Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Let's see how well our PR team does by getting this out in as many relevant sites and publications.
Has there ever been suits brought against people on message boards who essentially do the same things? People who pump stocks with supposed inside information, that promise that the stock will have amazing news or that it would be bought out soon etc, that may improperly induce people to buy or sell a stock? It seems that there should be a law against such behavior.
As has been stated here for years that; the Govt. and major Corp's have been for decades while spending Billions trying to Do the Goo.
Let's suppose that soon (and I pray) that LWLG can do it, faster, cheaper, and greener than has ever been done before, something that the world has anxiously been waiting for. Tell me why the Govt. Intel, DuPont, Google, or any other company that wants to be competitive in the future business world, would have a closed door, unless they got a call from any of our high esteem employees or Board members?
I can see it now, IBM would say, oh let Dell or the others put these amazing chips in their computers, we don't know their Chief Indian, we can't do this!
If they can Do It every door will open to us and we will be rich. If they can't Do It, it doesn't matter who calls them.
As I've stated before, it is now and always will be about the science. Everything else is BS, and I don't mean Smith. I await the day that for the first time they let an independent testing firm test and retest our Goo in a positive manner. That is the only PR news that will tell us that we are at the goal-line and the rocket will take off.
Even if Bozo the Clown, and Ronald McDonald were leading our sales-force we will be able to get in any door.
Gates, Unfortunately I have too much of the gambler in me. I knew of the demand for the Goo working and what the upside of this working could mean. Because of what was told to us by the company and what I thought were knowledgeable posters over the years, have gone all in. The only thing that kept me from selling my wife's unneeded second kidney to buy more was that the stock price, as we have had more and more successes, never showed the upside like a biotechnology or other tech stocks do when they have proven tests. I have always wondered why we never have had independent labs that could confirm our results. I can turn water into wine, but I'm just sayin.
Like I said in an earlier post, burn me once, shame on me. Needless to say I haven't slept well in the last few days. I hope Walter gets some positive factual info from the company.
So then tell us Ronald McDonald what outside independent results have you been basing all of your pumping on over the years?
"I cannot speak to the science because it is not available to me".
Wow what an admission by x. So for the last 6 years when you were telling us all about the science, and how it was a sure thing, and that we needed to buy it, and the stock was such a sure thing that it was going to be bought out any day, what were you basing this on?
What is worst, someone asking questions specific to the actual science that could be hopefully answered by the company, or someone telling us about what is not available to him, with certainty? Who has influenced more people to spend money in a manipulative way?
Which one do we want to say who they really are and what is their agenda? Do we all want to hear only what we want to hear that is positive, or all of the truth? Or can't we handle the truth?
I have for better or worst, most of my investment dollars in this stock, based on information I have gleaned from company PR's and what I initially thought was factual scientifically based information here.
By admitting to all that "I cannot speak to the science because it is not available to me" should open up everyones eyes. Let's ask everybody what are their supposed knowledgeable facts based on? Not just accept what we want to hear and attack what we think is negative.
People like Walter always speak the truth based on facts that they get from the company. Let's continue to have one or two trusted posters ask the company questions that hopefully they will answer and share with us. I no longer (and haven't for a while, after getting burned long ago) will follow the Pied Piper into the sea.
It doesn't matter who is working with this company, other than the scientists, because this is now and always will only be about the science. I am happy that such great people are involved with this company, but who were Gates, Jobs, and others that brought new science and technology to the world before they proved success? There were no Jack Welch's involved.
Let's stay on topic which again is only the science of the Goo.
X how is it that you are now not sure, and you have been basing your years of pumping this science and stock telling many to buy, buy buy with promise of riches now just on the belief of PR reports? You never really understood the details of this science did you, or is BSmith making up all of this?
Generally, has anyone ever successfully been sued for trying to manipulate stock prices with phony MB reports or is it just buyer beware on these social media's?
Anyone know what was wrong that this post #9416 was X-ed off the board and who did it? Something smells fishy that certain gestapo moderators don't like to hear certain historic facts.
Yes Walter I completely agree that we should never allow any unknown actual posters on here without them giving us their real name, address, phone number and pictures of their children. After all this is an Internet message board not some crazy form of social media. Like the famous quote in Dr. Stangelove; There's no fighting in here, this is a war room!"
The last thing we should have in here is the constant opinions of some with only "pseudo background knowledge". The only ones that really count here are all of the scientists from the LWLG labs that report to us weekly what is actually going on in the labs.
