Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Balamidas...
The news is nice. I see a lot of new names. I see I have a lot of catching up to do. CHNW is looking very solid.
v/r
Sterling
Cargo_hauler...
It looks like I have a little bit of catching up to do. The halt surprised me, but I guess I understand. I'm not sure if I agree, but I do understand. Did I miss the date for the reverse split? It looks like it never happened.
v/r
Sterling
1cashkill & Cautionupahead...
I do see both views and how they differ and relate to the pros and cons of DANS. I must thank both of you for sharing your thoughts as it has made things a little easier for getting caught up on what has transpired. I appreciate both views tilted towards the right and left. I think we do share the same visions with the value of DANS. Thanks again.
v/r
Sterling
1cashkill, with those options...
Those are decent options which should all be positive for us shareholders. I'm a little rusty on the buyout rules, but I think that in order for them to go private, they would need to make shareholders a tender offer to mirror due diligence available for the public.
With no up to date info made public, the tender offer would probably need to be attractive enough for shareholders to approve. If a tender offer is made, I think then we would no doubt receive a proxy via mail or electronically to vote. From talking to the company, he mentioned something to the extent of them being like a private company with having less than 250 shareholders as their reason for them going to the pinks. Going private could be their goal.
v/r
Sterling
1cashkill, with the voting...
If I had to guess, because DANS is on the pink sheets, I think that it will probably be rigged (for the better) for us to not have a say so in the matter since we didn't have a say so for putting together such a huge deal. I don't see them risking it. It would be a nice gesture if we were considered.
ICON has some serious plans for paying the $70 million and potentially extra in cash for DANS intellectual property and they are going to make sure this transpires very quickly in my opinion from reading the closures on ICON's past deals.
ICON is not even going to let DANS do any talking during the Conference Call from what I was told. ICON will be answering all questions about the deal. I guess that's the difference between ICON being a NASDAQ company and DANS being a pink sheets company.
v/r
Sterling
Nsomniyak, to better explain my thoughts...
The comments I made in some of my earlier posts could lead one to think that a Balance Sheet and Income Statement are basically the same documents when in fact they are different. I’m normally rushing trying to make posts, but I do apologize if I have confused you on the matter as I do know the difference. I could have been a bit more explicit. This might have been where the disparity in our thoughts existed.
The Income Statement would be where the $70 million would be listed as Revenues to have any remaining funds documented as Income to generate the positive Earnings Per Share (EPS) that I was referring to (minus Expenses).
The Balance Sheet would be where the $70 million would be listed as Assets to have the remaining funds listed as Equity to generate the positive Book Value (BV) that I think you were referring to (minus Liabilities).
Listing the $70 million as Revenues is the beauty of this deal from how I understand things. This is what will be different as I was informed by the individual working for ICON who is responsible for the ICON and DANS deal. Because it will be considered as cash received for them selling their product, it will be logged as Revenues and not as an Asset.
If DANS would have been receiving this cash because of them liquidating through a Bankruptcy for an example, then the cash would have been logged as Equity. This is also where the Preferred Shareholders would have really mattered to what would have been given to Common Shareholders (us) because the Preferred Shareholders gets paid first.
Since DANS is not doing a Bankruptcy and the preferred shares have not been converted (confirmed by the company), we don’t have to worry about that. This is why I think the OS is still under 69 million shares as I was told by the Vice President of DANS. The $70 million will be placed into the company to enhance the company's value and not distributed out directly to us shareholders.
You mentioned that the $70 million in cash will be a one time entry in their fillings in which you would be correct if it was going to be listed as Equity. It is easy to view as such because cash is usually listed and included as Assets within the financials under the Balance Sheet.
Because the $70 million is going to be listed as Revenues to generate what we suspect will generate a positive EPS, it would be listed within their quarterly filings (10Q) and their annual filings (10K) on the Income Statement to carry a certain value for at least a year to not include any other Income that might have been generated. This is a nice jumpstart for the growth of the company.
Sorry for the confusion if I caused any when sometimes I might have posted as if I used the terms interchangeably. I hope this helps.
v/r
Sterling
Nsomniyak, about your numbers...
I can agree with your numbers and how you derived them, but I think your total price of .16 per share should be viewed as the EPS and not the share price. That means you can multiply your .16 by a PE Ratio to better derive an anticipated share price.
Usually a conservative PE Ratio of 12 is considered. However, for the Industry that DANS is in, either Textile - Apparel Clothing or Textile - Apparel Footwear & Accessories, the PE Ratio would be 18.60 or 22.50 respectively. These are the figures that would be considered for use as a multiple to reflect its Industry’s growth rate. Reference the link below:
http://biz.yahoo.com/p/3conameu.html
I called and spoke to the person that works for ICON that is responsible for doing the deal and he specifically informed me that the deal would be listed as Revenues on the DANS Balance Sheets. For him to say that, subliminally leads me to think that something definitely is going to be left after paying their debt or he would have told me that there will be nothing remaining to list as Revenues. He wouldn't tell me anything about the Expenses though. His name is Joseph Teklits who works under ICON's section called Integrated Corporate Relations out of Connecticut. His phone number is 203-682-8258. He is also the guy at the bottom of the ICON PR.
You are listing your figure as Equity. It’s a different consideration that must be considered if such was to be the case. From my understanding from talking with DANS and ICON personnel, I think that the $15 million will either be cash or ICON shares “cashed in” to go towards paying off debt. This will replace $15 million out of the $70 million going towards Revenues which should allow for an extra $15 million to be included on their Balance Sheets, Income Statement, etc. Revenues.
So in essence, even if DANS had $70 million in debt, the first $15 million as the contingent payment can go towards paying off the debt. This is why I think they want to remain nontransparent on the pink sheets to not have to officially report how they are straightening out their books for success. All the public is going to see is that DANS utilized strategically $85 million with probably a little more than $15 million as Income.
It’s really a good plan as ICON is the right company to team with. If they were reporting, they would have to apply all of the $70 million towards eliminating their debt, but then they would be forced to log the $15 million in contingent payments as Equity because of it being received after the $70 million in cash. Then the numbers you posted would actually apply for the books. This is assuming that the debt is $70 million in which I believe was subliminally confirmed to be less than $70 million for the reason I stated in the early portion of this post. These are only my opinions.
v/r
Sterling
Cautionupahead...
The lady mentioned that in her email to me. I won't post her email, but I do recommend going to my post with the Hoovers info on there and contact Hoovers. I hope that helps.
v/r
Sterling
JJSeabrook...
Thanks for sharing your constructive thoughts on this matter.
v/r
Sterling
With the AAPM Reverse Split...
A reverse split is still psychological just as a forward split. With it being a 1 for 10 ratio, to include reverse splitting the shares in the Treasury (Authorized Shares), it tends to lean towards the thought that they must really have news of substance and not to continue with an expected dilution pattern. That part of the reverse split is actually very positive for a few reasons.
1,000,000 x .0002 = $200 is the same as 100,000 x .002 = $200
Know too that it matters much more the actions of the company and not so much what I think. The market usually doesn’t see things like I do some of the time.
Make no doubt about it, any company doing a reverse split in the penny stock world is generally considered bad news. It is almost always a bad sign in the penny stock market because it usually spells out a pattern of continued dilution where shareholders continuously lose.
The normal thought is to sell on reverse split news and buy back in after the split and anticipated dip to see what news gets released. Since they didn’t put out a PR and reduced the AS too, that could be interpreted as a huge show of confidence for the substance they have to release. They must become transparent though in the very near future or the market will react.
Our fate is up to the company and how powerful an update will be to incorporate the reverse split. If they don’t release powerful news to support the reverse split, then doing one would have been a very bad idea as AAPM will probably drop or drift downwards. Doing one now was a bad idea in my opinion as it could have killed some serious momentum that had been building on AAPM.
My thoughts for the potential for AAPM remains the same in my two posts below given if they release the same anticipated numbers for Earnings and/or other huge news of substance. Just move the decimal one place to the right of the price and drop a tenths position on your holdings and the same effects should be fundamentally expected.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=17172674
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=17382275
Remember, if they company comes through with positive news of substance, the reverse split will be psychological.
v/r
Sterling
Stushy, with the .085 EPS...
That is very huge! That .085 EPS can be multiplied by any conservative PE Ratio one would like to use to get a better idea as to where it should be heading in the future. This is not taking into consideration other portions of the $740 million. The math is already done on this one. IMHO
v/r
Sterling
With the Hoovers Update…
I recently received an email from Anna L. Porlas, Editorial Customer Advocate, Hoover's, Inc., a D&B Company, who responded to my inquiry. I was going to post her response until I got to the bottom of her email and she stated…
…The information contained in this communication is confidential. This communication is the property of Hoover's, Inc. and is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me promptly and delete the message. Any distribution or copying of this message without my prior consent is prohibited.
Because of the above piece at the end, I won’t post her answers to my question asking how up to date is the release of the DANS info to them saying that DANS “appears to have recovered from its financial problems of the past few years” as stated in their recent Hoovers report in the link below:
http://www.hoovers.com/danskin/--ID__15863--/free-co-factsheet.xhtml
I won’t post the email, but I will say that in my opinion, I think the info reported in the Hoovers report is as up to date as the latest DANS press release. I recommend you emailing Hoovers at the link above with your questions about the validity and time frame of any updates to see of you get the same info since the info is considered confidential.
v/r
Sterling
Cautionupahead, From DANS about your thoughts…
Your thoughts are very well respected and appreciated. You are correct in that it would be nice if we could get more info from DANS, but I think we are not going to get very much. I called and spoke to John A. Sarto who is the Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of DANS and he is also the POC at the bottom of the DANS PR.
John wasn't giving up any info "hardly" at all. I did manage to squeeze a little info out of him though. He mentioned that the OS was 68.5 million not including the preferred. He stated their last reported numbers for the OS and share structure are still the same. He said the preferred has not been converted into common. From my guess, I don’t think they are about to convert any time soon for positive reasons. He sounded like he had a secret and you can tell that he was not budging releasing anything of significant value.
He definitely doesn’t want to do or say anything that could jeopardize the $70 million in cash and $15 million contingent payments. He said that he just can’t tell me anything without telling any of the other shareholders. I told him I respected that. He told me that the reason that they stop filing to go to the pinks was not because of money, he told me that it was because of them having less than 250 shareholders and that they could operate and do things as a private company because of that amount of shareholders.
With the 6 Mar 07 Conference Call, ICON is running the show. DANS won’t be the ones explaining and answering questions about the deal as to how it affects DANS and ICON. ICON will be running the show to explain everything and answer all the questions. From talking with John, they are going to let ICON handle everything. They have huge confidence in ICON and it appears that neither company is going to allow DANS to screw anything up which makes sense since ICON has done these types of deals before. What should we expect from a NASDAQ trading company.
John also told me that the $15 million is not going to be given out to shareholders as a dividend from their current plans. It’s going to be placed back into the company along with the $70 million in cash. At first I was a little disappointed, but then I realized that doing so is actually better for the shareholders for growth and enhanced shareholder value than a short term dividend that loses its value to the company after it’s given. It looks like we have to keep digging as we wait.
v/r
Sterling
Eagle1...
Thanks. I am expecting for CHNW to continue with solid to very upward movement. Things seem to be falling in place very nicely. I think the news from this point forward will continue to be positive with substance revealing objectives of where the company is heading. IMHO
v/r
Sterling
Urbanite2, that looks good!(EOM)
Awesome news!(EOM)
Allinxxl1968, With Future CHNW News...
