Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
In NMCX at .033, partial fill so far.
Hey BB
Could you post a chart for IWWH and USXP, if you have the time?
TY in advance.
Also, I think you do great on this board. Do not let those getting upset that you might post why you are not getting into a stockget to you. It helps us others who are thinking about getting in, but need to know a bit of the possible reasons to be wary. If posters dislike others lettng the board know possible negatives on a stock, it makes it quite suspicious that they want us to only see the rosy side so that we might jump in and add support for their own game - highly suspect to me and I like that you and Capt Nemo even it up a bit.
I would never think a board does its members justice if they only allow the positives about the stocks to be posted.
I'm in IWWH at .005, but having a hard time getting my full order filled.
In USXP at .0175 and .0150 and holding my breath for the TURNAROUND.
Looking at UMKG around 1.90 to 1.97 - we'll see if it gets there.
Doing OK
Got burned on a couple of REALLY bad picks a few months back (one was GMDP with Latinos's excessive optimism - I don't blame him though, he really thought it was gonna fly. They were my decisions and always will be regardless of what someone else believes a stock has the potential of doing.). Then, my computer crashed, TWICE!!!
So, I have not been around a while and I am starting to get back into the swing of things a little here. Very sporadic right now, thanks for asking.
IWWH made a nice little opening run, 50% profits.
Very helpful having the chart yesterday, misspellings and all, LOL.
Thank you
Glassy,
That is an GREAT chart and you did a most EXCELLENT job elaborating on what you are seeing in it. It has me conviced. I'll be watching in the am.
Thanks for the good work!!!
Does NMCX still have sizeable upside potential? I bought in today thinking it does but it has moved quite a bit already. What so you see in its potential here?
I am EXTREMELY new to this stock. I bought in today, 300,000+ shares. I know that they had some horrific management in the past and have spent the past 5 years turning the company around, and that they are getting ready to release numbers that we all expect ot be very much improved.
That is about all I know about this company.
What are you referring to when you post "finally we know what they sold the 100,000+ tons for."
100,000 tons of what?
and what is it that you know -
the price?
or the reason for selling the 100,000 tons?
Anyone watching BSQR?
If so, would you mind posting a chart with various indicators such as stochastics, relative strength, CMF, on balance volume, MACD, CCI and Money flow index?
Could someone post a chart on NWAU please.
I'm thinking this one has the potential to go to $3 when it gets legs.
I would like to, but for some reason, half the time I cannot get Raging Bull to work for me.
Let me rephrase this. I posted
"Unless of course, Interceptor72 would do us a favor and contact them. I think you are better informed here, and have the points lined up such that you can better ask MR Lutz or Mr. Vergas the questions in a manner that they can give effective answers."
I should have said, I think you are better informed here THAN ME, ...
I think EVEN is better informed than any of us here, and that also bodes well to cause us to be suspicious of his motives. Why would someone be so exquisitely informed about a company that they have no interest in putting their money in? Could EVEN be getting fed information about the company and it's places of possible concern by an investment group, a fund or the likes, in order to be SO informed that he can effectively cause legitimate concerns in investors' minds?
Is this what you are doing, Even? Or are you like me, just a VERY skeptical investor that wants to know all the details possible about a company, both positive AND NEGATIVE, they are considering investing in? If the second is true, then it would be prudent for you to contact the company. But since you seemm very hesitant to do that, it brings up all kinds of questions about your motives.
Again, I want to hear your concerns because they are LEGITIMATE and I do NOT want you to be shut up. However, I am also placing responsibility on you to help us find the answers in every way possible, including your turns at talking with the company.
So, come join us in our quest for answers, Even, and let's make some money together. OK?
I have just finished with a phone conversation with Rick Lutz regarding concerns over the Innoprise fund and the $3Million dollar investment. I have to say that I am still just as confused and he was unable to fill in any of the details at this time (It seemed that I got him while he was in the middle of something and the background noise at my house was also very distracting.). From the best I can tell, NMKT IS NOT incurring any new debt that is not adding value to the company. This apparently IS NOT A PIPE, and it is the most feasible and lucrative manner for the company to approach financing for acuisitions that are in their development strategy. Now, either you like their business plan and strategies or you don't, and that is part of what helps you decide whether or not to put your money into this company. Using this fund for help with financing for aquisitions is part af their strategy.
