Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
OT: Stocklemon Reports on Fronthaul Group, Inc. (OTCBB:FHAL)
Rufus, It might be time to hire a lawyer!
Stocklemon Reports on Fronthaul Group, Inc. (OTCBB:FHAL)
Rufus Paul Harris, CEO of FHAL appears to have run amok of every conceivable securities law at once. He has created the perfect storm of violations.
http://www.stocklemon.com/07_26_06.html
Here-we-go-PAI-VIS here we go!
OT: PAIV is upticking - eom
WOW.
"I would trust Paim over Disney or GM."
really?
can you support this with anything besides some sort of CMKXer pal-talk nonsense?
239,455,555 PAIV shares short to be exact -- almost 11 days to cover!
http://www.otcbb.com/dynamic/shortinterest/shrt200607.txt
PAIVIS CORP|PAIV|BB|239455555|0|239455555|100|22135113|10.82
PAIM also has an open short position, but it's only 9.55M shares (and obviously much less than 1 day to cover).
PEARL ASIAN MNG WY|PAIM|NBB|9552004|0|9552004|100|250809572|1
OTCBB reports 239+M short PAIV
http://www.otcbb.com/dynamic/shortinterest/shrt200607.txt
PAIVIS CORP|PAIV|BB|239455555|0|239455555|100|22135113|10.82
incompetent bozos?
you're kidding, right?
"In fact, many of us did not receive our proxy statements on the split in time."
Wave only had about 180 days to prepare for the inevitable.
Just wait till next Q, it'll be a watershed event!
schedule the meeting earlier and show some deference for NASD.
especially when it is supposedly imperative to remain NASDAQ listed to continue feeding the PIPE trough.
just a few more quarters, just a few more days...
nope - 2 different boards.
but i wasn't logged in when it happened (both times).
i suspect it is the soft porn advertising.
BS bbigtim...
Wave has had how many months to get its house in order?
The NASD order was GENEROUS.
It won't matter in the end though.
IMO
viruses - i just sent Matt a PM about it.
got hit twice with 4 infected files each time.
btw, OTCBB reported today that PAIV has 240M shares currently short.
T-girl, none of those other companies is a reporting issuer either!
PAIM has an UNLIMITED A/S with a par value of ZERO, per Wyoming SOS.
really? when was bid 0.28?
musta missed that...
edit: Previous Stock Value: Par Value Shares: 125,000,000 Value: $ 0.0002 No Par Value Shares: 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Total Authorized Capital: $ 25,000.00 New Stock Value: Par Value Shares: 25,000,000,000 Value: $ 0.0002 Par Value Shares: 15,000,000 Value: $ 0.001 No Par Value Shares: 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Total Authorized Capital: $ 5,015,000.00
edit: IMO it should be totally discounted until more info is available, like an 8K.
However, the SOS page does indicate that the Authorized Capital increased by 200x + 15K.
It could be to take into account the merger restricted...
why is the authorized capital stated as increased by 200x?
i'm not a shareholder / moe
how would the MMs maintain FTD shorts for over a year?!?
isn't the overwhelming majority restricted?
as in locked-up for at least one year per Rule 144?
it's the other way around.
Previous = 125M
New = 25B
bolds, brackets and italics = mine
https://esos.state.nv.us/SOSServices/AnonymousAccess/CorpSearch/corpActions.aspx?lx8nvq=mOW0MOy4g1qOh6B9UES11g%253d%253d&CorpName=PAIVIS%2c+CORP.
Previous Stock Value:
Par Value Shares: 125,000,000
Value: $ 0.0002
No Par Value Shares: 0
Total Authorized Capital: $ 25,000.00
New Stock Value:
Par Value Shares: 25,000,000,000 [ 200 x 125M = 25B ]
Value: $ 0.0002 [ x 25B = $5M]
Par Value Shares: 15,000,000
Value: $ 0.001 [ x 15M = $15K]
No Par Value Shares: 0
Total Authorized Capital: $ 5,015,000.00
link please.
"I read somewhere that PAIV has more than a billion outstanding."
rader38 posts do NOT count!
thanks in advance.
Agree MT -- amended but not yet announced or implemented
It would seem an 8K is in order.
bolds, brackets and italics = mine
https://esos.state.nv.us/SOSServices/AnonymousAccess/CorpSearch/corpActions.aspx?lx8nvq=mOW0MOy4g1qOh6B9UES11g%253d%253d&CorpName=PAIVIS%2c+CORP.
Previous Stock Value:
Par Value Shares: 125,000,000
Value: $ 0.0002
No Par Value Shares: 0
Total Authorized Capital: $ 25,000.00
New Stock Value:
Par Value Shares: 25,000,000,000 [ 200 x 125M = 25B ]
Value: $ 0.0002 [ x 25B = $5M]
Par Value Shares: 15,000,000
Value: $ 0.001 [ x 15M = $15K]
No Par Value Shares: 0
Total Authorized Capital: $ 5,015,000.00
and see Bauer's and Randhawa's Form 3 filings:
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1076607/000110801706000497/xslF345X02/primary_doc.xml
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1076607/000110801706000496/xslF345X02/primary_doc.xml
haven't spent much time reviewing all this, but it definitely appears to be a forward split IMO.
