Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
We'll be coming to the end of Q2 in two weeks.
Time flies... and hair keeps growin' and growin'!
We're sorry but the position is no longer active in our database.
High C, you have no appreciation whatsoever. Without the so-called bashers you wouldn't even know that you're being screwed.
So enjoy! LOL
High C, so how many Valimeds are being used in hospitals right now? Do you know? Honestly I have no idea. Four?
My understanding is that four units out of the first production run of 25 are in hospitals and 21 are on the shelf.
What about the beta units using the 1 ml cuvettes, are any of those still in use. Are the partner hospitals (Mott, Dallas, Mi...) still using beta units, new units, or no units at all?
How many total units are out there, both beta and new?
Were the beta units upgraded with the new cuvette ports?
?????????????????????????????
As far as anyone knows there have been only 4 sales and no one knows at what price.
Maybe the boyz threw some money into the pot to help out the bottom line and CDEX has been giving them away like they did the solar pumps.
Who knows, it's anyone's guess and I don't put anything past these sunsabiches.
"IMO The mixture would include some medication ,plus a bit of sodium. The article just said sodium chloride was mixed in the wrong proportion,which IMO would ring out NOT VALIATED if fed through ValiMed"
Sodium Chloride does not fluoresce to my knowledge. If this is the case than the solution would be rejected only if the high concentration of NaCl somehow altered the signature of the medication.
Same situation with non-sterility that we've discussed in the past. If the contamination effected the signature of the medication Valimed will reject the solution. If it doesn't, it won't.
It's a crap shoot.
"Valimed does not check for sterility and CDEX has not claimed it does"
-Ontheedge
I believe that some of the people on the other board are missing the point completely. Valimed has been targeted for high-risk, IV admixtures, i.e., only solutions, only high-risk solutions, and only high-risk solutions compounded by the pharmacist.
ValiMed is not intended to validate every IV administered, nor does it have the capability to do so. The 28% KCL solution is a perfect example.
Statistically, out of the reported 44,000 medical errors (or whatever the number is) in the US each year, less than about .05% (22) of the errors are associated with the type of high-risk, compounded IV's targeted by Valimed*.
Bear in mind that Valimed is not solving an existing problem that has no solution. There is not an urgent need. It is providing an "additional" safety protocol to the pharmacy's QA program for high-risk meds.
I believe it is for these reasons that sales are slow (have they even sold one unit at retail price?) and insurance companies have not been quick to endorse the product. It has NOT turned out to be a "Valimed in every Mom-N-Pop, corner drug store" or "22 ValiMeds per hospital" like Raiderman, Butterfly and a few others hyped. That should now be clear to everyone. They were wrong.
On the positive side, the more signatures the better and CDEX is moving in the right direction, but even with hundreds of useful signatures will it ever be used for an off-the-shelf IV bag that requires no compounding?
Will it ever be used for low-risk IV's?
I've waited a reasonable amount of time to see if CDEX had something which would attract investors. So far, it is not performing like advertised by the promoters (it has "wowed" only Capnmike- a CDEX stock promoter).
Currently, it's been targeted for such a niche market that even if it sales within that market it will not be a one product wonder IMO. In order to bring in major revenue that will build shareholder equity, it needs to bust loose and sell for a wider range of applications other than high-risk, compounded IV's.
So what am I saying High C? Crow was right! LOL
* I pulled that number out of my hat to make my point, and the point is that the number is very, very low when you think that a medical error includes a myriad of possibilities such as an adverse effect from the wrong pill, wrong dosage, surgical errors...etc. High-risk, compounded IV solutions is a small source of total error.
Your right Crow, Valimed could not have caught that error, but a standard pharmacy refractometer would have easily.
It appears that they were just too busy to check the solution.
Welp Sanddollar, I think those posts were pretty much the acid test to see if we still have a board monitor.
And I thought Viking65 was just being extremely tolerant.
There's always a bright side to things:
"He only got 57,000 a little bit more than half filled..he told me so I slipped in a little buy for myself.. but..it took us two weeks in at that price to get it...then he pulled out for the remainder...Says he doesn't need the money... Wish I could say that...I want to ask him for free rent..lol..."
