Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Alfeady lost nearly 20% of its gain today. It started at approx .0135, so if it tanks back down to .0135, it will have lost 100% of its gain today, RIGHT?? Let's say that it tanks down to .0125. So how much (percentage) of today's gain will it have lost at that point? Lololololololololololol..
There was 22.5% spike. In all likelihood, it'll be gone by tomorrow
P&D in progress!
Ok, see this spike up that just occurred? In keeping with vplm history, watch it goes right back where it came from...
"... filed an amicus brief in support of VoIP-Pal's appeal of a district court order invalidating two VoIP-Pal patents as ineligible subject matter."
The above excerpt shows that indeed, 2 patents were effectively deemed invalid, since they were ruled as "intelligible subject matter", just like I have asserted several times here. That ruling may or may not have been reversed, I honestly don't know, regardless, it happened as I said my memory served that it did. Someone else said no such thing ever happened. This shows that it did. eos.
"... filed an amicus brief in support of VoIP-Pal's appeal of a district court order invalidating two VoIP-Pal patents as ineligible subject matter."
The above excerpt shows that indeed, 2 patents were effectively deemed invalid, since they were rules as "intelligible subject matter", just like I have asserted several times here. That ruling may or may not have been reversed, I honestly don't know, regardless, it happened as I said my memory served that it did. Someone else said no such thing ever happened. This shows that it did. eos.
And voted as the biggest laughing stock of stocks
Vplm has been officially deemed pathetic as a company
Is it pollyanish arse kissers or arse kissing pollyanites? Hell, I'll just go with both. New material would be nice but have to settle for the blanks.
Rut-roh! Getting close to .010s! You know what that means!
I just hope someone takes pictures of the faces of those present when the patents begin to get laughed at & kicked out of court as they are finally discovered to be what they really are. Will Emu be able to find the way to stop it from getting that far? Will Hudnell be able to divert away from it getting there as he will need to underneath it all? Will the courtroom start to sink into an unknown sinkhole? Holy core patents & apple corps! Tune in some batshit time, same batshit channel! Lots of onopotopoeia: "BAM", "SPLA-AT-", "WHACKETH", and don't FORGET the all important "VWAP"!
There will never be enough spatulas to scrape off that much egg off faces...tsk,tsk,tsk
All that flotsam & jetsom below must all be good news...I mean just look at that pps fly!
We need more Emu PRs!
What a quagmire...
Pretty much the same a toilet paper. About $1.40 per hundred shares/sheets. Nah, I'll pass
-
¢-¢-¢-¢-¢ BEWARE VPLM BEWARE -¢-¢-¢-¢-¢
Hmmm...where have I ever heard that before? Sounds familiar...
Standing on head holding breath..
Here is the future of
-¢-¢-¢-¢-¢ vplm -¢-¢-¢-¢-¢
https://investorshub.advfn.com/uimage/uploads/2014/9/8/nsrhzltiss120706_TIV-picsay.jpg
That's exactly right and when viewed in that light, all the weird moves we've seen for years makes sense. Delay is the name of the game for as long as possible so as to keep being beneficiaries. That's why you'll see more monkey wrenches thrown to cause delays to any discovery phase. I've been calling it right for years & years because vplm is an open book to those who can read & comprehend in an objective way.
No, the lawsuit is not on their side because the patents are worthless & there is no infringment. Been saying it for years & years & it keeps "holding up".
"The only thing that will be squirming to get out is Timmy’s rodent collection down in Waco!!"
Not a chance. Apple is ridiculously strong, healthy, powerful, rich & doesn't even bat an eyelash at Waco & certainly not vplm. The only reason they fight back is because that's what you do when accused of something, you fight back (just instruct your lawyers to) so you dont lose by default. Duh.
Yup funny is right...how everything gets twisted & changed from what really was said...
