is doing math...
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You must have missed the entire day of trading.
No, he was bullish when the O/S wasn't increasing and now that they are dumping hundreds of millions of shares he's bearish. That's not confusing. Today is going to turn a lot of people off.
Perjury is lying under oath. Not the same as lying on a web cast. ;)
Look at the size of the ask. Dilution not finished.
Dilution.
What looks great, every indicator turning down?
Taking advantage of being "ignorant" of the SS to make sure it's exactly how you want it, and then PR it and claim it's the old CEO's fault.
You don't really believe that he bought a company and didn't know the share structure? He could call the transfer agent and find out any time he wants.
That said, I still think this is going up once they're done raising capital.
If you say "Dow offered to buy me out" in order and drive up the share price, then sold shares at the higher price, yes you'd go to jail.
If you say "Dow offered to buy me out, " and that claim is disregarded by the investing community and your share price actually goes down, you probably are not in any danger of going to jail.
Actually, consolidation on low volume does look good as long as the supports continue to hold.
I think the person making $8 an hour to answer the phone at E*Trade will say whatever you want to hear.
Unless that other order was routed through a different market maker. That's not manipulation, that's how it's supposed to work.
Nothing in your description alarms me, I'm not sure what you're complaining about. Your shares are for sale at the ask along with hundreds of millions of others and you're mad that yours aren't first in line to be sold?
He said would own whatever was above the current O/S. But since he "doesn't know" what the current O/S is (and neither do we) that statement is fairly arbitrary. He could say the current O/S when he made his video turned out to be 3 billion shares and he'll own anything above that.
That's because he didn't.
Uh, only if someone is trying to buy at .0006.
Unless you're selling at the ask. Like the millions of shares that did on Friday.
No, he's being colloquial. He means finality. When the President of the United States uses words improperly to suit his own meanings, we shouldn't be surprised when a NASCAR driver from Long Island does it.
He already did deliver on it.. the stock is three times what it was when he bought the company.
when the last transaction changes from the bid to the ask or vice versa, that's not a downtick or uptick. When the bid drops, that's a downtick. When the ask increases, that's an uptick.
Behold, the voice of reality. I've been trying to explain this people forever and they won't believe it.
I said 1-36 months. Realistic people don't expect gigantic returns on a stock in less than 1 month. And since they are holding longer than 1 month, 1 trading day is of little significance. My point still stands.
And this doesn't have to go to the big boards - .0005 to .001 is a spectacular gain.
Not all investors are traders. Someone who buys a stock with plans of holding it for 1-36 months does not care what time of day a PR comes out. If you are implying that it takes some ~12 hours for the word of the PR to spread and create buying pressure, than releasing it at 1300 EST would create buying pressure the next morning, versus an early morning PR creating buying pressure in the same trading day.
Any interest or attention generated has merely been pushed back a single trading day.
This has absolutely no effect on the long-term value of the stock.
This is laughable. You're mad because the company is not providing flipping opportunities.
I haven't noticed a difference in execution success or speed between the MM's. Seems to be market dependent and not routing dependent. Not sure.
E*Trade uses AUTO and themselves (ETMM and ETRD). They also let you select who you route orders to.
I'm not getting into a religious debate here, just pointing out that Scottrade's L2 had a bug that's been showing itself for the past couple of days.
Scottrade was having the same error yesterday where it was showing some trades twice on L2. I have not observed this on E*Trade.
If you don't do an all-or-nothing there is no difference between a million share order and two 500,000 share orders except for how much you're paying to execute the trades.
Yes.. print screen alone literally captures your entire screen. The screen shots I've done have been of Power E*Trade Pro.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=37101545
To the right of F12.
http://www.wikihow.com/Take-a-Screenshot-in-Microsoft-Windows
He gave a time line for a huge PR, and then gave the biggest news this company has ever had within that time line. You can call it whatever you want.
That would be the NY distribution deal and Piranha water in 4,000-5,000 stores by July 4th.
I think you're confusing me with Lang.
I'm merely pointing out that a company with millions of dollars in revenue could easily produce audited financials. That said, audited financials would be necessary before a formal buyout offer were made, so assuming the rumors are true you won't have to wait until Q3.
I really offered no opinion otherwise, no need to get defensive. There's clearly a company here - you can drive to Fort Wayne and visit it. There's also clearly questions that have not been answered and I think disregarding EITHER of those facts would be highly irresponsible as an investor.
Disclaimer - I do not and will not own shares.
How do you know they did $9 million? Because they said so?
They haven't released any audited financials. Surely a company with $9 million in revenue could afford to contract a CPA for two days. ;)
No, 4 at 6. The screenshot is from after the close.
Huh? He's talking about boardmarks.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but did he not say he would own "anything above the current outstanding shares?"
He never said "anything above 1.4 billion."
Actually, it's not really funny, because there's nothing for me to do anything about.
The whole market maker manipulation myth is getting old.
I give this a 10 out of 10 on the unintentional comedy scale. Thanks for making my morning. I'm sure some poor guy answering emails at the SEC will say the same.
He included a link at the bottom of the post.
There went the bid. - And there it came back. Still not enough buying pressure.