Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
He is correct Uber and any attorney in America will agree. It is probably deflation per se and since you are a not a lawyer, you should look up what that means. I'll help you. It is automatically defamatory and it goes right to damages.
Oh I will mark it. So far the only thing you have been right on is the timing of the registration statement. As far as his libel, I 100% agree. He has called it a scam 100 times and thinks his opinion is a defense. Opinion would be something like I believe this goes bankrupt. He should consult with an attorney. If you call something a scam, opinion is not an affirmative defense and proving something is a scam will be really expensive. He will lose that defamation case on summary judgment. Virtually guaranteed.
Actually I believe the stock is about to collapse. They have fixed expenses they can't avoid. So they've probably shut down production but it still takes millions to run things. If they shut down the buildings, virtually guaranteed to cause damage such as mold
Post 111493. Continue watching
Funny thing is I posted about that company and UF called the company dirt ponds. I wonder how he is feeling now.
Franny and Uf should come to class. They'll learn something
I am predicting a large percentage drop short term from the last price of .0110. Expect to blow through a penny short term.
Look into it. Very real.
So I agree but remember what I said, it's not in the best interest of the toxic debt holders to let the stock go below a penny. That is why I believe it's worth a bet here. So either I'm going to look like an idiot or I'm going to look like a certified genius.
I get that but $110,000 is a few weeks.
That is the guy who blamed the downturn on shorting in a penny stock. Knows nothing.
What happens if SHMP is expecting a big pump and is trying to do GHS a favor since it seems like if the stock ran, their conversion with the extra shares is a penny or less.
GHS obviously knows SHMP is in trouble. I agree $110,000 doesn't move the needle. So why this deal of $110,000.
Because I believe they'll be able to spin at least one more hype job short term. Also, the toxic investors have a vested interest in keeping the stock north of a penny. The supply here and selling is primarily toxic debt. They want to to stay north of a penny. That is the catch 22. When do they RS. That is the real risk - RS
So I have truly recently contemplated about purchasing shares. If you look back at my post in December, I believe I did say that the stock was going to bounce off of a penny. Unfortunately, I missed the bounce however, I am still contemplating purchasing some shares here. I am just deeply concerned that the company is going to declare a reverse split, and if they do, the stock is going to get crushed if they announce it. Anybody have any thoughts serious question
If he's a lawyer, I'm an astronaut. The Nevada law is 100% clear that the Preferred that has been the subject of so much discussion on this board broke Nevada law.
Unless you disagree that a preferred stock that grants voting control does not disenfranchise shareholders.
However Nooma will disagree because it his role to shoot down any intelligent post because he has a vested interest in misleading dumb people
Utah:
I learned from the CEO of a Nasdaq company many years ago who was worldclass rich then whenever you see 99% or as he said, 99.9%, it is usually 99% BS.
I'll give you a Franny question since you are buddies. Can you tell me how you came up with that number?
So that means that any public company operator that fails is a sleazeball. Very interesting. The whole stock market which is based on OPM - the man who spends 24-7 attacking management teams now says any public company operator who isn't successful is a sleazeball. Very interesting.
Actually Uber not really.
I am not part of a team and I have not attacked anyone on the management team.. Unless you have a long range psychiatry degree, it is interesting that you would comment on people you have never met.
Bill Williams, Bill Delgado and Tom U who I've all met personally are great people. I am certain I don't agree with them on their prospects for the company. As far as Gerald, I am not a huge fan.
Actually you are and you have been called out on it. Sorry. Like the statements about someone is shorting the stock. Good try. So how is your stock position doing?
Another Franny classic
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=170285216
The Hui Chen bio trying to pump Shrimp stock by posting the bio of Yotta CEO.
How'd that work out for you maestro?
Franny listen very carefully..
I learned I was wrong after doing sone due diligence and looking at the preferred stock fiasco.
And the fact that you have spent all day going back to 2019 tells the board all the board needs to know.
Good try!!!!!!!!! LMFAO.
The fact is I didn't have to go back to 2019 for your posts. I went back to yesterday.
My favorite posts from you is when you blamed the down turn on shorts. That was a con.
