Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You asked Rich if he sent out some letters you asked for no clarification of what was in those letters or who they were sent to, correct? The information that letters were sent out is not public and had only been stated to you in one of your contacts with Rich, correct? You also asked Rich if he has received a Wells notice to which you aledge he said "no." For this we have to accept his word and your word the conversation took place, correct?
I believe that someone asked Rich Inza if he sent out some letters, I don't believe Rich was asked what the content of the letters was about, if indeed they had anything to do with infringement or who Rich actually sent any letter to. So long and short as I understand conversation as reported on this MB. " Have you or VPLM sent out any letters to any companies as you said you would in some of the PR's?" Response from Rich, "Yes I/we have sent out some letters to some companies." End of questioning around this topic. We seem to be getting all excited that according to someone on this board they managed to speak to Rich and that he confirmed he had mailed some letters, but and a big but, this is not "public" information freely available from VPLM and we have absolutely no idea what letters Rich has mailed, what they are about or who these letters were mailed to.
Again with all due respect all because Rich told me so. Didn't ask who the letters were sent to or what the content was but the fact he tolde he had mailed some letters is supposed to make us all believe?
They are so focused and busy on selling the patents that they have been heard of by no-one, nowhere? These patents also have stealth tech included? The only reason the price is staying where it is, is because no one is selling. I have written my losses off. Got over it, to an extent, but have I sold? No, I haven't I am actually getting my money's worth from the entertainment provided by this board. I still wait for that miracle that maybe just maybe one of you positives have some valid point, some reason to think I may actually be thankful I spent so much money but not yet, unfortunately there is not one thing that has any validity. "Rich told me in a private meeting/call" just doesn't cut it.
Malak said that after listening to the evidence presented on Wednesday, he became convinced that Avatar was "independently created." Case dismissed, no out of court settlement. So now you would suggest that Malak and Cameron made a very quiet off all records settlement? Even if Malak was convicted of murder the judgement would be questioned and it would be asked how it could possibly effect any outcome to the obvious big time profits to come from investing in VPLM.
Not crickets but big blue aliens. Didn't Malak think he could contest Avitar? Malak allegedly wrote a story, he then went on to claim that another story copied and infringed on his ideas. The author Malak attacks says who are you and what is this joke, yep let's take this to court. What does Malak do? Walks away day one before even entering the court room with his tail between his legs. See some frightening similarities here between the story and the patents. Chirp, chirp, chirp
So unless I am mistaken you are suggesting that those that claim to email or communicate with Inza and gain information that we do not see or hear are lying or it is technically insider trading which is illegal?
Inside information? Seriously? Shouldn't this all be public knowledge?
Yes, one of our MB friends said that in a recent conversation with Richard that he confirmed letters had been sent to infringing companies. When were they sent, to whom were they sent and when and how will they be followed up? What is with Southbank? What has happened to the 100 m shares? Why do you not attend any events specifically linked to the patents and their technology? Why have you not had them independently tested and verified? What is the current board structure of VPLM? Have you receive a Wells notice? Just a couple of my questions and can't wait for others to add theirs...
So one should not be investing in this company for the long term reward and hoped for billion dollar plus sale but instead play a short term game based on buying at lows and waiting for any pump?
It might be $0.00, wouldn't that be terrible, thank you NYT for helping keep the dream alive. I have decided I really should take the sound advise from yesterday and purchase today at .09 to offset my losses because that makes so much financial sense. You clearly see from all the activity at the patent office and DD that Facebook are imminently going to purchase VPLM's patents. You would have to be mad not to buy in now. Not sure what the Doctor prescribed for me this morning but feeling much better now and can see far more clearly how this stock will make me my fortune. :)
With all due respect you didn't pay 0.29. You have even now doubled your money. Well invested. Shocked that you aren't taking it out whilst the going is still good. My strategy has become, I have lost thousands but can hope for a miracle and if keep digging and dissecting may just find one. As with my last post I totally respect and understood what had been said but am exploring and hoping for an educated response as to why these patents are not just totally outdated as say comparing a biro pen and pulp paper to a keyboard and word document
I am leaning toward Beer on this one. Happy to see your thought process again along with the explanation but billing these days is all about the data package and how much you use and stream not an individual text or fail army you tube clip. This is my fear, that the patents are already long outdated and have no relevance to the current billing process.
Absolutely loved this post, seeing your thought process along with the connection of dots. It was positive and well laid out. I am just not convinced that the RBR patent is required?
