Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I thought I was the only one who knew how to research a trademark.
That is the application.
No worries. I'm in no matter which way it goes. Another airline doubled me up. Again. So, I could care less. If it hits. It hits. My number is so far out there, most likely will not. Just the wording in the latest PR seems to be off.
"is pleased to announce it has successfully acquired & registered the trademark "Healthy Hemp™". FBEC's(FBEC) Healthy Hemp™ is trademarked for class 05 Dietary Beverage Supplements for Therapeutic Purposes, for class 030 Herbal Food Beverages and for class 034 Oral Vaporizers for smoking purposes."
"acquired" from whom?
"registered" where?
"is trademarked" by what agency?
the "product" trademark fell by the wayside.
I'll leave the debate over whether one can or cannot sell shares to those that understand the argument.
I simply directed those interested in doing any research to the SEC filed forms.
And he doesn't necessarily believe .14 is coming any time soon, if at all.
Form 5 and Form 4 filed with SEC 01-20-2016.
No, I'm not in Houston.
Odd that you reply to me on this. I'll bite. What number were you factually able to connect and speak with John Golden.
FBEC wrong ... mural with "company" logo ... not "company" "product"
Advertisement for what?
Explain how that mural describes any "product".
Do these newly created "entites" have names?
Where are these "entities" Articles of Incorporation filed?
As in what Secretary of State website?
Still sticking with the Neumatter Methods propaganda. Anyone, anywhere who can find anything about that alleged "company" and its "physical facility", I'd appreciate reading about it.
Curious if the "company" happened to mention to Mr. Johnson, his agent and his promoters that they intended to go pink.
.0099 or lower, IMHO (with DD)
My opinion only.
Back in May, I honestly thought we had a chance.
Not so much now.
This may be problematic.
Several sponsors are working on it.
“With the fighters in the UFC being off-limits now in terms of in-ring sponsorship,” Clement told MMAjunkie, “we had to look outside that.”
It’s a puzzle many longtime UFC sponsors have spent the last six months trying to solve. After depending on the power of UFC broadcasts for so many years, how do you replace that exposure now that it’s the sole property of Reebok? How do you remind UFC fans that you’re still alive and kicking if you can’t get your logo or your gear on UFC fighters when the cameras are on them?
Thank you...
interesting...
NOT my buddy...
I was unable to listen to the "conference call" yesterday.
Was any information provided on production and sales figures for the "product" so far
Kind of lost interest in the 10Q, what with this latest "news".
I'd be more inclined to want to see the 8K regarding this latest "development", which appears to be very exciting "news" indeed.
Pretty sure no endorser is going to work without compensation.
Was asking from looking at the available data; today and yesterday for example, how do you determine "accumulation" is occurring.
Just curious.
Are curious as to how you are able to determine there has been "loading" occurring here.
Probably will actually. Maybe not to .06, but it will rise.
As someone said, it is the sell off that usually occurs pre "conference call".
The sale of "attention" is a powerful tool to not so savvy investors who believe long holding in the OTC is ever worth it.
Those who impart "flippers" are present are correct, and they are actually making money. Today's buyers become tomorrow's sellers at fairly decent profit margins.
Anyone stating .14 or a similarly unrealistic high simply missed the opportunity because greed got in the way of common sense.
Compares to the star struck theory. Today, more "attention" will occur from the "conference call". "Endorser" is quite a bit different than "Sponsor". Tomorrow, today's "conference call" will be dissected. Expect some additional press releases regarding more future forward looking statements. Takes us to the end of next week and an extended holiday. Might even see an unaudited 10Q in there along the way.
But not much else.
Its a flipper haven here. Some quietly buying today will quietly sell tomorrow or the next and take a profit, as the OTC was designed.
Okay.
My broker said he would get me 100K in at .0099.
But then he also said I'd be lucky to ever find a buyer at any significant sell price to recoup all of my current loses.
