Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Gr8 summary & clarification ice.
At this point, I think we're all focusing on the ARRIS IPR.
Any input, steps involved or details, much appreciated.
To me, there is NO JUSTIFIABLE REASON why the board should institute an inter partes review, or something is amiss!
Next big hurdle:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=141570936
You have good insight & vast knowledge of all the finer points.
Thank you fellow long sir,
Scruffer
Good 1 AllinFun.
Yes, if Arris IPR review instituted, something or someone(s) are crooked.
Not so sure. Float wrong then.
Gmc2020: According to your theory, there is no way the float of 663M is correct then.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=139474848
I SURE HOPE this isn't the case b/c dilutes our value.
Also, we're already defended, quite well, a few blitzkriegs from the MMs. (described in bottom link).
I still believe the MMs are on the wrong side of the trade.
I think they are trying to unwind but are having a difficult time of it.
Anytime the price drops considerably, buyers are there to pick them up.
Also, not sure if a buyer is routing his/her shares directly (vs. automatically) b/c one 10K trade filled @ .02 when bid was .022 (as someone noted).
Clearly, the MMs are manipulating this, constraining the stock price and controlling the action.
Old, but a good read nevertheless.
http://counterfeitingstock.com/CS2.0/CounterfeitingStock.html
JMO, Scruffer
Gr8 post EB. Got your link 2. TY
I'm in the camp, MMs are on the wrong side of the trade.
Some doubt and discount this theory, but explains the low volume fills and repressed PPS.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=141554670
One last big "Subjective or Objective?" hurdle with Arris IPR.
To me (for what it's worth), there is NO JUSTIFIABLE REASON why the board should institute an inter partes review, or something is amiss!
Moreover, the skull-and-crossbones & financials not being current don't help, but presently not important to Carter.
If become current, believe royalty plan to be scheduled to allow ARRIS to spread their liability over 5+ years and remain a going-concern.
JMHO, Scruffer
TGISaturday.
MÜchÖ, MÜchÖ Appreciation Double-Aught
Thank you for finding. Great link(s). Bookmarked now.
A. The Petition Is Time Barred Under 35 U.S.C. § 315(b)
-- 1. Involvement in a Prior Litigation Creates Privity with the Defendants
-- 2. Petitioner Had Substantial Control over the Delaware Litigation
-- 3. Indemnification Is a Substantive Legal Relationship that Creates Privity with the Delaware Defendants
-- 4. Petitioner Was Adequately Represented in the Delaware Litigation
-- 5. The Board Has Denied Institution Under Similar Facts
B. The Board Should Deny Institution Under 35 U.S.C. § 314(a)
-- 1. Whether the same petitioner previously filed a petition directed to the same claims of the same patent
-- 2. Whether at the time of filing of the first petition the petitioner knew of the prior art asserted in the second petition or should have known of it
-- 3. Whether at the time of filing of the second petition the petitioner already received the patent owner’s preliminary response to the first petition or received the Board’s decision on whether to institute review in the first petition
-- 4. The length of time that elapsed between the time the petitioner learned of the prior art asserted in the second petition and the filing of the second petition
-- 5. Whether the petitioner provides adequate explanation for the time elapsed between the filings of multiple petitions directed to the same claims of the same patent
-- 6. The finite resources of the Board
-- 7. The requirement under 35 U.S.C. § 316(a)(11) to issue a final determination not later than 1 year after the date on which the Director notices institution of review
CONCLUSION
For at least the foregoing reasons, the Board should not institute inter partes review of the ’822 Patent on any of the grounds proposed by Petitioner.
https://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/ptab-filings%2FIPR2018-00570%2F17
If no corruption or judges gotten too, seems like undefendable.
Whitman is brilliant and extremely thorough.
"In Whitman we trust",
Scruffer
Thank you sir "Double 0 Dylan".
Yes, I know have seen, but not an iHub subscriber so don't have search capability.
And just learned of Happy Hour Friday.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=59568713
https://investorshub.advfn.com/Happy-Hour-18619/
Going to finish yard. It's hot!
Much appreciation again.
Kudos,
Scruff
Next Big Hurdle = ???
When have opportunity, could someone knowledgable explain the details of the next big hurdle.
It is my understanding it = the DENIAL of the ARRIS IPR Petition or Institution?
Is this a 3 judge panel? From? Objective or subjective in rulings? Corruptible?
If Cisco's & RPX's shot down, except part of one, how can this even be considered?
Much appreciation to those who can explain the fine minutiae and precise details of this entire process.
Obviously, this is my first & only patent play and stinky pinkie stock.