Not what some pseudo"scientists" write on this Message board. I mean imaging how bad it would be if for many, many years we had some phony unnamed (with all identities listed above) pumper telling us all to buy the stock now, because the science is done and we are on the goal-line with the rocket being ready to take off and of course we are going to be bought out, even though we have not once had an independent testing lab confirm our statements. Wow thank goodness that has never happened here because that would seem like someone was blowing smoke to manipulate buying and selling for some personal gain.
I don't know B Smith from an x y or z, but can anyone with much greater scientific knowledge than me, tell us that he is full of baloney with any of his specific scientific questions? If by some chance the things that he states actually need to be proven, does that mean that some other resident experts are only just "pseudo scientists"? I'm just sayin that are there real major scientific tests that have not yet been proven to those that really count, or is the world either hypnotized, or just ignorant because our PR guy failed to tell them that we have proven everything that the world desperately needs and would buy into instantly if only we could find some way to spread the word to the world?
We are under a lousy buck for a reason. It either has to do with the lack of proven tested results, or that our management team isn't literally beating up companies to buy our product even though it would help all of their products work faster, cheaper, and cleaner. I can't figure out which reason it is. Are there any experts out there that can help me?
x, I believe you did this same pump a few years ago on Yahoo. While I am 100% all in and a believer in the science there is no evidence that we are ready to cross the goal line. Anyone who listened to the CC knows that is a fact and they are predicting 12-18 months for major commercialization. Are you saying they were not truthful? If we were, why wouldn't the insiders, not only at LWLG, but at the LSS or universities, or Dupont or Government employees or at the undisclosed testing sites, or all of the Mark Cubans, etc. that are all aware of the value to any company that can DO IT not buying on the open market?
We all know that for decades the big boys have spent billions trying to DO IT, but have failed. If any one of them honestly believed that we were at the goal-line ready to commercialize this science that would change the world and literally turn the penny's per LWLG shares in to at least $100, this stock would be now at a minimum $5.00+.
It is selling where it is for a pure reason, we still have a lot of work to do. Have we accomplished an extraordinary amount over the last 2 years? Of course they have, but does that mean that there isn't a lot more to prove than what has been told to us over these MB's? The PPS tells us yes. Some here pumped the stock by saying all we needed was a couple of patents to prove that the Goo worked, and once we got them the rocket would take off so buy the stock. We got them and it was a false pump.
We were told that the many benchmarks that we then would achieve (tests, famous Board members, presenting at important forums etc. etc.) and when either of them was completed, that the stock would explode so buy now! This was all false pumping for whatever the agenda was.
Some here want to crucify and ban those from questioning the science or achievements with legitimate or even false questions or comments that are not positive which we assume are trying to manipulate the stock lower. The same concern from those of us that want to learn the truth about the science and stock, should be placed on unsubstantiated pumping trying to manipulate the stock higher. To me they are 2 sides of the same coin.
I am not against optimistic speculation on what we have and what it can "potentially" do, but to consistently predict (for 5+ years) that everything is proven and there are secrets that I can't tell you but wink wink, we are about to get rich, so buy this stock now or else, is a real disservice to potential investors that may be investing their hard earned cash.
I'm not saying you are a trader tying to manipulate buying so you can sell, and then having negative statements to get people to sell, while doing the opposite to prosper, but you may be.
I'm not saying you may have more than one identity to automatically agree with yourself or condemn those that don't, but you might.
This MB is all anonymous so we never know the whole truth about anyone. I have been in this stock for all 3 names and have been burned for tens of thousands of dollars by initially believing things that I have read here. I am not blaming anyone but myself for not doing the greater DD. Burn me once shame on me. I don't want to see others manipulated with unsubstantiated statements whether from sincere hopes or intentional conspired plans. This MB should only be about the science and only the science. Not speculation positive or negative that may be a scheme to affect the stock price.
I'm just saying, lets all keep it real. You have been wrong hundreds of times with your unsubstantiated predictions so why should people worry that they must have a screw loose if they don't buy now? If this is the lowest risk that you have ever seen in buying now, are you telling us you knew about much greater inherent risk while telling others to buy, or that you really didn't know what was going on while pontificating like an expert?
I hope you are right and tomorrow there will be great news that Intel or Google or someone else is buying us out for $60 a share, but I'm guessing that before that happens we will have to show and prove our Goo to independent and public testing sites. After that there will still need to be many steps that others here that have been scorned, have mentioned that have only to do with the science. I want to be rich now, but there is still much work to be done. And that is an actual fact.
