Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
All this talk about what's on the bid & the volume & all that stuff means nothing to me. The pps has closed in the 1 cent range for the past 21 straight sessions & for 67 of the past 71 sessions. Prolly for the majority of the past year. Speaks much louder to me than this trivial day to day stuff.
There will not be any "ending the year strong" because there is no reason for that to occur. It will end as weak and low priced as it has for the past 4 straight years, in my opinion.
Anyone capable of paying the least bit of attention would know, since Ive posted it many many times, that I did NOT have a problem with vplm in the beginning. It came considerable later when I began to see the lies & inconsistencies. I have explained all that so many times. That's what happens when forming ridiculous conclusions w/o 1st gathering the facts! In fact, that whole concept is ignorant because no one would buy into a stock & then keep buying & buying & buying as the price was climbing 4x what I originally paid, before I finally realized the nefariousness of vplm and connected many dots to support that conclusion. Therefore the pure & wrong assumption that anyone 10 yrs in & doesn't like the company, is very flawed to begin with as I just explained.
Big mic DROP!
Been right here for about 10 yrs posting all the same info as I learned of it. Just for the hell of it, I'll check this same date 4 yrs ago & see if you were posting.
Look at this bs from a 2019 eZine article:
".... today announced an interview
(https://www.ceocfointerviews.com/interviews/VOI P-PAL1019.htm) with Emil
Malak, founder of Voip-Pal (OTCQB:VPLM), a Vancouver, B.C.-based company
inventers and pioneers of the switching technology now being used by many of
the world's largest telecommunication and social networking companies,.... "
Imagine that emu was the "founder of vplm"!!!
I'm sorry, you'll prolly have trouble with that one plus its way off on the peaks anyway. I meant to give you this one...
Wow, it gave you the wrong one AGAIN! I don't know how it's doing that. Lemme try again..
https://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/advchart/frames/frames.asp?show=&insttype=Stock&symb=VPLM&time=20&startdate=1%2F4%2F1999&enddate=10%2F6%2F2021&freq=1&compidx=aaaaa%3A0&comptemptext=&comp=none&ma=0&maval=9&uf=0&lf=1&lf2=0&lf3=0&type=2&style=320&size=2&x=25&y=16&timeFrameToggle=false&compareToToggle=false&indicatorsToggle=false&chartStyleToggle=false&state=8
There we go! That's the right one! Ya get it
Keep in mind that according to Emus own words, he was connected with and friends with & working with the ppl of vplm long before any talk of acquisition. They hatched this rotten egg long ago...imho
I'm sorry, you'll prolly have trouble with that one plus its way off on the peaks anyway. I meant to give you this one...
https://www.tradingview.com/chart/J1jtfuRC/?symbol=OTC%3AVPLM
Here's a link to a chart that goes back into 2003. Check out the price it hit in early 2004. They were a Voip service provider (allegedly) even before this time. Supposedly not, but I have very rare records that prove otherwise. There's 3 main peaks. The last 2 were due to the huge bullshitting & outright lying PRs, as authored by that scoundrel, Chang. The last one was due to the IPRs & all the paid pumping that followed it. Notice how ALL spikes are ALWAYS followed IMMEDIATELY by falling back near the bottom and how it stays a bottom feeder for years at time.
https://www.tradingview.com/chart/J1jtfuRC/?symbol=OTC%3AVPLM
Esp that 5 yr chart. That REALLY tells a story! But have you seen the charts that go back to 2003/4?
I don't know.. Could it be because stocks go up & down on a regular basis???
As vplm jumps up & down in the 1 freakin cent range, good time to "write home about it", eh?
The key here is that it NEVER keeps going up. It ALWAYS drops right back down after an increase. ALWAYS!
Another benefit of weekly shareholder count would be to widen the aptitude parameters for understanding percentages. Not negative percentages, but those that drop by more than 100%.
So let's say the 1st weekly report on the number of shareholders at that point is 1000. On the 2nd week, it jumps to 2000. On the 3rd week it loses 1000. That loss is 50% of the previous weeks count, BUT, it's also 100% loss of the original 1st week count. Isn't that odd...it's both a 50% loss AND a 100% loss, depending on what you choose to compare it to, or the "basis". They are both fully legitimate percentages. It's just like geometry, ie, it's all in the angles or the point of view. It's just another example of now everything is relative. So, on week 4, the count jumps up to 5000 (major pump campaign, lol). But on week 5 dro ps back by 4000 down to 1000 again. That's an 80% drop from the previous week, BUT IT'S A 400% DROP FROM WHAT IT WAS THE 1ST WEEK!
