Sipping On A Sam Adams Boston Lager In Front Of My Beautiful Computer Desk On My Desktop PC Making Money On The OTC!
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Sure sounds like they better hurry lol....we are just about ready to roll out. They have a long ways to go yet.
The technology is used to detect pathogens in foods and could replace the need to have a biochemist on-site to conduct tests of samples at a meatpacking plant, for example, Rubin said.
The company plans to use the private funding to further development of its BARDOT (Bacteria Rapid Detection using Optical Scattering Technology)
Advanced BioImaging has raised about $2.5 million since its inception in 2008
IMO
exactly 3m rehashed machine old news. still needs lab, have to purchase test kits. Smaller better looking machine by 3M but still old news. MIT1000a is light years ahead. I could not agree more. No comparison at all. IMO
What 3m has is old news already available and is not good enough to make a final decision as to food being safe. Still needs sent to be tested old fashined way to verify? Not much point in that in my opinion. MMTC MIT1000a is light years ahead. IMO
exactly there is nothing that can interact negative with the food. This is huge in my opinion. Light Scattering/Lasers...clean water. Inexpensive nothing to interact and highly accurate. There is no competition as of yet. IMO
MUST READ DD ARTICLE. PLEASE READ THIS ARTICE IN THE LINK I HAVE POSTED BELOW AS IT WILL ELIMINATE ALL CONCERN TO ANY DOUBTERS. I HAVE POSTED EXCERPTS OF WHAT I FELT WERE KEY POINTS IN THE ARTICLE. PLEASE CLICK LINK ON BOTTOM BELOW EXCERPTS TO READ FULL ARTICLE.
INTERESTING EXCERPTS:
1.Most rapid methods can be done in a few minutes to a few hours, so they are more rapid than traditional methods. But, in food analysis, rapid methods still lack sufficient sensitivity and specificity for direct testing; hence, foods still need to be culture-enriched before analysis.
2.Evaluations of rapid methods show that some perform better in some foods than others. This can be attributed mostly to interference by food components, some of which can be especially troublesome for the technologies used in rapid methods. For example, an ingredient can inhibit DNA hybridization or Taq polymerase, but has no effect on antigen-antibody interactions and the converse situation may also occur (12). Since method efficiencies may be food dependent, it is advisable to perform comparative studies to ensure that a particular assay will be effective in the analysis of that food type
3.The specificity of DNA based assays is dictated by short probes; hence, a positive result, for instance with a probe or primers specific for a toxin gene, only indicates that bacteria with those gene sequences are present and that they have the potential to be toxigenic. But, it does not indicate that the gene is actually expressed and that the toxin is made. Likewise, in clostridial and staphylococcal intoxication, DNA probes and PCR can detect only the presence of cells, but are of limited use in detecting the presence of preformed toxins (12).
4.Currently, there are at least 30 assays each for testing for E. coli O157:H7 and for Salmonella. Such a large number of options can be confusing and overwhelming to the user, but, more importantly, has limited the effective evaluation of these methods. As a result, only few methods have been officially validated for use in food testing (1,11).
5.As a rapid method is used more frequently, its benefits and at the same time, its limitations also become more apparent. This section only briefly described some of the rapid method formats and selected problems encountered when using these assays in food analysis. However, because of the complex designs and formats of these tests, coupled with the difficulties of testing foods, users must exercise caution when selecting rapid methods and to also evaluate these tests thoroughly, as some may be more suitable than others for distinct testing situations or for assaying certain types of food. Lastly, technology continues to advance at a great pace and next generation assays, such as biosensors (18) and DNA chips (32) already are being developed that potentially have the capability for near real-time and on-line monitoring of multiple pathogens in foods.
******LOOK AT THE CHART AT THE BOTTOM OF THE ARTICLE AND NOTE 3M™ Petrifilm™ Plates WONDER MACHINE (NOT!!) IS INCLUDED IN THE CHART******
NOT INCLUDED IN THE CHART IS THE REVOLUTIONARY MIT1000A...WHICH USES CLEAN WATER LIGHT SCATTERING NOTHING LIKE IT CURRENTLY WE ARE ABOUT TO ROCK THE MARKET! HIGHLY ACCURATE! THIS THING IS GOING TO REVOLUTIONIZE AND DESTROY ALL OF THESE METHODS. THE ARTICLE BASICIALLY SAYS THAT WHILE ALL OF THESE ARE OK AT BEST IT IS BY NO MEANS A FINAL MEANS OF ASSURING SAFETY IN FOOD. GUESS WHAT WILL BE THE MIT1000A. READ AND ENJOY! I WANT MORE SHARES AFTER READING THIS. WE ARE GOING TO SCREAM IN 2012 PEOPLE! ALL IN MY HUMBLE OPINION....BUT I HAVE A FEELING I AM SO 100% SPOT ON. HERE IS THE FULL ARTICLE POSTED IN THE LINK BELOW. ENJOY EVERYONE!
