Please excuse my ignorance. I'm a immigrant to this country. I've gone back and have read your posts. I used some of your post in making my decision to invest in Top Shelf.

I didn't find in any of your post any disclosure of a "Vineyard Deal" (to me it doesn't matter who's idea) and stock options. To me, if that was known, at least I was have.. what's the word.. weighted it to the value of what you were posting.

Do you believe now, you should have done such a disclosure?

Was there a Vineyard proposal? If so, what version is true?

Was the Vineyard story, True?

I'm just a Frenchman from Metz.. So, do you agree with the posted link that leads to the OTC Short Table for Temn. That shows short volume. But, pardon, sub penny stocks are not shorted, so it must be the OTC doesn't know the definition of Short to have made the Short term applicable to it's chart and report.. "I'm absolutely shock there's gambling.. Pardon Captain, here are your winnings" from Casablanca..

Are you attempting with this post, shorting of TEMN does exist.. Like gambling at "Rick's" in Casablanca!

Will there be a launch?

You have established your insight in this company. So, I put the question to you.

Is there a product?

Will the product launch?

Is it a consensus on this board there's a product, that's in the process of being launched in three states, New York, Florida and Texas?

Next, what is more important. The product launch, which I believe is necessary for the company's survival or spending the company's resources on addressing audited statements, chill, lawsuit?

One last question, I have read all court filings. It's Alonzo Pierce and Top Shelf who are the defendants in the case?

With so much back and forth on this board today. I still want to get back to basics. In reading the financials on the Top Shelf website, inventory is clearly represented. Here's my question, besides all the back and forth: Is there a product developed and about ready to launch?

I'm not looking for a crystal ball.. I'm trying to connect the dots.. With product launch and other issues being constantly rehashed on this board.. Are the metrics in place for a recovery and product on the market to verify the companies viability.

My head is spinning after reading all the back and forth. Here's my question. What will the price do for the rest of August or do we need to wait for September before we see a true recovery. Next question, the .14 share price stated in the "bought and paid for research" a realistic price expectation and if so, when can we expect that price.. Thank you.

Top Shelf or Victory Partners or the Judge could have cancelled the hearing. This applies to both criminal and civil. Now, I've signed in the Clerk of Courts office and it clearly shows cancellation, not continuance. Now, the continuance request could be filed and the judge didn't want to rule on it today. Normally, the party that believes it's behind the eight ball would ask for the continuance: Who is that? Now, in my experience when a party asks for a cancellation, it could normally mean settlement talks are taking place. Then here's the catch 22 reason to cancel, the party doesn't want anymore entered into the record that could cause future damage or exposure to themselves. Now, I don't know what happened, I wish I did. But, again my legal experience tell me, you always go with the party that has most to lose.

Let me try it this way. Your reply is based on other people's posting, not on facts you have in your possession. Along with the 5 million line of credit is old news, even though it can have an affect on current and future operations.

So, you have access to the terms of the Credit Line. Where you can say; "make that much and more back via "DUMPING" TEMN shares."

If you know all this, where are the shares coming from. Are there from the 600 million you are always referencing. But, if Alonzo loses the lawsuit, the shares in question come into play, but according to SEC filing the total authorized shares are 2B. So, are there another class of shares we need to deal with. You must know this, since you know "make that much and more back via "DUMPING" TEMN shares."

Due you believe River North Equity LLC did it's DD?

According to the PR, River North Equity has given Top Shelf a $5 million dollar line of credit. I've been to River North's website, google them, they seem to be a legitimate company.

Now, if you were giving out $5 million dollars in credit: If it's a secure line, would you verify your security? Would you verify who's signing for the company had the authorization to sign? Would you review all pending legal matters, i.e. lawsuits? Would you do a complete review of the business plan to make sure there will be income to pay back?

Or, would you just say: Hey, let's give Alonzo $5million dollars, he seems like a nice guy.

So, if you believe they did indeed get the $5 million line of credit. Don't you believe they had to get the answers to the above questions.

Well said...

http://www.drinktopshelf.com/

Go to Top Shelf's website. Go to financial disclosures. Everything is there. The first document, "OTC PINK BASIC DISCLOSURE GUIDELINES".

Section 3: Security Information

"Total shares authorized: 2,000,000 as of: July 28, 2014"
"Total Shares outstanding: 1,608,417.061 as of July 28, 2014"

Then go to Section 4: Issuance History

"List below any events, in chronological order, that resulted in changes in total shares outstanding by the issuer in the past two fiscal years and any interim period. The list shall include all offerings of equity securities, including debt convertible into equity securities, whether private or public, and all shares or any securities or options to acquire such securities issued for services, describing (1) the securities, (2) the person or entities to whom such securities were issued and (3) THE SERVICES PROVIDED BY SUCH PERSONS OR ENTITIES. The list shall indicate:"

The answer to all questions were N/A.. Not applicable.. So, if you have evidence that Top Shelf and since Pierce signed the statement has committed perjury. Please show me.

Correct. But, there must have been an update. I trade through Scottrade, it was updated. Ihub was updated. Where did they get their information to update their screens for customers?

You are correct, no one knows until there's a SEC filing. Can you answer these questions for me.

1) What was the effect on the share price when the shares outstanding was updated?

2) Was there increase in daily volume when the shares outstanding was updated?

Now, when Mr. Pierce updated the amounts of share authorization was reduced to 2 billion shares. Did it give him the authority to issue new shares over the amount that was currently issued (according to his court filings that were authorized legally) in the course of daily business.

http://www.sec.gov/News/PressRelease/Detail/PressRelease/1370542594818#.U-K5mWd0xjo

This is the first post I have done. I pride myself in doing my due diligence. So, I went directly to the SEC website and read the charges against Money Runners. I've attached the link above. In the press release, the companies that were targeted by Money Runners for profit and manipulation are listed. Top Shelfs is not one of them. Now, for full disclosure, I hold a Law Degree with a specialty in Corporate Governance. Now, like many others, I am concerned about the close to 600 million additional shares. But, after further review, I examine what would be the potential reasons for issuing those shares. Again with keeping Corporate Governance in mind.

1) The 5 million dollar line of credit for the Venture Capital firm, who are legitimate. Do you believe that did if for free, they are venture capitalist.

2) The acquisition of rights for different brands. Do you believe that was free.

3) The adding of two advisors, asking them to risk their name and reputations. Do you believe that was free.

Now, I wish Mr. Pierce would give clarifications to the additional stock issuance.

We will see, but as long I have some gambling money, I will take the chance.