Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I added 80,000 this am. Still buying, if it dips more. I'm happy with the answers I'm getting to the issues I have had concerns about. I've got a good lead on a good reason for negative money flow - I need to look into a bit more and then I will post what I have found to alleviate my concerns on that issue.
I hate to say it, but I am starting to fall in love with this pick. I've never been able to have a penny stock that I felt so comfortable about, and did not have concerns about what they were doing behind the shareholders' backs - thus, my very cautious tone up to this point.
Moxyone and I have come over here from a very rough battle ground, LOL - he certainly understands my concerns. I appreciate the moderate tone you bring to the board here, Moxy.
Darn it, I cannot get the sound to come through on my computer. Is there another way to listen to this interview?
How can we tell that that was a buy and not a sell?
I'm always wondering this, is it because it went off at the ask or something?, but then you can't really see all the bids and asks once the market closes - confused.
Yes, he is.
Quite impressive to observe, and quite informative/educational.
Again, this is the main reason to let the people who are negative post the negatives, and let the people who can see the discrepencies point such out - all of it produces more informed investors, rather than a bunch of cheerleaders hoping that what they know doesn't end up having some negative come out of nowhere and remove all their spare change.
Negative posters provide as much information as do positive posters as long as people are willing to look into it and then dispute erroroneous information. However, not many can match the skills of My02cents, I'd have to say. We are priviledged to have him debating the issues with Charleoi - we learn so much more about what has gone on in this company and related parties.
THANKS.
Now, this discussion in the last 50 posts has been what I have been looking for. Now I have a better understanding of both the optimistic and conservative potentials for this company. I feel more and more comforatable every day about having bought CHDT, but after this discussion, I now have a much better gameplan for a potential VERY long-term hold.
Added 40,000 more.
Thanks Moxy, for adding some conservative common sense to the discussion so that I could become more comfortable with potential, and less scared about all the over-enthusiasm. Hard to contain the over-enthusiasm with this company because it really does seem to be one in which we are getting in on the ground floor of an excellent and potentially very profitable business plan (unlike some others we have seen, LOL). A business plan that is being executed by a wise and conscientious leader who takes into account how to instill shareholder loyalty.
I know, the people on this board do such thorough DD (a little light on the points to be cautious of) but excellent DD nonetheless. And I greatly appreciate all of you people for your concerted efforts - it helps a new shareholder so much to be aware of all the great potential. Thank you from a pretty much silent shareholder (mostly silent because by the time I get through reading all the posts, it is bedtime and then the start of a new day - and another 350 posts to read through - ARGHHHHH!!!!!!! - Life's a b---- when you have so much interest in the stock you have chosen to invest in Huh, LOL).
I just get a bit irritated at myself for staying and reading all this when my kid just came in a few hours ago and said "Why do you spend all day in here every day working on the computer". That is when I tell myself it is time to just quit trying to keep up with all the posts and just hope I catch the important points in the ones that I do get the time to read. That is also why I do not post much - no time after all the reading.
So, I guess my point is, if you push posting too much, it may have the exact opposite effect you are hoping to achieve by posting so much - Just a thought.
Wallstreetman,
I have to disagree.
I am one of those people you are talking about that comes here daily to read about the company and its investors. However, when I see over two hundred posts that I have to go through, I go "Man-Oh-Man, I do NOT have that much time today" I need to spend some time watching my investments and not get caught up missing something on the other companies I am invested in. I have to do everything I can to make myself read allllll those posts. You people are an excellent bunch of obvious experts, and you do phenomenal DD. I love reading your input however, it would help me to stay in AND ADDING TO MY CHDT POSITION if I could come here and NOT have to read so many posts, but just a lower number of extremely pertinent posts that are put up from time to time. I know others who have come here and just refuse to read through all the posts because of the sheer volume; they then miss some very pertinent selling points about the stock, or even the few negatives and how you people are able to give reassuring responses once you get over being offended that someone brought up something negative.
