Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
No -nor have I called as I was going to...
Sure enough true. Thx Florida
I put a million at .0002 - along with 200M+ others -
Poop or get off the Potty ACLP
Majority of pinks are....
Wellll..... something is stirring...
but what - remains to be seen. :)
It's Tiiiiime.... for the main event! RM......
My trade ethic is based on numbers - I sleep okay at night
OTHM
zAHH!! (THANKS!!)
I did -let it sit for a bit just to watch L2 and Time and Sales -it just sat there ... I pulled it - I want to buy more not sell
I'll post to board when I bid -
I'm going to put in a small sell just to see - 1M -hold please.
REAL FAKE SCAM or BIBLICALLY LEGIT
I make money - all the time - on a spectrum of junk to gold star triple A....
OTHM
Big volume jump to 103 - but ... *shrug
OH -(sorry).. well -what the H do you make of that?
Not showing at all here Jim -on TOS trades -or on TD Architect -
TD's website -I'm trying to do it through TOS now -
Yep. Hmm... ??
AND the only account I have $$ to play with is being snotty - I'll keep trying..
System is temporarily unavailable. Please try again later or contact a Client Services representative - OKAY thanks TD
VFIN/CDEL and MBAY didn't budge - interesting...
I might have to move some things and buy a couple mill -just to see -aren't we a sad pair. :) funny.
Good deal -thx. Not showing at all on volume or L2... small sale! Go buy em back. :)
People trying to sell at .0007 need to hold their hands... and learn how to trade :)
GLTA!
JMHO
70682849 to be exact. :) Morning Jim!
(thanks) I think my post was unclear - we're on the same team. :)
Thanks Tech -
*my logic on this was backwards.. R/S here in OTC = MUCHO different than blues.. :) You're right - (I still don't give it the exact perspective but -you helped me to "get where you're at" and being fairly new to OTC- (only been spec. investing for a few years.. ) but with every company I learn a different approach to "looking at things" and the why behind different reasoning..
very cool.
ACLP
I am familiar - with all that you mentioned -(thank you)... and everyone should really do all the readings etc...
My only point was.. all of these "scams" and otherwise... failures - FINRA shortcomings - outside of the lines -non-compliant issues -are par for the course and I will try to support this now.. .with some like SEC events - when a new category tries to find its way into the marketplace.
Yes yes... I do...
And I do understand where you (and Jim and LGL etc) are going now... in regards to.. the higher the PPS is pre RS -the more likely that post RS will be great/successful and less likely to spiral... (gotchya and thank you guys -I'm with you now).
My time frame? OH you mean my long-term? (That is my shortest commitment to this company is all)...
RE RS - yes I do understand your thinking now -and I concur -there best be a plan or... we're all wasting our time!! *but I don't necessarily give as much weight to the pre-RS PPS as you ...
(that definitely doesn't mean I'm right!) I appreciate the insight on your thoughts.. and makes sense -
Okay, that is helpful. Thanks.
I understood the PURPOSE of the RS -was to get to the .001 - or .01 respectively... in order to THEN...
take off in PPS. (I'm sorry)
Ooops- sorry about that - *not a very tech savvy poster am I?
Jim -and LGL etc- can you help me understand that logic? About the relation between PPS and RS?
They are not contingent in my mind -the RS will happen regardless of PPS - and - it has no bearing on the shareholder's value unless it runs back down...
IN case of ACLP -it seems -rather a step toward attracting a higher caliber investor/shareholder -
(THANKS ALL) - and sorry about post errors..
Can't argue with the SEC or FINRA -
However, in light of this being an industry very new to regulation... halts and corrective measures are seemingly to be expected as everyone learns/creates the rules.
Seems premature to bet the farm on any weed stock however, seems more naïve to not continue due diligence or abandon investing a reasonable portion of our portfolios (speculative)... toward what could turn out to be a lucrative long -
but what do I know...
*I think.. if they RS -they will max it out and never do it again- I'm planning on 1:500 - For many OTC's -this is a strategy to raise funds... in case of ACLP - I believe this is a business strategy to legitimately advance the company to another level...
I'm wrong a lot.. but 100 or 500 - whatever they decide -I think will wash out to the shareholder benefit (IMHO).
Relative to overall market performance this week -
It seems TRTC fared "okay" (IMHO).
Does anyone else see .42 as resistance -then next at .63?
Thanks.
video = hilar
"What is the point to recreate PHOT with the contingent liability held over it? Nobody can quantify that liability at this point. Therefore, PHOT could be doomed no matter what it does."
Could or should indeed. Does anyone have/know stats on these clowns recycling entities via proxy? (Not "these" clowns specifically...but generally speaking)
Sorry about not being able to cut and paste the filing info that I referenced earlier. It was my intent until my computer ran off the tracks.
Apologies.
Little reading for a comparative perspective...
SEC filings from 2011 for XDSL -
Then look at the XDSL chart from the time in July when they announced intent of acquisition(7/29/2011)... to the current....