I'll take fecal size for $500?
Who knows. I just know when a company puts out a tweet that basically says significant news early this week, it's worth a bet. Just read the tweet.
I appreciate your post.
At the most simplistic level, anyone can grow shrimp. To be clear, drop three PL's in a fish tank and as long as your filter works, you will have shrimp. Commercially viable means producing at a cost in which you can turn a profit. Until SHMP completely scales any facility, no one knows what the cost will be. I am quite confident they don't know that number.
Commercially viable means growing shrimp on a consistent basis at a price in which you can turn a profit. Right now, they don't even have their PL supply figured out. Without a virtual guarantee of PL supply, you don't have a commercially viable system.
I also believe you are leaving out the genetics part of the equation.
Finally, I know you have posted multiple times on the stress of the shrimp. The shrimp will always be more stressed than a native environment. Maximizing water quality helps with the stress but in no way will the stress ever be the same as a native environment.
The bottom line is they have never really proven anything.
I do admit that you have been pretty much wrong 100% of the time. Virtually every post.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=170821298
Can you give us an update on the wholesalers? Please. For laughs.
Hey Franny, how's this data work out?
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171564089
BTW, here was my post. Completely amazing how right I was and how wrong you were. Well at least your consistent.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171564636
In all seriousness, I am even shocked how correct I was.
Hey Franny
I do agree that math is not your strong suit. Your words, not mine. How'd the math work out?
Your post below
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171564974
Hey Franny, how are your shrimp shares doing for you? You down 90%. 98%. LMFAO.
So if you don't have data, what exactly do you know. Nothing. Instead you try to lie about a court hearing. And you refuse to answer questions about the preferred which continues the big lie. Sad actually. However, people see through the sadness.
And you have all the data LMFAO. I get it, it's the PL'a fault. No clue sir. No clue. Zero Nada.
I'll take that as a compliment
Hey welcome back. I am still waiting for the answer to my question which is now going on 3 weeks. I don't forget and I am always correct. Please answer my questions on the preferred and then I'll put you in the front row in my class.
In order to do that at scale, they would need for example an optical sorter or something to differentiate for the size distribution which i don't believe they have ever thought about. I also believe they have always had an issue with size distribution which causes a major problem. For example, just imagine that 30% of all shrimp in the final grow out tank have not reached their target size, do you harvest that 30% or leave them in the tank.
What interview. Can you please specify
I don't get why you are surprised on things I have discussed on this board over a year ago. Do you know how many times I discussed the size. You have any idea what the retail value of 39 tails is. Max $5 retail. And the proceeding costs on those size shrimp is astronomical. Think Chinese buffet shrimp or popcorn shrimp. High end restaurants have no use for that size. Zero. Red Lobster would bug then at $ 3-4 wholesale.
Haven't I been saying that for 5 years. The only thing people like UF can talk about is mud ponds. The problem with that argument is that most of the food people eat has some association with dirt and mud. That is a real SHMP price. Now in fairness. Those are smaller shrimp. Probably 30 per pound heads off. SHMP is producing about 20-25 heads off when they produce. However, that is a Texas shrimp farm that will LEGALLY have the same classification as SHMP's product. Here lies the main problem which I have highlighted for 5 years.
So let's say that is true. If they are a data driven firm, what did they see in Shmp's data that they liked. Based on your DD, is there anything in writing you have seen that would say it's Niterra's system OR SHMP's system.
Two comments. The guy being interviewed looks like he's 11 and has a net worth of $8,000 so it does not move my needle. Second, they will not be in the shrimp growing business as I continue to say over and over. They are in the sensor proving and selling business.
Sir, it doesn't matter how it works and if it works. What matters is the cost to produce. That is why most of these systems fail. There have been companies that have been able to produce shrimp . The issue becomes the following. The absolute maximum price that any shrimp (16-20) tails off will sell at is $10.00. I for one do not believe their published costs. I also do not believe they are getting a consistent growth rate within the same lot. Finally, they may have a shot to grow consistently to 16-20 heads off with Superior genetics. For example, homegrown. Other than that and without the superior genetics, it won't happen.