I'm sure many others are in my same boat as well. I'm just ignorant and uninformed on all these steps, gambits & legalize.
Thank you very much for your time, knowledge and explanation fellow LONG "SMART, BRILLIANT & OUTSTANDING" crew members and team players.
Sincerely, Scruffer
P.S. The more input, the merrier. I can be really stupid & slow at times.
Oh sheets, misinterpreted! Thank you.
276 order Oral Order Thu 8:50 AM
ORAL ORDER: D.I.242 Renewed Motion to Stay Pending Resolution of Inter Partes Review is DENIED without prejudice to renewal based on changed circumstances. The parties should in due course advise what their plan is as to the scope of expert discovery and summary judgment motions. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 6/14/2018. (ksr, )
Also, thank you zombywolffam for going.
Never provided how/where send BBQ, bourbon, cash &/or small token of appreciation for going to hearings and spending all day there.
Just curious, but what's your pleasure (choice of bourbon)?
Isn't this the DENIAL of ARRIS IPR?
That's how I read it.
Thank you, Scruffer
P.S. Took staycation day and out cutting the yard with the pack, my dogs.
Can only go by what's provided jbbb.
Moreover, that's ~3 years old.
Clearly, Carter released hundreds of millions of shares to cover noteholders, inventors, Deirdre and investors.
UOIP had gone dark so no details had to be provided, hence the skull-and-crossbone warning.
If working on financials, that's probably indicating (deducing) on-going royalty plan.
Just have to trust information provided by Olde Monmouth.
Additionally and undoubtedly, Rob's concern was not UOIP and the correct numbers.
Carter may have intentionally left him out-of-the-loop to focus on his health.
Especially, given the fact, you routinely post, he stated, "Hang in there!".
Plus, the I/O number did not changed from 5/1 to 6/1 update.
Also, wrote brokerage. They validated my shares DO INDEED EXIST!
Finally, 100-200M+ shares will probably never trade again as market cap was less than $5M then.
Almost all of those purchases and extreme volume were when UOIP was in the trips.
It costs too much to have volume of 100M+ shares, unless, of course, huge money enters the picture or settlement of xyz dollar reached.
Then I could/would expect a 100M+ volume day.
JMO, but those are the provided facts, the best we know.
As I've always thought (and posted), this is that 1 in 10,000 stock & opportunity of a lifetime.
Should be extremely exciting day, Scruffer
Holy Mama. Should be 1 heck of day.
Maybe dreams do come true.
Thank you EB.
Mkt Cap should be 100M or 0.0625/share
The market cap for UOIP should be around 100M RIGHT NOW.
That's 0.0625 per share. (0.0625 * 1,614,601,069 I/O = $100M+)
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/UOIP/security
It appears the MMs are keeping the price suppressed and constrained.
It reminds me of the movie, "The Big Short" where banks have opposite position.
If MMs would only reverse course and go long with us, this should begin upward trajectory again.
Still a bargain given the DENIED STAY and possible ginormous ROR.
Baby stepping along nevertheless.
JMHO, Scruffer
Sure hope Judge Andrews on ARRIS IPR
Not exactly sure how works and the process.
Is it a 3 judge panel? Details of process appreciated.
Remember reading, but too many posts & didn't bookmark.
If financials became current, think deep, deep pockets would enter picture.
Carter probably doesn't care, but would ease some nerves, at least mine (at times).
ROR is just sooooo extreme.
The unknown keeps many away.
TY in advance, Scruffer
Exactly. Crazy. Very risky. May miss spike.
Once the profit takers sell their positions, may be hard to re-enter lower.
Technical analysis on UOIP, to me, doesn't make sense.
JMHO, but each to his/her own.
I'm with you Ranger.
At this point, deep pockets could enter and off to .03++++.
This stock is just too thinly traded now and/or tightly held.
Where/How 2 send Bourbon & BBQ $$??
Not sure what's on docket tomorrow...
But thank you again for going your HONOÜR.
Do you (or anyone) know if there will be a near real-time ruling?
http://www.worldofwanderlust.com/say-thank-50-languages/
Gavel, gavel, gavel.
Scruff
MMs will keep price down (if possible)
One has to realize, in almost all cases, they eventually profit.
Almost all of these "Stinky Pinkies" become defunct or BK companies.
I do NOT believe it's the case with UOIP.
Someone asked privately, "What would make them cover?"
We know if settlement or judgement, the MMs will have to come-up with the shares somehow or cover (at any price).
If have counterfeit shares out there, they'll have to buy at premium to obtain.