I REALLY would like more information, but since it is a fact that EVEN JUST WILL NOT CALL the company, for some reason, I'm not sure we will get it. Unless of course, Interceptor72 would do us a favor and contact them. I think you are better informed here, and have the points lined up such that you can better ask MR Lutz or Mr. Vergas the questions in a manner that they can give effective answers. I would greatly appreciate your efforts here, 72. However, I'm afraid they may avoid answering much until Even calls to get direct answers.
Even;
You not calling the company is the one thing that makes your posts extremely suspect - are you being paid to put questions in our minds? If so, we need to realize that you will only give us doubts and will provide no answers whatsoever. Thus you are working for people who want us to sell them our shares. So, when you post, it is an indication that it is time to buy. Now, IF THIS IS NOT TRUE, CALL THE COMPANY (or THE IR) AND REPORT IT TO US. Better yet, I'll be happy to call them in a three way call with you if you are afraid that they will be mad at you. I want the answers to your questions, so let's get them together. Just let me know when we need to do this.
IF YOU WILL NOT AGREE TO CONTACT the company, then right now, right here, I am saying you are telling us that you are a paid manipulator of the stock price. Your lack of action to do this (call the company) is a DEFINITIVE statement in itself that you are only posting concerns to manipulate our confidence in the company to some other investors' advatage over our own financial interests.
I will post this post in response to EVERY one of your posts until you contact the company because every post should be taken as an indication to do something other than what you are implying for us to think, until you nullify this statement by having contact with the company.
Just let us know you have contacted the company and I will call Rick Lutz to verify it. After this we can believe you are posting concerns that you agree to help us find answers to, and CONTINUE to contact the company when necessary. We can then, and ONLY then, believe that you are posting these issues for OUR vested interest rather than the interests of some other entity.
So, A PIPE is essentially a Private Placemant with a Fund of some sort and thus requires registration of shares
whereas a standard private placement is with big investors or investment bankers and therefore do not require registration of shares.
Either way, a PP is just as bad because these shares also are usually given at a discount to the market price (the reason the details are important to me is I have been invested in a company for a VERY long time that just LOVES doing private placements, and it kills us shareholders EVERYtime - one of my major gripes about that company. I would be very displeased to hear of anything like that going on here.) and those investment bankers act much like a Hedge Fund and want their money quick, so they sell those shares on the open market driving shareholders' PPS down.
So, A PIPE is a Private Placement? I always refer to those as PPs.
If I am wrong that these are the same thing, could you please explain to me the difference between a PP and a PIPE?
Thanks.
Yes, I do have a limit order in at .50. However, if it does start back up from .54 without hitting my order, I will buy in a bit higher, thus, I am watching, at least for a while.
Now who on this board can explain what a PIPE is to me and what NMKT has done to be involved with a PIPE?
OK Now, .49 is 50%.
If it holds that I am buying a lot more at .50. Right now, it looks like it may hold .54. I've got my finger on the buy button, just waiting.
I think this may go to the high .60s this week. If they release another good PR, it could go up to the high .70s, then I think it will rest a while.
The was no gap up. A "gap" up is when the stock opens higher than the HOD of the previous day. This opened at .61 and the HOD on Friday was .62.
And to really be a gap it has to trade the entire day above THE HOD of the previous day. No gap up here.
I want to hear the concerns that Even is posting about. I have called Rick Lutz, and I was VERY impressed with him and his apparent moral ethics regarding investing. He was VERY forthcoming, and I greatly appreciated the time he spent explaining a little bit of their strategy for NMKT.
Now, of course, he COULD have been feeding me a line and sweet talking me, but I believed his spiel and think this company is likely to do extremely well. I am very excited about NMKT!
That said, I WANT TO HEAR EVERYTHING EVEN IS CONCERNED ABOUT. I HATE IT when posters who are long just cannot stand to have someone with concerns voice those concerns so that others can be warned. I went through the same thing with GMDP and longs not wanting negatives to be posted about it, and many of you probably know where that ended up. IT is THE PITS!!!! I do not like being scammed and do not want optimistic longs to help the scammers by refusing to have negatives posted about their company.
I GREATLY appreciate how Interceptor72 has communicated with Even in all these posts. Thank you SO much. I have learned so much about this company from you, and yes, from Even also. Now I will be more prepared when I next talk with Rick Lutz, and now I understand why he went into so much detail about some things that I did not ask about, LOL.