CHNW is looking very solid. They are no doubt strategically planning the release of news at this point in my opinion. I am expecting to see a PR explaining the share buyback. I am guessing that we will see numbers no lower than 1 billion shares.
Then, I would like to see a PR explaining positive results of the FOREX platform beta testing. This would validate that there are no delays in forward moving. Investors normally don’t weigh well with delays. No delays would mean no break in momentum that has been building.
Then it would be nice to see news of the name, CUSIP#, and ticker changes. Depending on the continued momentum, a cash dividend would always be nice, but might not really be necessary. A small cash dividend would make for a more aggressive covering of any naked short positions in my opinion for the reasons I posted earlier.
Then news of substance from a major supporter to confirm the validity of why other major players will be willing to lock into positions of CHNW. Although it’s a little too early to start talking Institutions, but with the right major supporter, I suspect we will be seeing much more positive volume at higher levels. These are only my opinions as to how I think CHNW could be strategically planning the release of future news.
v/r
Sterling
Timmage, about your thoughts...
You do have a valid point about a small cash dividend. Since you can't fictitiously create cash as you can electronic shares, any naked short position would be forced to cover aggressively if it exists in my opinion.
Or to better explain it, creating electronic money to put into somebody's account will have to be accounted for differently and eventually coming out of somebody's pocket. Cash is very unlikely to be fictitiously created as like naked short shares are fictitiously electronically created since nothing has been in place to force a covering of those shares as it should be.
A cash dividend would do wonders if they paid the small cash dividend out to the new ticker immediately after the name and CUSIP# change. I think .001 would be too high though for a cash dividend. At these price levels, the main reason for a small cash dividend would be to really hit up hard any naked short position to cover very hard.
Something that the company has to consider too is that a cash dividend would be short lived. Since we are already doing a name, CUSIP#, and ticker change, it might be better to put those funds back into the company by announcing some buying back of more shares at higher prices and doing it which would be a huge show of confidence into the fundamentals of your company to the market. IMHO
v/r
Sterling
Timmage...
It appears that a new base might be building. IMHO
v/r
Sterling
Ciaobaby, with the Conf. Call Phone #...
I will do some research to get the number if I can if it is not released in the very near future even though I don't think I will have the liberty to listen to the Conference Call (depends on a few things).
As long as DANS have been quiet, I just don't think they are having a Conference Call in conjunction with ICON if they didn't have anything powerful to say. ICON giving them $70 million in cash and very possibly more keeps leading me to think that something huge is being properly orchestrated to benefit shareholders.
If they had nothing to say, they would have just kept doing what they have been doing all along and the news would not have ever been brought out to the public. It would have been done behind the scenes.
Level II being blacked-out is normally for very powerful and positive reasons when news of this magnitude is release as such the news with DANS and ICON. I don't remember the tickers, but I have seen this before. I think DANS is about to return to an awesome level of trading. I even think the stock was halted before huge news was released.
From such positive news, something big is going on with DANS that they are not quite ready to release just yet. I think they are trying to position the stock so that it doesn't get too high to let some of their major supporters (maybe Institutions) move funds around to get in place to begin buying to provide long term support by absorbing a large portion of the Float. I'm sure ICON has some Institutional support that will probably be supporting DANS too. It's the "One TEAM, One Fight" concept. IMHO
v/r
Sterling
StockLobster, with JRSE...
Right before I deployed I spoke to their SEC Counsel and the lawyer responsible for their reorganization plan. I'm a little rusty on any finite information, phone numbers, and emails to contact them, but below is a post I made when I thought it was ready to run a good while back. I think it's a good buy and hold just because of its potential from its intellectual property. I hope this helps.
v/r
Sterling
************************************************************
THIS IS AN OLDER POST I MADE IN MY FORUM.
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CLB01219&read=308220
By: stervc
17 Mar 2006, 09:28 AM EST
Msg. 308220 of 338028
Jump to msg. #
FYI: Geoart9, with JRSE...
I went through and saw some of the bashing on Mr.snakecharmer. I feel his pain. I have gotten bashed on many stocks, but after they went up, the bashing stopped or some still kept trying to throw CMKX or others that popped and dropped up in my face. I worked for none of those companies and was only a shareholder in all of them. That s a long story so let s just move on.
I believe Mr.snakecharmer will be correct with his thoughts shared with JRSE. I will share what I discovered, but please know to do your own DD to buy or sell as I am only trying to help because you do seem somewhat sincere in your quest for JRSE DD and some of your responses to him were fair and rational.
I don t own enough shares to make a difference as I had a hard time getting filled like everyone else. So please don t start bashing me or thinking I m the Snakecharmer or that I m trying pump and dump on you.
I have gone through enough bad and good bankruptcy stocks to know a little for figuring out info as I have learned from many. The last very successful one was ATISQ. They did not wipe out their common shares either. It went from .03 per share to trading at .22 per share. It changed its ticker to ATISZ. There have been a few others too, good and bad.
** Yesterday evening, I spoke to their SEC Counsel. He works at a law firm in Washington as he told me. If JRSE does not do the things he mentioned, I will return to post his name and phone number. Until then, I won t. He told me that the equity will not be wiped out and that it will remain in tact. That s because of the merger that will be taking place. We have not seen it PR-ed yet because there are others bidding on the soon to be debt-free JRSE shell too.
** He also told me that there are companies bidding on their portfolio of intellectual properties as they have a few of them. If you go to their website below, you will see the patent numbers for them in those PRs along with proof as to how one of them had even received FDA approval.
http://www.jrse.com/news.htm
I m not a biotech guru, but I am guessing that any type of biotech company that has a portfolio of intellectual properties with an FDA approval in there is probably worth something.
** Within the Pacer database, there are hundreds of pages of court dockets and documents to explain much. It now costs .08 per page for viewing information. Here is the link.
https://pacer.login.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/login.pl?court_id=00idx
The value of the intellectual property was played down in their court dockets and was listed as unknown under certain spots. This was a strategy move to hide the true value of JRSE from its Creditors. It worked. I ve seen this done before.
I read where JRSE filed Ch.11 on 13 Oct 05. Since they are not wiping out the equity, the shareholders will keep their position of JRSE shares owned. Again, see this as a strategy to become debt free with a new start.
I read in their court dockets where JRSE will have a hearing coming up on 20 Mar 06 at 3:30 PM in Tampa, Fl Courtroom 8A, Sam M. Gibbons Courthouse, 801 N. Florida Avenue to deliver their re-organization plan. The Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge for them will be Paul M. Glenn. From reading through their court dockets, it looks like they are going to pull this off again as I think they have done something like this before.
Again, please just don t believe what I have posted. Register with the federal Pacer site and read through their court dockets and documents for yourself to make your own decision. I just felt the need to step in because I think Mr.snakecharmer was unfairly treated for trying to help people. I think people will be thanking him once again with JRSE as this might be his best one yet.
As for the Q on JRSE, I m not sure if we will see one as I don t remember the logic that governs that. I m a little rusty. Back a few years ago, AMER went from .08 per share to over $2.50 per share in a matter of days after filing their re-organization plan from Ch.11 Bankruptcy. AMER did not wipe out their common shares either and the "Q" never popped up on their ticker.
Any bankruptcy stock that is under a penny with value and/or something of value and that is not wiping out their equity is a gift. The best sign we have with JRSE is that they still have their portfolio of intellectual properties and that the common shares will remain in tact to not be wiped out. We really should be thanking Mr.snakecharmer. IMHO
All is well!
http://www.sterlingsclass.com/
Sterling
AAPM**Market Capital Analysis…
Please consider this post to be very speculative in nature, but as far as I am concerned, AAPM is profitable unless proven otherwise. I think it’s fair to consider what they have filed with pinksheets.com to be factual. I think it’s fair to consider my previous Fundamental Analysis post below to show how “just maybe” AAPM could fundamentally be worth .00846 per share:
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=17172674
This Market Capital post is to show how AAPM is significantly undervalued at this price level of .0002 per share and could be worth .0136 per share given certain variables to remain as we believe.
It is sometimes thought that a stock should be trading at a comparable stock price that has its Revenues equivalent to its Market Capital. Please consider these thoughts even if the OS is 2.2 billion shares which would make for a Market Capital indicated below:
2,200,000,000 x .0002 = $440,000
As you can see, AAPM could be considered significantly undervalued because they generated much more Revenues than the $440,000 as the Market Capital above. They, AAPM, made $29,934,935 in Revenues as of 30 Sep 06. That means that AAPM trades at a little over 68 times less ($29,934,935 ÷ $440,000 = 68.03) from where its current market cap indicates given their Revenues filed with pinksheets.com at the .0002 per share price level.
Using this type of Market Capital analysis, AAPM should be trading at:
68 x .0002 = .0136 per share
Even if you max out the authorize and go with a worse case scenario of AAPM’s OS being 5 billion shares, you would still have what’s indicated below to consider:
5,000,000,000 x .0002 = $1,000,000
$29,934,935 ÷ $1,000,000 = 29.9
29.9 x .0002 = .00598 per share
Deciding which one should be used for making an investing decision is your choice; either the post in the link above which fundamentally reflects how AAPM could be trading at .00846 per share or this post which reflects how AAPM could fundamentally be trading at .0136 per share or .00598 per share. Or you could use none of them.
These posts are in no way saying that AAPM will ever trade at those levels. These posts are my thoughts as to how I see things for fundamentally justifying how AAPM “should” be worth more than its current level of .0002 per share by far in my opinion.
v/r
Sterling
Balamidas, very solid thoughts!Thanks!(EOM)
Cautionupahead, to better answer your question...
Ok... Daaaaa on me. I just noticed that Joseph Teklits, the name I gave you earlier from my earlier phone calls to the company, is the POC at the bottom of the ICON PR. He is not mentioned in the DANS PR. Again, because of his position, I believe him when he told me that the OS is still the same.
v/r
Sterling
DANS News released by ICON...
DANS is starting to give me the same feeling that I had with UAHC a few years ago. UAHC was at .36 per share when they dropped news of their earnings and plans for moving forward. In a matter of days, UAHC went to over $3.00+ per share and later went on its way to over $9.00+ per share to trade where it’s at today at $6.00+ per share. I think DANS have the same potential even though it’s in a different industry.
The news released by ICON seems to explain things a little more after reading the news released from DANS. It appears that ICON is setting the stage along with DANS for a big announcement on 6 Mar 07 at 10:00 am EST that will validate the part in the PR where it says...
"The purchase price for the transaction will be $70 million with a contingent payment of an additional $15 million, payable in cash or stock, triggered by the brand exceeding certain revenue and performance targets."
I recommend reading the ICON PR below FYI for those who are like me in just now reading the ICON PR. (LOL)
v/r
Sterling
****************************************************************
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/070222/nyth085.html?.v=79
Iconix Brand Group Announces Definitive Agreement to Purchase Danskin(R) Brand
Thursday February 22, 8:00 am ET
NEW YORK, Feb. 22 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Iconix Brand Group, Inc. (Nasdaq: ICON - News; "Iconix" or the "Company") today announced that it has entered into a definitive agreement to purchase the brand Danskin® from Danskin, Inc. ("Seller" or "Danskin"). The transaction is anticipated to close in March 2007.
Danskin is a 125 year-old iconic brand of women's active wear, leg wear, dance wear, yoga apparel and fitness equipment. The brand is sold through better department, specialty and sporting goods stores, and through fifteen freestanding Danskin boutiques and Danskin.com. Danskin also has a partnership with Wal-Mart Stores for its "Danskin Now ®" brand of apparel and fitness equipment.