IMO looks like a forward split + another class of shares
bolds, brackets and italics = mine
https://esos.state.nv.us/SOSServices/AnonymousAccess/CorpSearch/corpActions.aspx?lx8nvq=mOW0MOy4g1qOh6B9UES11g%253d%253d&CorpName=PAIVIS%2c+CORP.
Previous Stock Value:
Par Value Shares: 125,000,000
Value: $ 0.0002
No Par Value Shares: 0
Total Authorized Capital: $ 25,000.00
New Stock Value:
Par Value Shares: 25,000,000,000 [ 200 x 125M = 25B ]
Value: $ 0.0002 [ x 25B = $5M]
Par Value Shares: 15,000,000
Value: $ 0.001 [ x 15M = $15K]
No Par Value Shares: 0
Total Authorized Capital: $ 5,015,000.00
and see Bauer's and Randhawa's Form 3 filings:
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1076607/000110801706000497/xslF345X02/primary_doc.xml
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1076607/000110801706000496/xslF345X02/primary_doc.xml
haven't spent much time reviewing all this, but it definitely appears to be a forward split IMO.
"regarding future revenues"
pure nonsense -- how will they pay for future R&D, product support, marketing, advertising, dist. channel costs, etc.?
from all the non-existent upgrades?
maybe from the $40M in Dell revs?
CMKX-style dilution could also explain that, and actually makes more sense considering the Dominion of Melchizek BS, PearlAsia history, Mario Pino-Mellon connections, etc.
Mega-inside-dumpage the month before the CD event seems more logical to me.
Maybe rader38 could explain it to us all?
Google Pearl's address:
"400 South Beverly" and 214
You will get something like 120+ different hits.
Looks like some kind of shady mail drop IMO.
like what?!?!?
"Well , it just is , good fundementals" [sic]
Please explain it to me.
Thanks in advance!
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/profile.asp?User=77839
Profile for rader38
Add Person Mark Send A Private Message
Read Last 50 Messages Ignore this Poster
Membership Type:
PeopleMarked By: 0
EMail Address:
Location:
Age:
Interests/Hobbies:
Favorite Stocks:
Investment Philosophy:
Job/Title:
Favorite Links:
Quote:
Alias Born On: Sunday, July 23, 2006
Please explain it to me.
"This stock has soo much potential you dont understand :)"
Thanks in advance, rader.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/profile.asp?User=77839
Profile for rader38
Add Person Mark Send A Private Message
Read Last 50 Messages Ignore this Poster
Membership Type:
PeopleMarked By: 0
EMail Address:
Location:
Age:
Interests/Hobbies:
Favorite Stocks:
Investment Philosophy:
Job/Title:
Favorite Links:
Quote:
Alias Born On: Sunday, July 23, 2006
Boards Moderated: 0
Total Posts: 2
nukuhiva - that is for issues already on the list!
"Until a security appears on a non-SEC reporting threshold list for 13 consecutive settlement days and an open fail position for such security exists for that same period, Rule 3210 does not require a broker-dealer to close out the open fail position."
If what has been claimed is true, why has this stock not appeared on the Reg SHO List?
"...on July 12, Pearl Asian Mining announced that it was close to completing the buyback of approximately 27,000,000,000 or 90% of its issued and outstanding common shares using a convertible debenture (CD). Pearl Asian Mining has transferred to the Depository Trust Company (DTC) notes with a face value of approximately $27,000,000.00 which the DTC received on approximately June 21, 2006. However, PAIM has not received any of the 27,000,000,000 common shares of the buyback. At this point, the shares bought and sold in the market should only equal the remaining 10% of Pearl's issued and outstanding shares. However, the company believes that some of the DTC's participants, i.e. brokers, have failed to notify their clients, which has resulted in many shareholders selling shares short."
Trade Date:
Friday, July 21, 2006
File Creation Timestamp:
07/22/2006 2:07:45 AM
Threshold Security List - Friday, July 21, 2006
OSTK OVERSTOCK COM INC DEL G Y N
PAIV PAIVIS CORP COM STK U Y N
PARL PARLUX FRAGRANCES INC Q Y N
http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/aspx/regsho.aspx
RegSHO List was updated yesterday
Threshold Security List - Friday, July 21, 2006
Trade Date:
Friday, July 21, 2006
File Creation Timestamp:
07/22/2006 2:07:45 AM
http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/aspx/regsho.aspx
So I'll ask again.
If there is actually a "Huge Short" then why doesn't it show up on the Reg SHO List that was updated just yesterday?!?
OSTK OVERSTOCK COM INC DEL G Y N
PAIV PAIVIS CORP COM STK U Y N
PARL PARLUX FRAGRANCES INC Q Y N
http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/aspx/regsho.aspx
If you can help me find any entry in past Reg SHO lists, please let me know. I didn't see it anywhere in the archive:
ftp://ftp.nasdaqtrader.com/symboldirectory/regsho/
Thanks in advance!