Finally, even though I want EVEN to continue with his questions, I do have to agree with Interceptor72 when he posts to Even:
"EVEN, what I personally don't like is your M.O. You make everything sound dire with NMKT. And you never initially post information upfront. You always ask open-ended quesitons that appear to have negative answers. Thus it makes it sound like you have an agenda."
and
"I don't understand why you just don't come out and state your opinion. Instead you play a song and dance routine and try to get others to guess what you are implying.
It would be much better if you would just come out and give your opinion.
...It would also be good if you provided facts and links to back up your concerns."
In this way Even, we could all benefit by understanding the details of what the concerns are and then decide for ourselves if these are risks we are comforatble with taking. If you want to help us be fulliy informed, as it appears you want, then help us out and post more substantiating information regarding your concerns. Please, I want the information. Help me out a little here, don't just SCARE me.
AND IH ADINISTRATION;
PLEASE ALLOW US TO READ ALL THE INFORMATION so we CAN be informed. Please do not delete a post that has negative information about a company as long as it is not pure conjecture and rumor, and as long as it is not attacking another poster unjustly. And as long as it does all this without using undue profanity.
Maybe you could re-post the posts of Even's that you removed so we can all see what he had to show us???????????
No, and no communication either. This really stinks!!!!
Looks like all these positive longs on this board are just gonna roll over and take it. I've asked people to work on getting a class action lawsuit together, but noone will respond. It is amazing how when people are long on a stock they will post ad nauseum about how great it is and how they are just gonna keep picking up more stock cheap, but if an investor is concerned that things don't look right, they do not want it posted and they will not get together to take what legal recourse is available. Just roll over and suck it up, ridiculous!!!
They stick their heads in the sand and they dictate for anyone else who has put money into the same company to stick thier heads in the sand also.
Actually, I have not gone on vacation for 8 years. So, yes, will put off the vacation and the children will learn to entertain themselves doing group activities, sports, dance and music for the summer. I will hold to my responsibilities and budget until we can AFFORD to take the vacation. Affording is not only money, but also the responsibilities you have set toward other people that still must be tended to.
We learn to find joy in every day by doing something every day that involves fun with each other, after our work responsibilities are tended to.
Does that answer your question?
Very good observation. I agree with you totally.
When you are the President of a company that is in the middle of MAJOR important business, you put off your vacation, for the whole year if need be, until the business is finalized.
I will give them more time but THE VERY LEAST thye should have done is release a PR the minute they saw that the dividends were not getting distributed.
I will give the one more month and then I am ready to jump on a class action lawsuit - this is downright illegal. They should return all invested money from investors who bought in from the date they announced the dividend (which I know is a joke). This was an incentive to buy the stock and they did NOT hold up their end of the bargain.
Anyone have any idea of how to get attorneys to look into this? Time and my patience is getting VERY SHORT.
Has everyone given up on GMDP? I'm not seeing any posts here. Is it because we cannot get any information? Everytime I use the number Latino gave me to call Doug Brown, I get a message that he is "out". I leave a message for him to call me, and I never hear back from him.
Has anyone had any luck in getting ahold of anyone with the company?
I'm calling the (619) 222-2568 number for Doug Brown.
I'm gonna try to get Bruce Barron at (310) 471-3735 on Tuesday, unless anyone else here has any information or other suggestions.
I'm starting to get REAL scared that we just got ripped off here and the dividends that got everybody to buy in were just a phantom story so that the owners could get a bunch of people to buy and hold the bag. I STILL do not have any of my Globelink Capital shares in my account, and it is way, WAY past the distribution date.
This is my first experience with this kind of rip off and it really does not feel good.
I, for one, wish that posts that warned of this sort of scam situation were allowed to stay when the stock was in the .4 to .5 range instead of being removed, and only allowing the posts that talked about how it was going to have another big pop when the second set of dividends were to be announced and all the stuff about two contracts with a China connection that required it to get to .10 for them to go through. All this false hope stuff was allowed to be posted, because it could be documented with PRs and filings from the company. Looks like we were just led right into the trap by the company, because they do their best to make it hard to find documentation about the true negative aspects of what is happening, and thus they know boards like IHUB will not allow negative things to be said about them due to lack of documentation, but will really re-inforce the positive stuff the company puts out, because they provide the documentation in full force. However, the people that kept jumping in saying that things did not make sense and it looks like a scam were consistently removed due to lack of documentation other than things that just did not add up.
This allowed us buyers be given only one side of the story, the positive hopeful side, and we were denied the chance to see the side that pointed to the inordinate risks.