The purchase price for the transaction will be $70 million with a contingent payment of an additional $15 million, payable in cash or stock, triggered by the brand exceeding certain revenue and performance targets. The acquisition will be self-funded from the Company's cash reserves.
Iconix has also announced that, as of the closing, it will enter into a license agreement with the Seller, to continue to operate the Danskin® wholesale business including the freestanding retail stores. Carol Hochman, President and CEO of Danskin, and her team will continue as Iconix's licensee to grow the Danskin department and sporting goods store business.
Neil Cole, Chairman and CEO of Iconix commented, "Danskin is one of the most established and recognized active wear brands in the world and we are thrilled to add it to our portfolio and to be partnering with Carol and her team as our licensee. Upon closing, this acquisition will further our diversification strategy by giving us a strong presence in the rapidly growing active wear, yoga and fitness market. We are also excited to have the opportunity to work with Wal-Mart on 'Danskin Now®.'"
Carol Hochman, CEO of Danskin commented, "We have made a lot of progress expanding this great brand and implementing our multi-channel distribution strategy but the missing ingredient has been the marketing strategy and investment needed to complete our vision. The Iconix team has exciting plans for Danskin® and I am looking forward to working closely with them to grow the business."
Additional details of the Danskin acquisition will be addressed on the Company's fourth quarter and 2006 year end earnings conference call scheduled for Tuesday March 6, 2007 at 10:00 am EST. The transaction is subject to customary closing conditions including clearance under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Anti Trust Improvements Act of 1976 as amended and Danskin stockholder approval.
Iconix Brand Group Inc. (Nasdaq: ICON - News) owns, licenses and markets a growing portfolio of consumer brands including CANDIE'S ®, BONGO ®, BADGLEY MISCHKA ®, JOE BOXER ®, RAMPAGE ®, MUDD ®, LONDON FOG ®, MOSSIMO ® and OCEAN PACIFIC ®. The Company licenses it brands to a network of leading retailers and manufacturers that touch every major segment of retail distribution from the luxury market to the mass market in both the U.S. and around the world. Iconix, through its in-house advertising, promotion and public relations agency, markets its brands to continually drive greater consumer awareness and equity.
Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The statements that are not historical facts contained in this press release are forward looking statements that involve a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict and many of which are beyond the control of the Company, which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to, uncertainty regarding the results of the Company's acquisition of additional licenses, continued market acceptance of current products and the ability to successfully develop and market new products particularly in light of rapidly changing fashion trends, the impact of supply and manufacturing constraints or difficulties relating to the Company's licensees' dependence on foreign manufacturers and suppliers, uncertainties relating to customer plans and commitments, the ability of licensees to successfully market and sell branded products, competition, uncertainties relating to economic conditions in the markets in which the Company operates, the ability to hire and retain key personnel, the ability to obtain capital if required, the risks of litigation and regulatory proceedings, the risks of uncertainty of trademark protection, the uncertainty of marketing and licensing acquired trademarks and other risks detailed in the Company's SEC filings. The words "believe," "anticipate," "expect," "confident," "project," provide "guidance" and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statement was made.
Contact: David Conn
Executive Vice President
Iconix Brand Group
212.730.0030
Joseph Teklits
Integrated Corporate Relations
203.682.8200
Wallyma...
Thanks! I hope your Nephew is doing very well.
With PTSC, I had a good friend inform me about PTSC back when it was at .04 per share some years ago. I wasn't smart enough to pick some up until a little higher. I shared some thoughts about their patents in my forum below:
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CLB01219&read=131780
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CLB01219&read=131789
PTSC later ran to over $2.00+ per share. Today it has stabilized at .70+ per share. They have even issued out a few cash dividends too.
With DANS, I think you are correct and that it is very possible that DANS could come out of this smelling like a rose. This is why DANS accepted the deal in my opinion. I believe the guy from ICON when he told me that the share structure is the same especially since he works for ICON and is the one whom I was told to be responsible for the deal.
I think this will be a multi-bagger because of the announcements to come from ICON and DANS on 6 Mar 07 at 10:00 EST. IMHO
v/r
Sterling
Dream, with the Insider Ownership...
Thanks for posting that. It slipped my mind to catch that. That's a plus to us in my opinion that the Insiders own 27,396,741 shares.
This means that the DANS’ Float since its inception to now is 41,551,259 shares (68,948,000 - 27,396,741). I just did a quick scan on DANS volume history.
It looks like its first day of trading was on 2 Jan 97. It was stabilized and traded over $2.00+ per share for a bit. I only posted below the volume history up through its filings as of Sep 02 for those to see that it is very unlikely that any dumping of shares have taken place since the number we are using for the OS.
The total shares from the price history below equates to 29,041,800 shares traded since their last filing as of Sep 2002. Minus the 3,562,800 shares traded for over the past two days, the total shares traded were 25,479,000 shares. That’s an average over the past 4.4 years of about 5,790,682 shares per year traded.
One should be able to see that float is definitely much lower than 41,551,259 shares after going back to research their volume history as of 2 Jan 97 (probably under 5 million shares if I had to guess) and that there has been no dumping of shares to see that the OS being 68,948,000 shares is very much conceivable. IMHO
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/hp?s=DANS.PK&a=00&b=2&c=1997&d=01&e=24&f=2007&....
v/r
Sterling
************************************************************
Date Open High Low Close Volume Adj Close*
23-Feb-07 0.25 0.25 0.14 0.17 1,677,300 0.17
22-Feb-07 0.03 0.4 0.03 0.27 1,885,500 0.27
21-Feb-07 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
20-Feb-07 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 5,000 0.02
16-Feb-07 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 5,000 0.02
15-Feb-07 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
14-Feb-07 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
13-Feb-07 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
12-Feb-07 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
9-Feb-07 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.02 17,800 0.02
8-Feb-07 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 1,000 0.02
7-Feb-07 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
6-Feb-07 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
5-Feb-07 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 800 0.03
2-Feb-07 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
1-Feb-07 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 4,500 0.03
31-Jan-07 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 10,000 0.05
30-Jan-07 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 1,500 0.02
29-Jan-07 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
26-Jan-07 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
25-Jan-07 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
24-Jan-07 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
23-Jan-07 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 1,300 0.02
22-Jan-07 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
19-Jan-07 0.05 0.05 0.02 0.02 6,100 0.02
18-Jan-07 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
17-Jan-07 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
16-Jan-07 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
12-Jan-07 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 3,800 0.02
11-Jan-07 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
10-Jan-07 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 4,800 0.05
9-Jan-07 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
8-Jan-07 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 35,000 0.02
5-Jan-07 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
4-Jan-07 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
3-Jan-07 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
29-Dec-06 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 2,100 0.02
28-Dec-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 10,900 0.01
27-Dec-06 0.02 0.07 0.02 0.07 22,000 0.07
26-Dec-06 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
22-Dec-06 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 4,000 0.02
21-Dec-06 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 7,000 0.02
20-Dec-06 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 300 0.02
19-Dec-06 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 5,000 0.02
18-Dec-06 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 15,000 0.02
15-Dec-06 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
14-Dec-06 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
13-Dec-06 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 700 0.02
12-Dec-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 4,200 0.01
11-Dec-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
8-Dec-06 0.07 0.07 0.01 0.01 18,000 0.01
7-Dec-06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 3,000 0.06
6-Dec-06 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 1,000 0.07
5-Dec-06 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 1,000 0.07
4-Dec-06 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 1,100 0.02
1-Dec-06 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
30-Nov-06 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 300 0.02
29-Nov-06 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
28-Nov-06 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
27-Nov-06 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 200 0.02
24-Nov-06 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
22-Nov-06 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 60,000 0.02
21-Nov-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
20-Nov-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
17-Nov-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
16-Nov-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
15-Nov-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 3,200 0.01
14-Nov-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
13-Nov-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 300 0.01
10-Nov-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
9-Nov-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
8-Nov-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 25,100 0.03
7-Nov-06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 27,000 0.04
6-Nov-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
3-Nov-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 1,000 0.05
2-Nov-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 5,800 0.05
1-Nov-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
31-Oct-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 10,500 0.03
30-Oct-06 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.04 47,500 0.04
27-Oct-06 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 5,000 0.02
26-Oct-06 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.01 19,900 0.01
25-Oct-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 15,000 0.03
24-Oct-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
23-Oct-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 15,000 0.03
20-Oct-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 200 0.01
19-Oct-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
18-Oct-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
17-Oct-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 20,000 0.01
16-Oct-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
13-Oct-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
12-Oct-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
11-Oct-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
10-Oct-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
9-Oct-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
6-Oct-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
5-Oct-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
4-Oct-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
3-Oct-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 1,300 0.01
2-Oct-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 1,000 0.01
29-Sep-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
28-Sep-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
27-Sep-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
26-Sep-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
25-Sep-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 9,000 0.01
22-Sep-06 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.04 8,000 0.04
21-Sep-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 1,000 0.01
20-Sep-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 7,000 0.03
19-Sep-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
18-Sep-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
15-Sep-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 300 0.03
14-Sep-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 23,000 0.01
13-Sep-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
12-Sep-06 0.02 0.04 0.01 0.01 56,000 0.01
11-Sep-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 1,100 0.01
8-Sep-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
7-Sep-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
6-Sep-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 6,200 0.01
5-Sep-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
1-Sep-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 1,000 0.03
31-Aug-06 0.08 0.08 0.03 0.03 56,200 0.03
30-Aug-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 34,500 0.01
29-Aug-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
28-Aug-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 300 0.01
25-Aug-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 36,000 0.01
24-Aug-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
23-Aug-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
22-Aug-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 6,000 0.01
21-Aug-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
18-Aug-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
17-Aug-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 23,500 0.01
16-Aug-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 99,000 0.01
15-Aug-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
14-Aug-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 400 0.01
11-Aug-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
10-Aug-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 5,000 0.01
9-Aug-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
8-Aug-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 18,200 0.01
7-Aug-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 11,200 0.01
4-Aug-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
3-Aug-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
2-Aug-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 4,000 0.01
1-Aug-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 1,000 0.01
31-Jul-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 31,800 0.01
28-Jul-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
27-Jul-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
26-Jul-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
25-Jul-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
24-Jul-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 1,100 0.01
21-Jul-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
20-Jul-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
19-Jul-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
18-Jul-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
17-Jul-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
14-Jul-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
13-Jul-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
12-Jul-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