Ok all long-timers, remember why we are all now on IH and not Yahoo? It was the idiotic back and forth with the Gigidiots that was quite honestly precipitated by a certain LWLG stalwart that not only continued to engage them with a reply to every intentionally ball-busting message, but went on their board first which started the whole stupid waste of time.
Let's only stay on topic. Whenever there is an obvious poster looking to manipulate those that respond with outrage, only making their mission a greater success, just put them on ignore. That way you will never see their posts and by not responding which will eliminate the waste of time for all of us reading the responses that will never stop them. Facts or logic are irrelevant as they are not serious with questions or statements. Who cares what their agenda is, as it will not change long-term what the company can and will do.
What happened to post number 9205? Who deleted it and why?
True x. In todays modern era when there are world changing technologies or scientific discoveries made and commercialized, there is no way that these Lil Ol companies can survive those big bad Fortune 500 monsters from taking them over, cheaply before they can prosper.
We remember when how Gates and Microsoft got run over and bought out by IBM. And poor Steve Jobs having to sell out to Sony and AT&T at those ridiculous PPS's when they reinvented the portable music and phone industry. They never had a chance to grow the share prices to the hundreds of dollars before selling out.
And even more currently those poor suckers that started Facebook and Twitter, left with just pennies on the thousands of what they and their shareholders could have earned if they just weren't too small at the beginning.
Too bad we have as you have told us many times, a bunch of fools running this company, that are not smart enough to maximize our share value IF we can Do the GOO.
IF we can Do the GOO there would be no intelligent reasons to sell-out until we are at least at $100.00 per share. To keep pontificating about this (for 3+ years) while we are under a $1.00 and without a penny of income is ludicrous.
The only way we would be bought out in the next couple of years would be that management has failed to being able to bring this to market, and the company had run out of money to continue. We would be bought out for pennies. If you are right that we will be bought out soon, it will be for all of the wrong reasons.
I agree Walter. I believe the reason there is such a disconnect with many of the shareholders and the company is that if you read the MB's, the so called experts made you believe that all we needed originally was an approved patent. We were promised once we had it, it proved that we were done and the rocket ship was ready to take off. Of course that was not true
Then we were told when just one of the tests was positive (tested by unnamed companies that we paid) we we were done and the rocket ship was ready to take off. Of course that was not true.
Then we were told that just because we hired or added to the board someone of high credentials, and that they would only come because we proved the Goo, we were done and at the 1 yard line. Of course that was not true.
Time and time again we were told that we had proven the world changing science, and any day we were going to take off and make a fortune. When anyone suggested that there were many peels to this onion that needed proven, people wanted to attack them as evil agents with a mission. Even if they were, their questions about certain tests might be accurate and a reason that we are not at $50 a share. There are real reasons we are under a dollar, that ONLY has to do with the science.
I admit early on(3 name changes ago and on another MB) I bought in to this pumping hype and bought shares at a higher rate. Burned I learned to read more and understand that there was a reason that multi-billion dollar companies for decades tried and failed to solve this equation for a reason, it is not easy.
It is and always will be about the science. If we had the 3 best CEO's in the world running LWLG, does any intelligent person believe that Intel or any other major corporation would risk their future with a product that isn't 100% proven and repeated over a long period of time? Of course not. Is our CEO making prudent financial decisions? Is he hiring more scientists, improving in house lab's and building another lab next to what apparently is the best location of outside scientists working for the same goal? Those to me are the most important decisions and actions that they can perform.
We may or may no ever prove and commercialize this science, but I believe the steps taken over the last couple of years are the right ones. The Mgt maybe should not have promised some things that were said, but I assume they did it with hope and confidence in the Goo, not to manipulate the share price. I can't say the same thing about the motives of some of the pumpers ( I would suggest they are traders looking to get people to buy, so they can sell, and visa versa). I hope that many of the shortsighted and short-term traders blew out of their shares yesterday and we won't continue to hear them blaming, blameless reasons that the stock is not higher.
Let me say it again, it is now and always will be about the science. Until we have a device that we can take to an Intel, a Mark Cuban, or the secret military departments, that they can show to be faster, cheaper and even greener than what is in the market we will be where we are now. Period.
Best of luck to the patient long-termer's.
