Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
No tension and planes toy or otherwise are important to the beholder only. I may even put a DBMM sticker on a toy plane myself!
Access to certain information has a pay wall. But free account and Google DD warriors already know this...
Crap is not spread just here. Remember there's 1000 twits now too.
The Bologna I believe. Maybe add a little Swiss. A BS sandwich seems adequate here. Takes a lot of DBMM to own a private jet. Probably better to charter them like I do...
3% is pocket change.
I don't hold any of this anymore. It's all my father now. I couldn't force him to sell DBMM. He still thinks .5 is the sweet spot. As if he needs money, lol. Greedy old man.
Same strategy I use here or in traditional markets. I still have plenty of $20 Tesla after selling a portion at 20x. Smart trading doesn't know what market you are in.
Facts only matter here if it fits the narrative.
Yes, screen shots are great. So are private messages, lol. But all things are better in Indonesia. That's where someone can get their head on straight after some relaxation...
Absolutely agree. Even if someone wanted to unload significant size now, it would be almost impossible to do so without ridiculous slippage. So why sell now? It has already been several years. Another few months doesn't make any difference. Especially considering how little it took to get a large share size in DBMM. Sure, maybe take a little profit. That is just smart trading.
Better be careful. The thesis police will get you. Or is it dissertation now lol.
Thats a lot of twits.
If that's true then only 30% of the board is read. Lol
Apparently, someone read enough to make a pointless comments.
This is a very true statement, or let's say fact. Lol
Hahaha. Surely, facts would never come to mind here, lol.
BTW thesis is poor word usage.
Some truth to that.
It's funny how intelligent facts take more than 5 words...
Obviously, everyone doesn't or it wouldn't have been brought up on the board and inaccurately described.
More about time and regulation than difficulty. There are a lot of companies that stay OTC by choice. They have long ago meet requirements to uplist, but why if not necessary? Uplist is expensive, so ROI needs to be there.
Not really true. QB is the next tier up from pink sheets. But certainly is considered and up list. OTCMM is not and exchange traded entity, so nothing is exchange listed. QX is the next and highest tier, but still not an exchange.
"Factual information can be found on wikipedia as well as dictionary.com".
That's some funny stuff right there...
Sort of accurate. GLED is the DBMM sponsor in the form 211 filled. 15c2-11 is just the rule regarding publishing quotations on the OTCMM. GLED could be the "AX" at some point, but that term is given to any MM that is controlling price action. Each MM has it's specialty though. GLED is actually known for working with toxic diluters and CDEL is generally known for short selling. Does not mean that is why GLED or CDEL is here, just means they are more known for that action. Ultimately, the MM makes their profit on the spread and all they care about is profit.
Your last statement is very accurate "In the meantime, there isn't much left to talk about until the company comes out with something".
Also can be spoofing. Which in OTC is rampant.
FYI. Anyone that has payed litigation research accounts, would know you can't link to those.
Same with any trading pay to play accounts. Kind of how they make their money.
I guess at least one shareholder needs to do more than free DD...
Google was so simpletons could find it.
Don't be ridiculous. Kramer has multiple SEC litigation in his various dealings. Many were decided without admission of guilt.
Long before DBMM.
Do some actually due diligence and shareholders would know.
HAM needs explaining. Awesome for holiday meals, good on sandwiches. Expert trader?
Never heard of a HAM signal.
So Junk response to Junk thesis?
Of course Kramer got caught. It proves if he steals tens of millions and only has to pay back 1 million in fines.
Immoral, but profitable business model. With little fear of consequences.
Oh I forgot, Super Linda will make him pay where everyone else failed.
Well clearinghouses rob Peter to pay Paul until they can settle FTD's. They are ultimately responsible for the shares even after liquidating all assets to cover.
Guys like Kramer have little to take though. They keep the bulk of their profits naked as well....
Would be foolish to be scared. This factual information simply proves he has been doing this for a long time and he has fingerprints on DBMM too.