I would much rather be able to come to this board and read pertinent posts about the company and sentiment, both positive and negative, in as few posts as necessary. It is fun to read some of the personality posts, and they are a lot of fun, but to try to get people to just post to where we see 300 to 500 posts a day?;
well, I just give up and go over and read on other companies that I do not have so many posts to read on and then come back to this board a day or two later when I can afford to sit here hours on end reading post after post, often saying the same positive stuff.
If you really want more people to come here and to get a good feel for how great an investment this company is, it would be much more helpful if you could condense the info a bit rather than expanding it to overwhelming proportions where people just do not have the time to really read up on the company from the excellent DD provided by the crew here.
No, but many who have money invested here, learn more and more about the company from answers that are stimulated by those questions. VERY HELPFUL answers.
Thank you My02, as usual, you are excellent at DD. (And at a good debate 8>)
Oh, That is just toooooo funny!!!!
You got them goin for a few minutes there. ROTFLMAO!
Very good counterpoint there, WSM. Definitely negates much of the concern over insiders selling at such a minimal level compared to what they have put in to support the company.
Wallstreetman and other moderators,
I appreciate you not deleting that post by Larice. Many of us need to be reminded to remain ever cautious of the pitfalls that come with being invested with any stock, but especially the penny stocks. It is comforting to see some cautious posts, that are not so overly optimistic about this stock. "Sober" viewpoints and interpretations often provide the most sane feedback to stimulate RESPONSIBLE and productive investing/trading.
The reason I ask, is in one of Burps's posts, it said it was a majority owned subsidiary, but in these last few posts (the ones I am responding to) it says it is wholly owned.
Just a bit of confusion here about ownership.
?
Is CPF wholly owned or majority owned by CHDT?
If majority, is it just 51% or a higher ownership percentage?
Burp,
Excellent post and extremely relevant. Thank you for laying that out. That is the one indicator I have been a tad concerned aobut, but it is looking better and better every day.
Three cheers for green Money Flow!!!!
This is my concern, Wallstreetman. I like seeing this information (even if it is for the second or third time) and the ways people come across it - it is all educational to me. Another person's rebuttal that will often even bring out more counterpoints that can be seen as positive, only reinforces my positive feelings for the stock. This is because I get more exposure to the rebuttals for the possible negatives that others visiting the board might see on their searches for red flags.
For others to get so warped about a simple post of information makes a cautious investor a bit nervous - wondering what other negatives are not allowed to see the light of day and be discussed and rebutted.
Did you get my PM Wallstreetman?
Bought another 20,000 on the dip back down to .85 in my IRA account. BOY, was I lucky!
Heading out, look forward to reading any updates later, (and WSM's response to my PM)
HEY Moxy,
So nice to see you over here. I am still lurking and only posting every once in a while because there is so much good information provided by the longs here. I just gotta soak it all in and decide when I can buy more.
Thanks for checking into that Wallstreet. Looks like MF is wanting to go positive as of yesterday, so I'm doin OK.
Sounds like the chartist you talk to agrees with what Dart had to say on his chart - nice to have a concensus. If it goes subnickel, I'm in for more.
Just waiting to see the reaction when the roof tile news comes out now.
Thanks for the feedback. It gives me an idea of where all that outflow of money could be going and why - just makes me feel better to have a reason for a pattern. Without one, I start thinking of the most obvious reasons and those are NEVER good for a stock's appreciation potential. Those reasons just did not fit with everything else I have been reading about this company.
Thanks for the kudo.
However, that still leaves my MF concerns unaddressed. I am a bit concerned/confused about why CHDT, a company that looks to be having everything falling into place as far as getting the profits rolling, would have money flowing OUT of the investment into the stock? What is happening to cause more of the invested monies to be taken out than to be getting put it in?
And how in the world has the share price appreciated so very nicely in the same period that money has been flowing OUT of the investments in the stock?
This is the big thing that has me antsy about investing here in full force right now. Everything else that I see and read seems to be all positive, and I want to just jump in with both feet, but that money flow keeps nagging at me causing me to just risk my toes at the moment.
I forgot to put in the link to the chart I was talking about regarding Money Flow.
I edited my response to you to include the link.