11-Jul-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 10,000 0.01
10-Jul-06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0 0.04
7-Jul-06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0 0.04
6-Jul-06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 8,000 0.04
5-Jul-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
3-Jul-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
30-Jun-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
29-Jun-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
28-Jun-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
27-Jun-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
26-Jun-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 4,000 0.03
23-Jun-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
22-Jun-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
21-Jun-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
20-Jun-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 22,200 0.03
19-Jun-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 300 0.03
16-Jun-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
15-Jun-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
14-Jun-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 500 0.03
13-Jun-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
12-Jun-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 15,000 0.05
9-Jun-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
8-Jun-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
7-Jun-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
6-Jun-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
5-Jun-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
2-Jun-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 75,000 0.03
1-Jun-06 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0 0.08
31-May-06 0.03 0.1 0.03 0.08 2,500 0.08
30-May-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
26-May-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
25-May-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
24-May-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
23-May-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
22-May-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
19-May-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
18-May-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
17-May-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
16-May-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 12,000 0.03
15-May-06 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 7,000 0.08
12-May-06 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
11-May-06 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 2,000 0.02
10-May-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
9-May-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
8-May-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
5-May-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
4-May-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
3-May-06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 100 0.01
2-May-06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 50,000 0.04
1-May-06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0 0.04
28-Apr-06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0 0.04
27-Apr-06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 400 0.04
26-Apr-06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0 0.04
25-Apr-06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 46,000 0.04
24-Apr-06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0 0.04
21-Apr-06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0 0.04
20-Apr-06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0 0.04
19-Apr-06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 200 0.04
18-Apr-06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0 0.04
17-Apr-06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0 0.04
13-Apr-06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 36,000 0.04
12-Apr-06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 1,200 0.04
11-Apr-06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0 0.04
10-Apr-06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 10,000 0.04
7-Apr-06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 50,000 0.04
6-Apr-06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 11,300 0.04
5-Apr-06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 75,000 0.04
4-Apr-06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0 0.04
3-Apr-06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 14,000 0.04
31-Mar-06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 200 0.04
30-Mar-06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0 0.04
29-Mar-06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0 0.04
28-Mar-06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 5,000 0.04
27-Mar-06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 80,000 0.04
24-Mar-06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 30,000 0.04
23-Mar-06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0 0.04
22-Mar-06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0 0.04
21-Mar-06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0 0.04
20-Mar-06 0.08 0.08 0.04 0.04 17,000 0.04
17-Mar-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 60,000 0.05
16-Mar-06 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 5,000 0.07
15-Mar-06 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.08 15,900 0.08
14-Mar-06 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 100 0.08
13-Mar-06 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 100 0.08
10-Mar-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 600 0.05
9-Mar-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
8-Mar-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
7-Mar-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
6-Mar-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
3-Mar-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 600 0.05
2-Mar-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 1,000 0.05
1-Mar-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
28-Feb-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
27-Feb-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
24-Feb-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
23-Feb-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 12,100 0.05
22-Feb-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
21-Feb-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 5,500 0.05
17-Feb-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 185,300 0.05
16-Feb-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 5,000 0.05
15-Feb-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
14-Feb-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
13-Feb-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
10-Feb-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
9-Feb-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
8-Feb-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 45,000 0.05
7-Feb-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 400 0.05
6-Feb-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 800 0.05
3-Feb-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 200 0.05
2-Feb-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
1-Feb-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
31-Jan-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 5,000 0.05
30-Jan-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
27-Jan-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
26-Jan-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
25-Jan-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
24-Jan-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
23-Jan-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
20-Jan-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
19-Jan-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
18-Jan-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 2,500 0.05
17-Jan-06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 44,000 0.05
13-Jan-06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 3,000 0.06
12-Jan-06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 3,000 0.06
11-Jan-06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
10-Jan-06 0.08 0.08 0.06 0.06 3,600 0.06
9-Jan-06 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 2,000 0.07
6-Jan-06 0.08 0.08 0.05 0.05 60,000 0.05
5-Jan-06 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 14,000 0.07
4-Jan-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
3-Jan-06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
30-Dec-05 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 9,900 0.03
29-Dec-05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 4,800 0.03
28-Dec-05 0.05 0.05 0.03 0.04 20,400 0.04
27-Dec-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
23-Dec-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 2,000 0.05
22-Dec-05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 15,700 0.04
21-Dec-05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0 0.04
20-Dec-05 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.04 200 0.04
19-Dec-05 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
16-Dec-05 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 9,900 0.03
15-Dec-05 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 1,500 0.03
14-Dec-05 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
13-Dec-05 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
12-Dec-05 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.03 96,200 0.03
9-Dec-05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0 0.04
8-Dec-05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0 0.04
7-Dec-05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 10,000 0.04
6-Dec-05 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.04 12,000 0.04
5-Dec-05 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.05 4,000 0.05
2-Dec-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
1-Dec-05 0.08 0.08 0.05 0.05 6,000 0.05
30-Nov-05 0.07 0.07 0.03 0.03 14,600 0.03
29-Nov-05 0.07 0.07 0.02 0.02 18,200 0.02
28-Nov-05 0.02 0.07 0.02 0.07 33,600 0.07
25-Nov-05 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 10,000 0.03
23-Nov-05 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.02 33,000 0.02
22-Nov-05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0 0.04
21-Nov-05 0.07 0.07 0.04 0.04 63,300 0.04
18-Nov-05 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0 0.07
17-Nov-05 0.04 0.07 0.04 0.07 14,200 0.07
16-Nov-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
15-Nov-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
14-Nov-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
11-Nov-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 63,500 0.05
10-Nov-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 16,500 0.05
9-Nov-05 0.08 0.08 0.05 0.05 17,000 0.05
8-Nov-05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11,100 0.06
7-Nov-05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11,100 0.06
4-Nov-05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11,100 0.06
3-Nov-05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
2-Nov-05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11,100 0.06
1-Nov-05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11,100 0.06
31-Oct-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 6,000 0.05
28-Oct-05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
27-Oct-05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 1,100 0.06
26-Oct-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 37,000 0.05
25-Oct-05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
24-Oct-05 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.06 66,000 0.06
21-Oct-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
20-Oct-05 0.05 0.06 0.05 0.05 6,700 0.05
19-Oct-05 0.05 0.06 0.05 0.06 4,300 0.06
18-Oct-05 0.05 0.06 0.05 0.06 10,200 0.06
17-Oct-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
14-Oct-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 200 0.05
13-Oct-05 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0 0.07
12-Oct-05 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0 0.07
11-Oct-05 0.06 0.07 0.06 0.07 110,000 0.07
10-Oct-05 0.06 0.08 0.06 0.06 15,700 0.06
7-Oct-05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 20,000 0.06
6-Oct-05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
5-Oct-05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
4-Oct-05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
3-Oct-05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
30-Sep-05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 20,000 0.06
29-Sep-05 0.09 0.09 0.05 0.05 42,000 0.05
28-Sep-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
27-Sep-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 50,000 0.05
26-Sep-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
23-Sep-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 38,700 0.05
22-Sep-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
21-Sep-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
20-Sep-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
19-Sep-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 100 0.05
16-Sep-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
15-Sep-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
14-Sep-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 45,000 0.05
13-Sep-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20,000 0.05
12-Sep-05 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 15,000 0.07
9-Sep-05 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 2,000 0.08
8-Sep-05 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 10,000 0.07
7-Sep-05 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 6,000 0.07
6-Sep-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 1,000 0.05
2-Sep-05 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 3,800 0.08
1-Sep-05 0.09 0.09 0.05 0.05 10,300 0.05
31-Aug-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
30-Aug-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 1,800 0.05
29-Aug-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
26-Aug-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
25-Aug-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
24-Aug-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
23-Aug-05 0.09 0.09 0.05 0.05 13,000 0.05
22-Aug-05 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.09 3,000 0.09
19-Aug-05 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0 0.08
18-Aug-05 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0 0.08
17-Aug-05 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0 0.08
16-Aug-05 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0 0.08
15-Aug-05 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 4,000 0.08
12-Aug-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20,000 0.05
11-Aug-05 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 1,000 0.08
10-Aug-05 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.08 22,900 0.08
9-Aug-05 0.05 0.08 0.05 0.08 4,000 0.08
8-Aug-05 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 1,000 0.1
5-Aug-05 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 500 0.09
4-Aug-05 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0 0.08
3-Aug-05 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0 0.08
2-Aug-05 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0 0.08
1-Aug-05 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0 0.08
29-Jul-05 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0 0.08
28-Jul-05 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.08 44,000 0.08
27-Jul-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 5,700 0.05
26-Jul-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
25-Jul-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
22-Jul-05 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 2,500 0.05
21-Jul-05 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0 0.07
20-Jul-05 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 500 0.07
19-Jul-05 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0 0.07
18-Jul-05 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 29,000 0.07
15-Jul-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
14-Jul-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
13-Jul-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
12-Jul-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
11-Jul-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
8-Jul-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
7-Jul-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 10,000 0.05
6-Jul-05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 31,000 0.05
5-Jul-05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 1,000 0.04
1-Jul-05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 20,000 0.04
30-Jun-05 0.06 0.06 0.04 0.04 4,000 0.04