I haven't had a chance to review the recording yet. Where in the CC did they tell us about the imminent buyout that we have been continuously told about on this MB? BTW the daily number in NY will be 714. It may be in a year or 4 but when it happens, I will have told you all so.
Let's just keep to the reality of the science and their slow but steady progress in this arduous process. Anyone who expected that they were going to announce deals was misguided. They are obligated to announce such things within a certain amount of time after getting them, so we knew they weren't keeping it in their pockets.
The contract disappointment aside, was there anything that was announced that was negative in regard to the science of the Goo? Until they have it on a chip or whatever other format that they can plug in to show independent testing groups how it is faster, cheaper, and greener everything else is superfluous.
Their burn rate is relatively cheap and they are good at this rate for almost another year. I didn't hear anything that would make me sell my shares, as I am a longterm holder and not a trader. Until there is a competitor who has something better for market, or we announce that the Goo is Pooh there's nothing to do but wait, and wait some more. I want to be rich now, but as they say, it is what it is.
Good luck to all patient longs!
I think we should ban anybody that gives false positive information that might cause people to buy the stock at a higher price while that person might be actually selling. Anyone who tells people that we are about to get bought out at a higher price is as bad as anyone saying that our product won't work.
This is about the most inane discussion that I have encountered on a Message Board.
Walter, here and on the Yahoo board you have always been professional, stayed mostly on topic (although I don't mind hearing about your golf adventures either) and shared pertinent detail. That is what this MB is supposed to be. Personal attacks, phony hype positive or negative should be done on the other social networks.
We don't need cheerleaders or detractors trying to have a personal gain, by influencing those that can't think on their own.
I believe LWLG is making slow strides towards solving a very difficult puzzle and hope it's solved sooner than later, but the only thing that matters is the science. There are many small details that we don't know about that must be proven before the experts start to buy this stock. If somebody is letting us know what they are, and why the share price isn't higher, just because we have patents, and great people on board, I want to learn about it.
I admit I had in the past been mislead by hype on these MB's and lost money. I want to make sure that we "keep it real".
Yes, We don't want anyone here that asks scientific questions on a highly technical product. Anyone that asks a question that isn't a personal attack but just scientific doesn't belong here.
We need more people, just saying (for the last 5 years) that we are at the goal line and the rocket is ready to take off, and I'm going to buy more shares and y'all should too etc. That's the only thing we need to hear. By the way even though for the last 5 years we haven't produced 1 commercial piece of anything, we were very close to being bought out, so y'all should buy more shares (while I'm probably selling mine).
We need more people here attacking another company that has nothing to do with our message board that will bring their people on our message board ruining it that we all needed to move here.
We all know that if you ask questions that have not been answered that details very technical items, which unless we prove to the scientific world, the stock will remain low, you have a secret agenda. We need to know where anyone who asks these questions lives so we can get the pitchforks.
Why attack somebody that is asking scientific questions? There obviously are a bunch of reasons that this stock isn't $10 higher if we were on the 1 yard line and ready for the rocket to take off as some of the "experts" on this and previously for years on Yahoo websites have espoused. MANY years ago I bought this stock and continued to buy more, and have lost money, believing these expert views that once we get our first patent it would prove the science and we would take off and be bought out.
Then once we presented at the science shows that we did, we would takeoff and be bought out. Then once certain experts from major corp's joined our team, we must be ready to takeoff as they wouldn't be here unless we have proven that the Goo can do.
I still believe in this company and group that they have assembled, and have never sold a single share (something the main man here admitted to doing, not long after he pumped that we were at the 1 yard line). But I learned that despite all of the hype this is a long road that has to be traveled, with many tests needed solved.
As we all have heard, giant Corporations and the Government for decades have spent billions of dollars trying to do what we are trying to do. If we were so close that silly predictions for years that we are about to be bought out, why wouldn't this stock be at least near $20+? Do any of us think that all of those Corp's that spent billions are not still trying to find the solutions that would be world changing? Wouldn't a Mark Cuban or other brilliant tech savvy billionaires be buying this dirt cheap on the public market? Of course they would.
So why is this stock hanging around a lousy buck when it was $3.00+ years ago? Just saying, they must still have plenty of work to do. When we send out news of our latest great test results they aren't done in front of the science world, it's usually with an unnamed group. Whenever we are ready to go to market, and I pray it's soon, cause I want to be rich too, they will be demonstrating all of the things needed before outside testing groups where we have no control.