Actually, during the period that I was making my decision as to what I was going to buy into at the beginning of June, I looked at CHDT and a couple of other penny stocks.
Here is one that answers your question: "is Money Flow a "raging positive" with any penny stocks?"
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=11555477
I actually bought some of this company at the same time I bought into CHDT, so I am obviously watching both quite closely. I was just curious about the huge opposite in their charts regarding MF.
Hi, thanks for the welcome.
I was just concerned when I looked at the chart and looked at Money Flow. All the indicators have been positive and quite bullish except for Money Flow, which has been negative for quite some time, and remains negative. That concerns me.
With this stock having had such a nice upward move, you would think money flow would be a raging positive. What is causing an outflow of money from the investment in this company?
Hey dart, did you get my PM?
I have been reading this MB for a couple of weeks now. I am a new investor in CHDT. It was recommended by a long-term investor friend of mine from a different stock board on Yahoo. He has been talking about how great CHDT was going to be doing for about a year now, and finally got me to buy in a couple of weeks ago. His price movement expectations are that CHDT will go to .20 by year end.
I have asked someone else from another IHUB board to please post a chart of CHDT today. We'll see if it gets posted. I have been afraid to ask about some of the indicators because of the moderator's comments that you investors did not want discussions from people who may only be planning on being in CHDT for a few to several months (or even shorter timeframes). If it is OK, I would love to ask a couple of questions.
I plan on being in CHDT for about 6 months minimum, and if it goes as positively as you people seem to think this could go, I will be here for years. It all depends on how CHDT's growth and share price appreciation pans out with the financial demands of my family.
I presently own 50,000 shares.
NewMarket Technology, Inc. Announces $1 Million North American Services Contract; With Over $40 Million in Annualized International Revenue Company Continues to Expand North American Sales
11:38 AM EDT June 13, 2006
NewMarket Technology, Inc. (OTCBB:NMKT) today announced signing a $1 million support services contract to an undisclosed client. The contract has a three year term and is expected to expand over the course of its term to exceed $3 million in revenue for NewMarket. The client is headquartered in North America with operations throughout South America. The NewMarket contract will support the client's North American operations. Increasing North American sales is a current priority of the Company and this contract demonstrates progress in building that revenue.
Someone else will need to provide the link to the entire story.
I have been wanting to see that also.
LOL, I bought that 100,000 shares at .039. Enjoy your profits!!! If it pulls back to your .035, I'll ride it out.
If it pulls back to .028 to .03, I'll be buying more.
I have.
I can't.
That is why I am minimally invested here as of late compared to how much I was investing in NMKT 6 months ago.
Right now it is all based purely on hope; hope that SOMEthing that the management has touted as being a good reason to put money here actually comes to fruition. As it stands now, I'm not really sure where all the increasing revenues and subsequent profits are coming from.
Sad, but honest.
Very simple.
You ponder as for me engaging "the most sophisticated basher":
It is, I like to know as much as possible about the issues where my monies are placed, both negative and positive. Seeing the worst case scenario along with the best case scenario gives me the ability to gage the risk/reward ratio much better than only hearing what positive people have to say about the company.
I hate feeling those tigers tearing at my feathers when my head is stuck in the sand. I would much rather look at the tigers straight in their eyes, and attempt to either battle them with the old whip and chair or find another tree to climb.
I posted about IMMG only because I know that Rick Lutz does PR for them in addition to NMKT, (and others).
Rick has stated some interesting things about IMMG, such as looking at how they performed after their RS, to get an idea of how NMKT could potentially perform after its RS, should NMKT ever do one.
Now, I am of the belief that NMKT is NOT CONSIDERING A RS, but it has been discussed over and over at times on the message boards. SO, IMMG was brought into the picture. Consequently, I have been watching IMMG as I watch NMKT, as was suggested by NMKT's IR firm. And then you have a problem with me posting a question about what is happening with IMMG, when NMKT IR has given a suggestion to look at them as an example; to look at in a certain possible NMKT scenario?
You have become wayyyyy to nervous about allowing some of us other NMKT investors look into where our investment might be going.
