Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
36813 gone? porque? quien sabe!
(glad you accept what I post and don't surprise easily, drummer.)
gooooooooooo ceeeeeeeeeeddddddddddddddex !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
pennstreet Member Profile pennstreet Member Level
Share
Thursday, December 29, 2011 10:23:57 AM
Re: sea_urchin post# 36802
Post # of 36813
sea urchin,
Okay, if YOU say so. I am not surprised about any words typed on this board by any entity that has not played in the room.
da digger
duckie ... you're flailing.
Three posts of thrashing and flailing trying to hang on to a leaky rubber life raft.
btb, a couple of us know all about Dr. Poteet's experience with the SEC. Surprised? You shouldn't be.
And no, the SEC didn't tell us.
Figger that one out, duckie.
You don't want to answer my pregunta, then, pennypots?
Why didn't you just say so?
Not like you to duck and spin, luv.
yadayadayadayawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
btw, pennypusher ... you're so informed ... why did malcbaby leave his law firm way back when? Corollary pregunta: how well did he know loch harris principals?
pls to fill in the blanks (in your inimitable fashion). danke.
goooooooooooooooooooooooooo cexi cdex !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
" CDEx will put on a big push for the G4 to sell some of those 200million shares.
Unfortunately... This just dilutes the current shareholder and lines the pockets of the insiders. "
Hasn't that been the whole idea all along? I mean ALLLLLLLLL along, from wayyyyyyyyyyy back pre-elf and vammp?
oops ... forgot again ...
gogogogogogogogogoGO ccccccdexxxxxxxxxx !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
FACT: We now know that MP brought in Stevenson and personally asked him to be on the new CDEx board.
Baddddddddddddddd career decision, Dr. Stevenson.
(Hope Malcbaby made it worth your while.)
ps, pennypromoter ... want to try to deny now that MP brought in Stevenson?
true enough, crowe ...
and when the web site's up and running, there'll no doubt be a bunch of newbies ready to hop on the turnip truck.
gooooooooooooooooooooooooo cdex !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Look at these with the sound off ... all they are is stock photos overlaid with typed claims and sparklies morphing into a sort of logo, all repeated over and over. Interspersed with spinning visuals of the "equipmnent." A truly lethargic Poteet doing a ridiculous-looking "demo" with a model who isn't even in a lab coat (hired, no doubt, for the cost to the company of a free cup of coffee, unless she's related to one of the principals in which case she prolly got free cream and sugar, too). Add several local-area "testimonials" and a cross-eyed CEO frozen to his spot(marked with an X on the floor, no doubt, so he wouldn't wander out of focus). Oh the excitement, oh the knock 'em dead impact !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Wowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwnnnnnnnnnnn.
Which reminds me ... who's the intended audience for this masterpiece? What's the one-line message it's meant to convey?
Looks like something a student designer put together for his 8th grade class project. Wonder what grade he got.
C'mon,Paige. You're a good seeker and finder. Find something someone can get even just a little excited about!
(Merry Christmas and Happy 2012 to you)
"Henry fooled many about his education, including ... the SEC ..."
Wrong.
Try again, hollowpennydrummer.
yawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwn
Let's try this again, pennydrummer: my comments in red.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
pennstreet Member Profile pennstreet Member Level
Share
Tuesday, December 20, 2011 12:50:50 AM
Re: sea_urchin post# 36668
Post # of 36670
sea urchin,
Where is the spin? I asked you or anyone who doubts the G4 as real to get a DoP and have him/her call and get a demo. I don't care if the DoP is from the UK, Japan, Georgia, New Mexico, Wisconsin, or MIT.
No, you didn't ask "anyone who doubts" to do that. Here are your exact words:
"I would like to challenge anyone that knows a Director of Pharmacy at a Hospital to ask them to call Cdex-Inc and ask for a demonstration of the G4. Lets see if any DoP can say that the G4 is an imaginary product."
I know it's hard for you to remember your own words, but now that you see them again, I'm sure you'll agree they aren't what you're now saying they were.
I am not digging either. I believe it was obvious to all that you dug up a lady from the past, who obviously was not happy with Mp.
