Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
GrooveMaster, I'll get in touch with you if you are truly interested in purchasing over 32,000 shares of this "DYNAMO". It CAN be arranged.
stick, how about just buying my shares at a "break even" price and I'll stop posting here?
kickyballs, I am making a "bundle" on another stock right now and it's just "warming up". But I'm tired of continued talk from NVEI and NOTHING that REALLY MOVES this share price. If I were a "newbie" I probably wouldn't be so frustrated with this company.
I don't know for sure but, as paranoid as some of you are about my basically demanding a REALLY significant PR after all these years, I'm wondering about some others true motives as well.
So BeaverDam, it doesn't bother you in the least that the share price continues to drift lower and lower, resulting in 144s being sold at lower and lower prices? This is really costing shareholders in the form of more and more dilution which will make it harder and harder to get the share price up, "IF" NVEI ever does produce a viable tech.
This is especially troublesome while watching the markets in general, go up.
GrooveMaster, check the share price. I want NVEI to actually do something to get the share price up, so shareholders don't suffer from so much dillution. Obviously, the movie isn't doing it. It looks like until NVEI PROVES they can get funding and PROVES the tech is LEGITIMATE, the share price is in jeopardy. IMO
How can NVEI stay out of the .20s much longer without funding or independent verification that the tech has LEGITIMATE potential? The movie hasn't been able to generate much enthusiasm for investing in NVEI judging by the recent price action.
TFN, something just doesn't seem to add up, does it?
The_Free_Nebula, if funding continues to be a "bugaboo" for NVEI, maybe shareholders need to make a bunch of calls to Ketch expressing our desire for this type of approach to be seriously considered.
sauceishot, how does what Ketch told you compare to what Ketch told cosmo? Maybe this should be cleared up for all shareholders to see with another RAQ.
cobra, I'm fairly sure that I read somewhere, that NVEI is now looking elsewhere for a lender. Nevertheless, we need to keep an eye on those authorized shares so they are used for the intended and stated purpose. Agreed?
In regards to the recent vote to authorize additional shares.
I posted, "I am concerned about the authorized shares being presented with the premise being, that they were to be used, primarily, as collateral for securing a loan from Mercatus. Now, from what I understand, it doesn't look like the Mercatus deal is going to happen. What are they going to do with all those shares? Does this have shades of the "reverse-split for getting on NASDAQ" on it? This deal was too "iffy" to suit me. That's why I voted against it. Please don't consider this a "bash". It's just something, as shareholders, we need to be concerned about. It's our company and our money."
sauseishot responded, "Austin I asked Brad that very question and it was brough up in the s/h meeting question and answer period. Brad's answer: the shares won't be used if the Mercatus loan does not take place."
If this is the case, we need to keep an eye on those shares, if not used as collateral for securing a Mercatus loan, and hold Ketch accountable. Further dilution MUST be kept to a minimum and be used with prudence.
Cobra, do you feel from NVEI's past history, they deserve our "blind" trust now?
I don't really have any choice but to sell (and take a financial "beating"), or hold and continue to encourage this company to provide evidence that what they say is "factual".
I was really interested in the impressions you shared from your meetings with Ketch. Please continue to give us any insights you may gain as to the company's direction.
dilt, a little judgemental there, aren't you? I have called the company in the past and my recent attempts to connect with Ketch have failed. He did return my calls, eventually. We just haven't been able the get together "schedule-wise". You can be assured, eventually, he'll be hearing from me again.
As far as the meeting goes. I would have really liked to have been there to make face-to-face inquiries about what's going on with my investment. In my case, it was difficult to get away.
By the way, I wasn't real pleased with your inference.
Oh, I get it, if I have the "gall" to ask tough questions about the company I have invested in, I shouldn't be a shareholder. Baloney!!!
excel says, "NV has decided not to disclose the two companies that according to them were testing our technology, once again missing out on a tech PR while keeping it a SECRET!"
