Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I dont think a journal embargo would block an NWBO PR saying what is in plain sight for everyone to see. EMA/MHRA/US clinical sites have been updated with amended endpoints.
I am pretty the completion date in the clinical website is mandatory and they wanted to make 100% sure they will release TLD within that timeframe. Im pretty sure we will see the journal before that heck between now and a few weeks
my thought is immediately make a screenshot before it disappears...
Yes my bad I made I mistake I thought it was 30 days but notification is indeed 60 nor less than 10 days before the date of such a meeting
for 10 billion Im saying SOLD
you dindt link anything to anything, doesn't matter.
You are aware of Delaware law stipulating when an ASM should be held? no. Ok
ASM proxy notice should have been in on May 14th according to Delaware law 1 month before June 14th and thus 13 months before May 14 2021
So too late, LP is affraid
I second that Thank you Flipper
you keep pretending to know me and to know what I want.
Go bother someone your own age like 10 years, frustro
yes we need a pivot and an offensive strategy and Im counting on it we will see that after the FREAKING arggggg journal comes out
Is it a coincidence we have not seen the proxy for the ASM yet?
Im incredibly disappointed like most here.
The problem with the silence at the worse possible time is that they are waiting for the journal. I know I know freaking 20 months wait. After that, they can start talking and PRing.
Its not how I would have handled things but that's what is going on.
I do expect the CT.gov/EMA/MHRA endpoints change to be PRed by NWBO
look its all about risk vs reward for shorts as much for longs.
IF NWBO would have changed the endpoints CT.gov website a year ago
IF NWBO would have had the journal publication prior to NYConf and then thus be free to PR "endpoints have been met"
I'm pretty sure the attack would not have come for A. scared longs would not have sold who have sold now. B. shorts would find it too risky to attack for it may very well be so that big buying volume would have stepped in and C. AF and all his shortie friends would have looked like complete morons
We are now in a bad mood here, but I do believe in the end everything is going to be alright, just have to have more patients
I agree but the Cancer organizations would not have bashed as they have now
Yes I thought you would say Dendreon but Dendreon did not go bankrupt because of financial problems it got BR because it was no longer capable to produce its product feasible economically due to poor product preparation. Also, Dendreon got FDA approval. That's why I asked for an example between TLD and approval. : )
yup just like with Anavex in January where Leslie J Goldman after being warned replied not to worry one bit about this.
no I was not :) I was invested in Anavex bought at aroudn 4$ sold at around $8 and switched to NWBO.
I know you are invested in Anavex
I do read the Anavex board from time to time and they can complain about Missling but he is a brilliant genius compared to LP. I wish NWBO had the communication management and execution Anavex has.
If things had gone to plan I would have sold my NWBO holdings by now and bought back into Anavex. Anavex is very promossing.
me too. also the whole speculation, if a journal is waiting for those endpoint changes yes or no, would be put aside.
Its mind-boggling
Next short argument after the government website has changed:
wo wo wo wait a minute you changed the website with new endpoints AFTER you were in possession of data... post hoc knowledge and all that.
Exact what Anavex did and got attacked over
If it walks, talks, looks hell taste like a freaking duck then it is a duck..
a Summarized indicating how the trial has performed was presented and released through a PowerPoint presentation I, therefore, call it what it is topline data
well NWBO management promised us a barrage of PR after topline and they have kept word just not in the way I expected it
good lord the mess
thanks TC
as long as NWBO will not be PRing that they have met endpoints AND PR that FDA is not objecting to the amended SAP the SP will not react to the government website change. NWBO is under embargo thus we wait for the journal.
what I would like to know is if NWBO is waiting for the journal to appear before they will communicate the agenda for the ASM with a proxy?
so even one of LP biggest mistakes as an NWBO CEO was actually a strategic deep undercover operation to expose shorts.
But, but but but thats thats Brrrr IALNT
hahahahahaha lol wow jus wow
CT.gov does not "accept" anything it just registers. Its the FDA that accepts amended SAP and then decides on approval or not. The FDA has said nothing 2 months after they submitted the amended SAP, years ago before NWBO was aware of the unblinded data, therefore the amended SAP has been bought in by the FDA
Come on you dont know that and I disagree.
A lot of positive things may be going on. You are now starting to get TOO negative.
Im realistic but Im not going to second guess that we are all doomed I do not believe that for a moment and neither should you.
Have they made stupid mistakes yes?
Is DCVAX L approvable? Yes
Lets wait now for the journal, the official TLD, and the change of endpoints on the government website.
I also believe that they are negotiating a deal with a big pharma and we will see the submission for approval in the UK
Only after NWBO has retaken the initiative, PR endpoints have been met, the government website has been updated, and the journal is out the SP will start moving up again. I do however not believe it will be significant perhaps retest $2 at max.
Before that SP will be volatile.
For a substantial SP increase, we need NWBO to tell us they have submitted to the MHRA, EMA, and or FDA and even better a JV deal with a BP.
Im expecting MHRA submitted PR in July but hopefully before ASCO
Your assertion is absolutely laughable. You are making a fool of yourself as I have seldom seen anyone ridiculing himself.
You Saying that placebo (graph fruit juice? hahaha) in the DCVAX trial works much better than SOC and much better than DCAX L which is already working x2.2 better than SOC is comedy gold it really is.
I have already asked you this. Please point me to a lethal cancer trial result from the past where it turns out that placebo worked effectively much better than SOC?
You should pursue a career in stand up comedy ex hahaha hahaha lolol hhihihi Gold
it doesnt make any sense to me if that is the reason.
Now after May 10th presentation anyone saying NWBO did NOT meet their endpoints and thus the trial failed in the US while pointing at the government website, cannot entirely be dismissed as lying short.
What would have made some sense if they barraged the world with one PRs saying endpoints have been met and endpoints bought in at EU/UK/US right before or after May 10th. Im still expecting those PRs.
yes NWBO ways are truly mysterious.
The whole short thesis approach resulted in exactly the opposite. If indeed that was the reason not to update
Thanks Sentiment great news
Thanks, Vubru I appreciate your reply and view.
so what this Hodag person is saying is nonsense?
TIA
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=168837988