No one said anything about filing a lawsuit with "maybe infringement". I clearly said that when vplm finally got around to sending out infringement letters to the companies, they did not tell or accuse them of infringement. They told them they might want to take a look things as they "might be infringing". Funniest thing I ever saw. By the way, keep em coming...its good that readers see who tells the truth & who twists. At the time, shareholders were complaining to vplm for a LONG TIME that they needed to send out letters of infringement. Those who pay attention will recall this. Day after day, vplm was getting bitched at for not sending out the letters. Shareholders were begining to say vplm was basically a punk, too scared to send out letters of infringement. I've been here all along for 10 or so & paying very close attention to the actions & non actions of vplm. Most prolly have no recollection of this. Finally, after a very long time, I can't remember exactly how long, vplm notified us that they sent the letters, I believe to the ghost list of about 60. I call it a ghost list because vplm, on their website, named all the companies on the list, but then they must have found out the were slandering them or something, I don't know what, because shortly after they posted that list, then they removed it from the website and it was never seen again. I fan only guess that they had serious evidence of any infringment so maybe that's why they were told they had to remove the list of names. I can't think of any other reason aside from another possibility is they knew there was no infringement, just bluffing, so they were advised to take down the list of names. That's my guess. When I have facts, I present them as facts & usually have supporting docs, when it's my theory or opinion, I state it as much. Of course that does no good as the words always get changed & twisted to fit convenient agendas that don't care about accuracy or truth or decency. So they published some of the letters and I began calling them "love letters" as they were not letters of infringement. They were silly, bluffy letters that basically said the company might be infringing & to please take a look/see. The letters were ridiculous but were exactly what you'd expect from a big bluffer. All vplm has been trying to accomplish all this time is to bluff their way thru this & to convince some dumb company to offer a settlement or to license. They never wanted to actually sue in court since they know all too well that there is no infringment happening and they could never prove it. But as time went on, they Hani choice but to file a few suits to not only make it look real, but they could only dally for so long w/o filing. Ever since, they've done whatever they could to delay any trials from moving fwd to the point where they will finalky be exposed as the bluffing bullshitters they are. They do not want to get to discovery, they want to entice some settlements. None of these companies will ever settle as they know they aren't infringing because the patents are bogus. All the army of lawyers could care less, they are mercenaries & that's why lawyers have the rep they do. They don't care who's right & wrong, they care about getting paid. I don't think there's any contingency going on. There have been an army of lawyers & we were hoaxed into believing they were on contingency. I think a couple of them may've been on contingency for a short amt of time before they could see where that was going and how much work they'd have to do & quickly put a halt to that crap... It's really cool that by twisting my words and well researched info, it sets me up for this pique, where I must show how the dots connect for all to see. So far, pretty much everything I've said has been proven or backed up w/documentation or came true, consistently and if it didnt, I'm sure the proof would be shown, but it hasn't been. So I'm thankful for the oppotuities to spell out what vplm had done to rip you off and show how easily I always am able to predict what will happen (like all the monkey wrenches) or he able to refute some bogus predictions about this, that & the other about to happen & then say it won't & then be shown correct everytime.
No good stuff is about to hapoen aside from the very entertaining events where we see vplm have painted themselves into a corner & watch the Emu squirm to get out.
Coming soon!!!
Absolutely no evidence of infringement has ever been shown in any way shape or form. Vplm has only told the various companies that "maybe they are infringing". And vplm has came up with the cash to keep trying to sue for years with no success. I dont think they even want to get to discovery as that's where the house of cards will begin to fall apart and they will lose their cash cow fiat share printing/selling machine. Watch & see what happens..
Some patents were rendered invalid by koh.
And it took them a whole year & 3 seperate panels plus the very real threat of being brought up on RICO charges by a very important & influential man, Tom Sawyer. And the orig ptab boss had to be forced out due to major conflicts & her blatant announcement that she would not follow the rules. Other panel judges were found to be in conflict. The ptab was unequivocally shown to be a corrupt agency. And no company before or since has ever gotten a unanimous positive judgement like that. The ptab was famous for invalidating in most cases. It was a farce decision.. Totally bogus in my opinion. But it gave nothing to vplm anyway, outside of what it had all along, except for some help in temporarily boosting the pps.
