Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
We need to tighten the spread a little. If we could get the bids up over .0022ish we might get some ask slappers. Unlikely but possible! LOL!
Yeah, I am surprised there isn't more interest in this one. The outstanding share count was confirmed at 85M and this thing moves on air. It went from .0006(where I saw it) to .0049 on around 20 million in volume. The float must be tiny.
What do you guys think about KWBT here? .0017X.0018
Yeah, I hate to get on a soapbox, but I think a lot of this has to do with people trading who shouldn't be. Their accounts are underfunded and they chase every runner with small gains from another stock. The only quick way out is to sell at the bid. It is a shame really because on a stock like this even 45 minutes can make you a lot of money.
Doubtful. It is pretty much investor 101 that on a low float stock you buy and sell at the ask. With a float this low it always keeps the momo going forward, yet every low floater I play idiots sit on the bid. A little more buying pressure here and it won't matter though.
Any opinion on OPGX? It has dropped almost 70% today after a pretty solid run. It is a low floater that moved to .005 on relatively low volume. Looks kind of good at .0012x.0015.
OPGX Down almost 70%. Last .0012 b/a .0012 X .0015. Low floater.
Yeah that could be right. I heard it on the radio several days ago and have had many a Lone Star since then.
Whats the big deal? GM is just losing what the average American family earns in a year every minute. And now they are talking about buying Delphi. They can't afford to buy a stick of Doublemint. As a show of how brilliant their manangement is though they have put Hummer on the block.
I laughed so hard when I read this I almost pi$$ed myself. Is there a post of the year award on IHUB because I am nominating this. I can hardly type. Good thing I got rid of this one when I did. Classic. Person mark for you my friend.
I know, but since you seem to take you as the collective "we" I thought I would answer.
Did you get any yesterday when you posted the exact same thing?
You and I have different reading comprehension methods. I took it to mean "have no desire to prove to you(CXAC)why you(CXAC)should buy this stock".. I generally take you in the singular in that situation, especially when it is directed at a single person.
If you "have no desire to prove to you(him/her/anyone) why you(him/her/anyone) should buy this stock",...then why are you "going to the mine in a couple weeks and will document everything with photos and videos."?
Well, their diversification has brought them from over a penny to a no bid, so management must be doing a hell of a job.
So, would we all be better buying a no bid food supplier?
Well, I only have a post or two left, but I guess my question is how does anyone know they have filed it then? I am most certainly not saying they haven't, I agree that they have to be paying some expenses from somewhere. But someone saying it on an internet message board isn't enough proof for me. If they have a link to some kind of filing or any kind of proof for that matter I would love to see it.
Yeah, I found him at Duncan, Blum and Associates, but I still can't find where he has filed the Form D. Wouldn't they have to do that to sell 504 stock. Am I wrong(that is a good possibility)?
Yeah, I am getting in a little over my head on this one. I have read this a few times and it looks like TSHL would have to file a Form D with the SEC, which could then be found in the EDGAR database, if they had an open 504 offering. I could just be missing it so if anyone has previously located it I would love to see it. Here is what the SEC says:
Rule 504 of Regulation D
Rule 504 of Regulation D provides an exemption from the registration requirements of the federal securities laws for some companies when they offer and sell up to $1,000,000 of their securities in any 12-month period.
A company can use this exemption so long as it is not a blank check company and does not have to file reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Also, the exemption generally does not allow companies to solicit or advertise their securities to the public, and purchasers receive "restricted" securities, meaning that they may not sell the securities without registration or an applicable exemption.
Rule 504 does allow companies to sell securities that are not restricted, if one of the following circumstances is met:
The company registers the offering exclusively in one or more states that require a publicly filed registration statement and delivery of a substantive disclosure document to investors;
A company registers and sells the offering in a state that requires registration and disclosure delivery and also sells in a state without those requirements, so long as the company delivers the disclosure documents required by the state where the company registered the offering to all purchasers (including those in the state that has no such requirements); or
The company sells exclusively according to state law exemptions that permit general solicitation and advertising, so long as the company sells only to "accredited investors."
