Let me rephrase this. I posted
"Unless of course, Interceptor72 would do us a favor and contact them. I think you are better informed here, and have the points lined up such that you can better ask MR Lutz or Mr. Vergas the questions in a manner that they can give effective answers."
I should have said, I think you are better informed here THAN ME, ...
I think EVEN is better informed than any of us here, and that also bodes well to cause us to be suspicious of his motives. Why would someone be so exquisitely informed about a company that they have no interest in putting their money in? Could EVEN be getting fed information about the company and it's places of possible concern by an investment group, a fund or the likes, in order to be SO informed that he can effectively cause legitimate concerns in investors' minds?
Is this what you are doing, Even? Or are you like me, just a VERY skeptical investor that wants to know all the details possible about a company, both positive AND NEGATIVE, they are considering investing in? If the second is true, then it would be prudent for you to contact the company. But since you seemm very hesitant to do that, it brings up all kinds of questions about your motives.
Again, I want to hear your concerns because they are LEGITIMATE and I do NOT want you to be shut up. However, I am also placing responsibility on you to help us find the answers in every way possible, including your turns at talking with the company.
So, come join us in our quest for answers, Even, and let's make some money together. OK?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