Thus, we were consistently influenced to "hold on" while we could not get equal influence to be aware of the shortcomings that were popping their ugly heads up so we might get uncomfortable enough after seeing the ENTIRE story to sell off before it was too late.
This is what only allowing positive posts and no bashers does for the common investor/trader. In this manner, I say Raging Bull would be a welcome format change, at least there you can see your risks as well as the optimistic PR generated benefits.
Subtlerise,
Thank you for the charts - GREATLY appreciated!
OK, I understand your points, up to a point.
I strongly feel that the posts that point out that we may have been taken for a ride and set up to be bag holders are very informative about the possible tactics that might have been used to get us into this stock so that others could exit at some level of a profit with no regard for the losses we take providing their opportunity for an exit. I want to be informed about these tactics, and hate when you people have them removed. I want to see the posts even if I may be in the stock that they have been used on and even if I am one of the gullible bag holders. At least it educates me to stay away of what else may be happening with that company and gives me some idea of how to cut my losses and how to possibly be much more cautious in the future.
All comments about how someone "MAY HAVE" frontloaded a stock and then kept telling others how beneficial all the developments would be and that this stock is one to keep holding even as it goes down are surely just conjecture, but INFORMATIVE conjecture about how someone of opposing views sees what has happened. These things DO HAPPEN even though you people do not want to think that it is a very real possibility that you may have been taken in on this tactic.
Now, for the record, I do not believe that this is what Latino did on purpose. I believe he truly believes in this company and is a bit taken aback about what it has done the past two to three months, and he just got caught up in a bad investment that he truly believed was going to be a good one and he tried to help us others benefit from the same prifits he was hoping to benefit from.
However, I like to see how other, more skeptical people might view his moves, because I am an overly trusting person and I need skeptics to point out possible things I may be taking in too trusting a manner so that I can invest more cautiously. After all, scam artists are very crafty at making people believe they are sincere and I believe it only benefits us all to get input from the other SKEPTICS that post warnings about tactics that they possibly see other posters employing. It does not make them true, but it gives us others something to keep thinking about while we are deciding whether to hold or not. Whether you and the other IHUB posters want to accept it or not, there is a level of crafty scam artists and frontloaders on these IHUB boards - it is inevitable. Their feet need to be held to the fire so this is not a candy store for them to make profits off of trusting people.
EVERYONE needs to be called to task for their mistakes to try to keep the successes of these types at a minimum. Even the posters that you and I think are sincere. I think Latino has been great in that he has, on NUMEROUS occasions, answered the accusations and THAT IS WHAT THE FORUM IS FOR. Let the ones that might call him to task do such, do not remove their posts, and then let us see his or other defenders' responses, and decide for ourselves what we think to be the most accurate story. Now, I agree, when they get down to cussing and MEAN name-calling, remove them. However, when they are posting suspicions and accusations, THEY SHOULD REMAIN FOR ALL TO READ and for us to then see the counterarguments.
Not getting all sides of the story is what angers me so. Even countryclub goers have differing viewpoints and it is only courteous to display them all.
Boy, I sure get very, very, very, very, EXTREMELY tired and downright ANGRY about all the posts being removed. It is like only one side of a story is allowed and if anyone dare disagree with it, well they are not allowed to give others some information. I have over 200,000 shares of this stock and I sure as hell would like to be able to read both the positive AND THE NEGATIVE posts about it so that I, ME, THE PERSON DECIDING WHETHER OR NOT I'VE BEEN GULLIBLE AND JUMPED IN ON A SCAM OR NOT, can then decide what I want to do about it. You people praise IHUB so much about being different from the RB, and I thought I liked IHUB, BUT I SURE HATE not being able to see both sides of the stories. All these IHUB boards keep removing posts of people who have opinions that point out how they very adamantly disagree with some of the regulars and by God, you better follow the regulars or people do not get to see what you might see as possible warnings.
I would have gotten rid of some of my GMDP shares and not be holding back on things my family needs a bit more, IF I HAD BEEN ALLOWED TO SEE SOME OF THE NEGATIVE POSTS that would have made me think twice of being so positive about this stock's potential.
Even though you strong, confident longs think this is the greatest thing since buttered bread, some of us others would like to at least see the other side, even if it may have some, or even numerous, distasteful comments.
I hate the way you think you have a right to influence my trading decisions by limiting my information to only being allowed to read positive comments about the company you happen to find favor with.