Does NVEI really expect us to "just take their word for it" that testing went well, without having these companies ACTUALLY validate it? Unbelievable!!! No wonder the share price remains in the "doldrums" after another "upbeat" shareholders' meeting.
Knock, Knock, NVEI, it's called "credibility" and you need it, regarding the tech.
What two companies have been testing Embarq? If I understand correctly, that testing is completed, the tech tested positive, and the tech will be "frozen". Ok, that's cool! Just to validate these claims, who did the testing? Shouldn't shareholders be provided this information about their investment?
I am concerned about the authorized shares being presented with the premise being, that they were to be used, primarily, as collateral for securing a loan from Mercatus. Now, from what I undertand, it doesn't look like the Mercatus deal is going to happen. What are they going to do with all those shares? Does this have shades of the "reverse-split for getting on NASDAQ" on it? This deal was too "iffy" to suit me. That's why I voted against it. Please don't consider this a "bash". It's just something, as shareholders, we need to be concerned about. It's our company and our money.
Y2K, I'm confident your daughter will be included in many concerned people's prayers before, during and after her surgery.
fam, you're probably right. But my feeling is, that the discontent that led to that decision was perpetuated "right here". We'll probably never know for sure, will we?
Surfca, NVEI definately has a "shareprice problem" and a long, uphill battle to qualify for NASDAQ.
Thanks Y2K. By the way, I hope your daughter is doing well.
buffalo, I feel you really "reaching" with you "HUMAN FAILURES/BASHER THEORY".
Would their have been voluntary salary reductions without the expressed shareholder discontent about the high salaries brought forth on this forum? I doubt it. JMO
If NVEI has a "proven" hot tech, I still feel a partner with "deep pockets" may want to get in on the action enough to agree to a "sweetheart" deal to assist in the funding for a "piece of the action".
NorthernTrader and hitimer, I found your recent posts very interesting. Thanks for the input.
Sid, what ever happened to that "hot info" info you thought you had a while back?
Will NVEI likely be "dead money" for the rest of this year unless there is announced funding? What are the chances of an announced funding PR in 2003? 50/50 maybe???
excel, are you sure NVEI hasn't been in the .20s within the last six months? Yahoo has ".27" as the 52 week low.
cosmo says, "It cant be helped if a loan is not closed and dillution contineus with the new shares..."
Please refer to my message #16121 and please comment.
cosmo, do you see the .20s coming again in the process?
It seemed to me like spokeshave was trying to help fellow shareholders figure out what might be going on with their investment when some others seemed MIA. Thanks spokeshave for your efforts.
So NVEI has the tech, but doesn't have the funds to develop it.
If NVEI can't get the resources to do this thing "right" I would hope they have the good sense to search for a partner that DOES. Or maybe consider an outright "sell-out" (at a reasonable price). I hope they don't let pride and greed get in the way, at the expense of shareholders.
If Ketch establishes a sound company financially and the tech impresses a "major company", I feel a "buyout" would be the best possibility of getting shareholders $5 a share for their investment by late 2004 or early 2005. Any thoughts on the "buyout" potential after digesting the info from the meeting?
Any chance NVEI could be bought out earlier than late 2004 considering the tech timeline?
So Cobra, do you feel $3 is achievable in 2004?
famlydog, so you feel that a "buyout" may possibly be in the company's "game plan"?
Was there a 50,000 "sell" today? I hope some somebody with LOTS of shares isn't "unloading" or NVEI could see the .20s again.
cosmo, wonder who's selling today? You think some frustrated "longs" that are tired of waiting on funding and the tech?
So famlydog, what would your answers be?
Two "yes" or "no" questions pertaining to RIM's future share price potential. From the information that you have recieved and digested from yesterday's shareholders' meeting. Do you feel that RIM has a realistic, legitimate chance to reach 1) $3 per share sometime in 2004 2) $8 per share sometime in 2005 ?
If you choose to support your answers, as well, it would be appreciated.
Why is the share price down today after NVEI seemed to make a good presentation yesterday?