But don't forget. A valid patent doesn't mean there is any need for it, nor any efficacy, nor any value.
That's right. All patents are "valid" the moment they are born, until someone comes along and proves them to be invalid. The IPRs tried to do that but the instigators lost their chance to do so. Vplm didn't win anything though. After the ptab decision was handed down, vplm did not have ANYTHING more than what they had beforehand.
I think the current # of investors is far less than 45k. Also, the ptab decision was in 2017, not 18. And it was not a "win". It was vplm simply defending & maintaining the patent validity they had from day one. Nothing gained. Nothing lost. Simply maintained.. And there won't be any buyout because no one is interested in buying the worthless patemts & there is no proof of infringement & it likely to ever be.
Everyone knows that "patience is a virtue" & "in the BEST position ever, are the 2 biggest lies ever told!
Made up, contrived, biased & outright lies is what has been spewed, usually with zero documentation. I have posted hundreds of documents to back up what I report. Good ex is all the copied from official court documents that I just posted to prove the lie that's been spewed here for a long time about how vplm won the case against locksmith. And how the 100 mm+ shares were returned. We all know the source. It was blatant & unequal lies! I posted the documents that proved beyond any doubt that the case was digi vs vplm & vplm lost. It was crystal clear and it named the main defendants as Emu Malik & Tom Sawyer (as well as candy & tucker & one of the Vancouver thugs. We were told over and over that the ones to found against by the jury, were really r Kipping & Kwan, but I showed that to not be true. And immed after it was called lies. They are official court docs. So most know who is telling the truth & who is not by simply reading the docs and the facts. I've been posting the old PRs overloaded w/lies for years.
The story is not fabricated. It's 100% documented fact from filings & PRs & the so called "conference calls" (infomercials). All you have to do is connect few dots. In most cases I have the docs. I can't seem to find the one that digi-phony-ca filed when they said they wanted out & had paid roughly 1/2 mil for the patents & just wanted to get rid of them. I may have forgotten to copy it but it was an official filing that was posted & I read it. Emu himself stated both companies went way back as friends. There are no lies or fabrications. Emu is a known liar. He swore he would stay with the avatar trial to the end, then quit on the 1st DAY, TWICE! He told everyone that vplm had nothing to do with the Sawyer letters & later was forced to admit that indeed he did. How Clintonesque! He's lied repeatedly (along with Sawyer) about alleged imminent buyout deals & offers on the table, etc etc.
Rut-roh...look out below! Falling like a rock. Already touched the .013's
Russ, it's not a matter of that.. Maybe you dont know the "story" we were "fed". Allegedly, the Emu (& his co-founder?) paid some 20-25 (the number changes everytime he [Emu] tells it) VoIP/telephony engineers to write the software (patents). Where did he get the $17 mil? Shortly thereafter he allegedly couldn't pay the lights & was forced to sell the patents. (that is such a bullshit story! It doesn't add up. Makes no sense and I've seen documentation to the contrary. The real deal is that they were all friends for a long time before all this & both companies were abject failures & being sued left & right, etc. And they created this whole scheme ahead of time. They pooled their resources & merged. Emu owned the most shares. He came from Vancouver, a place well known to the world, as a place where these pennystock schemes were created. But anyway, that's the story he gave, ie, that he paid about $17mm to 20-25 engineers to create the software. But guess what? I had an official govt doc that was some kind of digi-phony-ca filing. In it, they said they did not want to be in the VoIP business anymore and just wanted to sell the patent apps for cost & get out. I seem to have lost the doc but I'll never forget what it said.. It said the cost of the patents was a number approx $400k & then in a later doc they said the cost was about $450k. I might be a bit off UT the numbers were similar to that. So you have the Emu later telling vplm shareholders