29-Jun-05 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.02 3,600 0.02
28-Jun-05 0.01 0.06 0.01 0.05 10,100 0.05
27-Jun-05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 4,500 0.06
24-Jun-05 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 15,500 0.05
23-Jun-05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
22-Jun-05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
21-Jun-05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 81,400 0.06
20-Jun-05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
17-Jun-05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 5,500 0.06
16-Jun-05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
15-Jun-05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
14-Jun-05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
13-Jun-05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
10-Jun-05 0.05 0.06 0.05 0.06 2,200 0.06
9-Jun-05 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0 0.08
8-Jun-05 0.06 0.08 0.05 0.08 508,000 0.08
7-Jun-05 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 1,000 0.07
6-Jun-05 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 200 0.07
3-Jun-05 0.1 0.1 0.07 0.08 19,000 0.08
2-Jun-05 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0 0.08
1-Jun-05 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0 0.08
31-May-05 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0 0.08
27-May-05 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0 0.08
26-May-05 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0 0.08
25-May-05 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0 0.08
24-May-05 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 13,000 0.08
23-May-05 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0 0.07
20-May-05 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0 0.07
19-May-05 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 10,500 0.07
18-May-05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 3,000 0.06
17-May-05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
16-May-05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
13-May-05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 3,500 0.06
12-May-05 0.07 0.09 0.07 0.09 18,400 0.09
11-May-05 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0 0.09
10-May-05 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 2,000 0.09
9-May-05 0.07 0.12 0.07 0.12 22,600 0.12
6-May-05 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 600 0.07
5-May-05 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0 0.11
4-May-05 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0 0.11
3-May-05 0.06 0.11 0.06 0.11 20,600 0.11
2-May-05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
29-Apr-05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 3,800 0.06
28-Apr-05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
27-Apr-05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 10,000 0.06
26-Apr-05 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 1,000 0.07
25-Apr-05 0.11 0.11 0.06 0.06 18,000 0.06
22-Apr-05 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0 0.11
21-Apr-05 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0 0.11
20-Apr-05 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 8,600 0.11
19-Apr-05 0.11 0.11 0.05 0.1 143,000 0.1
18-Apr-05 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 600 0.14
15-Apr-05 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 500 0.14
14-Apr-05 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0 0.15
13-Apr-05 0.14 0.16 0.14 0.15 135,500 0.15
12-Apr-05 0.14 0.15 0.14 0.15 17,300 0.15
11-Apr-05 0.14 0.16 0.14 0.16 63,800 0.16
8-Apr-05 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0 0.16
7-Apr-05 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0 0.16
6-Apr-05 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0 0.16
5-Apr-05 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0 0.16
4-Apr-05 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 200 0.16
1-Apr-05 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 6,900 0.14
31-Mar-05 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 50,000 0.15
30-Mar-05 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0 0.16
29-Mar-05 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0 0.16
28-Mar-05 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 3,000 0.16
24-Mar-05 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0 0.16
23-Mar-05 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0 0.16
22-Mar-05 0.16 0.17 0.16 0.16 15,000 0.16
21-Mar-05 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0 0.16
18-Mar-05 0.19 0.19 0.16 0.16 20,300 0.16
17-Mar-05 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 6,300 0.18
16-Mar-05 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0 0.16
15-Mar-05 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0 0.16
14-Mar-05 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0 0.16
11-Mar-05 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0 0.16
10-Mar-05 0.16 0.16 0.15 0.16 15,800 0.16
9-Mar-05 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0 0.16
8-Mar-05 0.21 0.21 0.16 0.16 12,000 0.16
7-Mar-05 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0 0.2
4-Mar-05 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0 0.2
3-Mar-05 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0 0.2
2-Mar-05 0.21 0.21 0.2 0.2 35,000 0.2
1-Mar-05 0.16 0.21 0.16 0.2 6,900 0.2
28-Feb-05 0.16 0.17 0.16 0.17 10,200 0.17
25-Feb-05 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 1,700 0.16
24-Feb-05 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0 0.22
23-Feb-05 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0 0.22
22-Feb-05 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 5,000 0.22
18-Feb-05 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0 0.16
17-Feb-05 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 5,000 0.16
16-Feb-05 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0 0.15
15-Feb-05 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 200 0.15
14-Feb-05 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 12,200 0.16
11-Feb-05 0.15 0.22 0.15 0.19 43,400 0.19
10-Feb-05 0.15 0.16 0.15 0.16 12,000 0.16
9-Feb-05 0.18 0.18 0.15 0.15 14,800 0.15
8-Feb-05 0.15 0.16 0.15 0.16 56,000 0.16
7-Feb-05 0.16 0.18 0.16 0.16 22,800 0.16
4-Feb-05 0.18 0.18 0.15 0.15 20,300 0.15
3-Feb-05 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 10,000 0.17
2-Feb-05 0.15 0.16 0.14 0.14 90,000 0.14
1-Feb-05 0.15 0.17 0.13 0.14 84,500 0.14
31-Jan-05 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.14 24,000 0.14
28-Jan-05 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 300 0.14
27-Jan-05 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0 0.14
26-Jan-05 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0 0.14
25-Jan-05 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 56,600 0.14
24-Jan-05 0.13 0.15 0.13 0.14 63,900 0.14
21-Jan-05 0.14 0.18 0.14 0.18 3,100 0.18
20-Jan-05 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0 0.18
19-Jan-05 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0 0.18
18-Jan-05 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 200 0.18
14-Jan-05 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0 0.15
13-Jan-05 0.14 0.15 0.14 0.15 2,000 0.15
12-Jan-05 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0 0.15
11-Jan-05 0.14 0.15 0.14 0.15 4,300 0.15
10-Jan-05 0.14 0.15 0.14 0.15 54,200 0.15
7-Jan-05 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 300 0.14
6-Jan-05 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 17,500 0.14
5-Jan-05 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0 0.15
4-Jan-05 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0 0.15
3-Jan-05 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 20,000 0.15
31-Dec-04 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 3,000 0.14
30-Dec-04 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0 0.14
29-Dec-04 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 600 0.14
28-Dec-04 0.14 0.15 0.14 0.15 7,800 0.15
27-Dec-04 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.14 29,700 0.14
23-Dec-04 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0 0.14
22-Dec-04 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0 0.14
21-Dec-04 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 500 0.14
20-Dec-04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 35,000 0.15
17-Dec-04 0.15 0.15 0.13 0.13 8,200 0.13
16-Dec-04 0.14 0.17 0.14 0.17 31,000 0.17
15-Dec-04 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0 0.13
14-Dec-04 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 200 0.13
13-Dec-04 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 600 0.14
10-Dec-04 0.13 0.17 0.13 0.17 37,600 0.17
9-Dec-04 0.15 0.16 0.14 0.16 24,700 0.16
8-Dec-04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0 0.15
7-Dec-04 0.13 0.15 0.13 0.15 13,200 0.15
6-Dec-04 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 300 0.13
3-Dec-04 0.16 0.16 0.13 0.15 41,500 0.15
2-Dec-04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0 0.15
1-Dec-04 0.13 0.15 0.13 0.15 16,300 0.15
30-Nov-04 0.13 0.16 0.13 0.16 23,200 0.16
29-Nov-04 0.16 0.16 0.15 0.15 34,000 0.15
26-Nov-04 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 10,200 0.11
24-Nov-04 0.14 0.16 0.08 0.12 241,100 0.12
23-Nov-04 0.15 0.15 0.13 0.14 15,800 0.14
22-Nov-04 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 700 0.11
19-Nov-04 0.16 0.16 0.11 0.11 18,000 0.11
18-Nov-04 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 0.1
17-Nov-04 0.1 0.15 0.1 0.1 42,900 0.1
16-Nov-04 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 0.1
15-Nov-04 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 0.1
12-Nov-04 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 15,800 0.1
11-Nov-04 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0 0.12
10-Nov-04 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0 0.12
9-Nov-04 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0 0.12
8-Nov-04 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 16,000 0.12
5-Nov-04 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 7,000 0.12
4-Nov-04 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 1,300 0.12
3-Nov-04 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0 0.12
2-Nov-04 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0 0.12
1-Nov-04 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0 0.12
29-Oct-04 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.12 382,600 0.12
28-Oct-04 0.12 0.13 0.11 0.12 215,300 0.12
27-Oct-04 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 374,300 0.12
26-Oct-04 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0 0.12
25-Oct-04 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 500 0.12
22-Oct-04 0.14 0.14 0.12 0.12 49,900 0.12
21-Oct-04 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 3,000 0.12
20-Oct-04 0.14 0.14 0.13 0.13 25,100 0.13
19-Oct-04 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 200 0.14
18-Oct-04 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 3,700 0.12
15-Oct-04 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0 0.12
14-Oct-04 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0 0.12
13-Oct-04 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 50,000 0.12
12-Oct-04 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 7,200 0.11
11-Oct-04 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0 0.11
8-Oct-04 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 3,900 0.11
7-Oct-04 0.11 0.12 0.1 0.1 17,000 0.1
6-Oct-04 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0 0.11
5-Oct-04 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 200 0.11
4-Oct-04 0.12 0.12 0.1 0.12 365,200 0.12
1-Oct-04 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 0.1
30-Sep-04 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 3,300 0.1
29-Sep-04 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 5,000 0.1
28-Sep-04 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 5,500 0.1
27-Sep-04 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0 0.12
24-Sep-04 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0 0.12
23-Sep-04 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0 0.12
22-Sep-04 0.1 0.12 0.09 0.12 161,400 0.12
21-Sep-04 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 1,000 0.09
20-Sep-04 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 200 0.09
17-Sep-04 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 0.1
16-Sep-04 0.15 0.15 0.09 0.1 861,500 0.1
15-Sep-04 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0 0.14
14-Sep-04 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 1,000 0.14
13-Sep-04 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0 0.14
10-Sep-04 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0 0.14
9-Sep-04 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0 0.14
8-Sep-04 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0 0.14
7-Sep-04 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0 0.14
3-Sep-04 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 5,000 0.14
2-Sep-04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0 0.15
1-Sep-04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0 0.15
31-Aug-04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0 0.15
30-Aug-04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 7,500 0.15
27-Aug-04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 10,000 0.15
26-Aug-04 0.2 0.2 0.18 0.18 8,700 0.18
25-Aug-04 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 1,500 0.2
24-Aug-04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 28,500 0.15
23-Aug-04 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 1,000 0.14
20-Aug-04 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.15 73,300 0.15
19-Aug-04 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0 0.14
18-Aug-04 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 3,700 0.14
17-Aug-04 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0 0.14
16-Aug-04 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 4,200 0.14
13-Aug-04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0 0.15
12-Aug-04 0.14 0.15 0.14 0.15 25,000 0.15
11-Aug-04 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0 0.13
10-Aug-04 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0 0.13
9-Aug-04 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 1,700 0.13
6-Aug-04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0 0.15
5-Aug-04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0 0.15
4-Aug-04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0 0.15
3-Aug-04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0 0.15
2-Aug-04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0 0.15
30-Jul-04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0 0.15
29-Jul-04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0 0.15
28-Jul-04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 800 0.15
27-Jul-04 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0 0.13
26-Jul-04 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 500 0.13
23-Jul-04 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0 0.13
22-Jul-04 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 2,300 0.13
21-Jul-04 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 6,500 0.17
20-Jul-04 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0 0.13
19-Jul-04 0.13 0.15 0.13 0.13 2,200 0.13
16-Jul-04 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0 0.13
15-Jul-04 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 5,200 0.13
14-Jul-04 0.13 0.15 0.13 0.13 53,100 0.13
13-Jul-04 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 1,500 0.13
12-Jul-04 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0 0.13
9-Jul-04 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0 0.13
8-Jul-04 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0 0.13
7-Jul-04 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0 0.13
6-Jul-04 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 700 0.13
2-Jul-04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 2,000 0.15
1-Jul-04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 2,500 0.15
30-Jun-04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0 0.15
29-Jun-04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0 0.15
28-Jun-04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0 0.15
25-Jun-04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 600 0.15
24-Jun-04 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0 0.25
23-Jun-04 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 300 0.25
22-Jun-04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 3,900 0.15
21-Jun-04 0.15 0.23 0.15 0.23 3,500 0.23
18-Jun-04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0 0.15
17-Jun-04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0 0.15
16-Jun-04 0.23 0.23 0.15 0.15 5,700 0.15