That's good. You could have found yourself with a rent increase! LOL
Paige, that's historical information, regardless if you just happen to chance upon it.
You do know how Inet feels about briong up past Loch/CDEx events don't you?
Let's not stir up the pot.
The guy is making a fortune from his ad placements.
doyourdd, maybe you should email that to MP.
Quite frankly Pagie, I'm getting mixed signals from you and I'm beginning to think that our basher-hours can be spent more productively elsewhere:
"p.s. That action on the .15 the other day was my landlord...yep after all these years he decided to buy in.. he wanted 100000 at .15 but didn't get quite all the way filled..sickning isn't it Rotten smirk..."
"Didn't the Army passed us off to the Navy per the SB-2 filing?"
I have no idea what you're talking about.
"The funding as we know was in cahoots...I mean I can bring up countless articles on how bad the TSA managed the contracts...
I have no idea what you're talking about.
doyourdd, get back to work and get off your boss' computer.
What I don't understand is how someone can get away with something like that?
Maybe Kidinsight can explain it to us!
How about if we email MP with the question, then Kidinsight can answer it for us.
So it was just MP's "i", running away with him? LOL
LOL! Now that was funny Demmo.
Bad girl Paige. You see how you are?
No posting of historical facts, like the Navy dismissing CDEX's alleged revolutionary technology!
But what I would be interested in seeing is that revenue bearing Army contract claimed by MP at a time when CDEX wasn't registered with the CCC.
Can you find that for us?
"How about the Missouri's Public Safety Operations Contract for our Meth Gun?"
My feeling is the meth gun has gone the way of the Army contract which allegedly sat in the queue for a couple years before shareholders learned the truth.
No news has always been bad news.
IMO, the meth gun was a novel idea designed to sell shares and keep hope alive. It has more technical obstacles to overcome than Valimed, which to this point appears to be a toy of interest to a few in a niche market, not offering anything new which is substantial enough to justify the cost of "additional" QA. Valimed appears to be an expensive new gadget affordable only to leading edge hospitals for bragging rights.
And out of those top hospitals which "acquired" a Valimed, how many actual purchased them at full price and how many received deep discounts.
AFA the meth gun, MP said that there would probably be no report on the MSHP testing, we will know when testing is complete when they're "shrink wrapped and ready for shipment".
Unless you're Inet or Raiderman, this is NOT good news.
Three of those hospitals were "partners" which helped develop the pharmacy protocol for use of Valimed.
How many hospitals have Valimed? Seven.
How many hospitals bought Valimed? Less than seven.
How many pharmacists involved with development loaded their truck with CDEx shares seeing the new MicroSoft on the horizon?
HellifIknow. (TM- Crow) LOL
Excuse me Inet, I wasn't trying to insult you, if I wanted to do that I'd have used some of your language in no uncertain terms.
6 years and 25 million dollars (and counting) later you and Raiderman are still saying "We either have it or we don't."
Sure sounds silly to me. Don't take offense.
Your ole buddy,
d4diddy
Un Friquen believable. LOL eom
Oh Inet! I hope some day you realize how silly you sound!
"Now we have a company that is admittedly struggling to develop something that may or may not work well enough to make us well"
Yawn....
Maybe after another 6 years and 25 million dollars they will figure it out huh Inet?
Why not hire back Sonny-Boy for another 300K/yr and 1 million stock bonus to put him to work on the problem:
"Do they have it or do they not"?
UFB!!!!
Locs, I got a feeling that one has something to do with the word "select".
Fine, but don't use any of my Trademarks.
I see that Dr. Biffnix has learned wisely from the mistake Xeno made by not protecting his Mark.
I have gone stone-cold after losing my company and I haven't looked back.
I am bitter and shall seize anything that I perceive as having value that is not protected, especially anything I can take from Xenomon!
I will cash in when the book is written.
