I wouldn't be too positive about those "positives"...

The IPRs were not & never will be "a win". I thing was "won". Patents were challenged & the challengers lost their challenge, leaving vplm with nothing lost, nothing gained. All they did was maintain what they had from the beginning. That's a "plus" I guess, but not a win. And besides, the whole thing was a debacle put on by a known corrupt agency. No bout-a-doubt-it! It took 3 panels & a real threat of RICO charges, by Sawyer, to finally "obtain" the <cough, cough> unanimous & unprecedented ruling. The whole thing was obviously a farce of the highest kind. If you can't recognize that, I don't think that's very objective. Every single allegation against the patents was up against the fact that all claims are considered VALID from the point of patenthood. That's what the USPTO is assumed to be doing in the 1st place, is to expertly look at all the patenmt claims when the patent application is presented to them. Therefore the whole corrupt debacle turned out to be zero sum game. It took 3 freakin panels 1 whole year to finalky decide they didn't need any RICO charges leveled agin them. Those are the facts. That is the reality!

Some claims HAVE been invalidated. Reversals are conjecture therefore don't deserve to be counted as "a positive".

The artificially induced lower OS share count has been QUICKLY gapping back up. It's huge at 1.7b

With the huge legal quagmire, I don't honestly think it possible to know for a fact that all requisite filings are complete..

I submit that "defendant friendly" & "fair judge" is a misnomer & an impossibility. It's red herring. It is AT ONCE a conflict. The 2 things cannot fairly coexist!

"most cases settle before trial"
And yet there are still no overtures despite the fact that naturally, as time goes by, the price goes up. Not seeing any settlements ever!

Source codes, in a trial, are protected by law!



The allegation about Apple admitting relay use is absotively posolutely ludicrous. I researched & spoke (posted) on this when the allegation 1st surfaced, years ago. I'm in the electronics business. The use of relays is so common in any & all electronic systems is well known & that point would be laughed out of court. I asked for anybody to identify what was the admitted infringment by Apple, for the last couple yrs. No one could or would answer it. Most could not answer it because they were just regurgitating what someone else said. And the other didn't reveal it because of what an embarrassment it is to allege. The apple expert knew full well that there was no issue admitting use of relays. Ppl keep regurgitating that any many other "points" as thought they actually have diligent in depth understanding of the facts. Not seeing that at all... Below is just one of many examples of relay use in the industry in routing phone calls (or faxes as the case may be)...

Configuring VoIP Fax Relay Using CallManager
and a Voice Gateway
Document ID: 13949
Contents
Introduction
Prerequisites
Requirements
Components Used
Conventions
Configure the Cisco CallManager Server to Route the Fax Calls
Step-by-Step Instructions
Configure the Gateway
Verify
Troubleshoot
Related Information
Introduction
This document explains how to force fax calls to use Voice over IP (VoIP) Fax Relay rather than local
hairpinning. This functionality is useful in a scenario that includes a Primary Rate ISDN (PRI) port accepting
voice and fax calls. The voice calls are directed to IP phones and the fax calls are directed to Foreign
Exchange Station (FXS) ports on the same router.
Local hairpinning of analog calls on a router without a time-division multiplexing (TDM) bus makes those
calls subject to delay on the router backplane and Digital Signal Processor (DSP) buffers, and therefore
unreliable. VoIP in general, and Fax Relay specifically, overcomes this problem for fax calls by terminating
them directly on the router DSP.
This forced Fax Relay is accomplished when you route the incoming fax call setup to the Cisco CallManager
server, and then immediately redirect it to the same gateway.
In summary, the gateway now terminates the fax call using Fax Relay on one leg, establishes a VoIP Fax
Relay call between its voice cards routed through the Cisco CallManager, and then re-establishes the fax call
on the FXS call leg.
Note: Only the call setup messages pass through the Cisco CallManager. After the VoIP call is established,
data travels directly between the ingress and egress DSPs on the gateway voice cards.
Prerequisites
Requirements
There are no specific requirements for this document.
Components Used
The information in this document is based on the software and hardware versions:

• Cisco CallManager versions 3.x and 4.x
The information in this document was created from the devices in a specific lab environment. All of the
devices used in this document started with a cleared (default) configuration. If your network is live, make sure
that you understand the potential impact of any command.
Conventions
Refer to the Cisco Technical Tips Conventions for more information on document conventions.
Configure the Cisco CallManager Server to Route the Fax
Calls
Use this procedure to configure the Cisco CallManager server to route the fax calls.
Note: The setup in this document makes use of Cisco CallManager 3.0. However, the concept is relevant for
all versions of Cisco CallManager including 3.x and 4.x.
Step-by-Step Instructions
Complete these steps to configure the Cisco CallManager server to route fax calls.
Select Device > Phone > Add New Phone to create a dummy extension.
In this case, Phone Type Cisco 30 VIP is used.
1.
2. Insert a dummy MAC address in the MAC address field. For instance, 00AABBCCDDEE.
In the Button Template field, be sure to select a 30 VIP handset (it has plenty of line appearances) and
insert it into the database.
3.

Assume these for the dummy extension (use any numbers that are available on your system):
? line 1 is extension 4444, call forward always to 5555
? line 2 is extension 4445, call forward always to 5556
? line 3 is extension 4446, call forward always to 5557
? line 4 is extension 4447, call forward always to 5558
The Call Forward Always settings route patterns that point back out to the H.323 gateway,
specifically to the FXS ports. This forces the router to establish a VoIP call. Therefore, it should use
Fax Relay to terminate the fax call on one leg and bridge it to the FXS call leg.
Click on the first line appearance and enter a dummy number in the Directory Number field. In this
example 4444 is used. Then, enter a Forward All number that points back to the FXS destination
pattern. This example uses 5555.
4.

In the VoIP world, route patterns are the equivalent of static routes. The only difference is that route
patterns point to an E.164 number instead of an IP address. Create and insert a Route Pattern that
matches the forward all number from the dummy extension and direct this to the H.323 gateway with
the FXS ports (the H.323 gateway must have been added previously). In order to do this, go to the
Route Plan menu and select Route Plan > Route Pattern > Add a New Pattern.
5.

Go back to the Dummy Extension Configuration page and add a new line number, (for example,
4445) and call forward all numbers (5556). Create a new Route Pattern that matches the Call Forward
All number and points to the H.323 gateway. Repeat this for each fax line you have.
6.
Configure the Gateway
On the gateway, create these VoIP and plain old telephone server (POTS) dial-peers:
!
Dial-peer voice 1 voip
Destination-pattern 444.
!--- Wildcard match for 444X numbers.
Session target ipv4:172.16.1.252
Codec g711ulaw
Ip precedence 5
Dtmf-relay h245-alpha
!
dial-peer voice 5555 pots
destination-pattern 5555
port 1/0/0
!
dial-peer voice 5556 pots
destination-pattern 5556
port 1/0/1
!
dial-peer voice 5557 pots
destination-pattern 5557
port 1/1/0


!
dial-peer voice 5558 pots
destination-pattern 5558
port 1/1/1
You should now be able to receive fax calls on your system.
Verify
Use the show voice call summary command to verify the change of the codec when the fax call is processed
by the DSP.
Certain show commands are supported by the Output Interpreter Tool (registered customers only) , which
allows you to view an analysis of show command output.
Troubleshoot
There is currently no specific troubleshooting information available for this configuration.
Related Information
• Configuring Cisco Fax Relay
• Fax Relay Troubleshooting Guide
• Configuration on a Cisco WS-X6624 with an H.323 Gateway
• Voice Technology Support
• Voice and IP Communications Support
• Troubleshooting Cisco IP Telephony
• Technical Support & Documentation - Cisco Systems
Contacts & Feedback | Help | Site Map
© 2014 - 2015 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms & Conditions | Privacy Statement | Cookie Policy | Trademarks of
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Updated: Apr 28, 2006 Document ID: 13949




Treble kaboomski

I know, I know.... "next week"

I want to see it go to .0125. I have a big surprise if it does. Go ¢¢¢¢¢vplm¢¢¢¢¢!

That's right & it's still correct. It tries to fly but wings been cut... Hasn't got what it takes.

I know they've been saying the same thing for it's entire existence, but for how long they been predicting the takeoff this time around, just for shits & giggles?

