Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[nyt]

"... filed an amicus brief in support of VoIP-Pal's appeal of a district court order invalidating two VoIP-Pal patents as ineligible subject matter."

The above excerpt shows that indeed, 2 patents were effectively deemed invalid, since they were rules as "intelligible subject matter", just like I have asserted several times here. That ruling may or may not have been reversed, I honestly don't know, regardless, it happened as I said my memory served that it did. Someone else said no such thing ever happened. This shows that it did. eos.