15-Jun-04 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0 0.23
14-Jun-04 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0 0.23
10-Jun-04 0.09 0.26 0.09 0.23 149,300 0.23
9-Jun-04 0.18 0.26 0.11 0.26 34,100 0.26
8-Jun-04 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0 0.17
7-Jun-04 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0 0.17
4-Jun-04 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0 0.17
3-Jun-04 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0 0.17
2-Jun-04 0.25 0.28 0.17 0.17 594,700 0.17
1-Jun-04 0.22 0.26 0.22 0.25 47,700 0.25
28-May-04 0.2 0.22 0.2 0.22 42,700 0.22
27-May-04 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0 0.2
26-May-04 0.2 0.21 0.2 0.2 44,000 0.2
25-May-04 0.21 0.21 0.18 0.2 143,100 0.2
24-May-04 0.13 0.21 0.13 0.2 14,000 0.2
21-May-04 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0 0.11
20-May-04 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0 0.11
19-May-04 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0 0.11
18-May-04 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 2,500 0.11
17-May-04 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0 0.11
14-May-04 0.13 0.14 0.11 0.11 35,500 0.11
13-May-04 0.13 0.14 0.13 0.14 18,700 0.14
12-May-04 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0 0.14
11-May-04 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0 0.14
10-May-04 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0 0.14
7-May-04 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0 0.14
6-May-04 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0 0.14
5-May-04 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0 0.14
4-May-04 0.14 0.14 0.11 0.14 101,000 0.14
3-May-04 0.16 0.16 0.1 0.1 219,000 0.1
30-Apr-04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 6,400 0.15
29-Apr-04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 2,000 0.15
28-Apr-04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0 0.15
27-Apr-04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0 0.15
26-Apr-04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0 0.15
23-Apr-04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 2,000 0.15
22-Apr-04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0 0.15
21-Apr-04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 1,000 0.15
20-Apr-04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0 0.15
19-Apr-04 0.15 0.16 0.15 0.15 209,000 0.15
16-Apr-04 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 800 0.15
15-Apr-04 0.3 0.3 0.15 0.15 2,500 0.15
14-Apr-04 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 15,000 0.3
13-Apr-04 0.15 0.3 0.15 0.15 19,000 0.15
12-Apr-04 0.15 0.3 0.15 0.3 22,200 0.3
8-Apr-04 0.16 0.16 0.15 0.15 56,300 0.15
7-Apr-04 0.25 0.25 0.16 0.16 13,000 0.16
6-Apr-04 0.3 0.3 0.14 0.3 21,800 0.3
5-Apr-04 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0 0.14
2-Apr-04 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0 0.14
1-Apr-04 0.14 0.15 0.14 0.14 14,100 0.14
31-Mar-04 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 1,100 0.17
30-Mar-04 0.3 0.3 0.14 0.14 33,000 0.14
29-Mar-04 0.16 0.21 0.16 0.16 102,600 0.16
26-Mar-04 0.17 0.22 0.16 0.16 42,400 0.16
25-Mar-04 0.3 0.3 0.17 0.23 146,700 0.23
24-Mar-04 0.18 0.22 0.18 0.22 190,900 0.22
23-Mar-04 0.18 0.18 0.15 0.17 114,600 0.17
22-Mar-04 0.1 0.14 0.1 0.13 224,400 0.13
19-Mar-04 0.1 0.12 0.1 0.12 5,000 0.12
18-Mar-04 0.09 0.12 0.09 0.11 108,200 0.11
17-Mar-04 0.1 0.11 0.1 0.11 30,000 0.11
16-Mar-04 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.11 27,500 0.11
15-Mar-04 0.11 0.12 0.1 0.11 42,500 0.11
12-Mar-04 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 500 0.11
11-Mar-04 0.08 0.13 0.08 0.12 133,900 0.12
10-Mar-04 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0 0.13
9-Mar-04 0.08 0.13 0.08 0.13 1,900 0.13
8-Mar-04 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 4,000 0.13
5-Mar-04 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0 0.13
4-Mar-04 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 12,300 0.13
3-Mar-04 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 5,000 0.13
2-Mar-04 0.13 0.13 0.07 0.13 44,000 0.13
1-Mar-04 0.14 0.14 0.08 0.14 30,500 0.14
27-Feb-04 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 7,200 0.14
26-Feb-04 0.08 0.15 0.07 0.1 243,700 0.1
25-Feb-04 0.06 0.07 0.06 0.07 22,200 0.07
24-Feb-04 0.06 0.08 0.06 0.08 26,300 0.08
23-Feb-04 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 115,500 0.08
20-Feb-04 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 5,000 0.08
19-Feb-04 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
18-Feb-04 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
17-Feb-04 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 5,000 0.06
13-Feb-04 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
12-Feb-04 0.08 0.08 0.06 0.06 35,000 0.06
11-Feb-04 0.06 0.07 0.06 0.07 46,000 0.07
10-Feb-04 0.06 0.08 0.06 0.06 46,800 0.06
9-Feb-04 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
6-Feb-04 0.06 0.08 0.06 0.06 6,500 0.06
5-Feb-04 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 161,000 0.08
4-Feb-04 0.08 0.08 0.06 0.06 36,000 0.06
3-Feb-04 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 66,900 0.08
2-Feb-04 0.08 0.08 0.06 0.08 85,000 0.08
30-Jan-04 0.07 0.08 0.06 0.06 102,500 0.06
29-Jan-04 0.05 0.07 0.05 0.07 115,500 0.07
28-Jan-04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 11,000 0.05
27-Jan-04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 6,800 0.04
26-Jan-04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
23-Jan-04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 3,000 0.03
22-Jan-04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 900 0.03
21-Jan-04 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.07 154,500 0.07
20-Jan-04 0.05 0.07 0.05 0.05 37,600 0.05
16-Jan-04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
15-Jan-04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 800 0.05
14-Jan-04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 800 0.05
13-Jan-04 0.07 0.07 0.05 0.05 95,300 0.05
12-Jan-04 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.07 95,000 0.07
9-Jan-04 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0 0.07
8-Jan-04 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 10,000 0.07
7-Jan-04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 32,000 0.03
6-Jan-04 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 60,000 0.07
5-Jan-04 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0 0.07
2-Jan-04 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 12,900 0.07
31-Dec-03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 19,100 0.03
30-Dec-03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 30,700 0.03
29-Dec-03 0.04 0.05 0.03 0.03 151,800 0.03
26-Dec-03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0 0.04
24-Dec-03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0 0.04
23-Dec-03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0 0.04
22-Dec-03 0.07 0.07 0.03 0.04 32,100 0.04
19-Dec-03 0.03 0.07 0.03 0.03 113,500 0.03
18-Dec-03 0.04 0.08 0.03 0.04 240,900 0.04
17-Dec-03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 35,200 0.04
16-Dec-03 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 6,800 0.07
15-Dec-03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 4,600 0.03
12-Dec-03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 600 0.03
11-Dec-03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 3,300 0.03
10-Dec-03 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 37,500 0.07
9-Dec-03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 25,000 0.03
8-Dec-03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 5,000 0.03
5-Dec-03 0.03 0.06 0.03 0.06 6,200 0.06
4-Dec-03 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.06 126,500 0.06
3-Dec-03 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
2-Dec-03 0.08 0.08 0.03 0.06 47,000 0.06
1-Dec-03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 45,000 0.03
28-Nov-03 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 3,500 0.06
26-Nov-03 0.03 0.06 0.03 0.06 24,500 0.06
25-Nov-03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 5,000 0.03
24-Nov-03 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.04 85,000 0.04
21-Nov-03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 1,000 0.03
20-Nov-03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0 0.04
19-Nov-03 0.06 0.06 0.03 0.04 8,700 0.04
18-Nov-03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 75,000 0.03
17-Nov-03 0.04 0.05 0.04 0.05 50,000 0.05
14-Nov-03 0.04 0.05 0.04 0.04 37,600 0.04
13-Nov-03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0 0.04
12-Nov-03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0 0.04
11-Nov-03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0 0.04
10-Nov-03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0 0.04
7-Nov-03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 800 0.04
6-Nov-03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0 0.04
5-Nov-03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 100 0.04
4-Nov-03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 7,700 0.04
3-Nov-03 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.03 67,000 0.03
31-Oct-03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 1,000,000 0.04
30-Oct-03 0.05 0.05 0.03 0.03 18,500 0.03
29-Oct-03 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
28-Oct-03 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 50,000 0.05
27-Oct-03 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 45,000 0.05
24-Oct-03 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 70,500 0.04
23-Oct-03 0.05 0.05 0.03 0.03 30,000 0.03
22-Oct-03 0.07 0.07 0.03 0.03 810,100 0.03
21-Oct-03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 20,000 0.03
20-Oct-03 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.04 322,000 0.04
17-Oct-03 0.08 0.08 0.03 0.04 117,100 0.04
16-Oct-03 0.07 0.08 0.02 0.03 108,800 0.03
15-Oct-03 0.07 0.08 0.04 0.07 56,700 0.07
14-Oct-03 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0 0.07
13-Oct-03 0.07 0.1 0.04 0.07 68,900 0.07
10-Oct-03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
9-Oct-03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
8-Oct-03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 300 0.01
7-Oct-03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
6-Oct-03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
3-Oct-03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 50,000 0.02
2-Oct-03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 500 0.02
1-Oct-03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
30-Sep-03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 15,000 0.01
29-Sep-03 0.05 0.05 0.02 0.04 77,000 0.04
26-Sep-03 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 1,000 0.05
25-Sep-03 0.04 0.05 0.04 0.05 20,000 0.05
24-Sep-03 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.01 115,000 0.01
23-Sep-03 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 5,000 0.06
22-Sep-03 0 0.1 0 0.1 1,200 0.1
19-Sep-03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
18-Sep-03 0.03 0.06 0.03 0.03 300,000 0.03
17-Sep-03 0.06 0.06 0.03 0.06 163,100 0.06
16-Sep-03 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 30,000 0.06
15-Sep-03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
12-Sep-03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
11-Sep-03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 200 0.01
10-Sep-03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
9-Sep-03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
8-Sep-03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
5-Sep-03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
4-Sep-03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
3-Sep-03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
2-Sep-03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
29-Aug-03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 1,000 0.01
28-Aug-03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
27-Aug-03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0 0.03
26-Aug-03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 26,300 0.03
25-Aug-03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
22-Aug-03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
21-Aug-03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 19,000 0.02
20-Aug-03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
19-Aug-03 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 103,500 0.02
18-Aug-03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 20,000 0.02
15-Aug-03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0 0.04
14-Aug-03 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 130,000 0.04
13-Aug-03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0 0.04
12-Aug-03 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 35,000 0.04
11-Aug-03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 10,000 0.04
8-Aug-03 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 10,000 0.07
7-Aug-03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
6-Aug-03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
5-Aug-03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 10,000 0.02
4-Aug-03 0.05 0.05 0.02 0.02 14,500 0.02
1-Aug-03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
31-Jul-03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
30-Jul-03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
29-Jul-03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 6,400 0.02
28-Jul-03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
25-Jul-03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
24-Jul-03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 1,000 0.01
23-Jul-03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 200 0.01
22-Jul-03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
21-Jul-03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
18-Jul-03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 1,200 0.01
17-Jul-03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 4,600 0.01
16-Jul-03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 2,100 0.01
15-Jul-03 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.01 22,500 0.01
14-Jul-03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
11-Jul-03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
10-Jul-03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
9-Jul-03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
8-Jul-03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
7-Jul-03 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.02 61,000 0.02
3-Jul-03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
2-Jul-03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
1-Jul-03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
30-Jun-03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
27-Jun-03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
26-Jun-03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 100 0.02
25-Jun-03 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.04 55,500 0.04
24-Jun-03 0.03 0.07 0.03 0.07 5,700 0.07
23-Jun-03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
20-Jun-03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
19-Jun-03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 3,000 0.02
18-Jun-03 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0 0.08
17-Jun-03 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0 0.08
16-Jun-03 0.03 0.08 0.03 0.08 2,600 0.08
13-Jun-03 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0 0.07
12-Jun-03 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0 0.07
11-Jun-03 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0 0.07
10-Jun-03 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0 0.07
9-Jun-03 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 500 0.07
6-Jun-03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 1,000 0.01
5-Jun-03 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0 0.07
4-Jun-03 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0 0.07
3-Jun-03 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0 0.07
2-Jun-03 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0 0.07
30-May-03 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0 0.07
29-May-03 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 11,500 0.07
28-May-03 0.02 0.08 0.02 0.02 11,000 0.02
27-May-03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 400 0.02
23-May-03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 100 0.03
22-May-03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0 0.04
21-May-03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0 0.04
20-May-03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0 0.04
19-May-03 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.04 37,000 0.04
16-May-03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 0.02