I respect all comments and input. Shocking that we have such opposing views on our own DD. Yours based in part due to conversations with a company representative who does not make public his information and for some of us is as elusive as the scarlet pimpernel. I am not asking for any of VPLMs information to necessarily be made public on this board but would strongly demand that they update their company website and have office contacts that make them available to all who have an interest in their business, especially those that are lining their pockets!!
You think it is perfectly acceptable for Mr Inza to spin to a select few based on their alleged attitude and for VPLM to not make any information publically available?
Apparently you do not need to wonder why anyone would purchase, though myself I see no strong evidence of purposeful buying of this stock not as 0.09 is not very exciting is it? I am so glad Rich had chosen to answer you. I am so glad he has been able to answer every question and doubt raised here and managed to spin that into success due soon. Why oh why can you not share his wisdom?
Great!! More mysterious under the radar only a select few can know about information and probably only another two years to wait....
What happened to who?
You could read that as "We, Southbank who ourselves like to be as anonymous as possible have absolutely no idea what our client VPLM, another anonymous company, want from us, but we will continue a personal relationship and it has to be personal as we can't find each other's offices and continue trying to find out.
I see absolutely no way of connecting with him via the JT social media unless I am being incredibly stupid!! I can find no FB or linkedin profiles for him either.
How does one send that message?
The biggest problem by far for me personally is that there has been no pick up by any serious media. If these patents were so foundational there is no way whatsoever after all this time and the full knowledge that these patents exist that the world would not be screaming about them and that the stock price would not already be through the roof.
The simple question is why would he have the need or desire to buy VPLM, what does VPLM have that he could actually need?
Or maybe this time next year?
JT Global does not list his connection to VPLM. Start really trying to track these people down. Try finding LinkedIn profiles, Facebook or any social media that has any real substance.
I love that, to try and get hold of Mr Tucker at JT Global, you have to write yes write a good old fashioned letter and post it to a PO Box.
That's all I can find as well and like you am unsure if it means being contested
Then why is VPLM not mentioned in his bios? Truthfully I do not believe anything anymore. At best this is one of the most poorly run companies ever. Yet supposedly run by such credible and credited men? B/S utter B/S!! There is no way I would let my name be associated with such a shambles. Breaking one promise to investors is bad enough but bit to follow through on one thing? Not to keep people updated and informed? Presidential advisor with shabby qualifications and a restaurant owner with a bizarre reputation? Perfect combination. Southbank new website? Francis Galbally, funny that he is shown on the site when sources say he walked away. Still can find no trading information for them either.
Can't wait for someone to get hold of Colin Tucker at his new company and see if he knows anything of VPLM especially as they are not mentioned in his bios. Unfortunately still cannot find a direct number for him, yet!
With all due respect Ibird. Putting to one side all the PR with regard Southbank and the fact it would appear to be a company that does not exist or no longer exist and that does not bother you. You appear to be the only one that can see it find any evidence of VPLM working hard on the patents. That is a fact I find mind boggling.
There is no concenviable reason why anyone would advise friends or family to invest in VPLM and that in short says it all.
Employing a apparently Mickey Mouse company to monetize VPLM is irrelevant? The fact they used this as PR is irrelevant? Really wish I could find some evidence of continued hardwork going on.
At the end of Feb you ask if VPLM is worth buying. Then a few days later you make a statement that you are not losing confidence in VPLM. Wonder if you would care to share what made you purchase and what exactly gives you confidence in the stock. Have you been able to research the patents? Do is it concern you that none of the alesged revenue streams have not been pursued? Does it not concern you that the company Southbank, mandated to negotiate a deal for VPLM does not seem to exist?
Seems everything about VPLM is hearsay with no proof. VPLM have fostered this by their actions or lack of actions. Maybe then every thread regarding VPLM which are questions and supposition based on opinion should be removed? There wouldn't be much left to read would there?
Always concerning when a company is listed as previously know as. What was it Novus? Can't find any evidence of any capital or assets
I do not believe it to be relevant for one moment. Smart Flash obviously had a verifiable patent that fell into all the legal parameters. I am seeing and hearing that there is a huge uprising against patent trolls. The last $10,000.00 VPLM have should really be spent on producing an indecent report on the validity of the patents.
So my initial reports are coming back that they are what are regarded in the industry as patent trolls, there is no product or intrinsic value. They have been set up with the hope that in the future there maybe an infringement case. I have been pointed to the fact that the US in particular is trying to stamp our these types of patents and are starting to reject infringement cases bought about by this type of company. Google and Sony in particular are working together and hold in high disdain these "trolls." Please discuss...
You are quite right and truthfully I am now confused. I will ask them to read again and explain their thoughts to me...
This supports what I have been told by other sources that they could see no useful applications, suoerceded or there were other programmes and platforms