Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Look at the bid and ask and you can see MM manipulation
Lets assume flaflyersfan is correct, how does Southridge make money. Assume they buy with 8% discount. they have to get share price northwards to make any money. so it is not in their interest for price to drop.
that said I have a question for you, do hold any ECDC shares? why are you on this board
I see a company that will cone to its own in 2012. barring any unforseen events this is going to be blockbuster
but you are correct and he is wrong. The date he referenced is August 12, just last week. Your comment was about the quarter 2nd Q. August 12 will be in the 3rd Q
August 12 is not 3 months and is not in the quarter in question, don't play games with us. We know better.
I look at this differently. Most penny don't have cash. And anyone thaty knows banking knows an overdraft on your financial may only mean deposit made to the bank pending posting.
I like the way broke down the numbers, share issued and all. but you completely ignored the fact that revenue is growing, expenses is dropping and losses are significantly reducing. If the trend continues you will not just be wrong you will be counting your losses in another quarter or 2.
but we are in a different market situation. I am sure it will bounce back.
That is standard auditor statement in development stage companies. If that was an issue considering what have seen in cash flow they should be out of business. Cash is tight only that.
200k-300k
From CEO Yes, he actually said this in the press conference that was held if my memory is still any good that the company is looking forward to 3rd Q. the company also mentioned that 2nd Q will be between 200k and 300k, so why is everyone jumping off the bridge?
I understood they plan to pursue the patent infringement after the 10Q is filed
"Letter of Intent", it formed the basis for the final agreement that will be executed between the two companies. In fact if you look at their announcement today that was exact the description they gave.
It was the LOI
Thank God some people on this board knows what it takes. give the poor guy time to close the deal people. chicagodog, drdroomy thank you for the info on Chinese negotiation. i ma more interested in knowing who they are negotiating with in the US
LOI was announced in the last release when the company said it was negotiating a licensing agreement in the US, it is safe to say one could speculate that their is an LOI coming. could we not? or are we not allowed to do deductive thinking? or is that privileged process for Flaflyersfan. you predicted said management will issue Preferred shares to itself, was that insider information? did you trade on that rumor?
So because the market did not buy in your view the market did not like ECDC.What about the days when ECDC does not put out news but sells millions? Just make sure the shorters keep their dollars ready for when they need to cover
So because the market did not buy in your view the market did not like ECDC.What about the days when ECDC does not put out news but sells millions? Just make sure the shorters keep their dollars ready for when they need to cover
From my view, a company with incredible technology, negotiating a US and Chinese Master licensing agreements, with a NASDAQ company, a global logistics company and just got a $10ml funding commitment, has distributor network in 15 countries.
Do you not suppose this stock is preparing for the big league, its got what I call core fundamentals. Not all the garbage some people want to spew on this board.
Welcome back
my point exactly, no volume
You are totally right
This I must agree with. If flafly is shorting, he is setting up to get burned. This company has too much weapon in its war chest
This is the one time I will agree with you. I see a lot of things posted here attributed to the CEO that just does not seem right and one of them is the buy out rumor. Especially from a guy that I find to be very evasive and generic when answering questions.
Amen to that. This is going to challenge Kay as a CEO and his decision on this issue may increase or kill his profile. This is his chance to go to the big league
Jeff, for those of us who kept saying this penny was not the usual, have been vindicated. Part of the fundamentals that should be evaluated about a company is its approach to business. ECDC sacrificed quick revenue for long term technology development and IP rights - Its about to pay off.
You are absolutely correct, I got the same feeling from talking with him
droomy misunderstood my question, I agree with him on the issue of patent infringement. I was referring to the issue of buy out that Flaflyerfan seem to be insisting is some sort of SEC violation. I have never seen anyone wrote that the CEO said he was offered a buy out by ZSTN for .20cents to .25 cents.
I am certain he said this I am referring to the comment by Flaflyerfan regarding buy out offer. He continues to try to insinuate that the CEO is disclosing information that is not in public domain.
My question is related to the .20-.25 cents offer, I don't remember you or Sharky ever mentioning a price offer discussed with the CEO of ECDC
who quoted the CEO?
who quoted the CEO?
Can you please tell us who confirmed this rumor with the CEO and when?
This information is complete rumors and has no basis in fact and people posting these type of garbage need to stop
No comment, I still believe it was a good move, access to capital to grow, manufacturer and expand. the only thing this company lacked was capital and in 6 weeks after SEC green light they will have access
wow! You musty have been around some really dirty players because the only thing you think management does is hurt shareholders, yet have neither shown us nor have we seen any evidence of that with this company.
More importantly is how you contradict yourself. First you said they need to increase A/S when they did you have a problem with it, could it be that they just simple maintain the same ratio between common and preferred shares. Looking at the number it appears that was all they did, increase both at the same rate 100%.
Which suggests no ulterior motive as you seem to imply here.
OC you laid it out perfectly. If management and board is controlling the stock maybe it is because they see something in the horizon
I am starting to think so as well
You have to know some people assume the rest of us don't know "Jack". Was that a movie about a doctor who convince people to kill themselves?
People to don't buy the death spill.