Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Not far fetched, sounds a little like Chemotherapy? All that is not necessary , I have found drinking Lysol and eating light bulbs works just fine, haha
yata yata yata
What did he leave? Hopefully he's still with BioMotiv.
I remember the same point being made when Dr. Faro got involved, I can't answer as to why another Dr. put his name on this without seeing potential and having the best intentions, it's a long list. His background IS a good fit.
It is true, past performance does not indicate future results, but it does need to be considered. Big hurdle for them here.
So far this is beginning the same as the previous tests, nothing known, Bret said so, so anyone questioning the narrative must be TrueNorth, anyone wondering about a detail is a basher.
I remember an e-mail "news update" where Bret said he wasn't going to pursue covid, all of a sudden, a holy cow moment.
There is no good way to disuses anything until the facts, numbers and test results about this test are released.
You must actually be new here to have the expectation that this will get that far. Curios how you found this, what is it about this test that caught a medical veterans eye?
Sure makes sense to me;
Don't know why he left Battelle, if it was a new opportunity it was here https://www.biomotiv.com/operations-team .
Spot the difference in the diseases? Why bring that up?,,,, who knows this one might burn itself out also.
In the tests, same lame source of high hopes with incomplete data, after reading there is a list questions no answers, bad timeline. How many years and how many times has this repeated itself-
Spotting the difference in the success of this test, I suppose time will have to tell, perhaps there will be the PR but I won't quote Einstein.
Good chance this test will have equal success of the NNLX Ebola test.
Well said, simplest answer is normally the best.
It's not hard to explain either, all their eggs are in one empty basket and a quick study of the company structure and lack of performance over the many years, no mystery here.
Time on corona running out
It's not a David against Goliath story, It's an is David worthy of the fight story
It's mot David against Goliath story, It's an is David worthy of the fight story
But, Isn't the problem really that there is no antibiotic?
My guess is that like so many other similar developments (or lack of), there will be no follow up and this will be the last we hear of this.
Still pissed?
You can thank your broker later, they just help you learn to follow your instincts, without the pain.
In this environment you may get a few pennies out it but there are plenty who will unload given the chance. If volume doesn't increase you'll be as stuck as they have been . A recent e-mail to investor update the company has said there is no plan to pursue anything corona related
yeah, I didn't see anything either. Revealing perhaps, good hmmm not really
What is good about it?
Bad spelling is the least of their weakness, not catching and fixing, priceless.....
Unable to identify the problem.
The only manipulation that would make any sense would be to the upside, unless still accumulating, and then a bid that low wouldn't make sense.
Someone has been buying higher for a few days and the new support bids haven't been put back up yet.
Its just OTCBB crap, you cant see all the bids, market orders are seldom used and for the most part can not be used.
all the hopes for this company have always began with if.
it would help to have a patent on something useful that someone needed, or at least wanted.
Probably started may 2017. update was something about rust belt mentalities and finding another state that NNLX might be able to be a benefit to.
I'll guess internet sales, Ohio is a little vague on who must charge.
Always a study, one thing different about this one is they’ve pretty much said they don’t have the money to do it. If the patents had a value anywhere near the asking price you would think the sales of flatpacks domestically would be paying for the study,
Other then completing the clean room or going to a few shows, what projections have there been any follow up. everything just evaporates. Not even smoke and mirrors anymore.
Apparently it's still walking dead.
It is about right when the only thing proven is that there is little to no interest in BNP or Flat Packs.
Perhaps if the Doctor can get some of the N-Assay studies initiated something good will be proven. Perhaps the "news will then be worthy of reaching more then just those already invested.
You know what, it's good thing for the stock they don't do PRs.
Read these updates. They really need help with PR,
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=132424446
Yes they said petri in OH. , N_assay in Tex. but that was in Dec. 2016.. Read on,
May 2017, update was pitiful, a few quotes from that update..
‘’’ we at NanoLogix had a goal, and that was to develop and provide to the world, diagnostic and research technologies that are premier and second to none, to create jobs in the rust belt area of northeast Ohio where the mindset of the area is steel mills, auto manufacturing, and low tech service jobs. “
“We will expand our facilities as soon as feasible for increased FlatPack and N-Assay production, and are exploring relocating to a different state where we can be considered as bringing a benefit to the area.”
"I wonder what the collateral was?"
The word investor was used, they should still have shares available and no reason not to use them for what apparently could be the last chance/gasp.
What happened to the investors that where with them in Texas ready to help open a new facility? Was not very encouraging to hear that didn't work out, wonder what the investors saw that changed their mind.
And yeah, what update, I don't see anything, no volume in the stock and a blank page when researching is all i see.
Thanks,,,,, I guess.
Which technology was paid for? For what purpose? Did they pay for it a 2nd time? Do you happen to know profit margins on any NNLX products?
I noticed you feel the PPS is out of line, what do you value the company at?
significance cannot be understated?
Yes, showing nothing.
And if they have something worth developing, nothing isn't going to fund it.
Curious who?, whoever updated the share structure to 4/24/17 on this website should help NNLX keep their site up to date. Even noticed a float number, never noticed that anywhere.
Share count is really not bad. The way this thing trades, if a little dilution is what it took to get N-assay going wouldn't hurt a thing.
How corrupt the market is when explaining the stocks poor performance. Brokers and market market makers risk their livelihoods, a very large list of rules are given absolutely no regard by anyone to possibly earn only a few pennies move to the downside on this thinly traded stock.
Haven't seen the penny stock being manipulated narrative being used so much on this MB, almost hate mentioning here, but, we all get put in a box. If I thought the manipulation argument to be true it would seem a contradiction to think no one is willing find a way to break one vague little trading rule when they saw the products potential and the likely unlimited upside move in the stock. but that just me and my paradigm.
Classic NNLX post, complete with footballers. As time goes by without mentioning the source of the information it will likely be cited as evidence of revenue and talked about as if fact.
You can't prove they didn't make money is just funny, he is right though, you can't.