Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Hopefully some of the manipulators. They can move and let this rise more naturally. And then not scare away new eyes when we get them.
Who's the idiots selling now? Just prior to fins?
Well that's nearly everything. Good.
That's probably it, right?
There are different approaches. We could have a stock that announces everything and it waves back and fluke a flag in the wind. Or we have here a company that only announces firm knowledge.
With the rest of pennyland the former I like this being as is.
Granted it's a ways out but I think by the time the current fundamental improvement continues on paper you'll have missed out on some potential room.
There is a lot of evidence that the current increase in revenue generation is going to continue.
Definitely manipulation, which also hurt the manipulators. We've had a number of new eyes and buyers but they're scaring off. Talk about shooting self in foot.
These people don't even know how to game things right. Manipulation is bad enough. This is stupid manipulation.
I could use more as well.
Now seems to be the time to get them!
I'm ready! Very interested in the report.
I guess some people don't count for distribution channels, etc. We've covered this topic at length, along with others.
So who are all the resellers/implementors/contactors?
Alvarez, Intersections, ADC?
On the gov side anyone is free to scan fbo.gov for Federal RFPs. There was a USAF release last Monday for cybersecurity awareness, something with awards for the contract but the contract is more to test fully potentials that would lead to direct awards or other RFP opportunities. It can take a bit to go through these. I sent the USAF opp to SFOR, btw.
Yep, upwards by value and down by manipulators.
Those are good lots.
Glad you did! Thank you
Check my posts f from this morning. I had figured a lot of this out from the maths. Good to have some kind of confirmation.
For certain status checks every mid-month starting January. Every other month are in person.
Of course those deals bring revenue, but likely small charges per transaction. Reliable.
Now imagine all the transactions used by everyone using OOBA. That's what the methodology is behind the lawsuits and deals set up so far. Usage either by transaction or in volume brackets.
I remember one, which had the percentage of when in the process IP litigation was settled. It was something like 90% by Markman trial, which I believe is in May. About one month after earnings.
Yes it might be a long couple of months but the late spring should be warm and toasty.
I did and they are. On 698 it spans what was in Authentify's. It's pretty solid. I did see Chase using some verbiage today wondering if it was an end run - I'll try to look at that.
While the OOBA is strong, I'm also excited by the keylogging one.
They can release anytime in that frame.
Hopefully manipulators. They can't even play this to their advantage. SAD!
Cool. I'm feeling good about the report.
It's looking good. But to be clear we have some remnants of that last bit of inflow left, correct? Something like 5M or so?
I hear you. And if that was still the only focus...
It's obvious they are doing other things, now.
And it's only my opinion, but I'm fairly certain with the litigation that they aren't pursuing the other companies to the point where they'll close up shop. SFOR wants licensing fees from all of them. That way, if anyone buys a competitor, SFOR gets at least a few cents off the purchase. In a model like usage, such as FB or Google, that's a great deal.
Look, I didn't go through the RS', though I went all the way through the rocket up and back down. So I can empathize with the bitterness from before, but it does seem like they are generally moving in good directions. Yes, I wish some things could be done differently (again, the internet presence - it would take about two hours to fix some glaringly stupid things). I wrote to them about some of it this morning, hopefully they'll make the changes.
Isn't Kay's salary something like $100k? And he put in $2M of his own money. They're working, so I'm fine with that and hiring others.
The ROI on public campaigns - especially now - has an incredibly low ROI. Spend a year at a cost of $500k and you can end up with quite a few larger contracts each worth millions.
They have retail presence which is good. Retail is not yet mature for this technology. I will give you they need to clean up their presence (redirect the old domains for instance). Spend money on a public campaign to trickle in new buyers? Not the best approach atm.
I know what you have in mind and it's admirable. But that requires a lot of education of the masses, which doesn't come easy.
They're out there and ready, but where should the money be spent first? Large contracts like the one I pointed out, where you sell half a mill units at once. In such a scenario, it directly touches about 600,000 people - at once.
Then those people learn of it, see that it's on the shelves, and the snowball begins.
An education campaign shouldered by a company on that order (to sell that many units) is quite expensive.
Wrong. Take Census, as an example of a smaller one time sale. 500,000+ handhelds all bought at once and configured the same way. Then all the users also learn about it through their experience.
Retail is still immature for this product, though they are there in time, which is good. Retail will be important in a year or three, but right now it's important to have a presence there and put energy to larger deals.
Last year it was April
After doing DD it's pretty obvious that SFOR's business model is on licensing fees. That's what they have with Comcast and MSFT. Look at the three current defendants and you can see they are going more service oriented.
Retail play is a small aspect for all of them. The market hasn't really developed.
I wouldn't worry about not seeing costs being sunk into retail marketing.
I think you're doing too much DD on mj stocks....
Yep. In this game there are steady and rising revenues, legal action on one patent and the keystroke encryption is the ace in the hole.
Seriously this is just a game of patience.
Do your DD. They sued each other and settled at not suing each other again. Read both patents. It's a Venn diagram where Authentify is wholly within SFOR.
Authentify (and their new parent) haven't tried suing anymore since.
They know how the landscape is graded.
Not too worry. I've done very well in the past holding when I know the stock.
Small plays are fine but I never let my full position be in jeopardy until it reaches the right range.
Manipulators are just hurting themselves here anyway, scaring away new eyes while we wait. More eyes for them would allow more play. The short sightedness they have is over reaching.
All I can say is goddamn thank you ma'am.
Yes but it's a risk. Just like the cameras being on and recording. SFOR wouldn't help with the cameras but these are factors now in the new landscape. Keylogging protection is easier than cameras and are being put into risk mitigation strategies. This includes handhelds where the camera isn't the factor.
Welcome back. Good time to get more.
Fun here was already had. Sometime again in the future. January/ February?
Financials will be late March.
Some court dates in each month starting January. Mainly status updates.
SCHEDULING ORDER: that any motions to join parties or amend pleadings, whether by third-party complaint or amended pleadings, shall be made by 1/24/17, dispositive motions shall be filed by 2/16/18, scheduling an in-person status conference on 1/12/17 at 10:00, telephone status conference on 2/17/17 at 3:30 p.m., in-person status conference on 4/19/17 at 10:00 a.m., telephone status conference on 5/24/17 at 4:00 p.m. AM before Magistrate Judge Mark Falk, all Fact Discovery shall be completed by 11/1/2017; etc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark Falk on 11/30/16. (sr, )