Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
That's so MEAN. As I type I'm watching a Cortislim commercial, and Dr Cinnamon is explaning how hurtful it is for fat people when others make unkind remarks about their weight.
The "important" ones.
Rob, Which posts are you missing?
I see that Slurp's libel is being reposted...
read post 28709 at this link
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=307
Um, you don't seem to understand what I'm talking about. If you short a stock, you have to put up margin. And contrary to what many people think, you can't spend the money from your sale until you've closed the position.
you cant margin buy pinks lol
OT: Then you go waaayyyy back. ICVI/MTEI, a really major scam, eh?
I remember you from ICVI
Stockprowler:
Our officers, employees, and others affiliated with Intervast Corp. may have positions in some of the stocks mentioned or profiled on Stockprowler.com and may buy or sell these securities at any time. Holding periods of positions can be any length of time. It should be understood that positions are typically taken before, and sometimes after, publication of Information. Such positions may increase or decrease before, during, or after distribution of Information without notice. Some or all of the positions will typically be sold should a mentioned stock sharply rise, no matter how attractive the stock is or has been. It is possible to like a stock and still sell it. We may want to buy it back on a pull-back, or feel its potential to go up has been temporarily diminished, or simply see a more attractive investment opportunity.
http://www.stockprowler.com/disclaimer/
Why don't you start a "Let's Talk About Pumpers and Bashers" board? Seriously.
I don't believe that is the right way to deal with this issue. Just my opinion...
Probably because those PRs had nothing to do with the company's actual business.
BIG NOTICE!! The Last 2 PR'S are missing the following!!..
."There is no guarantee that further exploration or drilling will produce any economic benefit to the company or the shareholders of the company"
Why??
Sorry to disappoint. I've never posted on any EDIG board at any website.
wow didn't know shell was still around after she got embarrassed with EDIG
You must indeed be a rookie, as your alias suggests.
1. Urbie's issued way too much stock--even by the LOWEST estimates--for there to be any meaningful short position. Anyone wanting to short CMKX at any time would have had to put up many millions in margin to make any kind of profit, and it just ain't worth it.
2. None of the GetShorty companies has ever proved the existence of any significant naked short position.
LET ME ASK YOU! WHAT MAKE YOU THINK THERE ISN'T ANY SHORT POSITION IN CMKX.
That was exactly what the ones I've seen were. Though I may have missed some.
janice... many of the posts that are being deleted are NOT those kind of posts, imo.
Whether he realizes it or not, Shapiro is talking about shorting against convertible paper, which is NOT "naked" shorting. Toxic financing is indeed a big problem, as I and many others have been pointing out on the boards since 1998.
Important read on Naked Shorting
That's okay. The whole Investrend/GetShorty thing is really very interesting.
"Mini" as opposed to the gigantic coordinated effort being made on behalf of CMKX.
Mini-promotion? I don't have a clue what that means.
I'll ask again: what makes you think there's any short interest at all in CMKX?
One thing the shorts probably didn't really think through when they were shorting out the wazoo at .0001...
Are you aware that so far NONE of the GetShorty companies has succeeded in demonstrating a large naked short position?
You're free to leave.
Why do you guys put up with this?
Why do you stay here?
Chill. It's very simple. The moderator (and Matt as well) don't want the thread to turn into a forum on which people do nothing but go on and on about "bashers" and touts.
ZEN whats up here?
Probably. Very RBish.
I think Zen posts musta been deleted cause he 'named off' his ignore list.
What's your basis for imagining that they were "important"?
ok Ive had two important posts deleted now?
Oh yeah. If someone indirectly connected to the company has a cute dog, I just BUY BUY BUY!!
She has a cute lab shepard mutt like me! nice dog, hope this convinces some of your concerns.
I don't get it. Did they reopen the boards and then shut them down again? Not very helpful that the post by Melvin doesn't have any time stamp.
hmmm...
He said " I don't know what CMKM is going to do, don't know if they will even have a T/A after this."
After WHAT, I wonder...
http://www.ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CLB01219&read=25631
Try Pepto-Bismol.
Thanks!
Isn't IBC Joel in New York?
Sigh....I believe I did say that the person called last week. Why not try again?
And wouldn't it have made more sense to ask whether he was contributing to IBC than whether anyone had called?
Sorry...I can't find either the original post or the woman's reply. Maybe Sterling zapped 'em?
