on WHAT case settles first and when. If you are talking about this "what if" as of today, I would say .05 to .10 range would be more like the run we'd see. I don't think our current market cap supports a PPS of .25 with just one settlement.
I'll try my best to make it to the top / all the way with SFOR, but when I start seeing millions in my account, its going to be VERY hard to not make a move. GLTU and everyone else here. It should be an exciting next few months leading up to the end of the 2017 year.
This is typical trading action for SFOR. Look at the tiny volume. This walk down won't last. Just someone trying to flip and make some $$. It's all good. It will recover either later today or the next few days.
I personally don't mind when this happens because it presents nice buying opportunities. GO SFOR.
I have a few sell orders in place for the run up, but I'm actually contemplating moving them up higher....
hmmmmmmmmmmmm what happened to RAD running up to $6 or $8 today..... I think a lot of people took their chances on getting out yesterday. There is a chance this gets bought out. But it is weak. So B/O will reflect that and if NO B/O happens?
Not saying their isn't money to be made with RAD, people just need to be carful how they are playing this one is all..... GL
I was hoping it would be this morning, but hey, anytime this week is good!
And I'm not into cosmic signs or anything, but I was at a restaurant the other night and it was lit up saying "NECA for the win". and I was like whhhhaaaa???? hahah. Part of the sign was blocked from my vision. It was actually a sign for Seneca Nation gaming lol.
What's the difference between SFOR and a SFOR long investor?
One has an awesome patent and the other has awesome patience!
and I'm spent..... have a good weekend y'all!!
there's a nice ask smack! lets see a few more before close!
Hey I'm a bagholder still here.... hahah. Thinking about averaging down though big time.
What's the new website? Is there a link posted? TY.
Does any one have the TA's contact info?
slowing volume indicates .0008 to .0009 is established bottom. Might be able to get it a bit cheaper, but not much.
you got a link to this?
right, right. I just meant the bid grew from 2 milly to almost 70 in a HURRY! Very good to see.
It'd be awesome if the news hits today, but either way, I can wait!
wow, out of no where. That's awesome. Now we just need to see one of those 50M ask slaps. THAT would make my day!
I hope you have a higher price target in mind than .05 for SFOR. But either way, that's awesome.
I might just buy some more at .05 ;)
Been a lot of folks tossing around Guarantees o Sub Pennies..... all of which have been wrong.
My friend made a good point in talking to me saying "wow, Kay was pretty accurate on his PPS assumption that he gave during his latest interview." Wonder if that means he will be right about 2nd half of 2017? Hmmmmmm
Sets SFOR up for an interesting close to the week a the very least. The start of a run, or just a 2 day low volume flip opportunity? Either way..... waiting for news lol
Bid on the 2's is growing a bit today as well.
Not saying there are any SFOR implications in this article, but still a good read. And also shows that technology is still on center stage for the GOV.
PS if you are going to reply SFOR isn't DOD eligible, this post isn't for you! ha
http://money.cnn.com/2017/06/22/technology/trump-telecom-ceos/index.html
Nahhhh, there hasn't been any talk of R/S at all. SS hasn't changed in months. And even when it did, the CEO PR'd it and explained the situation.
And what was the statistic? 21 trillion dollar industry by 2020 I believe it was? I don't feel like looking it up. Ha. Night y'all.
Awesome! In lessor words, I feel the same way. I am by no means the most schooled investor in the world, but anyone with enough time and patience can be successful.
I think another key factor to the puzzle is risk. Me personally, I have been watching SFOR for a LONG time through the R/S and only felt comfortable getting in after the MSFT settlement. (So still very low PPS just not bottom like some lol) But that said, the risk vs reward on SFOR for new investors should definitely be considered. They have a track record now, which makes this a much safer and more favorable investment IMO. Thanks for the time you put into this. It has definitely provided a pathway for myself and others to DO OUR OWN DD and make a very smart decision.
So are you saying the likes of Steve Jobs and Warren Buffet didn't have shareholders interests, or best interest of the company in mind? There are several CEO's who have worked for multiple companies at once. A LOT bigger than SFOR I might add.
Yes, there might be a crazy Waller doomsday scenario out there where this is bad for SFOR and shareholders. But the fact is, we just don't know if that's true or not. So what if he is double dipping?