My guess is they win 98%+ of the time, so can absorb these rare unexpected losses.
Odds are just in their favor and that's how they play this game.
This also explains the reason so few short squeezes. Create more counterfeit shares.
JMHO, Scruffer
13. Does NSCC’s stock borrow program create “counterfeit shares?”
NSCC’s stock borrow program, as approved by the Commission, permits NSCC to borrow securities from its participants for the purpose of completing settlements only if participants have made those securities available to NSCC for this purpose and those securities are on deposit in the participant’s account at DTC.
https://www.sec.gov/investor/pubs/regsho.htm
As explained in "Counterfeiting Stocks", we know they disguise these transactions.
Naked or Counterfeit 100M+ shares.
I still stand by my claim the MMs are short or created counterfeit shares.
As we know, they'll do anything.
Just change "naked short" to:
>> Disguised
>> Hidden
>> Fabricated
>> Unbooked
>> Mislabeled
>> Unaccounted for
shares.
Eventually, they'll have to cover (or create EVEN more counterfeit shares).
We have them on the ropes.
Once again, my deductive reasoning:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=140681693
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=141108438
Old, but worth reading/perusing. This still happens.
http://counterfeitingstock.com/CounterfeitingStock.html
http://counterfeitingstock.com/CS2.0/CounterfeitingStock.html
https://www.sec.gov/comments/s7-08-09/s70809-407a.pdf
JMO, Scruffer
T-3 and counting until news.
But once again, what is your source please?
This is your commentary of understanding.
Yes, it's intraday (throughout and total) short trading volume, but do not see opportunity where SHORTY covered most shares in rising market.
The covering volume just doesn't add-up, equate, make sense.
Also, what is the reason for your concern, warning, post?
I'm not sure if have seen many posts in the past from you.
No one is going anywhere. We found that 1 in 10,000 gem.
Thank you for your input nevertheless.
JMHÖ.
Sincerely, Scruffer
What is your source? Covering vol not there.
>> It's possible they covered more than thought, but lost lots daily the last 2 months
>> To me, the covering volume and spread differential was just not there.
What is your source besides?:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=140753191
Thank you for possibly "Schooling" me (us), but do NOT see it that way.
Yes, it's intraday short volume, but doesn't equate. Losses mounting.
Finally, it appears another MM is clearly SHOOTING AGAINST THE NAKED SHORT MM.
Too many low volume buys at ASK to keep price up.
If positive news, MMs are going to fire against SHORTY. The question is how much money?
JMHO.
Sincerely, Scruffer
Understand sell, then cover but rising market
First, thank you for the information.
>> Completely understand to sell then cover, but in rising market, the volumes were not this extreme.
>> The float is held tightly
>> Easily borrow shares in-house or from another MM
>> Especially, notorious shorting from overseas markets
>> Seen it a number of times
>> They deliver shares, but from someone's inventory
Granted, I may be wrong on the total volume short, but it's gotta be at least 50M+.
There is no other way to explain it.
I've watched this stock daily and volume was just not there to cover daily on selling then buying back.
http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/quickchart/quickchart.asp?symb=uoip&insttype=&freq=1&show=&time=7
If pick a historical day when trading b/t .002-.005, they were doing this consistently. Caught in rising market!
http://regsho.finra.org/regsho-Index.html
JMO, Scruffer
P.S. Justified my rational is second link of original post. It's the MM's SOP, "Standard Operating Procedure".
Please explain & justify FINRA's numbers
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=141108438
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=140681693
Thank you Homebrew,
Scruffer
Depends on news & who enters.
If MM shoots against another, may throw in 10M, 20M, 30M+ dollars.
Of course, that's the 100,000's or 1,000,000+ dollar question.
If U find out, please let us [me ] know. lol.
Some MMs may B going against SHORT MMs.
With so many shares short, MMs passing shares won't provide cover.
It appears, an MM (or more) may be shooting (going) against the SHORT MMs.
Many times (or most times), when UOIP trades lower, a small vol trade will occur back-up to the ASK level (or close to it).
Typically, the SHORT MMs will walk the price down daily. The stock closing lower this day, then a little lower the next day, etc.
Like after last (or first) big run-up to .012 about a year ago.
With the clock ticking, appears not the case this time. Holding pretty steady.
Hang on longs--This could get even more exciting if other MMs are going against the MM SHORTIES.
Extra, tighter and even more extreme SQUeeeeeeeeZE.
JMO, Scruffer
Oh, that would be "Passed" on UOIP.
Working and posting not a good combination.
Or it's dain bramage.
