Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Well, the two stories are very different. I hope you don't plan to start posting about EVERY current stock market scandal here.
What on earth does the Refco scandal have to do with CMKX?
I'm touched.
An MM was asking for .02 for PAIM.
The MM in question just didn't want to play today. His ask has no significance.
t WOULD give brokers an edge to deal with shorting... and allow them to collect additional fees.
Why would brokers want to "deal with" shorting? It's part of the way they make money.
I think the whole thing would be way too complicated. After all, many people play both long and short.
They collect quite enough fees as it is.
Thanks for the answer, anyway...
I've never met anyone you mentioned.
Uck. Melvin and the Miners?
Earning interest would be a gift.
Exactly. Which is why they won't do that.
LOL!! But will Pearl BE there? Where is she now? Maybe Rick knows.
and give notice that the shares are borrowed.
Why? They're still yours, and you can still sell them whenever you want.
I never said I "supported" naked shorting. What makes you think that I do?
My GOD. Who in hell are THEY?
However, you know more about SEC rules than myself.
He does? You were right. In compliance with Regulation Full Disclosure, company representative may not disclose information to some, but not all, investors, journalists, consultants, analysts, and so on.
So I should make every reply to a shareholder ONLY in A PRESS RELEASE, is that what you're saying??
Generally speaking, I think that'd be a very good idea.
When we deposit money in a bank, we do so knowing that the bank owes us our money back plus interest and they are free to earn money using our money.
And when you open a margin account with a brokerage, you're acknowledging that you're willing to have your shares lent out. If you don't like that, you have the option of opening a cash account, from which shares cannot be borrowed.
Has Mario ever told you the truth about ANYTHING?
lol, that link doesn't work either.... But how about George Burns. Oh, I know, he's dead, but does that matter?
He looks way too young. And he'd probably balk at wearing a polyester flame shirt.
Discussion, long or short, is the purpose of these boards. And believe me, I could spend another hour or so digging up info on Ronk.
Excuse me, but this is a discussion relevant to PAIM.
Obviously Ronk didn't do very well in the securities field.
And then there's this:
To: ravenseye who wrote (4951)
11/4/2005 1:03:30 PM
From: SI Admin (Dave)
Read Replies (1) of 5373
Tom RONK is a fine example of a spammer.
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/profile.aspx?userid=4858780
That doesn't count the 67 spam posts that were deleted.
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=21856610&srchtxt=Ronk
If you were working as a pharmacist, I'd worry about it. Ronk is still in the same field.
Nothing. It has to do with the guy who runs Buyins.com.
Tom Ronk of Buyins.com:
Thomas Carter RONK (CRD#2293671, Registered Representative,
Corona Del Mar, California)
submitted a Letter of
Acceptance, Waiver, and Consent
pursuant to which he was censured,
fined $50,000, and suspended
from association with any NASD
member in any capacity for 30
days. Without admitting or denying
the allegations, RONK consented to
the described sanctions and to the
entry of findings that he participated
in private securities transactions
without providing prior written
notice to his member firm describing
the proposed transactions and
his proposed role therein. (NASD
Case #C02990057)
RONK, Thomas C.Individuals Revoked For
Failing To Pay Fines And/Or
Costs In Accordance With
NASD Rule 8320
Corona Del Mar, California
Individuals Revoked For
Failing To Pay Fines And/Or
Costs In Accordance With
NASD Rule 8320
Biddick, Bruce
Rancho Santa Fe, California
(February 8, 2002)
Chepak, John A.
West Harrison, New York
(February 8, 2002)
Flynn, Scott D.
Highlands, New Jersey
(February 8, 2002)
Gerace, Joseph G.
S. Laguna, California
(February 8, 2002)
RONK, Thomas C.
Corona Del Mar, California
(February 8, 2002)
Sitomer, Richard A.
New York, New York
(February 8, 2002)
Waddell, Charles K.
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
(February 8, 2002)
http://www.nasd.com/web/groups/enforcement/documents/monthly_disciplinary_actions/nasdw_007466.pdf
This isn't making a lot of sense to me.
They're having people write articles to post on their own site rather than in a real publication?
Thanks. It'd be nice if they'd say where this article is from.
Sure, Kensley. You've been just sooooooo right about this piggy, haven't you?
LOL!! He'd be perfect.
Well, there's always Mel Brooks. Urbie's a lot younger, of course, but he doesn't look it.
I'd agree, but......it's worth zillions in entertainment value.
That's a thought. Or we could invest in paper companies; the price is bound to go up.
Think of all the poor dead trees.
By now they certainly have enough copies of certs to do that.
That makes sense. I think it's possible that Shorty was trying to poison Frizzy and his workers.
Why didn't they paint BEFORE they moved in about a month ago?
The first launch of PayChest Inc was a trial run to see where most of PayChests customer base would be responding from.
The "launch" announcement was just more BS from the master of misleading PRs.
Note that there hasn't been a PR since. I suspect the SEC is riding herd on our little friends.
Where's the article?