So let's get back on track...

My best guess on the value of NNVC if the topical creme came to market: $500 million to $1 billion dollars.

My greeting: Good afternoon, kind sir.

OK, now your turn to answer my question.

You'd have to ask an admin that question. You can request a review of the deletion. Just go to your mailbox and select 'My Removed Posts'.

You see, I'm just not good at figuring these things out. To me, someone jumping ship is a sign of regression not progress as far as the company is concerned. It just raises all sorts of questions, none of them positive.

But that's just me.

My best guess on the value of NNVC if the topical creme came to market: $500 million to $1 billion dollars.

My greeting: Good afternoon, kind sir.

OK, now your turn to answer my question.

My sincerest apologies. Could you identify the progress in that document to which you refer?

Just a reminder...

Thanks for posting this. A lot of truth in what you said.

Some people believe that the more word salad is dished up, the more it will be eaten.

I forgot the quotes on my original post.

Interesting choice of words. Emphases mine.

The virus has a latency phase inside neurons; our drug essentially suppresses the copies that emerge, but the infection will reappear. Our drugs, if they work clinically, are an "effective" cure. Which is still a major advance.

Yeah, I get that part. I'm just saying let's mix it up a little.

How about using a pitcher plant, sundew or butterwort for an analogy? Or maybe even an angler fish? Or any of the other hundreds of organisms found in nature that uses something to attract its prey before striking.

Oh... just thought of a double-analogy. The venus fly trap could also symbolize Diwan luring in unsuspecting investors with his sweet aroma of a miracle cure to purchase shares. Then, WHAM! Say bye bye to your money, Mr. Sucker Bait Investor.

I guess that's pretty appropriate.

C'mon, it's 2020. Let's use a fresh analogy.

In this interview posted on May 18, 2020, Dr. Diwan addresses many of the topics that are discussed on this board. The interviewer asks questions that many of us have asked such as, will NNVC's attention be diverted away from Covid-19 if another virus happens to come along and what is the status of the Herpes/HSV IND indication. Diwan has a very long 15 minute monologue at the beginning, mostly history and origins of the company, but at about 15 or 16 minutes the interviewer starts asking questions.

Enjoy!

I love that one as well. I think it's much more likely that an everlasting gobstopper will be invented than NNVC ever earning one penny.

My only regret is associating a great character like Willy Wonka, who had great business acumen, with a charlatan like Diwan. One may say Willy Wonka is a fictional character, but NNVC's fantasy 'cides are fictional too.

No matter which chart one looks at, it's still the same ol' song and dance, my friend.

That's a really eye-opening chart. It's hard to avoid the truth of what it's trying to show us, but then again, some may choose to ignore it.

I think this chart is more relevant than the 30 day one I posted earlier today. If I remember my statistics classes correctly, the smaller the sample size, the more accurate the trend analysis.

There are many who claim the Diwans are innovative geniuses, creating revolutionary breakthroughs in science. Perhaps they were referring to the Diwans' financial prowess.

They seem to be perfectly happy donating their gains (loosely speaking) to the Diwans. Win/win.

But the technology is real so none of that matters.

I used "directly" in the following context:

The $10 million is an infusion of capitol to presumably (presumed by the Faithful Followers anyway) further the testing and someday get a product to market. At such a time, if it ever comes to pass, Diwan would reap great financial benefit from the $10 mm invested today.

I'm just wondering what percentage will actually be used for development/testing and what percentage Diwan, via NNVC salary and bonuses and the Theracour 30% money laundering, is going to take off the top.

It would be great if Diwan, who has already siphoned tens of millions from NNVC and does not really need any more money right now (I'm making assumptions here; he may have significant gambling debts or some such), would forego his salary and suspend the 30% Theracour bleeding, and allow the full $10 mm to go entirely toward the work. It would go a long way toward dispelling the notion that this is a scam.

But we know that's not going to happen.

I wonder how much of that $10.2 million is going to end up directly in Diwan's pocket.

That's been happening for several days now. Rose-colored glasses often skew one's perspective.

Disclaimer: Past fraudulent performance is not necessarily indicative of future scamming.

Diwan may turn over a new leaf and actually produce this time.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Happy Friday chuckle!

Go NNVC!!! to da moon!!!!

This one never gets old.

"SEC wants us to tell you that you have to take everything we tell you with about a bag of salt. But I would like that you put it on the uh, uh donkey's back and take it to water."

Yessiree folks, this is the stable genius running NNVC and Theracour.

The clown Diwan uses that tried and true Venus flytrap analogy once again in this riveting interview.

$0.109 pre-splits. What a joke of a company NNVC is.

Wrong. It's most definitely a scam. Easy to see by following the money. It all leads to Diwan's bank account.

You'd think an announcement like this would be on NNVC's website. Guess they don't think it's important enough to put out there.

https://www.morningstar.com/news/accesswire/590874msn/nanoviricides-announces-pricing-of-102-million-registered-direct-offering

Not necessarily. Diwan has been a pretty tough negotiator with himself. Nothing is certain.

Agreed. Why do you think they will change now after 15 years of failure to do so?

Could you elaborate on the accommodation[sic] FDA? I don't see any evidence of that.

There's that tired old phrase, "collaboration." Please name the collaboration interest of which you speak.

I am now. Thanks for sharing your valued opinion.

You seem to be an expert. Can you tell me what other indications, besides weight loss, would show low toxicity and/or efficacy?

You seemed to intimate that weight loss was the primary (only???) indicator of safety/efficacy and coincidentally, this is the only thing on which NNVC provided good results.

If this is such great news, what now is preventing the tests from going further? Are there other indications which must be measured and evaluated?

Again, you seem extremely knowledgeable about the process so I was hoping you could shed some light on it for me, a non-scientific person.

Thanks in advance!

Is this the only thing that is looked at in these types of tests? It there's no weight loss, the FDA gives a green light?

I've been saying NNVC's nanoviricides are nothing more than tonic water as far as efficacy for a decade.

For 15 years they've been claiming they are a miracle cure for any virus, capable of being produced in a matter of a few weeks.

I've been 100% right for my 10 years and NNVC has been 100% wrong for their 15.

Until they get something through trials, I get bragging rights.

So, yes, they are silly researchers making nothing but silly claims.

According to their tests, reduction in loss of body weight was the primary indicator of drug effectiveness.

That's it? How do we know the 'cides aren't just great antidiuretics?

Who, exactly, is reporting the significant progress? I didn't bother to read the article. A little help?