Mentally, prepare 4 worst; hope 4 best!
I know. T-8 and counting.
I have to stay grounded and prepare for the worst, but hope for the best.
We're fortunate, zombywolf is going.
If the law is enforced and followed, there should be ABSOLUTELY NO WAY ARRIS gets IPR.
Also, some wrote, may get STAY, but at this point, I'm not sure what negates what.
I don't understand how anyone doesn't see the ROR on this.
LONG & STRONG.
Note to self: Deeeeeeeeeeeeeep breaths.
Terrific. Join the club & GO LONG
Welcome.
I don't really play in OTCBB or pinky land and hate getting burned.
One REALLY never knows, but we pretty much know this:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=141302228
If anything, have a huge chance to profit just from the coming short squeeze.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=141216943
A few others past on UOIP when below .003 and haven't been heard from since. Possibly, lifelong regret.
To me, this is CLEARLY worth the risk. Sooooo many positives.
Call him & let us know. Thank Ü
William R. Carter, Jr.
UnifiedOnline!, LLC
2515 McKinney Ave. #1000
Dallas, TX 75201
(214) 438–0750
(Name, address and telephone number of person
authorized to receive notices and communications)
90470w101
(CUSIP Number)
Thank you once again.
We sincerely appreciate it.
Don't like putting cart before horse.
Or count chickens until...
Yes, very, bery, bery SMART, BRILLIANT, SHARP law firm.
Carter knew & knows what he's doing.
Whitman is a GENIUS attorney. Amazing legal mind.
We need those favorable rulings (if/when law followed/enforced).
And then it's just a matter of time.
Very exciting times for us LONGS.
Okay, back to work for me.
Have a great day crew.
And we're riding that bull. Monstrous payout.
As I've always thought, this is that 1 in 10,000 stock.
Basically, only OTC BB or pinky playing.
Yes, life changing, altering, bettering opportunity.
Hear, hear. Well summarized ytse.
1 thing seems certain...Volume will cost
MMs have a lot to cover.
IMO, they are caught.
Do NOT see a way out if DENIED ARRIS IPR.
And if law enforced, should be denied.
That would be AWESOME!
T-8 and counting.
Thank you zombywolf.
IMO, 10% is not the case anymore
Reasoning:
>> 44.7M shares turned over to Deirdre Leane
>> Multiple noteholders converted, probably in the trips
>> Many days 10's to 100's of million shares traded
>> Carter had to release shares for this to occur
>> Olde Monmouth (Jeff) fortunately disclosed float to rstar
>> Finally, market makers have to be 100M+ short
>>>> I/O == 1,614,601,069 shares as of 06/01.
>>>> Float == 663,868,192
>>>> Carter = 950,732,877 (?)
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/UOIP/security
Therefore, in all probability, do not calculate how this can be the current circumstance.
LONG & STRONG ÜÖIP,
Scruffer
Supporting this is same 1.6B I/O shares.
Outstanding Shares >> 1,614,601,069 >> 06/01/2018
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/UOIP/security
Have no idea what MMs are thinking. Crazy, insane, caught.
If ARRIS IPR DENIED and new investors or money pile-in,
>> SHORT SQUeeeeeeeeeeeZE here we come.
It will be a thing of beauty.
Oh, NO DOUBT about it; 100M+ SHORT
May have seen these but will post again (just in case).
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=141108438
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=141263920
Long & strong,
Scruffer
As long as DENIED.
Hear, hear. The sooner the better.
With 438 followers here (& more elsewhere), there can be almost NO FLOAT.
Know some with tens of millions of shares.
With only 640M float, we're gonna experience some crazy stuff.
It's going to get very exciting...................
Enforce law & IPR should b DENIED!
One would think if just "The law" is followed and enforced, the IPR would clearly be DENIED.
It appears to be a no brainer, but "The law", especially these days, as well as, throughout history, has NOT been OBJECTIVE.
>> not influenced by personal feelings, interpretations, or prejudice; based on facts; unbiased: an objective opinion.
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/objective?s=t
I/O shares update; SAME; 1,614,601,069.
There simply can NOT be much float!
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/UOIP/security
Actually, T-10 & counting (or earlier).
I'm looking forward to seeing Outstanding Shares update.
If no change and get "DENIED, DENIED", all heck is going to break loose.
I think just the denial of the IPR (which SHOULD BE DENIED) is going to be the trigger, catalyst, short squeeze.
If fair, and read arguments presented, UOIP should win.
Else, something fishy is going on. IMO.
We are all in this together.
Thanks GB.
Everyone here does such a fantastic job.