ALL IN MY HUMBLE OPINION OF COURSE!!!!
http://www.fda.gov/food/scienceresearch/laboratorymethods/bacteriologicalanalyticalmanualbam/ucm109652.htm
let the consumer know we have what is needed. idk lol something we need EXPOSURE. But i have a feeling Mr Brennan will take care of that shortly. GO MMTC! IM happy today.....feel even better about this. Cant wait till the bashers try to run away with the 3m thing can only imagine what will be said lol.
lets start putting mmtc flyers on the pegboards at our supermarkets or posted in parking lots. Attach food scares with it. IMO
We can even highlight it with a 3M highlighter so it stands out nice and clear! LOL
Not as though food contamination or pathogen detection is a specialty of theirs (although they do make a good razor). I just dont want any MMM investors to get to excited about branching off into this new market considering the fact we already have their new machine sucking air at best lol. Maybe we can send it to them on a 3m sticky note! LMFAO! IMO!
Im thinking maybe its a good idea to post about our superiority on the 3M message board. IMO
Food processors will benefit greatly from the system’s affordable accuracy and fast time to results, minimizing downtime in the lab.
Just another feel good clip. Notice the word lab.....yawn so old news 3M. IMO
This is off topic completely but man those razors are ridiculous expensive. lol
Stick the old mit1000a right on the production line lol not a lab. Train your average joe how to use it in two days lol. Not a lab tech making god knows what an hour. LOL BYE BYE 3m hello mmtc. go mmtc all in my very humble opinion.
Im not positive on this and i need to dig some more...but im thinking it is restricted to a lab because the materials used with 3m are toxic. Again i will dig some more but i am thinking so.
After some very quick reading as well.....I am certain the 3m product in no way shape or form trumps nor even holds a candle to the mit1000a. Knowing that 3m is looking to enter this market makes me even more excited as to what we have. Not to mention cost per test is cheaper with the mit1000a. 3m can spend all the money they want on advertisng and lord knows they have the cash. But lets face it...it all comes down to the bucks and the mit1000a is cheaper. Not to mention the fact it is highly accurate. Also my sister is an RN and said that this system 3M has would have to be used in a lab lol. i have underlined the word lab in a cut copy and paste directly from the news release on 3m here is the copied and pasted clip in parentheses (taking up less counter space than a laptop computer, making it portable and adaptable to various lab environments.) The mit1000a is not restricted to a lab which speaks volumes alone. lol I am even more excited now. All in my humble opinion. Do your own dd on this and im sure you will come to the same conclusion. GO MMTC!
If you want to get out at .0001 lol. Would be nice to hear something soon. IMO
sure glad i got just a tiny tiny slice of this. Got it for a trade on news. Well see....i might die of old age before we get any news lol. IMO
Thank you!! Im sure glad this isnt a spelling bee! LMFAO! All these experts would not fare well. LOL. IMO
April was the absolute latest by the way....more than likely will be sooner. IMO
company is on the cusp of sales. He is getting ready to announce the biggest news the company has put out to date! You dont think that news will do anything to the pps? what about the 2,000,000 from epic? that wont be enough to get started with production? You dont think news of a major company in the food industry being interested will do anything to the pps? That is right around the corner. You seem to be throwing things out there aimlessly...step back and put all the pieces togethor. By the way u think this is such garbage. Why would you be spending so much time here? LOL is it to save everyone. Bashers are always a good sign. He said at the latest certs will be ready by april. Is April to long for you? Can brennan make it that long to drop the bombshell news thats going to send the pps up. Maybe we can all get togethor and loan him some money until april considering april is so far off. All in my opinion.
SEC NEEDS TO SHUT THIS DOWN. ALL IN MY OPINION. THIS IS A JOKE. ONCE AGAIN IN MY OPINION.