Mr. Smith has asked technical questions about things that our "experts" never even mentioned. Why attack him and ask him personal questions or to talk about other companies products? The only thing as a shareholder that I care about about is our Goo and where it is along the trail of repeated success testing of its properties, and do we have enough money to keep pursuing it. Period.
This will be proven in the lab, and thank goodness for the smart decision to bring it in house, not relying on advanced students. It doesn't matter who is running the company, who our PR person is, or where anyone lives. It's a science project that we are trying to win the blue ribbon, and only the scientists can make that happen. Everything else is minutia. If there are 5-10 things that need to be proven, I don't hate on someone bringing it to my attention. If those are made up issues, please expose these as false. I don't want to hear only positive messages, unless they are true, and I am not against negative questions about the science if they are valid.
The numbers and information looks great to the best of my limited scientific knowledge. I suppose that if I am a financial firm that is viewing this slide presentation, with probably even less technological knowledge of this that we have, I would say that this looks good on paper, but we can put anything on paper promising the moon.
I hope that we will also have a working devise, whatever that is, that would demonstrate what we are talking about. The proverbial a picture is worth a thousand words rings true, especially with world changing technology. My question is, how would we show the world in a presentation how and what the Goo can do? Can it be demonstrated in front of a group, or is the increased speed that it works undetectable to the eye? If those that understand the technology here were in a room deciding to invest money in LWLG, what would you expect to see?
Terry, if we ever hit the big pay dirt, and all get together for a victory party, I am putting you neat the top of the list of people I would like to share a drink with. I enjoy your perspectives with fresh and amusing input on what is becoming a long slow tedious journey. Hopefully we will end in the promised land faster than it took Moses et-al.
Graphene,
Can someone please explain to those of us less knowledgeable of the science how this relates to our Goo?
http://triblive.com/news/allegheny/4846546-74/graphene-research-material#axzz2ixic6C7y
Good point x I mean weak. Thank goodness Edwin Drake, Alexander Graham Bell, J. C. Licklider, George W. Carver, Thomas Edison, Bill Gates, Paul Allen, Steve Jobs, Steve Wozniak, Mark Zuckerman just to name a few were all multi-millionaires and billionaires when they came up with their inventions. Otherwise they never would have had any investors begging to jump on board to invest in their world changing ideas.
We are living in a time when somebody can get millions invested in some movie or other pretty silly ideas just over the Internet.
Those corporations that failed after spending billions of dollars would probably pay at least $0.75 more to buy the company, right?
This stock was selling for more than $3.00 years ago on rumors that they were about to get a patent on the Goo, and you want us to hope to get bought out for less than that amount? Nobody has hyped this stock longer (see Yahoo message board) and more ofter than you, but you want to sell it for 300 pennies?
Come on tell us the truth, are you part of a group that will try to steal this potentially greatest invention in modern times from the dumb shareholders or are you not really a believer that IF we can do the GOO it isn't worth more than a few hundred pennies? What is your real agenda here?
X using your "golden rule" as a starting point, why would anyone want to sell the golden goose for peanuts after it lays the second golden egg (showing it can repeat the act)?
If corporations have spent billions of dollars trying to perfect this, who would settle for selling this stock, if all the unlimited applications are at our door begging for the Goo, for less than $100 a share?
If we have patents which protect us against competition and potentially have unlimited upside, what kind of bird in hand (selling out for a few dollars a share) is worth more than letting this company do nothing but gain more and more and more market share over time as the world's corporations would adjust to to Perk, or else go our of business to their competition that does it faster, cheaper, cleaner etc?
Even if as I believe you or someone else had stated previously that the principals of this company are old and would want to cash out, that logic would mean that all of these great people that you have properly espoused about are charlatans looking for a fast buck. Wouldn't they want to see the stock rise to a greater amount for their families future also?
I've been in this stock for longer than most, and would certainly vote against selling this soon or cheaply IF after all of these years of testing and slow progress have finally achieved the world changing technology that the Government or any of the worlds top corporations couldn't.
I appreciate your scientific and historic input on LWLG, but please explain to us how selling something that almost every corporation selling anything that has a chip in it would have to buy to stay in business, with a patent that would give us the exclusive control for years, would make sense financially or intellectually to sell before it has a chance (at least 5 years) to even coming close to it's shareholders value?
BSmith. Anything about the last news release that proves to you that they have progressed scientifically?