Emu has "gifted" 782 million shares just since march of last year. Gifted an additional 38.3 million shares going back to Jan 2017. Roughly 820 million shares total.

This must be that big price rise predicted for weeks. Wow, impressive.... Something to write home about! Dizzying...

This is July 11, 2012, NOT 2014....and vplm is boldly claiming to preparing to license the "PATENTS" they claim to have ALREADY AQUIRED! (a year & a half before the actual finalization & before there were any approved patents. THIS KIND OF TOTALL BULLSHIT PR IS WHAT SOLD (illegally, in my opinion) ZILLIONS OF SHARES & GARNERED MANY MANY NEW SHAREHOLDERS! (I was already a shareholder before any if this went down).

I saw something up above about "10 years again!" & no patents then, etc.

Just another in the untold piles of steaming bs.

1st of all, in my post, I had made NO REFERENCE to patents. All I said is I could've warned ppl 10 yrs ago about vplm (and that's because some of the negative signs were already coming to light & my consciousness. That said, the patented technology was created around 15 yrs ago. 1st applied for in 2006/7. But the shenanigans began long before the 1st patents were approved in 2013 as digi-phony-ca & vplm were collaborating for a long time (putting this scheme together) according to Emu.. And they began 1st talking about & PRing about the "acquisition" of the patents as far back as 2011, which is 10 yrs. And on the contrary, Emu was already controlling everything by that time, even tho he was not yet named as CEO, because he held the majority of shares BY FAR! So all that crap above, is just that, crap that lacks knowledge of the finer points. Vplm started shareholders as far back as 2011 that they had acquired these patents (they often referred to them as patents instead of properly referring to them as patent applications, BUT THAT WAS DONE ABSOLUTELY ON PURPOSE (for 2 yrs) IN ORDER TO SELL SHARES & GET NEW SHAREHOLDERS (as part of the rogue plan developed by Emu & certain vplm ppl). And that's exactly what they did but they LIED TO US, PROMISING IT WAS ALL GOING TO BE INTEGRATED INTO THE VPLM VOIP SERVICE PLATFORM. THEY RENEGED BIG TIME (on the shareholders).

Alfeady lost nearly 20% of its gain today. It started at approx .0135, so if it tanks back down to .0135, it will have lost 100% of its gain today, RIGHT?? Let's say that it tanks down to .0125. So how much (percentage) of today's gain will it have lost at that point? Lololololololololololol..

There was 22.5% spike. In all likelihood, it'll be gone by tomorrow

P&D in progress!

Ok, see this spike up that just occurred? In keeping with vplm history, watch it goes right back where it came from...

"... filed an amicus brief in support of VoIP-Pal's appeal of a district court order invalidating two VoIP-Pal patents as ineligible subject matter."

The above excerpt shows that indeed, 2 patents were effectively deemed invalid, since they were ruled as "intelligible subject matter", just like I have asserted several times here. That ruling may or may not have been reversed, I honestly don't know, regardless, it happened as I said my memory served that it did. Someone else said no such thing ever happened. This shows that it did. eos.

"... filed an amicus brief in support of VoIP-Pal's appeal of a district court order invalidating two VoIP-Pal patents as ineligible subject matter."

The above excerpt shows that indeed, 2 patents were effectively deemed invalid, since they were rules as "intelligible subject matter", just like I have asserted several times here. That ruling may or may not have been reversed, I honestly don't know, regardless, it happened as I said my memory served that it did. Someone else said no such thing ever happened. This shows that it did. eos.

And voted as the biggest laughing stock of stocks

Vplm has been officially deemed pathetic as a company

Is it pollyanish arse kissers or arse kissing pollyanites? Hell, I'll just go with both. New material would be nice but have to settle for the blanks.

Rut-roh! Getting close to .010s! You know what that means!

I just hope someone takes pictures of the faces of those present when the patents begin to get laughed at & kicked out of court as they are finally discovered to be what they really are. Will Emu be able to find the way to stop it from getting that far? Will Hudnell be able to divert away from it getting there as he will need to underneath it all? Will the courtroom start to sink into an unknown sinkhole? Holy core patents & apple corps! Tune in some batshit time, same batshit channel! Lots of onopotopoeia: "BAM", "SPLA-AT-", "WHACKETH", and don't FORGET the all important "VWAP"!