15-May-03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 2,000 0.02
14-May-03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 400 0.03
13-May-03 0.06 0.06 0.03 0.06 209,000 0.06
12-May-03 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
9-May-03 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
8-May-03 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
7-May-03 0.08 0.08 0.03 0.06 87,500 0.06
6-May-03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 5,000 0.02
5-May-03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 1,000 0.03
2-May-03 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
1-May-03 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
30-Apr-03 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
29-Apr-03 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
28-Apr-03 0.04 0.06 0.04 0.06 208,000 0.06
25-Apr-03 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 4,200 0.07
24-Apr-03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 8,500 0.01
23-Apr-03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
22-Apr-03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 0.01
21-Apr-03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 100 0.01
17-Apr-03 0.04 0.05 0.04 0.05 59,700 0.05
16-Apr-03 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
15-Apr-03 0.05 0.07 0.04 0.05 177,000 0.05
14-Apr-03 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.07 2,631,900 0.07
11-Apr-03 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 0.1
10-Apr-03 0.14 0.14 0.04 0.1 88,000 0.1
9-Apr-03 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
8-Apr-03 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
7-Apr-03 0.03 0.06 0.03 0.06 14,800 0.06
4-Apr-03 0.08 0.1 0.08 0.1 12,400 0.1
3-Apr-03 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 22,700 0.08
2-Apr-03 0.08 0.08 0.06 0.07 62,200 0.07
1-Apr-03 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 51,100 0.1
31-Mar-03 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0 0.08
28-Mar-03 0.09 0.11 0.07 0.08 49,300 0.08
27-Mar-03 0.1 0.11 0.1 0.11 36,000 0.11
26-Mar-03 0.14 0.14 0.1 0.1 47,500 0.1
25-Mar-03 0.11 0.14 0.11 0.14 29,600 0.14
24-Mar-03 0.11 0.14 0.11 0.14 36,100 0.14
21-Mar-03 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 1,100 0.11
20-Mar-03 0.13 0.13 0.08 0.08 87,500 0.08
19-Mar-03 0.12 0.15 0.12 0.14 41,800 0.14
18-Mar-03 0.12 0.16 0.12 0.15 70,400 0.15
17-Mar-03 0.1 0.12 0.1 0.12 75,900 0.12
14-Mar-03 0.13 0.13 0.1 0.1 15,000 0.1
13-Mar-03 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 0.1
12-Mar-03 0.17 0.17 0.09 0.1 116,400 0.1
11-Mar-03 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0 0.16
10-Mar-03 0.11 0.17 0.11 0.16 81,600 0.16
7-Mar-03 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0 0.11
6-Mar-03 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 6,000 0.11
5-Mar-03 0.09 0.1 0.09 0.09 10,900 0.09
4-Mar-03 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0 0.09
3-Mar-03 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.09 67,500 0.09
28-Feb-03 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 300 0.06
27-Feb-03 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 1,000 0.08
26-Feb-03 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0 0.08
25-Feb-03 0.06 0.08 0.06 0.08 24,500 0.08
24-Feb-03 0.05 0.06 0.05 0.06 38,100 0.06
21-Feb-03 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 10,000 0.06
20-Feb-03 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
19-Feb-03 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
18-Feb-03 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
14-Feb-03 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 100 0.06
13-Feb-03 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0 0.07
12-Feb-03 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0 0.07
11-Feb-03 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0 0.07
10-Feb-03 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0 0.07
7-Feb-03 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0 0.07
6-Feb-03 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0 0.07
5-Feb-03 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 9,000 0.07
4-Feb-03 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 2,600 0.05
3-Feb-03 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0 0.07
31-Jan-03 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0 0.07
30-Jan-03 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0 0.07
29-Jan-03 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 2,000 0.07
28-Jan-03 0.05 0.07 0.05 0.07 77,500 0.07
27-Jan-03 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
24-Jan-03 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
23-Jan-03 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
22-Jan-03 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
21-Jan-03 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
17-Jan-03 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20,000 0.05
16-Jan-03 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 5,000 0.06
15-Jan-03 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 12,500 0.06
14-Jan-03 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0 0.07
13-Jan-03 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0 0.07
10-Jan-03 0.06 0.07 0.06 0.07 3,400 0.07
9-Jan-03 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
8-Jan-03 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
7-Jan-03 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 6,000 0.06
6-Jan-03 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0 0.07
3-Jan-03 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 3,600 0.07
2-Jan-03 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
31-Dec-02 0.05 0.07 0.05 0.06 79,700 0.06
30-Dec-02 0.05 0.06 0.05 0.05 121,500 0.05
27-Dec-02 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 56,700 0.05
26-Dec-02 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 125,300 0.06
24-Dec-02 0.07 0.08 0.06 0.06 19,200 0.06
23-Dec-02 0.06 0.07 0.05 0.07 329,500 0.07
20-Dec-02 0.06 0.08 0.06 0.06 70,500 0.06
19-Dec-02 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 35,500 0.07
18-Dec-02 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15,000 0.07
17-Dec-02 0.08 0.08 0.06 0.07 73,000 0.07
16-Dec-02 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20,000 0.07
13-Dec-02 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.07 36,300 0.07
12-Dec-02 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 62,400 0.07
11-Dec-02 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 113,900 0.07
10-Dec-02 0.08 0.09 0.07 0.07 50,300 0.07
9-Dec-02 0.07 0.09 0.07 0.09 45,600 0.09
6-Dec-02 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0 0.09
5-Dec-02 0.07 0.09 0.07 0.09 68,300 0.09
4-Dec-02 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 300 0.07
3-Dec-02 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0 0.07
2-Dec-02 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 1,500 0.07
29-Nov-02 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0 0.07
27-Nov-02 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 8,000 0.07
26-Nov-02 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.07 44,400 0.07
25-Nov-02 0.06 0.09 0.06 0.09 22,000 0.09
22-Nov-02 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 104,800 0.06
21-Nov-02 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.06 115,000 0.06
20-Nov-02 0.08 0.08 0.06 0.06 9,100 0.06
19-Nov-02 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.07 34,400 0.07
18-Nov-02 0.06 0.08 0.06 0.08 41,500 0.08
15-Nov-02 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 10,000 0.07
14-Nov-02 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 5,900 0.07
13-Nov-02 0.07 0.08 0.06 0.08 87,600 0.08
12-Nov-02 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 2,000 0.06
11-Nov-02 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
8-Nov-02 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 5,200 0.06
7-Nov-02 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 10,000 0.06
6-Nov-02 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20,900 0.07
5-Nov-02 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 11,000 0.07
4-Nov-02 0.06 0.08 0.06 0.08 37,500 0.08
1-Nov-02 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 2,000 0.05
31-Oct-02 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
30-Oct-02 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 2,000 0.05
29-Oct-02 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
28-Oct-02 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
25-Oct-02 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 4,000 0.06
24-Oct-02 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0.06
23-Oct-02 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 2,000 0.06
22-Oct-02 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 1,600 0.05
21-Oct-02 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
18-Oct-02 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
17-Oct-02 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 2,400 0.05
16-Oct-02 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
15-Oct-02 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
14-Oct-02 0.05 0.06 0.05 0.05 28,300 0.05
11-Oct-02 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
10-Oct-02 0.07 0.07 0.05 0.05 3,200 0.05
9-Oct-02 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
8-Oct-02 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 36,100 0.05
7-Oct-02 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 10,000 0.05
4-Oct-02 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
3-Oct-02 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 500 0.05
2-Oct-02 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
1-Oct-02 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05
30-Sep-02 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 600 0.05
27-Sep-02 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 10,000 0.05
Jerseyshore...
Thanks to you for your support! It is wild over here, but I must admit that it is a great learning experience. It's just dangerous as heck.
With DANS, I feel very positive on the potential. It would be nice if both ICON and DANS could release some even more positive news of substance to confirm much more. I got a feeling it's coming. ICON seems to be all about business.
v/r
Sterling
Cautionupahead (& ALL), about your thoughts…
The first individual I spoke with was a lady by the name of Karen who works for Iconix, Inc. (ICON). You can call her at 212-730-0030. She was the one who gave me the number to Joseph Teklits at Integrated Corporate Relations at 203-682-8258 out of Connecticut. She mentioned Joseph being in “West ????” as I couldn’t quite catch the name of the city as I didn’t feel it to be important, but I did catch Connecticut. I had a hard time hearing everything due to the Blackhawk Helicopters we had taking off in the background at such time.
Karen also told me that Joseph works for ICON and is the one who is working the deal and that I should speak with him to answer my questions. She was very busy as phones were ringing like crazy as she put me on hold a few times during our discussion. She told me that the deal is real.
After I called and spoke to Joseph, I asked if I could share our discussion of information with others and he told me yes. If he would have told me no, I would not had done such. I asked if the OS for DANS was still slightly under 69 million shares as it had been reflected in their last filings with the SEC. I proceeded to tell him that I think it was 68,948,000 shares. There are actually 2 or 3 different OS figures slightly fewer than 69 million shares in their SEC filings. I think for the record, the correct OS number we are looking for is actually 68,947,000 shares. I did see how it could have been viewed a little more or a little less as such is not that significant either, but using 68,948,000 is fine because it’s better to air on the high side for caution.
Joseph did not tell me a number for the OS, but instead he answered my question by stating that the OS for DANS is still the same as shown in their last SEC filings as I had stated and that he expects for it to remain the same. Since he is the one responsible for doing the deal, I figured he should know because these deals are paid out based upon the value of the intellectual property in relation to the share structure as given during the initiation of the due diligence process until it is definitive. The due diligence has been completed in my opinion. I believe nearly everything is already locked in place to proceed towards complete closure. From my understanding, as the news stated, this is a “definitive agreement” with DANS. That’s enough closure for me.
Joseph told me that he didn’t know the amount of Expenses for DANS, but he told me that it should work out very well for both companies. He told me that they will license back to DANS. This will in essence be like them carrying DANS on their back to success and growth as they grow too. For them to do this, they must already have a clientele ready to support what the intellectual property brings to the table that would not have been supported by their clientele if it remained with DANS. ICON is buying from DANS to license it back to them for both to prosper.
From my understanding, this is to happen at no cost to DANS because of them selling their intellectual property to ICON at such a great deal. Even more important, the huge Expenses to operate the intellectual property now are no longer a burden on DANS, but belong now to ICON. This is one of the beauties of this deal. Something else to consider, this means that they keep their clientele too with their previous revenues minus much of the debt. They will use each other from my understanding of what I was told. He also mentioned a few other things as I stated in the post below:
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=17342200
This could be much better than what any of us is thinking right now because if you took under consideration their about $30+ million in Expenses from DANS last 10K, then you have to take under consideration too their $54+ million in Revenues on that same 10K with this now huge reduction in debt and cost of goods sold. Heck, as a worse case scenario, you can assume that all of the $70 million in cash is going toward Expenses and then calculate what could be the case from what DANS generated in Revenues and reported as Income. I think you will see that my guess of around $3.00 per share in the link above was actually a very conservative guess.
I think ICON knows what they are doing from looking at their business plans and where they are trading. If this were two pink sheets stocks looking to consummate this deal then I would be very skeptical and play it for a trade. There is always risk in any stock, but I think the risk has been tremendously minimized with this being ICON which is definitely a powerhouse trading on the NASDAQ. ICON has a history for closing these kinds of deals as indicative in their previous SEC filings.
Remember, ICON is not some pink sheet stock that is nontransparent. We are talking about a NASDAQ stock trading at $23.00+ per share that has filed with the SEC proving that they have done major deals like this before to enhance their growth. I just don’t see DANS doing this deal to not have some huge benefit for them out of this.
There will be more that could really confirm even more pieces of info if released by either or both companies good or bad. Again, treat my thoughts and DD as speculation. As for right now, I think it’s worth the risk, but that is just how I see things as I have been wrong before. I hope this helps in doing your research.
v/r
Sterling
Rigatoni & Blue_Horse_Shoe...
Thanks for your thoughts! I hope DANS turns out to be as it seems. From going back to further research, it's looking even better.
v/r
Sterling
Wallymac...
I have seen a few years back with some stocks that had similar deals of this nature where it just seemed too good to be true. I think one started wit the letter "D" and the other with the letter "S" as I don't quite remember their tickers.
I have seen where with one it was too good to be true where shareholders lost and another one where shareholders made out tremendously. This is risky, but I think we have many more positives on our side here with DANS and ICON than the negatives. IMHO
v/r
Sterling
Cautionupahead, about your thoughts…
Your thoughts do hold merit and should be in the back of everyone’s mind, but I can’t tell you that the ways you are looking at things are wrong or incorrect no more than you can tell me that I am wrong or incorrect. Neither I nor you know how good truly this deal is. Each stock holds its own merit for its own reasons within the market. The good, the bad, and the ugly should be considered about any stock that anybody buys in any market.