Nice update X. I was thinking also that we will be getting more eyes on this MB and a LWLG update was a good idea. Hopefully we don't get some of the sleazy penny stock news letters pumping this up short-term and then drops without the immediate follow up news/orders. We've seen this a couple of times before.
Perhaps with informative detail of this world changing science, more long-term buyers will join us.
Has anyone seen if the LWLG news release has been picked up by any of the top science/technology sites?
Odd, I think we may feel underwhelmed to some degree because of the ridiculous connecting of the dots by some of the IH "experts". If anyone truly understands that as a developmental stage science/technology company, it is a slow arduous process to change the world.
Those that even talked about us getting bought out years ago are really misleading some people to buy this stock. I am very long and still strong but there are still a ton of hoops to jump through before we are ready to sell the Goo to somebody for profit on a regular basis.
I don't understand why the name of the third party and any other relevant numbers were withheld? As Mr. Smith brought to our attention, if he was correct, they need to prove in a publicly proven demonstration whatever the science world needs to see done, and repeated as needed. Hopefully that will be next in this process.
x, I don't really care about the personal comments by Smith. I am more interested in the scientific questions he raised. I know little about the science but if you can answer his questions about certain numbers and bands etc, to see if he is correct or misleading us.
I would like to hear your expert answers. Is he correct that LWLG has not been able to prove and repeat to the numbers that are required, before any experts would come in and buy this stock?
We don't need to cast negative opinions of people here. Let's stay on the science. After all, we all can recount that one of the experts on this board told people on Yahoo to sell their stock, right before they bought some more (just for the kids). And how 3 years ago, we were just days away from being bought out, as we had the science proven and ready for market. I am guessing that people who believed that, bought more and drove the stock price higher. Certainly that would be a good time to sell some shares and then come back later and at a lower price, after again and again that crazy idea was proven false.
Let's just stay on the science.
Good luck to all longs
Pitcook
Wow, Intel has been working on this project for 2 years and is only now presenting it publicly? I hope all of their unhappy minor shareholders were screaming for the firing of their CEO and board members for not doing this faster.
Of course this innovative technology, to my limited knowledge, is probably minuscule compared to the disruptive technology that LWLG is trying to perfect. Why can't we make our scientists and customer, do it as fast as our critics here want? Don't they know how anxious they are? Maybe if they yell at them more here, they will resolve the scientific issues faster.
Smars I agree, if it was our Goo, the share price would be at least $5.00. There are too many people involved in all of the processes that would look and see LWLG at a buck and change, and be buying it up. For years there has been hundreds of dots put together at Yahoo and here that have been 100% wrong. These incorrect predictions have raised the hopes of many readers of the MB and when they don't occur there is rage and accusations towards the officers of the company.
If shareholders haven't figured out that this is a SLOW process and things go at the pace that they go. As frustrating as it is, if this technology is truly going to change the world, potential customers are going to first make sure that it works over a long time. They don't want to put chips in devices and learn that after 1-2 years it turns to rust etc.
I wish that our dream order will be coming today or tomorrow, but I expect that it probably won't. Doesn't mean that it's the fault of the CEO or PR person. It's called science, and it needs to be tested and proven over and over.
Great information rj.....whatever your agenda is. Now go get your shine box.
x your technical input is appreciated as an asset to this MB, but your ridiculous fighting with the Gig people ruined the Yahoo board which is why most of us switched to the Hub. Please spare us from this stupid ego battle and stay on subject like everyone else here.
RJ if Phil's call is the only reason that you didn't sell all of your shares, I think you should sell all of your shares. If you listened and did not comprehend what this company is trying to do and has accomplished so far, how did you and others ever decide to invest here in the first place? Did you think they were close to producing revenues whenever you bought in?
This science isn't about making a better mousetrap, it's about changing the mouse. It probably won't be a serious cash streamed company for 1-2 years. Everyone who tries to predict what the stock will do the next day, and pretend that any charts are relevant to a company without any revenues are seriously mistaken in what this company is, and is trying to achieve.
I've been a shareholder through all name changes and want this to take off to the moon. The longer I'm in and understanding what they are up against, and how long and hard any major potential customer will analyze and test, it's obvious that it's a long time consuming step by step process.
Thanks to all who asked the relevant questions today.
F2, I agree that the name might not be public. Although it appears that we have put all of our eggs in one basket, if it's Intel, IBM, Apple or any other major brands, I would find it highly unlikely that we are the only "new" technology that this company is testing.