I hope I didn't make any minor mistakes in that example (after all, I'm only a h.s. dropout) but the basic concept is there and sound.
There are some who for some reason, cannot wrap their head around this basic math exercise & there are those who simply refuse to, even tho they know better & instead, use it as an example of something, for years on end, and constantly.. It doesn't take too much brains to discern why they would do that. What that means, effectively, is that every time they do it, instead of actually demonstrating the incorrectness of the the original fact posted, they are just showing what level they operate from. Very similar, in fact almost a carbon copy of the level vplm & emu operates from.
...not only a "demand FOR it", but a NEED to spread it, such as the one, originally, who claimed to know roughly the actual number [5000].
Easy to understand the privacy rights of individual shareholders, unless they choose to be NOBOS, but I don't understand why the number of individual shareholders cannot or is not disclosed. The 2 things are mutually exclusive. I thought that was the orig question, ie, how many shareholders are there? I also don't understand why they list the number "of record" they do, as it seems meaningless & useless (like vplm patents). Why does the actual number of shareholders need to be a secret?
Oh, I'm sure Emu does so cuz it must be best for us. He doesn't want us to hurt ourselves w/too much useless information. Everything he does is for our fiduciary best interests.......RIGHT?????
In fact, didn't he get some kind of award or something for just that...from some court or something?
Don't fret.. The doo-wap is way up, don't ya know?
Ok, ok...to be fair, the true #1 biggest lie(s) ever told was Changs near 2 year series of PRs about the acquisition & what was to immed ensue from it. Everything else kind of pales...
Can anyone guess what is vplm's favorite color?
Welcome to a place of never ending court dates, never occurring trial wins, never occurring sales, never occurring revenue (aside from selling shares), never occurring licensing, continuous lying, misleading info via PRs, 4 yrs of a massive, approx 97% downtrend in price, phony baloney "offers", where pretty much all the former BOD have quit, where honest, forthright & pertinent info seems to always be lacking, where rulebreaking is allowed to happen with zero repercussions ever (for ex., filing beneficial changes in stock gifting as much as 2 yrs late on multiple occasions), where a near 25 year record of failure can be found (or about 10 yrs with the current patent troll model), a somewhat shady and/or questionable past & current business dealings of the current CEO. And where, in all likelihood, one can expect another 10 yrs of ongoing litigation before anything is finally determined & very little expectation for anything close to the original promises & projections & expectations to ever be realized.
You've misplaced the source of the BS. I never said a thing about there having been more than 1 (alleged) offer by Dr Gil. In fact, i CLEARLY stated that he failed to come back w/a follow up offer. I made a POINT of it! What I DID say was that vplm has lied in the past about supposed imminent deals & so called "offers on the table", when there were none. I ALSO said that no one else (aside from Dr Gil alleged offer) has ever made an offer. Yup... THAT'S what i SAID!
It also shows how the "offers on the table" & "deals imminent", that vplm has lied about in the past were just that, total BS. Not at all surprising tho, as the whole scheme has been based on lies from the git. Ppl just won't accept that.
Pardon me for butting in but it's definitely not meaningless that vplm has, with many various instances of litigation and them being both plaintiff & defendant, over many years, never had a monetary judgement. That goes for both patents & other issues. I think that's very significant & the flaw is in finding it meaningless. You may have not known that before but you might now. It's meaningful in that it establishes a long term pattern for vplm.
2 years of incriminating PRs pulled from the otc records. 2 YEARS! They used to be there...
This is the way the DOTS connect...dots connect...dots connect.......this is the way the DOTS CONNECT, so early in the morning!
What a crock...
How's that $25B working out?
Need more predictions!
Show us your predictions!
More of that 'movin up' action today. Gotta luv it! If we're 'goin to da moon', I think we might need to be put in suspended animation for awhile, eh?
Here's someone's idea of "its been moving up"...
Let's take a look at the real numbers...
To start with vplm has been on a near 4 yr long, massive, over 95% loss & downtrend from it's high. Also....