I know you are but this is the ONLY company I know enough to be able to use for examples to speed up my learning curve. I do not, yet, know how to find the numbers on other companies and use APPROPRIATE numbers for analyses. I know a whole lot about NTWK and in such, I can learn so much more by analyzing its tactics rather than trying to look at someone else.
Once I learn what numbers to look for, and where and how to find them, then I can have appropriate discussions on other comapnies but for now I am stuck with good ol Netsol.
OK Evans,
In regards to our conversation on Friday, NOT the conversation Sat morning:
Like I said, I understood what you were saying and how you got your numbers when we were talking, but I could not reiterate what you were saying, so it is still a bit foggy. This post is in regards to what you think NTWK is going to give in the deal with SSI, here I go:
You said you think they are going to value SSI in the same manner as NTWK themselves are valued in the market, at 3.64 x book (rougly). When we talked, I remember you going through all the numbers and coming up with why you say 15M shares for the deal, but I have no idea how you got there now. Let me do my math, and see if you can point out where I am straying from your line of thinking.
SSI did 5M in revenues last year (from some source posted on the Yahoo board, but don't remember who or the source).
3.64 x 5 = $18,200,000 that NTWK will give SSI to close the deal IN YOUR MIND. WOW!!! I already think this is WAY TOO MUCH!!!!
If NTWK values their shares at say Friday's closing price of 2.05 (I know it will be an avg of 30 or 60 ds, just using this to make it simple), they would have to offer SSI 8,878,050 shares.
If value shares at $1/share, they would have to give SSI 18,200,000 shares
OS is 7,880,000:
SO, they would have to issue, say about 20M shares at $1/share,
OR say 10M shares at $2.05/sh.
I do not get the 15M you are coming up with, and I have no idea why you would think they would go down to $1/share????
So, as you can see, I lost a number or a few in the translateion which means I still do not understand.
Now here is what I was thinking. Shoot holes in it for me:
SSI valued at 5M (1 x last years sales or revenues). IF NTWK was valued at $3/share in the original talks and they are offering 10% of the deal in cash (from CC) that brought it to $500,000 in cash and $4.5M in shares. $4.5M/$3= 1,500,000 shares.
7,880,000 x .2 = 1,576,000 which is why they thought they could do it for less than 20% of the shares. However, I bet SSI said no, we will not value your shares at $3 (because they knew they could pressure the price down BIGtime), we will only value them at say $2.65
4.5/2.65 = 1,698,000 shares required to close the deal which they KNEW would put NTWK into needing to offer a PROXY vote to dilute to have more shares available. This would cause the price to FALL, (and in SSI's mind hopefully even further than 2.65, which it did) and they would get an even better deal.
So now we are at $2.05, so we get $4.5M/2.05 = 2,195,000 shares that NTWK will give SSI.
I really think the deal will be $500,000 cash + 2M shares valued at 2.25. I also think NTWK will proxy for 5M shares and, like you said, they will stupidly enough undervalue them at $2.25/share. JMO. Let me know what you think of my calculations.
One other thought: Could they issue 2M at 2.25 for the deal and another 3M at say 3.25 for other funding instead of issuing them all at today's current market price?
See, this is how I think: Very detailed, EVERY step, and s-l-o-w, LOL.
You just need to take your Northeast SPEEDTALK and ratchet it down several notches to my Arkansas (where I am from) slow twaang)ang)ng)ng)g)g)g)))) 8>). LOL.
I get dense when it comes to talking numbers. I like to understand where they all come from.
IPVO released their 10Q.
Has anyone looked at it?
Any discussion?
Ev,
Did you read my PM yet?
Thanks to all for a warm welcome to the board. Looks like I have found me a new board on which to lurk around. I'm looking forward to becoming a part of the gang here, slowly but surely.
CMF has dried up quite drastically and has gone negative - an indicator that it will likely be a while before any more positive activity occurs in this stock. Likely to continue dropping instead.
CCI has bottomed out just a bit below -100. I would not consider re-entry into this until the CCI crossed over the zero line with a strong angle (say 30 degrees or better) to the upside. Historically, it could be a couple of months before any real interest is generated in this stock again.
It is likely that the price will continue to drop until it is resting on the lower Bollie at about .015 and may ride that for a few trading periods prior to any uptrend back towards midline or tightening of the band widths. Could break through the lower Bollie and have the PPS continue with a major downtrend. Will need to wait until get some tightening before there would be any appropriate anticipation of a price movement and this movement could go either direction (more likely down at this point in time).