Because I would have to sell all I own at .14 to make it all back. Which he said was never going to happen.
The .0099 yes. The .14, no.
This truly is all about the paper, isn't it.
No different than any other OTC "company".
And the OTCQB Registration as well. It is remarkably outdated, 20 July 2015. Folks would think Sand was still CEO, majority shareholder and be confused.
Really.
So if we received a verbal statement that X number of units of "product" have been "sold", we should rely on that verbal statement from a "conference call"
With no verification in any form whatsoever.
A "statement" of "sales" of "product" should do it for us.
Oh this will be the very bestest "conference call" in the history of "conference calls".
Probably win Best Conference Call of the quarter, if not the entire year.
Then there will be a PR about the "conference call".
And then a letter to shareholders about the "conference call".
They may even find a way to submit an 8K about the "conference call".
There is no "painting" going on. A link was or was not provided.
No link, no paint.
Question.
Would you explain what you mean by big accumulation.
I'm curious what you mean by accumulating here, and how you can tell.
Yes, I read that many months ago and folks were talking about how exciting this was.
Then, well, nothing after the failed "sample" fiasco. Then of course the relabeling of "samples" as "finished product", then of course the "final product".
Just seems curious and odd after this:
"Cheryl Shuman will be spearheading the PR efforts for the WolfShot and said, "Product placement and branding is one of my specialties. I have secured placements for products in FX's Wilfred, CBS News, The New Ricki Lake Show, and much more. I am looking forward to getting behind a product with such an effective and unique formula.""
I'm confused. Nothing. Just weird I guess. Like a plug was pulled or a switch turned off.
Curious opinion.
Cheryl Schuman had/has zero value in regards to this "company".
Odd statement.
Also regarding the Exhibit in the 8K
Why was the letterhead (on line logo) cut and pasted
Why was the signature cut and pasted
Just seems curious why a Malone Bailey executive would not have actually signed such an important document.
Unless of course his name was Malone Bailey LLP. I checked. They laughed. Its the name of the firm.
Just curious.
Just out of plain curiosity....
What ever became of Cheryl Schuman's involvement here?
"Relationship" kind of fizzled to nothing after the "sample" fiasco.
That is the misconception here.
The "company" is all about attention from shareholders and prospective shareholders.
Period.
This is what I see >>>
Twitter marketing.......
(no press release for a "product" ranked 1100+ and falling......)
...... and continued and future disappointment.
Reading through the last several days of posts, I was incorrect. The "product" is not news. The "product" here is simply attention. Good or bad, does not really matter.
This was, is and always will be nothing more than a penny stock. The more attention, hopefully the more movement.
I'm eternally grateful I stuck with airplanes.
FBEC maybe the "co-packer" quit as well.
Oh wait, they don't have a "co-packer", at least not in the city of Houston, County of Houston or the State of Texas.
Sorry, I don't have a link.
I'll be waiting too. But, I have to leave and catch my flight. Quick stop to pick up kids, then to Vegas. We should know by now that news or filings usually occur at or near closing bell.
I'll let folks know if I see/hear anything of value regarding any of this from weigh ins, pre-fight or the actual card and after events.
I have this strange feeling it is going to be much like the "launch" party. Nothing much to report/show from that either.
Seems as if marketing efforts are following the soup du jour events of the day. Nothing to do with Art Basel, except it supposedly occurred over the same weekend, announced day before. UFC card, and stunning announcement the day before, etc.
Have a fabulous weekend.
ROCK, out.
While you have him on the phone, see if he is going to weigh-ins today and the pre-fight. We'll be sitting in 207 with McGregor's bunch (son figured that out last time) on Saturday night if he cares to stop by or we can try and find him if he wants.
A demand letter. You are inferring a civil matter. Do you have a docket or court of record to which we may refer?
Not supporting original poster on this one, but.
By the wording in the paragraph, does not has to go to arbitration. In legalese, very remarkable difference between the words "may" and "shall".
Do you have a number?