Think about how important it is for these top tech companies to stay on the leading edge. How many hot tech companies have come and gone? So before anyone of them is ready to leap into the GOO or any other new tech's. they are going to test and test all that is out there, not just ours, to find the best one that works, and maintains it's usage over a specific period of time.
We all here feel that ours is the best, but we don't know what is going on in every secret lab around the world. These top international corporations do, and I assume they have their fingers in anything that might come out on top. That's why we are all so frustrated that deals and contracts haven't been signed yet.
It's just another reason that the talk of buyouts and mergers at this early stage is so ridicules.
x,thanks for singlehandedly keeping the stock over a dollar. Once again you saved us all. Almost like superman (thanks Purple).
Nobody has pushed the buyout idea stronger or longer than you going back for years on the Yahoo MB. So tell us all why you would want to settle for one golden egg rather than a hen house full?
By the way, we all know how much you hate blogging on these MB's, and how hard you tried to stop all of the stupid communications with the Gig's on Yahoo. Thanks for all that you do.
The buyout talk is too silly. First we haven't sold piece one. Second if we really Do the Goo we instantly become one of the Big Boys! The potential applications are more than all of us combined can dream of, and every year there will be that many more new applications.
No company in their right mind no matter how old the people in charge might be would ever sell for less than $100 per share plus stock in the other company.
But again, lets first prove it works with the results hopefully soon to come. Then if all is good, let the market decide what we are worth. It would be like owning the only goldmine in the world and selling it for some donkeys because the old ones are tired. I know there were much better analogies but I'm trying to pass a kidney stone and can't concentrate!
Agreed that the volume increase is a good sign, but let's not forget that the last time it jumped to more than $3.00 (pre-overly hyped CC) it was the day traders from the bogus financial newsletters that really drove that. After the "normal" CC where nothing amazing was announced we fell back to reality.
We saw recently that a financial penny stock newsletter hyped LWLG after the most recent announcement and I believe some of this increase is from that. Until we get regular volume in the 800,000+ area, I wouldn't get too excited that the longterm buyers are coming in. Hope it happens soon.
Gary, I completely agree that there will be an obvious bounce in volume (800k+ per day) and share price ($4.00-$6.00) before there is any indication that all of the fantasies expressed on this MB are true. With a world changing technology there would not be any way to keep it secret. The fact that we have not had any kind of real rumors other than on this board, to me , proves this.
I have no doubt that we are making steady progress on a very long trail to success, but to believe that we are ready to merge with Intel or any other company is very hopeful, but doubtful.
With all of the social media and other outlets someone from the labs, or mgt. would be telling their cousins etc. about it, and volume, pps and talk would all be on the rise.
SS, that is a fair assessment of what the expectations should be. I wasn't really commenting on your projections of what may transpire on Friday, other than your email was the most recent to my checking here.
It's others that are predicting that the stock will drop 40% just because there may not be a contract with Intel or other major partners announced this week. I admit that I used to expect BIG things were just around the corner, thanks to the many unproven predictions from the mayor of the Yahoo MB but burn me 27 times, and I have learned to temper my expectations.
Let's just hope that the science has been advanced from the last CC/letter to the shareholders, all previous companies testing our Goo are still on board, and anything else will be gravy. The sooner this comes the closer we will be to partying with Mr. Purple
"Let the most pivotal week in the history of Lightwave Logic begin!!"
What possible reason are people expecting that the CC will be about signed contracts or other news that will send this stock into orbit? If there was major news, they would have been obligated by SEC rules to disclose it within a certain period of time, which would have been by now.
The Admiral promised to keep the shareholders informed on a regular basis, and that is probably all that this is. I am hoping for much more but with the exception of a few nice days of buying, there has not been the stock price movement that would indicate this. We all know that if we have achieved the success to change the world, it would not be a secret. If anyone working with us or the supposed partner, knew of the hopeful achievement, word would have been shared and the stock easily would be up 3-5 points.
If this is another update on the testing etc. which I expect, and not some grand announcement, any of you who get depressed and want heads to roll, deserve your angst. This is a scientific developmental company without a piece of product to sell. No CEO, CTO or anyone else will make the stock price go higher, until the science is proven, duplicated and then watched to see how it survives the test of time.
If you don't understand what this is, how did you spend your hard earned money buying this? I hate to say it but patience is what is needed without emotional outbursts if thing don't go according to those outside of the companies time frame. It has to be 100% exact, before we take the first step toward selling anything