Good catch a month ago, but don't let it keep you up at night....
http://fortune.com/2015/09/30/jack-dorsey-ceo-double-duty-two-jobs/
http://lmt-lss.com/5-super-successful-ceos-who-run-multiple-companies-and-their-productivity-secrets/
I'm not telling people to do a dang thing. They can do as they please. You read my words differently than I wrote. Or construe them to how you would like to make them sound.... I said "see past" those things, not ignore them as you so kindly suggested I said.
If you trade in the past you will NEVER and I mean NEVER make any money. That's like saying..... Circuit City and Radio Shack are solid investments because they were largely successful chains in the past. Or maybe is blockbuster a better example? Kodak? Enron? You get my point. Oh wait, you prob will take this out of context too.
What I am saying is SFOR has a HUGE potential. It may never live it out, but the potential is still there. And if traders don't see that..... Then so be it. But telling them to trade based on a shaky past is just as bad as saying TO DA MOON.....
SFOR ain't to the moon.... it's down to Earth mang. Just like it's CEO. That's why a lot of people here can see past the FINS and OLD R/S.
But that being said. SFOR TO THE MOON BABYYYYYYYY!!!!!
I hear that! hahah. I have a small stake and it's like ehhhh, not worth averaging down, not worth selling at a big loss. So Wait it out and see what happens. I'd be happy to get out with a 50% loss on this one.
Such is the game we play down here in OTC land. You aren't gonna get em all right!
New folks to SFOR, do your own DD and you will be rewarded.
Who does that? Someone who thinks their truth is the reality. When really they are the blind one. I've read 8k, I've done my DD. You are making assumptions the same as others are making assumptions and YOU don't like when they do that.
I look forward to you talking positively about SFOR again soon when you are ready to flip it.....
"Im flipping some others to get more cash to buy more but idk if ill have time as this can explode monday , tueday, wed etc etc who knows at this point. If im lucky itll dump one day and allow me to get more at cheap price "
"If mcafee is using 698 through acs who has contract with sfor and a competitor sees fit to buy sfor ..where would that leave mcafee ? Third party contractee from its competitor lol gets complicated ... could be thought through and lots of headache prevented if soneone buys sfor prior to many many contracts forming"
and that's a wrap folks.
what shares if you are saying there is a R/S. I wish I could see the future like you.
6. Chris Kringle ??? Santa attended?!? That's awesome! In all seriousness, that is an impressive list.
on just over a million volume? I think not.... people want sub pennies, but every time it drops down even a bit, people pull out their wallets and buy. And if it does somehow manage to get under .01, you KNOW people will be loading like crazy.....
who got some "ONES" this mornings? I'm sure it was .0001 right? hahah with way, nice snag!
I mean in the scheme of things.... if this is their best defense..... I'd say we are sitting pretty good! Sure it would suck if it was granted, but once the IPR comes back things should pick up around here! I've got time...... do you? (not meaning you specifically lol)
the two aren't linked what-so-ever. hahah. Tickers can run even with dilution occurring. And they USSUALLY do, because the people casuing the dilution want the highest PPS possible to get out at.
If you really don't understand why dilution is a bad thing, then I'm not gonna try to explain. It's a lost cause. GLTU.
Dilution is never a good thing for the common share holders.... EVER! Dilution does tend to occur when PPS rises as, why wouldn't the person creating the dilution want to make more money?
If you look at PPS and dilution as two separate things, you can still make $$, but dilution is never a good thing....
Profits are a good thing! But why can't people do both? Flip with your flippin sack and hold a long position just in case?
People want this to move faster than it's going to. That's why the PPS moves like it does. And it's a flippers paradise. There are many ways folks can play SFOR....... and it looks like they just painted it op for the close hahah
The two patents Entrust is saying we are infringing on.....
http://www.google.com/patents/US6728884
http://www.google.com/patents/US7010582
If you hold anything in the OTC you are "participating", right? I mean don't get me wrong. I am not gonna pump something, or support something. But Pumps and this kind of stuff happens in ALL markets. It's how you make $$.
The goal is to buy at the lowest low and sell at the highest high. If other people buy in, they should know the risks associated with any OTC play. So does that make me a bad buy if I'm willing to trade with them and make money? I get what y'all are saying though.
Agreed. But I'm ok with making money on a P and D lol. Thanks for your insight.
yeah, 3's and under is kinda what I was looking at too. This will run again at some point.
Airports using biometrics. Pretty cool! There is a technology shift going on in the world and SFOR is going to be at the forefront of it!
http://www.fox5ny.com/news/261030449-story