Thanks again for the IPVO chart analysis. You have confirmed my belief that I was getting ready to dump this potential bank-maker a bit too soon. What I really appreciate from your analyses, is that you give very good, methodical ways of finding stops and profit-taking points. I have been considering selling my AAC to buy back my NTWK shares from long ago. However, since IPVO has gotten its feet under it now and they still have not released the earnings that are due out any day now and that are to be quite positive, I may have to re-think that plan and redirect my profits from AAC into IPVO rather than NTWK. Appears to be a much better short-term profit potential.
Thanks for the book suggestions and the analysis of the NTWK chart. I had noticed the money flow being down a bit and thus, I had cooled my jets a little about rushing back into this stock. My biggest concern is that I am very confident that they are getting ready to release a few very good PRs very soon and I have been in this stock for sooooo long, I did not want to miss out on another of their stellar run-ups. (it is too long of a story to waste your time, LOL).
GREAT!
I'll pop in on Tuesdays' discussions when I can.
My first big basic problem is that old saying every body gives about doing your own due dillingence. That's great, but I am confused about which fundamantals I should really pay attention to to make up a good foundation for performing appropriate DD.
Any suggestioons welcome and also WHER I FIND THAT INFORMATION IN WHAT FORMS? There are so many forms S-8s, S-3s, 10Ks, 10Qs, Prospectuses, research reports, Financial reports released to summarize the quarterly reports, etc., etc., and they each focus on such different information.
I need to develop a system to know where to go, and to know what pertinent information to extract from those sources, so that I can make appropriate comparisons instead of comparing apples to grapefruits, LOL. There is such a plethora of information to process just in doing the DD, AND THEN there are the CHARTS AND TECHNICAL INDICATORS!!!! You can see I have become quite overwhelmed, LOL.
Harley,
Are you the person who put out a response to my "Cryptic" invitation on the Yahoo AAC board to come over here to IHUB for some discussion? I have this IHUB Swing Trade board on my list of boards I want to watch but there is SOOOOOOOO much informaiton here on IHUB that my head is spinning trying to figure out where the best place to lauch from is. I appreciate your invite and will watch this baord a bit closer now.
I have been trading on and off for four years now and I have done horribly at it. I have come to roost a bit on IHUB, hoping to get some better chart reading skills and intuition about how to play certain stocks at certain times.
Right now, I am in AAC and NTWK BIG time, IPVO, GMDP, GWDL. My ambition is to be able to ride their upward moves and trade out of one or two into the others when they ride up and then so on and so on. I am certainly willing to add another couple of stocks to my list like DCGN, SDGL, GZFX, HQNT, etc., and get rid of one or two of these I have been trading at the appropriate time. However, my problem is the minute I get out, they go up and when I get in, they drop like a rock. I certainly need some coaching to get a better feel of choosing entry and exit points.
I'm thinking AAC and IPVO are both good for at least another 20-30% within the next month. I hope I am correct.
NTWK is also very likely to make another of its flash runs by May 5 and I am hopeful to sell my AAC and IPVO to get my shares of NTWK back prior to their run up.
Any advice from any of the experienced, successful traders here would be enormously appreciated.
Ditzils and Kidhp: My first 2 questions are:
1) Could you recommend a book or two that would teach me how to read charts and understand technical indicators (and choose 4 to 6 for my preferrd indicators and time frame set-ups) as eloquently as you two do?
2) Could you do a similar analysis on NTWK and IPVO as you did on AAC Friday afternoon 4-2-03. I am trying to trade back and forth among these three and I would greatly appreciate you sharing any insight you might be able to offer.
(Another that I am in, but it is down right now, is GMDP - I think major news will have to happen before it will be in any position that your input could help , so I'll wait to ask for your assistance on that one.
LOLOL
I'm very happy for you and very pleased to see you are so confident.
That number just keeps going up, and up, and up - you gluttonous pig you! JK.
I have not been able to sell out of my other stocks at a high enough price yet that would enable me to get my shares back in NTWK. I am just anxiously awaiting the turns of events every day. I hate to tell you but I am pleased to see NTWK floundering a bit, because I need less profits from my others to get back those shares I hope to buy when and if NTWK gets back to 2.40 to 2.50. XXX.
(That's "keeping my fingers crossed" LOL)
Down to $1.30.