GEEEZ!!!!! I GIVE UP. ALL I HAVE TO SAY IS WE WILL SEE WHAT HAPPENS THEN WE WILL KNOW WHO WAS RIGHT. IMO
I dont understand you guys with dilution. You know there is actually a strategy in issuing shares lol. Its not like brennan is just going to say "ok A/S is increased time to dump???? Unless they had no other choice financially right now....which in my opinion they do. Dilution now makes ABSOLUTELY NO SENSE AT ALL PERIOD. IMO
MR CHENEY........HELLO!!!!! WHERE R U? LOL....Unbelievable. IMO
Honestly I think covering your initial investment is never a bad idea especially if one wants to be conservative/safe. As far as target price is concerned.....I never try to guess. All I know is there is DEF a big need for the MIT1000a. As far as competitive edge is concerned we have that hands down. If I tried to predict what the PPS is going to be six months from now I would be full of nothing but hot air. I can say in my opinion the PPS will be much much higher than it is right now lol. Stocks of course always have resistance/support levels and never just go up up up without pulling back for some air. In my opinion you cant go wrong with this. I just get upset when people equate inexperience at trading with lack of intelligence. Trading takes time I dont care what anyone says. If it were just a walk in the park everybody with brains would be rich....and we all know thats not the case. Persistence, experience and self educating yourself is what is required to become a good trader in my opinion. After all the DD junebug I really feel the right news will send this flying. News with just the mention of one big company in the food industry having orders placed and we will both be very happy imo. I really get a good vibe from this brennan guy. I like how he came forth with the interview trying to boost shareholder confidence. If you noticed he kept saying when stating facts....and that can be verified...and that is documented. Im not scared of dilution anytime soon as now would make no sense sub penny. IMO I think the 2,000,000 from epic will be enough to get certs start production. I think then brennan will announce completion of certs.. production started and hopefully throw in a name of a potential buyer in the food industry ( I think he will). I think that will be the news to sell on as that is going to send the pps screaming in my opinion. I expect a pullback after that. Then again news like that will bring alot of new eyes/new money to the stock imo. I think we need to hear the next couple of prs in my opinion to develop a "trading strategy". I really do feel in my opinion 2012 second quarter we will see people lining up to buy the mit1000a. Stocks are valued on future earnings/revenue. Right now this is totally speculative and imo the pps is a complete steal. Back to dilution I think once news on certs,production and a big name in the food industry is put out.....imo that could send the pps to oh idk much higher....put it this way i could see .50 maybe more. Then I think brennan will issue more shares as they will need money for further production orders expansion etc. On a final note Im pumped about this stock and after much dd have no fear of the legitimacy of the company or the mit1000a being obsolete cardboard play doh whatever. I really feel we are on to something big here and next year imo we will see a MASSIVE INCREASE IN PPS AND MANY MORE EYES/DEEP POCKETS COMING INTO THIS STOCK. ALL IN MY OPINION.
I agree not wanting to tout the stock is one thing for Cheney but this is getting ridiculous. He could have came forth with something by now. I agree with you also on the R/S thing. Usually penny stocks that have a history of R/S are the ones to avoid. This will prolly be just a rinse and repeat of the last deal. Tout it up R/S...only this time noone is buying it. Cheney has a lot of work to do in restoring confidence and so far he has done NOTHING. All in my opinion.
Check out APAGF once traded for pennies now at 82.65 a share.
Not to mention the fact. What was apples PPS when the Ipod came out. I know it wasnt .005!!! Just a little upside potential here just saying. There have been plenty of penny stocks that have a great product and have rocketed in price. Most never make it I agree with that......but there have been plenty that have. All in my opinion.
Actually in my opinion until you learn a little about trading.....read some books maybe do some paper trades....it is prolly smart to buy and hold. If the company is good and they have a product with a competitive edge you will never go wrong buying and holding until you get the hang of trading. Especially with a small cap growth company like this. In my opinion. Never has anyone walked into stocks with no prior experience and consistently took profits out of the market. It takes time....to say otherwise is ignorant in my opinion. Def not something that is learned overnight.
I would not go as far as to call people who are new to trading weak minded. No one person has ever just walked into stocks and made money trading. Trading takes time to learn. Becoming good at trading takes experience and some reading. You could be a genius and still lose money when you first start. All in my humble opinion.
I dont know...I was just wondering what was meant by 100k. I wish i knew the share structure lol.
100k market cap
come on man $500
what?
dude thats like $500 u serious?
couldnt agree more we need credibility and exposure.
Ill be there talked to SGR, cant wait to come to Cali...We are so going to scream next year!
You Tube would be very intelligent. IMO
Never mind it hasnt been. See 2010 on bottom of site.
Hey does anyone know if the website is new since cheney came aboard?