There will never be enough spatulas to scrape off that much egg off faces...tsk,tsk,tsk

All that flotsam & jetsom below must all be good news...I mean just look at that pps fly!

We need more Emu PRs!

What a quagmire...

Pretty much the same a toilet paper. About $1.40 per hundred shares/sheets. Nah, I'll pass

-
¢-¢-¢-¢-¢ BEWARE VPLM BEWARE -¢-¢-¢-¢-¢

Hmmm...where have I ever heard that before? Sounds familiar...

Standing on head holding breath..

Here is the future of
-¢-¢-¢-¢-¢ vplm -¢-¢-¢-¢-¢

https://investorshub.advfn.com/uimage/uploads/2014/9/8/nsrhzltiss120706_TIV-picsay.jpg

That's exactly right and when viewed in that light, all the weird moves we've seen for years makes sense. Delay is the name of the game for as long as possible so as to keep being beneficiaries. That's why you'll see more monkey wrenches thrown to cause delays to any discovery phase. I've been calling it right for years & years because vplm is an open book to those who can read & comprehend in an objective way.

No, the lawsuit is not on their side because the patents are worthless & there is no infringment. Been saying it for years & years & it keeps "holding up".

"The only thing that will be squirming to get out is Timmy’s rodent collection down in Waco!!"


Not a chance. Apple is ridiculously strong, healthy, powerful, rich & doesn't even bat an eyelash at Waco & certainly not vplm. The only reason they fight back is because that's what you do when accused of something, you fight back (just instruct your lawyers to) so you dont lose by default. Duh.

Yup funny is right...how everything gets twisted & changed from what really was said...

No one said anything about filing a lawsuit with "maybe infringement". I clearly said that when vplm finally got around to sending out infringement letters to the companies, they did not tell or accuse them of infringement. They told them they might want to take a look things as they "might be infringing". Funniest thing I ever saw. By the way, keep em coming...its good that readers see who tells the truth & who twists. At the time, shareholders were complaining to vplm for a LONG TIME that they needed to send out letters of infringement. Those who pay attention will recall this. Day after day, vplm was getting bitched at for not sending out the letters. Shareholders were begining to say vplm was basically a punk, too scared to send out letters of infringement. I've been here all along for 10 or so & paying very close attention to the actions & non actions of vplm. Most prolly have no recollection of this. Finally, after a very long time, I can't remember exactly how long, vplm notified us that they sent the letters, I believe to the ghost list of about 60. I call it a ghost list because vplm, on their website, named all the companies on the list, but then they must have found out the were slandering them or something, I don't know what, because shortly after they posted that list, then they removed it from the website and it was never seen again. I fan only guess that they had serious evidence of any infringment so maybe that's why they were told they had to remove the list of names. I can't think of any other reason aside from another possibility is they knew there was no infringement, just bluffing, so they were advised to take down the list of names. That's my guess. When I have facts, I present them as facts & usually have supporting docs, when it's my theory or opinion, I state it as much. Of course that does no good as the words always get changed & twisted to fit convenient agendas that don't care about accuracy or truth or decency. So they published some of the letters and I began calling them "love letters" as they were not letters of infringement. They were silly, bluffy letters that basically said the company might be infringing & to please take a look/see. The letters were ridiculous but were exactly what you'd expect from a big bluffer. All vplm has been trying to accomplish all this time is to bluff their way thru this & to convince some dumb company to offer a settlement or to license. They never wanted to actually sue in court since they know all too well that there is no infringment happening and they could never prove it. But as time went on, they Hani choice but to file a few suits to not only make it look real, but they could only dally for so long w/o filing. Ever since, they've done whatever they could to delay any trials from moving fwd to the point where they will finalky be exposed as the bluffing bullshitters they are. They do not want to get to discovery, they want to entice some settlements. None of these companies will ever settle as they know they aren't infringing because the patents are bogus. All the army of lawyers could care less, they are mercenaries & that's why lawyers have the rep they do. They don't care who's right & wrong, they care about getting paid. I don't think there's any contingency going on. There have been an army of lawyers & we were hoaxed into believing they were on contingency. I think a couple of them may've been on contingency for a short amt of time before they could see where that was going and how much work they'd have to do & quickly put a halt to that crap... It's really cool that by twisting my words and well researched info, it sets me up for this pique, where I must show how the dots connect for all to see. So far, pretty much everything I've said has been proven or backed up w/documentation or came true, consistently and if it didnt, I'm sure the proof would be shown, but it hasn't been. So I'm thankful for the oppotuities to spell out what vplm had done to rip you off and show how easily I always am able to predict what will happen (like all the monkey wrenches) or he able to refute some bogus predictions about this, that & the other about to happen & then say it won't & then be shown correct everytime.