I can tell you that many of us invest in these types of stocks in the penny stock market because of the “known” and “unknown” variables combined and not so much because of the known variables alone. These are the risks we all know or “should know” that we take. It’s that “hope” that we want to materialize into positive known variables.
If we wanted to invest in stocks with everything to be known, we would invest in the major market stocks trading on the NASDAQ, DOW, NYSE, AMEX, etc. Personally, I’m not that conservative right now, but should be considered for those not fully understanding the risks involved with penny stocks. Investing in stocks in the penny stock world are stocks we invest in because of the hope of unknown potential that we hope will factually transform into the “positive” known to capture a ground floor opportunity.
With that said, there are enough known variables with DANS as compared to your average penny stock that attracted me and makes me feel at peace with myself to take the “risk versus reward” for gains. A penny stock that has an OS of slightly under 69 million shares, doing an $85 million deal with a $70 million minimum in cash with a stock trading over $23.00+ per share on the NASDAQ is enough for me to at least “take” the risk. If things turn out not to be as good as it seems, then I can accept that because of the known variables that attracted me and simply move forward.
I did my DD and shared it because I see all of us as a team because we all have one thing in common with any stock; we all would like to make some money. When you don’t have all the facts, you don’t have any choice except to speculate. This is nothing more than trying to figure things out. This is what we all do with any stock in any market, especially in the penny stock market because of the many unknown variables. I say this so that all should not tag the success or failure of this deal on me or any other shareholder. I am nothing more than a shareholder trying to help like many that are here.
Bottom line, in the penny stock market, it is very risky. When you don’t have all of the facts to your desire to buy a stock, then I highly recommend not buying. My posts I make are not made to be considered the gospel for making you buy or sell a stock. I make them to help share research that made me see things the way I do. I recommend buying any stock because of your own DD and not because of mines. I only share DD in these forums because that is one of the reasons why I think these forums exist.
I have some more thoughts that I am organizing to post that I think I didn’t capture in my previous posts. I welcome you to read them and share your constructive thoughts. I will also answer your earlier post to me. Thanks for your now constructive thoughts.
v/r
Sterling
Morcash, about your thoughts...
You are correct. I was kind of envisioning the funds being legitimately authorized to be captured as part of their 10K filing even though it will be for the initial burst of the current quarter of the deal closing. I do see you point though. Thanks for sharing.
v/r
Sterling
Dream...
I'm still kind of rushing a bit. I made some updates to the post as I broke a few verbs here or there. LOL
Take care!
v/r
Sterling
DANS DD From ICON...
I called ICON at 212-730-0030 and spoke to a lady by the name of Karen to inquiry about the ICON and DANS deal. Karen informed me that the person who is responsible for the deal is a guy by the name of Joseph Teklits out of Connecticut whom works under their section called Integrated Corporate Relations. She gave me his email and the phone number of 203-682-8258 to call him. I got through the second time around.
I ask him about the deal being a buyout. I told him that I don’t see the deal as be a buyout, but instead as if ICON was just buying their product, being the intellectual property, which means that DANS would not merge into them or cease to exist, but instead enjoy the huge purchase because it would be listed as Revenues on the Balance Sheet of DANS. I stated that this would help them out tremendously and he agreed. Although he said that he did not know exactly what their total debt was, he agreed that this should help get them out of any debt and some extra because it will be listed as Revenues on their Balance Sheet.
I asked him about the outstanding shares (OS) for DANS. I asked him if it was still unchanged from their last SEC filing of 68,948,000 shares. Joseph stated that their OS is still the same and that he expects for it to remain the same.
He informed me that the $70 million will be cash and that the contingent payment for $15 million would probably be in stock. He said that DANS can either exchange the stock for cash to give the $15 million to its shareholders or give the $15 million worth of ICON stock to us DANS shareholders as a stock dividend. He stated that such would be up to the company.
Consider this from DANS as a worse case scenario assuming they had a quarter of the cash being given to them as Revenues and the remaining cash to pay off their debt:
(Revenues – Expenses) ÷ OS = EPS
($70,000,000 - $52,500,000) ÷ 68,948,000 = EPS
$17,500,000 ÷ 68,948,000 = EPS
.25 = EPS
With using an extremely conservative PE Ratio of 12, we can easily be fundamentally trading at:
.25 x 12 = $3.00
Now keep in mind that the above share price estimation is only taking under consideration the $70 million and "NOT" the $15 million contingent payment to be given to us in either cash or shares of ICON.
All of this should be coming out in a filing as I had shown with their history in closing and filing previous deals of this nature. I did not ask when, but I suspect very soon. ICON is a major market stock trading on the NASDAQ and I got that feeling from my conversations with them that they are very serious about paying out this deal soon.
Please, everyone do your own DD as I think some of this info my help to bring out more of what was not known to now being known to help weigh the risk versus reward. I personally think this is the real deal.
v/r
Sterling
Updated DD with DANS...
My apology, but I was rushing a bit when I made this post and used $75,000,000 instead of $70,000,000. I noticed it after I spoke to ICON about the deal. Below is the post with the corrected figures. My apology to you all with that error.
According to its old share structure in their last SEC filing, the Outstanding Shares (OS) for DANS is 68,948,000 shares.
http://www.pinksheets.com/quote/filings.jsp?symbol=DANS
With ICON being willing to pay $75 million, the worth of this deal could be considered below if the OS is still the same:
$70,000,000 ÷ 68,948,000 = $1.02 per share
Now take under consideration the contingent payment of $15 million, payable in cash or stock:
($70,000,000 + $15,000,000)
$85,000,000 ÷ 68,948,000 = $1.23 per share
The questions now can be centered on the validity of this deal actually going through. From further researching, Iconix Brand Group, Inc. ("Iconix") has a good history for closing on previous deals and trades on the NASDAQ at $22.00+ per share under the ticker of ICON. From reading their 424B3 file with the SEC on 22 Jan 07, it appears that this would not be the first time that ICON has closed/done something like this.
I recommend going to their website to see how nice it is then going to their SEC filings to take a quick look at their 424B3 filed with the SEC on 22 Jan 07.
http://www.iconixbrand.com/
You will see that on 31 Oct 06, ICON acquired all of the capital stock of Mossimo, Inc. in a merger transaction where they paid the stockholders of Mossimo, Inc. a total of about $67.5 million in cash and 3,608,810 shares of their common stock. They even had a clause to where if their stock didn’t close at or above $18.71 per share for at least 20 consecutive trading days during the 12 months ending October 31, 2007, they would give the recipients an additional 40,965 shares. To still add, they paid Cherokee Inc. a total of $33.0 million in cash to withdrawal its proposal and deal it had submitted to acquire Mossimo, Inc. As per their SEC filing, the note was paid on 15 Dec 06.
Back on 6 Nov 06, ICON acquired some assets from Ocean Pacific Apparel Corp., a subsidiary of Warnaco Group, Inc. and paid them $10.0 million in cash and issued a note in the principal amount of $44.0 million. Again, as per their SEC filing, the note was paid on 20 Dec 06.
On 13 Dec 06, ICON consummated a public offering of 11,184,750 shares of their common stock for net proceeds of about $189.7 million so I think they have a little lunch money to play with. This company appears to be very serious with achieving their business objectives.
Since ICON is a very legitimate company whom is making this deal with DANS, I can definitely lean more towards this deal being true after doing some quick research on ICON. These are only my opinions and I recommend that everyone do their own DD to make a rational investing/trading decision to be at peace with themselves.
v/r
Sterling
Dream, about the OS...
The OS is the same. I'm just getting back in from a mission, but I will post the names and numbers of the people I spoke to at ICON for you to confirm too if you like. Give me a few minutes. This is actually better than what I think any of us originally thought from reading some of the posts on this board.
v/r
Sterling
Some DD with DANS…
According to its old share structure in their last SEC filing, the Outstanding Shares (OS) for DANS is 68,948,000 shares.
http://www.pinksheets.com/quote/filings.jsp?symbol=DANS
With ICON being willing to pay $75 million, the worth of this deal could be considered below if the OS is still the same:
$75,000,000 ÷ 68,948,000 = $1.08 per share
Now take under consideration the contingent payment of $15 million, payable in cash or stock:
($75,000,000 + $15,000,000)
$90,000,000 ÷ 68,948,000 = $1.30 per share
The questions now can be centered on the validity of this deal actually going through. From further researching, Iconix Brand Group, Inc. ("Iconix") has a good history for closing on previous deals and trades on the NASDAQ at $22.00+ per share under the ticker of ICON. From reading their 424B3 file with the SEC on 22 Jan 07, it appears that this would not be the first time that ICON has closed/done something like this.
I recommend going to their website to see how nice it is then going to their SEC filings to take a quick look at their 424B3 filed with the SEC on 22 Jan 07.
http://www.iconixbrand.com/
You will see that on 31 Oct 06, ICON acquired all of the capital stock of Mossimo, Inc. in a merger transaction where they paid the stockholders of Mossimo, Inc. a total of about $67.5 million in cash and 3,608,810 shares of their common stock. They even had a clause to where if their stock didn’t close at or above $18.71 per share for at least 20 consecutive trading days during the 12 months ending October 31, 2007, they would give the recipients an additional 40,965 shares. To still add, they paid Cherokee Inc. a total of $33.0 million in cash to withdrawal its proposal and deal it had submitted to acquire Mossimo, Inc. As per their SEC filing, the note was paid on 15 Dec 06.
Back on 6 Nov 06, ICON acquired some assets from Ocean Pacific Apparel Corp., a subsidiary of Warnaco Group, Inc. and paid them $10.0 million in cash and issued a note in the principal amount of $44.0 million. Again, as per their SEC filing, the note was paid on 20 Dec 06.
On 13 Dec 06, ICON consummated a public offering of 11,184,750 shares of their common stock for net proceeds of about $189.7 million so I think they have a little lunch money to play with. This company appears to be very serious with achieving their business objectives.
Since ICON is a very legitimate company whom is making this deal with DANS, I can definitely lean more towards this deal being true after doing some quick research on ICON. These are only my opinions and I recommend that everyone do their own DD to make a rational investing/trading decision to be at peace with themselves.
v/r
Sterling
Newatthis69, to answer your question…
Although you were not asking me, maybe I can help answer your question.
No... You would not multiply the .035 per share by 12 because the 12 figure you are referring to is what is known as a conservative growth rate that is fundamentally known as the Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio.
The .035 is not an Earnings Per Share (EPS) figure so it would only need to be considered “as is” since the Market Capital figure is conceived from a different fundamental perspective. I hope this helps.
v/r
Sterling
Cargo_hauler & Balamidas...
I'm kind of rusty on my Technical Analysis skills, but Level II appears to be "quietly" strengthening from the bottom up. Last I looked when the market was open yesterday, I think there were three MMs out of six MMs that were sitting at .01 per share at the "ASK" versus initially only one.
Although I'm still not sure if there is a naked short in CHNW by the way it has been trading as of late given the volume, it does appear that the inventory of shares are nicely being depleted with the accumulation. I don't think that it will matter if there is a naked short or not. When the inventory reaches zero, it should trade as if there is a naked short because of the same pressure to get shares if the right news of confirmation is released to generate regular buying pressure.
It's starting to look like CHNW is ready to graduate to the next level of trading. I think CHNW is a beauty if they can execute their business plan. IMHO
v/r
Sterling