5 yrs - down 65.38%
3 yrs - down 76.92%
6 mos - down 9.55%
1 mo - down 7.46%
Sept 3 (18 trading days ago) pps was 2.2 cents. Every day since, the price has closed down below that price. (incl wed.)
5 trading days ago, the price was .1826. Price has closed below that everyday since, incl Wed.
If this is definitive of "moving up", who needs it? Blecccch. Never ending fake news. And never ending setting it straight.
You could only lose $2 on the lotfery, but the upside is far more than 500x hello! Simple math
How bout some more predictions?
Mighty big "IF", cause ain't never gonna happen...
They'll probably start announcing another bogus "settlement offer", which will put more delays in the trials. They've done it before & then later, they just say it's a mistake or someone's else's lie, etc. The monkey wrenches have only begun. Ain't seen nothin yet!
It is not judge Allbrights "philosophy" that patents are assumed valid, as though he developed such a philosophy about it. That's just silly talk. I am the 1st one here on this blog, years ago, to have posted about the ridiculousness of questioning the validity of a patent. I explained that the very act of awarding a patent obviously comes with validity. The application goes thru a procecution process & if the patent is awarded, then it's a valid patent, period...until someone invalidates it. That's why, in the IPR's they gained nothing, because they never lost their inherent validity. To say you have a "philosophy" of a patent has validity, as opposed to someone else with an opposing "philosophy", is bogus. Patents are valid, PERIOD....until ruled otherwise. So of course vplm deserves an in-kind consideration. So the judge sets a good example here but it doesn't matter because vplm will find some way to steer clear of Alice & markman & discovery as it knows it better not come too close to that or their cover (the compelling story & the actual patent language) will start to unravel...
In the red again. It's in the red so often, might as well call vplm "the lady in red"...
"TEN YEARS??? EMIL HASN'T HAD VPLM FOR TEN YEARS!
* In fact, Emu has been pulling strings & calling shots for over 10 yrs. He began accumulating vplm stock long ago. As emu stated a long time ago, they were friends & working on this (scheme) long before the acquisition. That's right, it's in print, in an early PR. Then he became a director close to 10 yrs ago but was very involved with vplm & the takeover 10 yrs ago or very close to it. In fact the acquisition was 1st announced very close to 10 yrs ago but was obviously already being worked out before that. How does one think he got all the shares he got? 10 yrs ago, he and Chang were putting together the big Hustle.
............................
VPLM HAS HAD ONLY ONE PATENT FOR AS LONG AS 9 YEARS!
* wrong. Vplm has not had any patents for 9 yrs
........................ "
The VPLM lawsuits are little more than 5 years!!
* wrong. Vplm lawsuits go back closer to 6 yrs than 5.
................................
Emil started and the stock was as low as $.0025...SINCE, VPLM has been to $.30/$.35/$.40... VPLM has worked out well for my 4.7 shares and me.
* I do"n't think vplm ever went as low as .0025 that I know of, but in any event, these post Emu prices are a bad example because the same .30, .35, .40 was achieved looong before the Emu, like 16 yrs ago.
.............................
VPLM has d"efeated 12 iprs, two being full trials vs. aapl! ESTOPPEL APPLIES!!!!
* in fact, Estoppel has NEVER been applied!!!
...............................
Heard, from outside the VPLM community that the Avatar lawsuit worked out quite well for Emil!
* bullshit in its purest form. Absolutely no evidence of any kind for this. Simply made it up.
..............................
Ten years--------->>>>>BULLSHIT!!!"
* no it is not. The scheming, involving Emu & Chang has been going on for at least 10 yrs. In fact I have posted PRs which are close to 10 yrs old, which claim the acquisition is a done deal.
VWAP-A-DOO-WAP-A-WAP-BAM-BOOM!
$$$$$ VP=LM $$$$$
(voip-pal = lose money)
What you've seen for the last 10 yrs, that's what to expect for the next 10. Been telling you all along, at least for the last 8 or 9.
Pipe dream is all...
How many years has it been now, trying to sue the. bigs w/o any success? 5 or 6? I'll have to check.
* I checked. Going on 6 yrs! Lol
How much has Hudnell been paid so far. Anyone know? Is that disclosed? Or is that ANOTHER vplm secret?
From this point in time, I calculate the vplm half life to be 9.8 years...