“Microsoft was once a penny stock!”

“ When was Microsoft stock a penny stock? Mmmm. Never!
ByABC News
September 27, 2007, 9:34 PM

Proponents of penny stocks often try to convince investors to take a chance by spreading false success stories. One of the most popular has to do with Microsoft starting as a penny stock. It's not true, but I'll show you how the fraudsters try to trick you.

Here's the truth: Microsoft's stock debuted on the Nasdaq market on March 13, 1986. Its price at the end of that first day was $28. Microsoft's stock price, as quoted in newspapers and now the Internet, has never fallen below $1 a share. In fact, the stock's lowest quoted price in its history was $21.51 on June 13, 2006. You can see for yourself using this stock price spreadsheet from Microsoft, available here:

Check out the second column, called "Pre-Split Closing Stock Price." This number shows you the stock's price, as quoted by a broker or in the newspaper.

But, wait a second! What about the first column, called "Post-Split Closing Stock Price?" It shows Microsoft having a stock price of just under 10 cents a share on March 13, 1986. Does that mean the penny stock hucksters are right?

Not at all. That first column tells you what the stock price would have been in 1986 if you had considered the effect of all the company's later stock splits.

At no point did Microsoft's stock actually trade for 10 cents a share. It debuted at $28 a share. The 10-cent price is merely a reflection of the company's nine stock splits, which mathematically affects past stock prices in relation to current stock prices.

Don't be fooled.”

"I saw no reason to dispute the interpretation of these facts as presented by the well-qualified authors at stockinvest.us."

"I completely reject your opinion that the analysis is somehow "fake." "

"Insiders are very positive buying more shares than they are selling in Voip Pal.Com Inc
In the last 100 trades there were 420 million shares bought and 16.71 million shares sold."

"It's okay if we disagree"

"OTCBB:VPLM
Strong Sell Candidate
Voip Pal.Com Inc Stock Forecast
OTC Bulletin Board > Communication Services > Telecom Services

Is Voip Pal.Com Inc stock A Buy?
Voip Pal.Com Inc holds several negative signals and is within a very wide and falling trend, so we believe it will still perform weakly in the next couple of days or weeks. We therefore hold a negative evaluation of this stock. Due to some small weaknesses in the technical picture we have downgraded our analysis conclusion for this stock since the last evaluation from a Sell to a Strong Sell candidate."

"That does not mean that the data is false, Dontnosheet."

"I found this in-depth perspective from a stock analysis site"

"PURGE THE WEAK HOLDERS!"

“ Race to the finish line, love it!”

“ It’s all about processing things and understanding how things work.

A lot going on that one has to be intelligent enough to understand the process, especially in patent cases.”

“ What, do you think they’re selling because they know of bad news?”

"Did you see the pre-clinical PRs showing efficacy in animal models, better than existing antivirals? or Phase I PRs about safety?"

“ they did seem to show that NV-387 was safe in humans with their Phase I India trial, with NO dose limiting toxicity,”

“ Yes, Amazon is conspicuously absent from the class action.”

“ This looks a little like David attempting to bring down Goliath”

“ “This lawsuit is yet more nonsense by an unsuccessful serial litigant seeking a windfall,” a Verizon spokesperson said Monday in a statement. “The factual allegations are baseless, the legal claims are frivolous, and the damages figure is pure fantasy. We are confident a court will see this complaint for what it is ………..”

“We dispute the allegations in these lawsuits and will vigorously defend ourselves in court,” an AT&T spokesperson said Monday in a statement.”

“ The lawsuits claim that the three major U.S. mobile service providers, who control over 97% of the smartphone market”

“ legally king Tut doesn't have to give press reports”

"There are many reasons cases could be dismissed, isn't there?"

"FINAL JUDGMENT
At the Final Pretrial Conference held July 9, 2024, the Court announced on the record that
(1) Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Amend Answer to Add
Counterclaims (Dkt. No. 88) is GRANTED; (2) Defendant’s Motion for Sanctions Based on
VoIP-Pal’s Violation of Court Order (Dkt. No. 219) is DENIED; and (3) Defendant’s Motion for
Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement (Dkt. No. 136) is GRANTED. The Court issued a
written opinion granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement on July
29, 2024. Dkt. No. 272. The Court now enters its Final Judgment as follows:
IT IS ORDERED that final judgment of non-infringement is entered in favor of Defendant
and against Plaintiff. Plaintiff shall take nothing in this action.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any and all motions not previously ruled upon by the
Court are DENIED as moot.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s remaining counterclaims and defenses
are dismissed without prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s defenses to Defendant’s remaining
counterclaims are dismissed without prejudice.
Case 6:21-cv-00674-ADA Document 273 Filed 08/15/24 Page 1 of 2
2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant may file a motion for attorney’s fees and
costs, with supporting documentation in accordance with Local Rule CV-54(b)(2), within the time
frame prescribed by the Local Rules.
IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the
case.
SIGNED this 15th day of August, 2024"

“ $VPLM Email response today from Kevin Yang Law Clerk for Judge Albright.

Thank you for your email. At the July 9 consolidated final pre-trial conference for both the VoIP-Pal v. Verizon and VoIP-Pal v. T-Mobile cases, Judge Albright orally granted both defendants’ joint motion for summary judgment of non-infringement. Accordingly, the previously scheduled trials have been taken off calendar. A written opinion memorializing the terms of Judge Albright’s ruling will issue in due course.”

"on April 23, 2023, re-priced 621,470,562 warrants issued on April 12, 2021 from $0.021 to $0.001;

- on April 24, 2023, changed the vesting provisions and exercise price of 410,000,000 warrants granted on May 30, 2022, to fully vest and re-price all such warrants from $0.025 to $0.005; and

- on June 30, 2023, issued 831,466,899 warrants to purchase common shares at a price of $0.001 per share to the seller of Digifonica pursuant to the reinstated Anti-Dilution Clause of the amended STA (Note 4)."

"
During the year ended September 30, 2023, the Company:



- on April 24, 2023, re-priced all its previously issued outstanding options to be exercisable at $0.005 per share; and



- on May 31, 2023, granted 75,000,000 options to purchase 75,000,000 common shares at a price of $0.005 per share to its directors, consultants and advisors.



During the year ended September 30, 2023, on May 31, 2023, the Company granted 75,000,000 options to purchase 75,000,000 common shares at a price of $0.005 to its consultants and advisors. The options are exercisable for a period of five years from the date of grant, with 68,500,000 options vesting on the date of the option grant, 3,500,000 options vesting on May 31, 2024, and 3,000,000 options vesting on May 31, 2025. Of the 68,500,000 options vested, 15,000,000 related to replacement options issued from options originally issued on September 21, 2021. On June 1, 2024, the options terms were amended so that all options issued were vested on the grant date. The following assumptions were used for the Black-Scholes valuation of stock options on grant date as follows: risk-free rate of 3.74%, expected life of 5 years, annualized historical volatility of 148.52% and a dividend rate of 0%. Expected volatilities are based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock and other factors. During the nine-month period ended June 30, 2024, stock-based compensation cost of $299,261 (2023 - $nil) was charged against income from options vested (included as “Office and general” expense in the interim condensed consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss)"