X using your "golden rule" as a starting point, why would anyone want to sell the golden goose for peanuts after it lays the second golden egg (showing it can repeat the act)?
If corporations have spent billions of dollars trying to perfect this, who would settle for selling this stock, if all the unlimited applications are at our door begging for the Goo, for less than $100 a share?
If we have patents which protect us against competition and potentially have unlimited upside, what kind of bird in hand (selling out for a few dollars a share) is worth more than letting this company do nothing but gain more and more and more market share over time as the world's corporations would adjust to to Perk, or else go our of business to their competition that does it faster, cheaper, cleaner etc?
Even if as I believe you or someone else had stated previously that the principals of this company are old and would want to cash out, that logic would mean that all of these great people that you have properly espoused about are charlatans looking for a fast buck. Wouldn't they want to see the stock rise to a greater amount for their families future also?
I've been in this stock for longer than most, and would certainly vote against selling this soon or cheaply IF after all of these years of testing and slow progress have finally achieved the world changing technology that the Government or any of the worlds top corporations couldn't.
I appreciate your scientific and historic input on LWLG, but please explain to us how selling something that almost every corporation selling anything that has a chip in it would have to buy to stay in business, with a patent that would give us the exclusive control for years, would make sense financially or intellectually to sell before it has a chance (at least 5 years) to even coming close to it's shareholders value?
