Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Now that I know that the physics work at scale, it is just a matter of technical adjustments. Don't be frightened by our friends' talk of electrical shorts, impedance, explosions .. why not lol !
Got them !
Filled Buy 10000 ZERO Limit 0.39 -- -- 14:50:59 05/12/15
I am trying to buy 10,000 shares at 0.39. Did not come through yet.
Very interesting observations, the AOT did show the incredible laboratory viscosity reduction at scale with a 4 skids, albeit only for a limited number of data points,
power supply issue is trickier than thought,
(a few months ago I was coining the expression "dynamic power supply")
Subsequent upbeat claims of TAO now understandable.
Take out the foam and see the essential : the AOT with the necessary "tweeking" will work.
This is a work a progress, the big names are showing their willingness to be part of this endeavour,... will you ? ....
impressive, would be nice to know what size of meeting room they booked at the Ritz ....
I would be curious to know how many shareholders usually attend. Anybody knows for last year shm ? thanks
If it is good strategy to stir up the stock price before a big announcement, well then it is quite a brilliant move.
That's why it's highly improbable they don't have some positive news in their sleeves, cash wise .... Gregg is usually cash tight, so there is a message in this hotel choice that you just need to decode.
a brilliant teasing message concocted by M group or a cynical/stupid idea ? pick your own choice ...
Since a good part of people will think about the optimistic scenario, expect some share price movement next week.
To Our Stockholders:
You are cordially invited to attend the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “2015 Annual Meeting”) of Save the World Air, Inc. (the “Company” or “our”), which will be held at The Ritz-Carlton, Kapalua, One Ritz-Carlton Drive, Kapalua, Hawaii 96761, at 10:00 a.m. (Hawaii time) on Friday, June 19, 2015
You should change your booking engine, room is 499 usd. Not cheap but 4 times less than yours...
https://www.ritzcarlton.com/en/Properties/KapaluaMaui/Reservations/Default.htm#top
That's my feeling too, plus the fact that big shareholders (holding 2 millions shares +) don't want to fly 10 or 15 hours just to go to Santa-Barbara....
I am not surprised, a moribund company does not hold a shm in Hawai, good news ahead. By the way, I know big shareholders in Australia, Thailand, England, who might as well be in a nice setting if they have to fly anyway. Maybe they suggested the place ? It looks like the posters reacting are mostly in continental US.
I dont really see anything worth ranting about this. I would be worried if they held the meeting in Patagonia.
so you do agree that when a real field test gives new and better numbers than previously projected, it must impact the ROI and thus the price,
Thanks again as often, Sano
simple : TC don't want the 75% power reduction figure to be the basis for the pricing of the AOT, understandably. They rightfully found that this figure could be disputed through the protocol of the test. Plus, this figure is linked to the TC test so could be under the NDA. Hence the statement. But however you take it, the power impact is enormous. As another poster just said they might well be trying to figure out an acceptable long term pricing.
It's rather comforting to see such historical foundation to the rise of the AOT. The electric bulb took I believe 5 years between idea and patent, notwithstanding the fact that principle had been established 45 years ago (Lindsay) without industrial follow-up.
If my memory is good it was you who said that it took a long time between the science and the industrial production.
In this respect, STWA is not bad at all.
It would be very interesting to compare the ROI of the AOT with the one with DRA. The pipelines are not faced with the choice "AOT or Nothing", but "AOT or DRA".
Do you believe what they say (Bigger) or do you not believe them (Tao) ... lol
This is really strange and "interesting" thinking. So a movie being nominated to the Oscars means the producer is desperate ... isn't this kind of tortured reasoning that is desperate ?
what is funny is the 1 hour or so of silence they take to regroup and find something....anything ...
Our "friends" are now busy researching what's wrong with the Global Petroleum Show, before sharings their finds on this board, lol !
Too bad you are not COO of STWA. We would already be on Nasdaq.
Alkaline,
If I may ....
The pump power of the station N you have put the AOT on is a function of the drag effect in this section, but also in the other sections (as liquids are incompressible, and all is connected).
The sections that are most affecting the pump power of the station N are of course the drag of section N, N-1 and N+1 (immediate neighbours).
This is also true from the perspective of station N-1 : pump power of this station will depends on the drag of section N-2, and N.
So when you switch on the AOT on station N and the viscosity reduces so much that the drag effect is dramatically much lower in section N, according to the above, it will effect the power of the pump N-1 and depending on the way the pump N-1 has been parametered, you may see and increase of power of station N-1, which will in turn increase the flow and the parameters of station N that you are studying.
This is an example where the test might be "flawed" hence the need to design a new protocol. Had the viscosity reduction be less dramatic, the impact on pump N-1 would have been less and the test would be more "conclusive" meaning no need to redesign the protocol.
In a way the need to redesign the protocol is a direct consequence of the totally unexpected effects that have been observed.
He does not seem downbeat, lol !
Musing ...
That's a real scary prediction !
That would be my second explanation for the energy the "not longs" deploy :
they are not shorters so either they are from competition either they are trying for an "unknown" reason to keep the pps down ....