Did I say anything about the "lady from the past" (who happens to be a lady in the present and who also meets all your requirements for viewing a demo) not being happy with Mp (why in the world do you write his initials that way, one cap and the other lc)?
No I didn't. She wasn't happy with the cdex "product."
You just won't quit putting words in other people's mouths, as you spin away. Sloppy thinking at its finest. Must be a genetic defect.
I did exactly what I simply asked any of you to do, I brought the expert I trusted. No spin, no digging, just an expert to check out the G4.
Well whoopee do. You trusted your expert.
Give us his/her credentials so we'll all see and understand his/her qualifications to determine his/her area and level of expertise. Alternatively you can give the name of the hospital pharmacy he/she directs. That would do. Because why in the world should anyone take your word for it that s/he's an "expert" in a relevant field?
Had to watch the game, plenty of Cdex stock on San Fran.
You're using (or accepting) cdex stock instead of money for game bets? A clever, high stakes player you are, fershirley.
wiggle wiggle squirm squirm, hollowdrummerboy ...
and read whatever you like into "what I said" -- nothing new there. Since you like to keep things honest, though: I said nothing at all about any connection between Ann Jacklin and mp or shriver.
Read up on M. Pouligny and find out about him. And then draw your own conclusions. Or is that too much hard work for you?
Here, to save you the effort (because I can just imagine how bizzy you are and how valuable your time is):
http://fr.linkedin.com/pub/pascal-pouligny/8/82/251
That should give you adequate excuse for your refusal to contact him. After all, he even carried a CDEX title for a year. Una pregunta para Ud: Do you think he ever saw any "products" in operation? Or just relied on what he was told for his sales pitches?
And do you think his sales pitch for Ms Jacklin included the enticing bait -- offered ever so discreetly so she wouldn't take offense -- that she/her department wouldn't have to pay a single cent (or pence, as it were) for the opportunity to test the CDEX "product"?
Because make no mistake, she did NOT pay for the privilege. Don't believe me? Ask her.
No doubt at all that M. Pouligny's a great salesman, with all his years of experience in the field. Did he know Ms. Jacklin before the Las Vegas affair? No idea.
And also no doubt that all he was charged with doing was generating interest and "placing" a few. Which he did.
Do you suppose he got paid anything for his work? Paid by the placement, maybe? Maybe you can check old ledgers and find out.
Then he moved on to "consulting." Isn't that the usual career path for someone who's getting on in years and is bored to death with what he's done previously? Or who is made redundant in a buyout or merger, or who otherwise "retires"?
No idea why you mention "Barry." What makes you think he gives a hoot and a holler what cdex is up to these days?
Were you trying to catch either of us out in some compromising connection or sumpin? I've already told you, trying to play head games with me is a losing proposition (that also goes for diddy, crowe, arloco and ~kidd) butt I guess you dint b'leeve me.
Just go ahead and contact Ms. Jacklin. Ask HER your burning questions about any previous experience she had with cdex or its authorized or unauthorized reps, and then invite her to come visit the new powers that currently be in Tuck-sun. Tell her you're calling on behalf of Dr. Jim Stevenson, formerly with the CS Mott Children's Hospital of the University of Michigan Health System. With that recommendation, maybe she'll leap at the chance to accept your kind invitation.
Bonne chance.
oh come off it, hollowpenny.
Your "sleuthing" questions are pathetic.
If you're not brave enough to contact her, just admit it.
Goooooooooooooo CDEX !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nice try at ducking your own challenge, hollowman.
Doesn't hold up though, as I'm sure you know unless you're really really stoopid. Are you really really stoopid?
Matters not how or when she was first introduced to cdex or by whom (it was M. Pouligny, which I'm sure you know, and yes it was a real connection. Ask her if you doubt me. Regardless, that little detail -- whether or not there was a previous connection -- wasn't one of your criteria.)
Fact is you don't want to take your own challenge! It's as simple as that. So you try to build a "case" against contacting a majorly respected name at majorly respected hospitals and think it holds water?
Bwwaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!