that he paid $17mm but before the deal went down, he said in a filing that the cost was in the half million dollar range. It's all bullshit. None of it adds up. Digi-phony-ca was a private company. So he merged w/vplm and saw to it that many PRs were out out with all those lies about how they were gonna integrate the software into their own (rented) VoIP platform & become the king of the hill Voip service provider & be the technical leader of the industry. And immed increase subscribers by millions & immed start collecting upwards of $100mm per year in royalties, blah, blah, blah. So all that was fed to the shareholders & prospectives. This allowed there to be many new shareholders and sold zillions of shares and THEN.....then, the plug was pulled on the whole thing w/o rhyme or reason & no voter input & all of a sudden, they (vplm made up of Digifonica BOD) decided to become the biggest patent troll on the otc and RENEGE on ALL those promises made via PRs for near a 2 yr period. Yeah baby, that's what happened. And digi-phony-ca had stated that they did worldwide (3 cities) testing of the system. But no results were given. That crap about divulging codes & secrets is just that...CRAP! Telling shareholders the results of the testing in no way equates to divulging code & company secrets,lol. Testing results of many products & services are very commonly offered to it just shareholders but customers as well. I have the results of many tests of many products that are listed as footnotes in the literature of many company products. It certainly is done in a way that obviously does not divulge code or secrets.
Has anyone found those durn nodal testing results? They sure are elusive. Or maybe vplm has always seen fit to keep that info secret from the shareholders. Seems prudent & fiduciary, yes/no? After all, what business is it of the shareholders anyway?
You'd think that 8 yrs of the Emu custom anti dilution scheme woulda given it away...
Looks like the Emu went to the b. Madoff school of securities, lolol
"we'll see next week"
"we'll see next month"
"we'll see in the next few months"
So on and so forth....
Lololol lol, hahahahahaha, hehehahahoho..... Arghhhhhhh, I can't breathe...
Let me just say....
If anyone hasn't seen enough in the last 25 yrs (or 10 post trollistical) of vplm history, may I suggest an optometry appointment...
Read my lips....
The patents are worthless, the patents are worthless, the patents are worthless.
The only ppl on this earth who ever were interested in obtaining the patents, were digi-phony-ca & vplm. One says they spent some $17mm for them (yeah, right, I totally believe that...) & the other paid something like $850k plus I forget how many millions of shares. Funny thing is...the 1st thing they did w/them then...was either get rid of them as soon as possible, like they were a hot potato, or TRY to get rid of them (or at least make it APPEAR that way). Pretty strange I'd say. And no one else in the entire world wants them, not to own, not to license, no how, no way. Pretty weird.. (for the uninitiated).
Proven worthless for years & years...
I know, I know, next week...in a few weeks, months or years. Just hang in there with your never ever ending patience & don't forget to be a good, loyal, super long super strong, in emu we trust, "investor".
How can you call that little list nothing more than my opinion??? They are ALL indisputable FACTS, are they not?
Pps is not the whole story. The whole story is the pps after 24 freakin years (or 10 yrs if your prefer post patent troll history). Either way is more than enough time to tell the story, just like how mr market tells the story as well! If that's not enough for ya, add in "breach of fuduciary duty" AND "unjust (personal) enrichment" AGAINST THE EMU, SAWYER, et al, BY A JURY OF THEIR PEERS!! NEED MORE?? How bout NEVER A SINGLE SOLITARY PRODUCT SALE (as a patent troll). Zero licences. Zero settlements. Zero partnerships. Plenty of DOCUMENTED lies via PRs. Zero court wins.
Still need more??
97% loss of value in a 4 year MEGA LOSS TREND.
THERE'S PLENTY MORE BUT IF THAT'S NOT TELLING THE STORY, NOTHING WILL
Vplm...a stock to die for...all that's needed is patience...
I could've told you 10 yrs ago that shareholders are facing 10 yrs of failure and now, I'm telling you all signs point to another 10 yrs. Vplm is the "gluttons for punishment" stock, so strap in kids.