Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Any shareholder who believes it thinks that they have been harmed by me please contact me and in more than happy to speak to you, meet with you or discuss anything with you. I guarantee you won't feel the same afterwards. Don't believe the haters hype.
Agreed !! But he should than come out with an announcement that they are being redone and supply the name of the accounting firm that they hired to review and redo them. I look forward to any restated numbers if and when that happens.
Genius. Kim signed and did the q1 books also
We can only hope. My lawyer can use the money. And when he crushes Kim he will bull him very high
Funny thing is the facts :::
Kim has been the CEO for the entire 2nd quarter and claimed in a shareholder call to have sold more cups in 2 weeks than they did all year. Shoukd be easy to have financials for the quarter. He has been the only one in charge of them
Neither has Happened. Still waiting for judge to set a date. Discovery is to prove Tom Kim lied in an affidavit and have the judge uphold the default judgment
Is it just me or did I miss any filings at all today. Financials ?:
Never claimed to have hundreds of million. I said millions and that is accurate
Ross. Berrio and longoria have hundreds of millions of non diluteable shares.
Of course Kim could go to court and challenge their agreement however that would only result in the agreement being unwound and giving everything back to them
Either way it's a tough spot
I guess you haven't sen the Kim agreement with them from when they fold to Kim this year. It is very clear.
And non diluteable
Actually in reading the financials again. To made no mention in the year end of rupperts 2 lawsuits during 2015 or the shares issued in accordance with settlements. I'm no expert. But doesn't he need to as the CEO and signor of the reports. He certified that the company had no lawsuits against them either during the year or currently. Both statements are false
Please ask yourselves this. Do you find it strange that all of rupperts debts and conversions were well documented in the financials and disclosure statements however kakiskys notes, debts, lawsuit and 3a10 judgement don't show up in the year end or quarterlys anywhere. And both signed by Tom Kim as the CEO. Not one mention of a lawsuit that had been filed by Kalisky things that make you hummmm
Can't blame Ruppert for that obvious intentional bad reporting
Finally some intelligence and common sense. Thank you
Yes. Broward county Florida. And it was done this year. I already posted the case number earlier
Lots of credibility from a guy who was caught cheating his wife while she was in cancer treatments. Steady she was smart and dumped his ass and got a divorce and took everything back.
No one said it was a Loan. It is a long term note payable. Also I wouldn't advise their finiancials to change with out very hard proof of payments and documentation. Just because they don't want it to be true doesn't mean that it isn't
Your correct. Nothing. But it is just frustrating to listen to lies, misstatements And inuiendos. I feel it necessary to set the record straight and let the readers know the truth. Nothing more or less.
Ineither was in bankruptcy. Pam was not and the original debt was money's she was scammed out of and was the only plaintiff in the suit. I made an error after checking the records and of course it is all verifiable in court records. My Bk wasn't until December 2012
Sometime should read the June 2015 quarterly and pay special attention to long term note payable for 150k. When it is due in a few months than that to will be collected and if necessary a lawsuit would need to ensue
Of course it's legit. They never satisfied the terms of the settlement and then we sued for non compliance
Every single share every issued to us was documented and listed in the quarterlies. Nothing was ever hidden.
As far as bankruptcy. I was in a chapter 13 bankruptcy since 2010 if I remember correctly. I actually paid it out 2 years early. Nothing wrong with either earning or loaning money in 2015. As long as the court Payments are made it is all good
These attscks are so off base and wrong it's absurd but humorous.
Also read page 9 of the q3 2014 financials. It is extremely well documented again very clearly. It is not a fake Loan scheme no matter how loud posters scream
Facts are facts. Read page 8 of the initial disclosure statement in 2014. It clearly states that a lawsuit from 2012 was pending and settled in August 2014. Fully disclosed. That subsequent agreement was not fulfilled by the company and triggered the 3a 10 lawsuit. Exactly as was stated earlier and what keeps getting twisted by this board. The debt was for 200k and was owed from 2011-2012 way before Ngcg was even a company.
Not exactly sure what your referring to but all of my prior debts and suits are documented in their initial disclosure statement. Very clearly
You don't need Kim. You speak everyday with Kalisky. It's the same thing. Best of luck to you. You'll need it
Ingnorance is no way to go through life.
Don't need to prove to you what I have. You have zero. Also genius I never said Pamela didn't file suit against Ngcg. I said the debt went back to a suit against them from when they were UMMG. They settled the suit s d than defaulted so they had to be sued again.
I am owed money that I loaned them. Not shares and I want no shares. Period. I will accept and take no shares not am I suing for shares. Shares are not an option
Many millions
I have only my gut opinion to go on. Everyone can trash me but I truthfully think the lithium announcement without merit or teeth is a smokescreen because there will be nothing next week. I could be wrong and hopefully I am because I am a shareholder
Just wait and see and I mean WAIT because there is zero chance that anything will be filed. Other than excuses and extensions. Also guarantee Phil mine and group have hundreds of millions shares. They didn't sell out to Tom for nothing
Once again it had nothing to do with scsms or frauds but with business
Hopefully this will end the comments about fake rupperts fake loans and scam because this is the facts. Ruppert has NEVER sued the company ( except for current suit ) for any loans that they gave to them or for any monies they have ever loaned. these are the FACTS as supported in the court cases. Not your speculation
Here is the rundown again if the suits
Ok so here's the rundown on the lawsuits for you
#1 Ruppert was owed legit debt day for back prior to Ngcg when it was UMMG of 200k. Sold part of the debt to his lawyer who came up with a way to recover funds.
#2 lawyer forgot to include the almost 18k paid to him for the first lawsuit in the damages so Ruppert had to sue to recover
# 3 Ruppert sued for a note not paid back. Kalisky had 5 notes with Ngcg and Ruppert bought some of them from Kalisky
I hope that clears it up.
Yes. Very odd and potentially problematic for them. :)
Once again do some dd. By hey we're not from loans ? The debt went back to a judgement that was obtained against then before they were Ngcg. When they were UMMG for fraud against Pamela
I am more than happy to answer anything. Actually most things. Not sure exactly your question. Please simplify question and I'll try and answer
You forgot to mention that Ruppert filed chapter 13 and not 7 and paid every claimant back and actually paid them back 2 years ahead of schedule in his bankruptcy.
Once again and for the last time do some real dd please before you post. Rupperts legitimate debts dated back to 2011 before the company was ever Ngcg. His 3 a 10 was not for your so called fake Loans. It wasn't for a loan at all
In correct. Money was to Ngcg
There no whining. What kind of man wouldn't try to defend his case. I would if I was Kim. There are no sour grapes at. Only want what I legally gave them