GO CDEX GO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
well well well, pennyhollowdrummerboy ...
you give an open challenge, to contact a "Director of Pharmacy at a Hospital to ask them to call Cdex-Inc and ask for a demonstration of the G4. Lets see if any DoP can say that the G4 is an imaginary product."
I agree. An unpaid testimonial by a qualified Dir of Pharm would go some way towards giving some credibility to the cdex claims.
I give you the same challenge in return.
But with a name attached.
http://www1.ic.ac.uk/medicine/research/researchthemes/endandmet/research_endo/meta/postgraduateeducation/alliedhealthprofessionals/annjacklin/
I do b'leeve Ms Jacklin would fall within your parameters. You've heard of Charing Cross and Hammersmith? I imagine so since they were on the LENGTHY list of places where previous "products" were "placed."
Just so you don't think I"m rigging something, you should contact her yourveryownself.
A caution: Be sure to identify yourself and your connection to and/or interest in cdex or she might consign your e-mail, unread, to her delete or spam file (or not return your phone call).
Or ... oopswhoops ... is she too far away for cdex? She's not likely to want to make a trip to cdex h'qters, wherever that might be, to see a demo, so someone would need to take the G4 to her. As you can imagine, she's a pretty bizzy woman so it might take some effort on cdex's part to set a firm date.
Go for it, hollow drummerboy. Let us all know her response.
pennyhollowdrummer:
I was pretty sure mine would be zapped before the weekend was out.
Unless the moderator suddenly was decked (alternate verbs: punched out, zapped) by manflu.
Struck too close to home.
Is several people using the same alias in the same category as one person using multiple aliases, and therefore a zappable offense to ihub?
What's peculiar, diddy ... is he won't even say how MANY friends we supposedly have in common, that he knows of.
He's tried to headfake me before and that's a silly game.
So ... once again, pennystreet: how many friends do we have in common, according to what you know? Not people I "know" by their posts, people I know in person.
Go ahead, answer my question with a precise number (you know so much about me, that should be a piece of cake) and I'll drop the subject, after telling you you're either right or wrong.
Goooooooooooooooooooooooooooo cexi !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
my misteak ... hard to keep all the pennies straight.
OK, crowe ... try asking pennstreet my pregunta and see what he replies, if anything?
Goooooooooooooooooo CDEX !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
crowe ...
You seem able to get replies from the various pennies.
Would you please ask streetpenn how many posters he/she's met who have talked with me? Maybe they'll tell you!
Gooooooooooooooooooooooooooo cdex !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
penny ... to repeat a question I asked that you haven't seemed to want to answer:
And just how many posters would that be who have claimed (to you) to have met me, "penny"?
Can I have an answer now please? Just the number, not the names.
Goooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo cdex !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
oh dear ... another zapped post. Can't seem to carry on a civil conversation on this board.
"I used the word "May" because I am taking the word of posters I have met and claimed to have met you. I was not present when they had conversations with you."
And just how many posters would that be who have claimed (to you) to have met me, "penny"?
Goooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo cdex !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
May know both of us, and as posters on this board (as opposed to in person or as other than just posters on this board)?
That's not what you posted before. You said we had common friends, (by which it was clear you meant friends in common).
Now you're saying there "may" be people/posters who know us both?
That's quite different, I'm sure you'd agree.
While I agree there's no reason why your post should have been removed, I just thought I'd point out one more example of your back pedaling.
You need to complain to (or "discuss things" with) whoever notified you your post was zapped. They might reinstate it.
No idea why "pennstreet's" posts were zapped. I didn't find them offensive ... silly, but not offensive.
Oh well.
I think roberto's been (permanently?) replaced.
ah so ...
then that would be elrheo aka viking, n'est-ce pas?
Does the rest of the cut and pasted pr read the same as the original? Or is there another change here or there?
sumpin cattywumpus happened?
Pretty pathetic when they can't even copy and paste a link properly in their own PR.
Maybe they ackshally don't want anyone to read about it, but just rely on their own "powerful" words about what it will mean to them and to the bright future of the company.
Goooooooooooooooooooooo cdex !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://www.ashp.org/Midyear2011.
and what does this link yield?
"Bad request"
Too funny!