I was just wanting to know how the other companies that NMKT's IR is invloved with handle their issues - to get a continuing picture of their operating ethics.
Am I not allowed to ask others what they think on these concerns? Different companies, but YES, RELATED to NMKT's issues, therefore pertinent to post on the NMKT board.
I was not touting a different company, or trying to use NMKT's board to get information on another company having no relevance to NMKT, as you seem to be implying.
One would have to wonder why NMKT longs are having to be so protective of the company that they continually try to insult/denegrade other NMKT longs that just want information about issues that may impact their investment.
I've already stated that your comments on PV misleading us shareholders regarding the purchase/repurchase of shares by management were accurate in my first response to you on this subject.
"Much of what you posted about Phil telling us management would be buying shares and not seeing any forms filed yet is correct and verifiable."
And I am VERY UPSET about these shenanigans that PV perpetuates over and over. It just is not beneficial to add blocks of misinformation (assigning statements to management that has absolutely no documentation to verify that management actually has anything to do with those statements) on top of the substantiating information. Such behaviour only clouds the picture and makes the discussions start to become shrouded in their own air of deception. We don't need that. We are here to help each other decipher what is the most accurate story, not to make it more cloudy.
I greatly appreciate your and other's help in trying to keep the accurate story presented, but when you start inserting YOUR assumptions into the real story, it starts becoming deceptive. If a poster insists on continuing to mix truth with their own assumptions and opinions without clearly stating that those are their assumptions/opinions, us posters attempting to decipher the most accurate story no longer appreciate you clouding the picture. THIS is when one loses some measure of credibility.
Thanks for the help guys. Yes, that is IMMGE.ob (but not LMMGE.ob - I'm assuming that was a typo on your part Augie?).
Geez, sometimes I wonder about brokerage firms like Schwab. You would think that they could easily find such information. When I asked one of their brokers about this today, the guy looked for news and information for 10 minutes and could give me no reason for their not showing quotes, so I started to think there was some bigger problem, LOL.
No, No Charleoi. That post only says that they HEARD THAT management was doing such and such ......
It never says that "management made a statement" that x y z was occurring.
You are making an assumption here, and you should post that this is your assumption first before saying that management has made a statement. In this way people can decide whether or not they agree with the assumption you are making before thinking management has done or said something. Very different thought processes in those communication avenues there, and the distinction is very pertinent to make in the mindset of someone sizing up management as to their honesty, or sizing up you as to the validity/purposeful slant (honesty) of your posts.
Does anyone know what happened to IMMG?
It is no longer showing quotes and I do not think it is trading anymore.
Since they use Rick Lutz and his PR firm, I find this rather interesting and would like to know the story about what is going on there.
"but now we hear that Phil says that some government agency needs to approve this."
Charleoi, I did not see anywhere where that RB post said that Phil stated that he was needing government approval. The post specifically started off with "I heard that", which makes this a total RUMOR from the get go. None of us here put too much stock in rumors, I hope.
So, let's step back a few more steps here - Much of what you posted about Phil telling us management would be buying shares and not seeing any forms filed yet is correct and verifiable; but, to assign the comment in that rumor automatically to Phil is a bit of a stretch until you get some documentable proof that Phil has made such a statement.
Please keep to verifiable facts, or opinions stated AS OPINIONS.
Yea, what in the world did he get put in jail for?
Who put him in jail?
Please post in lower case. I will start deleting repetitive posts, and posts meant to encite anger among others by screaming negatives in capital letters for the entire post, or even the majority of the post.
To one of the moderators;
Could you please get the chart fixed/"updated to Sharp Charts 2" when you get a chance. I like having the chart there to follow the share price movements.
Thanks.
LOL, you just had to use one of his most useless posts like that one, rather than one that did provide a little information and leads to look into.
What do you think of my concerns?
I saw your post about CDSS. Is that not the exact same concern here? Why does CDSS bring in such higher valuation at this time? I've seen info posted about CDSS but have not looked into it much. Sounds so much like WOLV, I just don't know why its share price is so much higher. Seems like both of them should be trading down here in the teens to low .20s.