SPIN
PS are you really a predator?
HugeShort usually=RegSHO, right?
Okay, then why is it absent from the SHO List?
OSTK OVERSTOCK COM INC DEL G Y N
PAIV PAIVIS CORP COM STK U Y N
PARL PARLUX FRAGRANCES INC Q Y N
http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/aspx/regsho.aspx
"I will do everything in my power to see you banned"
~~~ shiver ~~~
you're welcome Ronle -- that thread is well worth reading.
are you a buyer going into the reverse split?
any predictions for Wave Systems' new ticker symbol?
Here's just a few possibilties IMHO:
SOBS
WEEP
WOOF
SADD
SKSS
LOSE
PUKE
ACHE
LOSS
DEAD
HURT
RUIN
SUCK
DEBT
WEAK
BEAT
BSBS
BKBK
SLOG
DUMB
VOID
WELL
DONE
PUTA
FORK
INIT
TPMS
VIST(a)
FOOL
OUCH
worth review according to a void:
I think your predictions of a reverse-split set up a way to judge once and for all who has the better grip of this Wave thing. I think your notion that "a reverse split is going to happen relatively soon, possibly before the end of this year" is preposterous.
This one will be worth reviewing.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=8448686
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=8449305
You can run away from your ridiculous prediction that "a reverse split is going to happen relatively soon, possibly before the end of this year," just as you've run away from your predictions of leveraged buyouts, goings private, and filings of bankruptcy. But the only way you're going to be able to hide is by going away, as -- if trusted computing comes to fruition -- you inevitably will.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/replies.asp?msg=8478188
Posted by: HhH
In reply to: 24601 who wrote msg# 74982 Date: 11/16/2005 2:28:06 PM
Post #
If you thought a reverse split scenario...
was ridiculous (and I didn't actually predict one), you'll no doubt think I'm completely out of my mind when I say I think a chapter filing is ahead. I think in 2006 the boys in Lee pull the plug on the cult. Chapter 11. The cult gets nada, trade creditors get put on hold, and the management teams hangs around and tries to rake in all the chips (if there are any) as long as there's enough cash to pay their salaries. I've seen it happen before, John. These folks are not to be trusted. Everything will be totally legal, of course.
HhH
And this guy is banned?
Why not post this on the Golden Shower?
If your position held water, why even post here?
Just join the void flock --- or are you seeking to shepherd?
No rejoinder about the PJS insider selling?
SPIN
Wave founder Peter Sprague has previously (& publicly) disagreed with your contention.
"...whether Wave needs to recruit additional investors here or on any internet chatroom to survive (it doesn't)."
In fact, the old man was actually quoted in a print article in the 90s stating something to the effect that Wave would not have even survived but for wavoids and message boards.
Maybe he didn't mean it though... sorta like when he was quoted in SmartMoney & claimed he sold 100,000 wavx shares into the summer 2003 press release spike, when in fact he sold 500,000 (according to Wave's SEC periodic reports).
But you probably already knew this.
Right?
SPIN
you obviously know better.
it took all of 5 minutes to read a post; recall the blatant contradiction; search for the prior inconsistent post & compose a response.
void vanity notwithstanding, i read only a handful of posts here. rest assured the avg. void spends exponentially more time on this subject than i.
& as i suspect you also know, my only posts regarding wavx throughout 2005 have all been on i-hub.
enjoy thanksgiving,
SPIN
PS cmf -- that picture is equal to one-thousand hype-filled posts!
today you claimed:
The last time it went to $ .69 I loaded up as others did.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=8551793
howiever, back then (in the message to which i have replied) you claimed you bought at $.61 (two weeks after it traded in that range).
Two weeks ago today we bought at $ .61. Not a bad move. Looking for more of the same in the next two weeks. Just my opinion of course.
which claim, if any, is true?
& btw, who is the "we" that you referenced?
tia!
it is not a prediction 24...
it is just an opinion!
is it preposterous for a void to contend the formal SEC investigation is over?
is it preposterous for the leader of the voids to opine that $40M in revs is imminent?
is it preposterous for a void to contend the baker's dozen of (consolidated) class action claims filed against wave systems are over?
w/out spraguespeak hype, wavx will have a formidable (& imo unattainable) challenge of sustaining a bid price of a buck while running at a half mil in revs per half & burning something around ten times that amount w/in the same timeframe (after 17 years as a "development stage company").
the shelf is (or nearly is) exhausted & future Cayman Island PIPEs will be at deeper & deeper discounts & the dilution overhang will make any upside tougher to sustain (& voids are likely tapped out or almost tapped out).
then there is that pesky issue of insufficient net tangible assets (well below NASD listing requirements).
wavx will flounder & de-listing looms w/out a R/S or a substantial increase in revenues imo.
the former is far more likely than the latter imo.
good luck,
SPIN
PS to the angry & desperate void on yahoo:
LMAO@U!