No good stuff is about to hapoen aside from the very entertaining events where we see vplm have painted themselves into a corner & watch the Emu squirm to get out.

Coming soon!!!

Absolutely no evidence of infringement has ever been shown in any way shape or form. Vplm has only told the various companies that "maybe they are infringing". And vplm has came up with the cash to keep trying to sue for years with no success. I dont think they even want to get to discovery as that's where the house of cards will begin to fall apart and they will lose their cash cow fiat share printing/selling machine. Watch & see what happens..

Some patents were rendered invalid by koh.

And it took them a whole year & 3 seperate panels plus the very real threat of being brought up on RICO charges by a very important & influential man, Tom Sawyer. And the orig ptab boss had to be forced out due to major conflicts & her blatant announcement that she would not follow the rules. Other panel judges were found to be in conflict. The ptab was unequivocally shown to be a corrupt agency. And no company before or since has ever gotten a unanimous positive judgement like that. The ptab was famous for invalidating in most cases. It was a farce decision.. Totally bogus in my opinion. But it gave nothing to vplm anyway, outside of what it had all along, except for some help in temporarily boosting the pps.

But don't forget. A valid patent doesn't mean there is any need for it, nor any efficacy, nor any value.

That's right. All patents are "valid" the moment they are born, until someone comes along and proves them to be invalid. The IPRs tried to do that but the instigators lost their chance to do so. Vplm didn't win anything though. After the ptab decision was handed down, vplm did not have ANYTHING more than what they had beforehand.

I think the current # of investors is far less than 45k. Also, the ptab decision was in 2017, not 18. And it was not a "win". It was vplm simply defending & maintaining the patent validity they had from day one. Nothing gained. Nothing lost. Simply maintained.. And there won't be any buyout because no one is interested in buying the worthless patemts & there is no proof of infringement & it likely to ever be.

Everyone knows that "patience is a virtue" & "in the BEST position ever, are the 2 biggest lies ever told!

Made up, contrived, biased & outright lies is what has been spewed, usually with zero documentation. I have posted hundreds of documents to back up what I report. Good ex is all the copied from official court documents that I just posted to prove the lie that's been spewed here for a long time about how vplm won the case against locksmith. And how the 100 mm+ shares were returned. We all know the source. It was blatant & unequal lies! I posted the documents that proved beyond any doubt that the case was digi vs vplm & vplm lost. It was crystal clear and it named the main defendants as Emu Malik & Tom Sawyer (as well as candy & tucker & one of the Vancouver thugs. We were told over and over that the ones to found against by the jury, were really r Kipping & Kwan, but I showed that to not be true. And immed after it was called lies. They are official court docs. So most know who is telling the truth & who is not by simply reading the docs and the facts. I've been posting the old PRs overloaded w/lies for years.

The story is not fabricated. It's 100% documented fact from filings & PRs & the so called "conference calls" (infomercials). All you have to do is connect few dots. In most cases I have the docs. I can't seem to find the one that digi-phony-ca filed when they said they wanted out & had paid roughly 1/2 mil for the patents & just wanted to get rid of them. I may have forgotten to copy it but it was an official filing that was posted & I read it. Emu himself stated both companies went way back as friends. There are no lies or fabrications. Emu is a known liar. He swore he would stay with the avatar trial to the end, then quit on the 1st DAY, TWICE! He told everyone that vplm had nothing to do with the Sawyer letters & later was forced to admit that indeed he did. How Clintonesque! He's lied repeatedly (along with Sawyer) about alleged imminent buyout deals & offers on the table, etc etc.

Rut-roh...look out below! Falling like a rock. Already touched the .013's