Digital Brand Media and Marketing Group Inc (DBMM)

[Gotham Bay Group]

Apparently shareholders and Linda don't know.
Shareholders don't know facts, documentation or where to look for the public information. Shareholders get plenty of opinions from self declared masters of due diligence though. I have access to huge databases full of information. Unfortunately, it is pay for information. But almost nothing to do with litigation in a public company is not available somewhere.
I am going to link a Kramer case that he won. Just because it shows shareholders that don't know, how these criminals work the system and win. You will find many more cases involving him here as well. Incidentally, this particular case is 2008...

https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/5914b276add7b0493475fff6

This link is just a quick name search for Kramer litigation.

https://www.casemine.com/search/us/Curt%2BKramer



I understand it puts the CEO in a bad light by exposing Kramer companies and associates, had been doing this for a long time. I can understand needing capital. I can understand accepting it from the only option. I can understand knowingly doing so, even with the understanding that the individual, his companies and associates are toxic. I can even understand, thinking, as an educated CEO, an agreement would be reached that could reduce the risk.
What I have know understanding of, is why play the victim after the fact. Own it and I can respect that. Everyone makes mistakes. The mistake Linda made was taking on risk.
That said, I agree with the courts decision in favor of Linda and DBMM. What Kramer did and has been doing for years is illegal or at least barely legal and immoral. I do applaud DBMM and Linda for not taking it without a fight.
But, the only thing Linda was a victim of was her own decisions. Had they never engaged with toxic lenders, only thing one can say for certain is they wouldn't have gone through all this to get here.