Even if a company makes a private sale where there are no specific disclosure delivery requirements, a company should take care to provide sufficient information to investors to avoid violating the antifraud provisions of the securities laws. This means that any information a company provides to investors must be free from false or misleading statements. Similarly, a company should not exclude any information if the omission makes what is provided to investors false or misleading.
While companies using the Rule 504 exemption do not have to register their securities and usually do not have to file reports with the SEC, they must file what is known as a "Form D" after they first sell their securities. Form D is a brief notice that includes the names and addresses of the company’s owners and stock promoters, but contains little other information about the company.
If you are thinking about investing in a company making a Rule 504 offering, you should access EDGAR Company Search to determine whether the company has filed Form D. If the company has filed a Form D, you can request a copy. If the company has not filed a Form D, this should alert you that the company might not be in compliance with the federal securities laws.
You should always check with your state securities regulator to see if it has more information about the company and the people behind it. Be sure to ask whether your state regulator has cleared the offering for sale in your state. You can get the address and telephone number for your state securities regulator by calling the North American Securities Administrators Association at (202) 737-0900 or by visiting its website. You’ll also find this information in the state government section of your local phone book.
For more information about the SEC’s registration requirements and common exemptions, read our brochure, Q&A: Small Business & the SEC.
http://www.sec.gov/answers/rule504.htm
I am still waiting on your reply. I know very little about this, but from what I have found, in a very brief amount of research, you have to file a Form D if you intend to sell 504 stock. This is registered with the SEC. The securities sold are not registered but you have to file a Form D and that is regsitered. Having said that, I have something that looks like Global Web filed something in 2005 but I can't find anything for Rapid Fitness or Tri Star. I also couldn't find Carl Dunkin in Maryland on FindLaw. Maybe you have his name misspelled. Just trying to find answers here. Thanks.
I am certainly not saying you are wrong but where can we find the info regarding the 504. You clearly found it so it must be accessible. I would like to look at it. Thanks.
I have to think no sane, rational person believed that in the first place. There are good, proven smaller gold companies out there who are priced less than .50 right now.
In an ode to the nitpickers on here I would ask that you post a link to a PR where he talked about scratching his backside. This is an outright lie.
OK, most people. You have certainly found 1 poster in those three replies you referenced who didn't know. Well done.
Well, I hate to argue with you but.
1) No kidding. Anyone who has followed this stock at all knew it was for COS#1. He stated in a email to me some time ago that this was the case. I posted this email if you would like to go back and see it.
2) There has not been an assay report that we know of. I don't know if they have done one, and by this I mean have extracted samples and are awaiting results, but you don't know either. If you have a quote from someone within the company stating one has not been done I would love to see it. The only one I know of for sure he hasn't done one on is COS#2 because he told me in the aforementioned email. Allegedly, another one has been done on Lucky Linda as well.
3) They have not been mining. I believe it has been said several times they had small equipment on site for testing. No mining, no gold.
4) They can't mine for more than 1.4 grams of gold w/o equipment. I guess they could put one guy in a trench and have 5 watch but we really don't know how much gold that can extract.
5)Once you answer #2 we can address this one.
You answered my question, thanks. I was wanting to know if we saw it no matter what the SEC's decision was. Thanks again.
Sorry, I don't know a lot about this, but is that something the public would see irregardless of whether or not the SEC approved the uplisting? If it is then I hope they don't merge with UCHBE because I would love to see a lot of the info in that report as it applies to TSHL. It would answer a ton of questions.
I don't much much about assaying, I never worked in a gravel pit and all, but I would think a competent assayer would be able to figure it out if a little gold dust were added to the samples. What DD have you done that leads you to believe there will never be any mining. Please post your findings. Did you ever call the assayer to see what accredidations he might hold, or are you leaving it to your Google searches? I have been in more than one of these that was going to .0001 and they never did before they ran first. It may end up there but it will run.