BTW, if Paige is going to Seattle w/o you, who is going to beehive her hair? LOL
Paige, is Li'l Blue a bench-top model designed for lab use, the portable unit used to check Tamiflu, or the "other unit" that Monsoonman claimed checked a whole pill without smashing it to smithereens?
MalcPractice Insurance (TM-d4diddy)
Did you read where Raiderman was "thinking outside the box"
"track. I also wonder if Valimed technology can be incorporated into existing Baxa products? Now, wouldn't that be cool. . .a liquid medication dispenser that validates the prescription automatically?
Just thinking out loud. And believe me, I am not saying this is going on. . .Just thinking a little out of the box."
I already heard that one Raiderman! Who've you been listening to? LOL
Hey, you heard (the rumor) about an IV bag with a "special window" built into it?
They're going to corner the market on "special" IV bags because every hospital will have "at least about" 22 (TM- butterfly) Li'l Blues and they'll all need to use the special IV bag to validate high-risk solutions during dispensing!
If I had a spare 10K lying around I'd put it all into CDEx. It's a wonderful little company- NOT
A: They wouldn't. It makes no sense. And if one is to assume that the international sales coincides with the launch of Li'l Blue (TM- d4diddy), then that's 6-7 month away.
Why stop free advertising for 6-7 months when you're sitting on a boneyard of Valimeds?
I makes no sense whatsoever. Someone didn't think this lie out well enough.
It reminds me of Ontheedge's stories.
Adrienne's post has altered trading "significantly", and if you look at the history of DiddyStock guidance, you will see that "significant" means by at least 25%.
On another note: Oh that Harry is just too much! LOL
I love this statement:
"IMO there was nothing said to Adrienne,other than answering her questions"
While once again Harry is missing the point about SD, can you imagine a dialogue between Adrienne and MP where she specifically asks such detailed questions.
"Read Adrienne's post on the true board. I believe she holds 200 k shares."
... and represents a group holding 1.4 million shares which requires MP to do what?
Tell the truth? LOL
"ValiMed is coming out with a smaller version that is priced for small hospitals. More sales to come. As of today, Baxa's web sit does not show ValiMed. It will be back very soon with the the smaller ValiMed unit."
If the big units aren't selling in the big hospitals, what makes MP think that the small units will sell in the small hospitals?
This is not a fix. If the big units don't sell they're in trouble.
If they start offering a smaller unit, why would a big hospital purchase a bigger unit that they've already dismissed.
Scrapping the big units and starting a new production run of smaller units sounds expensive and time consuming.
Off to the boneyard with the tooling for the big blue box huh Harry? Now that's up beat.
What a house of cards.
Saint Malcolm, the savior that gave investors "a chance"... the ring leader all along?
Also rhetorical.
"Maybe pay them 10 bucks each for them. I would donate a hunnert to the fund, if Diddy wants to do that, and can get them for 10 bucks a copy.LOL!!"
I personally am not interested in purchasing them, but a company called Diddysama BotanaLife, Inc., a division of General Phytoceutics has a keen interest.
If they can detect polydidsterites they will be of great use.
Oh!! So it's StockDiddy now. I should have listened to Crow and Sanddollar.
Get a good lawyer Demmo.
It appears that our national labs are a breeding ground for start-up public companies.... and a magnet for VC's.
"Maslow added that Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. plans other partnerships based on the technology and talent of Los Alamos National Laboratory."
I have a spot opening for LLNL, $50K- one time finders fee.
Cash.
"Primary Children's Medical Center Selects Valimed"- September 2006
The fact that all referenecs to this PR title were removed suggests that this wasn't a sale, but just marketeers creating the impression of product demand.
If this is the case, keeping that posted was probably making their lawyers nervous with the real facts about CDEX's marketing success becoming more and more apparent.
I can "select", "partner" and "accept delivery of" all day long and never purchase a damn thing.
If you sold it, say you sold it for gawd sakes instead of MalSpeak- honest folks are sick of it.
A hard days work of field testing in Tucson (featuring an intro riff by WP):
http://playthepines.com/golf/proto/playthepines/
Better "TM" that one drumbah! eom