Besides which the 1st sentence of the PR says the remarkable G4 system has already been demonstrated today ... before 9:00 AM New Orleans time!
I bet they had a HUGE audience!
added: to be fair, Brumfield has the wording down pat ...
"We expect to deliver several units over the next six months"
Yet a coupla more gifted "units."
And the beat goes on, da da da da dum (tm Sonny and Cher)
same goes for you, capnmike ...
A scam is a scam is a scam (ie, cdex ne loch harris) and history shows the only people who have benefited from the endless and fictitious supply of supposedly remarkable technology/IP are the pumperdumpers, the inonits and/or those at the top of the ponzi-type pyramid.
Do you really think anything's going to change? It is what it is.
Seems to me after 10 years or so of hoping things were on the up and up, it's long past time for you to accept that they are anything but.
Your endless links do nothing to change the spots on this scam, mike.
Jenn ...
How can you say another company could be a loch/cdex-type scam and in almost the same breath say you're "cautiously optimistic" about cdex's filing?
A scam is a scam is a scam (ie, cdex ne loch harris) and history shows the only people who have benefited from the endless and fictitious supply of supposedly remarkable technology/IP are the pumperdumpers, the inonits and/or those at the top of the ponzi-type pyramid.
Do you really think anything's going to change? It is what it is.
Seems to me after 10 years or so of hoping things were on the up and up, it's long past time for you to accept that they are anything but.
well ... if it's a myth gun that says it all, doesn't it?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mythology
A myth is defined as a sacred narrative explaining how the world and humankind came to be in their present form, within the field of folkloristics.[3][4][5] Many scholars in other fields use the term "myth" in somewhat different ways.[5][6][7] In a very broad sense, the word can refer to any story originating within traditions.[8]
"any story originating within traditions" ... the traditions of scams.
And this tradition was begun back in the early days of loch harris.
(edited twice for clarity!)
and a 3rd edit -- looks as if the sh price dropped ~25% today. oops whoops (tm someone else) 'Course math isn't my forte so someone else can check the %age.
Is there actually ever any sun in Seattle to test it with?!
I don't know if she had talked to that professor or not, to get his view, and then made up her own mind. Long time ago! Are they -- meaning cdex -- trying to rewrite history?
Do you know if the sec/fbi are still with an open investigation and/or doing any real investigating? That was at least ten years ago and the cast of characters at those orgs have probably all changed -- certainly one of them has gone on to other things.
Is cdex going to get away with this scam forever and a day?
and then of course there was that pair of British hospitals who were also disenchanted with their gifted devices.
plus ca change
absolutely correct.
You might remember I had some communication with Children's at the time and it blew that particular bit of hype and hints and nonspecific promotional language apart.
plus ca change
Are you sure about how cdex defines sterility or testing for same, crow?
Have they included a definition in a PR? In one of their comprehensive specifications booklets? Maybe in the small print in a disclaimer? Maybe one of da hollow drum diggers can oblige us with a link.
I just think one has to be very careful of using certain undefined terms when talking about anything or anybody connected, past or present, with this company in any of its incarnations or reincarnations.
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO forth and maybe multiply, cexibaby !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
How about letting your nemesis answer for himself and you answer for yourself.
Novel idea, no?
Cdex is doing all it can, to give shareholders a shot at recovering their hard earned invested dollars.
Sure it is, I b'leeve that, of course I do, never doubted it for a minute.
goooooooooooooooo cdexxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
My keyboard is not a rock I hide under.
If that's so, roberto (edit: or wade and/or anyone else using your alias), why haven't you ever admitted your real name, which everyone knows? That would be really upfront and transparent of you.
go cdexxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx !!!!!!!!!!!!
You do have a flair for ducking questions and beating your hollow drum. Nothing ever original, but maybe that's yet to come.
My post was really very short (unlike yours) and I asked you two twa too to 2 questions, neither of which you answered. I'm sure that wasn't because they were so buried you never saw them, but just in case, here they are again for your consideration:
So what were you peddling before, then?
When and how did you find Truth?
Loch/Cdex was all bad until September 2010.
So what were you peddling before, then?
When and how did you find Truth?