Where would they get the gold to salt them with? You have continually said they aren't mining? Think they melted down old wedding bands? I find it hard to believe if you were trying to skew samples you would send a "lawn man" out to do it. And for 829, if this thing is at .0013 by EOY I will be happy as hell.
How would a "lawn care guy" HAND PICK samples to "salt" an assay report? He is a lawn care guy, not a geologist. Are you saying Larry knows enough about mining to salt an assay. Sounds to me like he must be learning fast. I worked for a masonry company for years but if you told me to go out on a 25 acre claim(or whatever size it is) and "salt" an assay report it would be difficult. I should change that to it would be impossible.
While I agree that delays happen, and I am long here, you have to agree that with a company that is trying to prove itself it is very important to follow through on PR's. The plus side is they are nitpicked to death and that keeps people posting. The worst thing that could happen to this stock is the bashers leave. Every pink stock I have ever bought has come off that front page list of most active boards, and you see where we are on a day when only 1 really is around. If we fall off that list it is a bad thing in my opinion.
I have no idea about what the laws are from state to state, but I believe it was posted that the 504 was filed in NY, so anyone well versed in NY securities law should be able to tell us.
My gut tells me you may not necessarily be wrong, but I am tired of all the statements of fact on this board that can't be backed up with proof. We don't know if they have found any more gold. We don't know if they have actually applied for permits or if they could be issued permits once they have applied. I am all for info being posted on this board, both good and bad, but when someone posts a FACT I just want at least a little proof. The truth is we do need more info from the company and the sooner the better.
I don't know, did they? Can you prove to the satisfaction of the board they did not? My gut is that they didn't make anywhere near that but I didn't state it as absolute fact.
I was shocked at how many people post on here over the weekend, but I did skim a lot of the posts. When you say he is adamant about it are you referring to the post by thermo where he stated Larry said there will be a R/S and then doesn't post anything to back it up. Or have you spoken to him personally? If so what were the details of the conversation? If it was an email feel free to post it. Otherwise I for one would love to know how you came by the info that he is ADAMANT about TSHL doing a reverse split.
Well, I would agree with the fact that they would provide info but a lot of small businesses don't have websites. His profile that was posted says he has 4 employees. I saw several companies on the Pinks, OTCBB and the TSX he had done work for, so if he is staying busy w/o paying for and maintaining a website why not. It is certainly changing to where most businesses have one, but it is certainly not in itself indicative that the guy is shady. He may turn out to be but it won't be because he didn't have a website. Did you call him?
Hey it could be one guy in a trench with 5 others watching. That crew was fixing a pothole on I-35 the other day, or at least they were in that general "this is what real work looks like" formation.
I am not being a smart a@# here, but wouldn't the easiest way to find out be to call his office? I am certain any lab that is on the up and up would provide that info w/o reservation. If they can't or won't then I would say you have an issue. Instant results.
No kidding. If they put their ticker symbol on the front page watch out.
http://www.hidalgominingint.com/home.html
http://www.goldcorp.com/
http://www.goldcorp.com/
I love blanket generalizations.
I am to lazy to look it up but my recollection of the definition of objective is to not be influenced by emotions or prejudices, to basically look at something from all sides. You should follow your own advice. You seem to be pretty one sided. The whole dean clan is jumping on the TSHL website to save the lemmings. Thanks.
Do you know what properties he did the assay's on? I am guessing it is just COS#1 but is it also LL? We don't have them on Wickenburg so this most likely won't shut them up. When a guy(don't want to mention any name LOL) posted an old post of yours from October earlier it was number 9700. We have doubled in a month and change. One of the guys has posted 400+ times in a month. He is moving up the charts faster than a Hasselhof record in Berlin.