As I said, if the comment is read completely, I respect the effort to fix the wrong Linda's poor judgment created. People make mistakes. My only disappointment is not taking full credit for the decision.
And that is only a partial list. I found cases that alleged him as the inside contact when he was still working for a firm in the early 2000's.
He has had a long history so whatever happens, he earned it.
I agree actually. She got DBMM into the mess and was able with a lot of help to get them out.
The post was in response to poor information regarding Kramer history.
Apparently shareholders and Linda don't know.
Shareholders don't know facts, documentation or where to look for the public information. Shareholders get plenty of opinions from self declared masters of due diligence though. I have access to huge databases full of information. Unfortunately, it is pay for information. But almost nothing to do with litigation in a public company is not available somewhere.
I am going to link a Kramer case that he won. Just because it shows shareholders that don't know, how these criminals work the system and win. You will find many more cases involving him here as well. Incidentally, this particular case is 2008...
https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/5914b276add7b0493475fff6
This link is just a quick name search for Kramer litigation.
https://www.casemine.com/search/us/Curt%2BKramer
I understand it puts the CEO in a bad light by exposing Kramer companies and associates, had been doing this for a long time. I can understand needing capital. I can understand accepting it from the only option. I can understand knowingly doing so, even with the understanding that the individual, his companies and associates are toxic. I can even understand, thinking, as an educated CEO, an agreement would be reached that could reduce the risk.
What I have know understanding of, is why play the victim after the fact. Own it and I can respect that. Everyone makes mistakes. The mistake Linda made was taking on risk.
That said, I agree with the courts decision in favor of Linda and DBMM. What Kramer did and has been doing for years is illegal or at least barely legal and immoral. I do applaud DBMM and Linda for not taking it without a fight.
But, the only thing Linda was a victim of was her own decisions. Had they never engaged with toxic lenders, only thing one can say for certain is they wouldn't have gone through all this to get here.
They don't care s long as you pay the fine.
Look into how many tickers are merged with down here by private companies, claiming to bring in millions of revenue. Pay for PR full of delusions of parabolic moves. Stock pumps then fades to oblivion. Some of they organizations do it as a business model. Some were legitimate but couldn't pull it off. Why's don't matter. They still leave a wasteland in their path.
I think had no choice is the better deduction. I can understand that and by Linda's own testimony, she was reluctant to tak on the debt.
What are you talking about?
That is common knowledge in DBMM. Does your DD include the multitude of companies under the Kramers control? The hundreds of toxic loans to multitudes of otc companies under several different Kramer firms since the early 2000's? Litigation dating bacck almost as long regarding illegal lending practices, predatory lending, securities violation, fraud, fines, the list is long.
Kramer starts a new company to defraud as soon as the other is outted. That doesn't even cover the many wealth backers that use him as a proxy for all of this.
So if someone only looked at Asher, maybe could not see the depth of corrupt practices at that time. But very little investigation would show he is the last person you want to borrow money from.
Been there. Not a fun time.
I don't know about that.
Love, DBMM, Linda, naked and shorts on a plane seems creepy and risky...
Back to incoherent speak. Always take profit. There was plenty of time and volume to take some off the table at the highs. Not everything, but some.
Day drinking and DBMM promotion are poor bedfellows...
Was surprised to find out how long he had been around. In OTC there are a lot of these guys. He is small time as markets go. But he has taken a lot of money from a lot of investors and companies down here. Obviously he is small time compared to traditional markets but here he has been allowed to steal, pay small fine and continue on.
That is why I assume that is why Linda said she regrettably secured financing from them. She knew it was risky. But everyone always thinks they can out smart the fox.
Doubtful. But predictions are a risky thing.
Either hero or zero...
Take care. Monday is a new week.
Ok sorry. Not sure was debated by myself Kramer is a criminal.
I have read every filing over the years. But only had to read a couple on Kramer and seach edgar go know he is trash.
Take care.