Another point: I think that if people are willing to go on the radio and speak as "experts", they should be willing to identify themselves.
All right, all right, I'll go look for the post. Apparently he said quite categorically than he had no idea what she was talking about.
HUH? Haven't they reopened the message boards? Why would they re-release Friday's PR if that's the case?
She seems to be one of the more respected posters on Sterling's thread. As you know, there are NO bashers there.
And the woman who supposedly called Joel has an impeccable reputation?
janice shell: in one or two sentences, what are your prospects for CMKX from current levels (ie: .0006). I know its high risk, but relatively speaking (in the world of pinks), what do you think of CMKX??
I think it's a crap shoot right now. There just isn't enough information available. In the blur of rumor and fluff prs, I think many people have lost sight of the fact that the company has provided very little real information about its operaations, and none about its share structure.
Most cooler heads realize that if CMKX intends to mine its properties, it won't see revenues for years. If that's their intention, there may be spikes at time in future, but the fundamentals won't justify a huge increase in stock price. If they mean only to do exploration and then sell the mineral rights, rewards could come more quickly. Of course they could also fail to find anything at all that could be exploited economically.
As for the share structure, the rumormongers say Melvin and Urbie have promised to reveal it "soon". I wouldn't put much faith in that, but if it really is their intention to attempt relisting on the OTCBB, then that information will eventually become available. But I very much doubt that they'll be filing in the immediate future: don't forget that they have about two years' worth of Ks and Qs to catch up on.
So we return to point one: it's a crap shoot, and likely to remain one for some time to come.
Interesting post about Joel on RB.
I don't know if anyone's read it yet, if so sorry for the repost.
http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKX&read=317432
Wrong Joel. Someone on Sterling's thread posted this, and a woman replied that she'd found it earlier, and called the guy. He said he'd never heard of IBC Radio, and certainly had never called them.
Sorry I can't offer a link, but it'd take me half an hour to find the post.
A few points...
If that's the case....don't you know when Dateline does the story it will be embellished (misrepresented) even more!
--Typically Dateline stories (unless they're of cosmic importance) don't run for more than twenty minutes. I think it'd be very difficult even to scratch the surface of this in so little time.
--Dateline and other TV "news" shows often do a good deal of work on stories they never air. Back in 1999, Jeff Mitchell and I spent quite a lot of time talking (and in Jeff's case, meeting) with people from 20-20. They'd even started filming interviews with SEC people when the show was suddenly canned because one of the higher-ups decided it wasn't of sufficient interest to a general audience. Later, we also had some discussions with Dateline, but they didn't go very far.
--The Dateline story has been postponed till August. My guess is that it won't appear at all.
--What the GetShorty bunch don't realize is that real journalists (as distinguished from the toutish hacks from FinancialWire) always check out both sides of a story. I'll bet they've "discovered" that Investrend is in fact a company engaged in stock promotion. And I'll bet the SEC has told 'em that the GetShorty people are clueless when it comes to actual facts.
I suspect that they decided to drop the story, but won't make any kind of "announcement" because they know that if they do they'll be inundated with hysterical emails and phone calls from the GetShorties.
LOL!! Only four?
I just know I've read that news article in different versions now at least 4 times.
Ever since the first "article" about naked shorting appeared at FinancialWire, they've been recycling it. They keep on adding names and bits of "information". That's why they're so long and unintelligible now.
Might also help if they hired someone familiar with the English language to write this crap.
No...
It's not all OTCBB stocks either...that surprised me.
But who knows which of those companies actually gave Investrend permission to use their names. A few years back, Investrend started what they call the "CEO Council". Named as "members" were several SEC and Nasdaq officials.
They were contacted. They'd never agreed to be members of the CEO Council. They were pretty pissed off, and demanded that their names be removed. I suspect something similar is going on with the list of companies on the interminable FinancialWire "articles".
I just don't have the energy to write to all of 'em asking about that, but someone should do it.
Novo...
This board isn't very receptive to bs from FinancialWire.
But would you like to be helpful? Tell us who's behind the current mini-promotion.
lol, any shareholders left are gonna be pretty pissed off...
I think there are a number of reasons:
Why do you think Urban has targeted the USA people in his promotion?
There are a lot more potential investors here, and they're less likely to be knowledgeable about mining.
You don't have to be a reporting company to trade here.
Promoters will be more interested in working with you if you're here rather than in Canada.
And so on...