Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Sorry,
But what is the mess that they did not know about? What's public knowledge is bad enough, so what are you talking about?
I would agree.
I think it would take the company buying a ton of shares.
I think the range you said is most realistic. It would not make some old timers too happy like myself, but I'm sure there are a few newbies here who won't shut up about it.
Thanks for sharing
"Different verticals"?
just show me the money already!
Fine with me as long as I can still read your posts.
You won't find me singing meekly in the back row.
But until that time I'll continue to get a lot of material from this board.
Why do you think it's complaining? I think I'm being realistic.
Funny how it bothers you. If you're so insecure with your investment maybe you should sell?
Sorry, but I don't want to be cheated. No thank you.
Sounds good.
But I'll refrain from singing until a large order comes in.
Like I said we have read these before, including PRs from this administration.
No, just not too naïve to expect anything.
Thank you, thank you kindly.
Your new so I can understand your excitement.
For me it a sign that they're still in the game. No more no less.
Sorry but we read these, literally countless times.
Yes, I agree. But then I would believe there are other more durable aerostats? Without pick-up trucks? I just wonder about the platoon level part of this. After all we are trying to sell as many as possible right? Then I guess there are non-military applications, but I don't know or heard of any interest in them regarding that.
Maybe against an enemy, that the platoon does not care if the enemy knows where they are?
Maybe someone with a tactical military background can weigh in on this.....................?
I never understood that tactical part of it either.
From my laymen's perspective, If the Bib is for platoons, why give away your position?
Another one, Jeesh this board is great.
Reading comprehension? Maybe you should just read my posts three times, maybe then it will sink in.
Do you think I doubt the tests happened because I haven't a clue to what nie 14.1 is?
I don't give a crap if you read or don't read my posts, but don't make things up, much thanks.
Sorry but this is just a bet to me, so I haven't the patience to read thru that. If you have, does it mention anything about results or a conclusion if this will lead to a big hive of wasps?
Thanks,
run
Your first conclusion is correct.
Taken literally, I asking if the test took place. Not if the company is a participant or not.
Is it an issue of reading comprehension or are you just purposely misrepresenting my posts?
Where have I questioned the validity of tests? Since you have conveyed your thinking to someone else, the least you can do is answer me.
Doubting the success means I think they are not on the "up and up"? I don't understand.
If I post daily, that means I read every post?
If I want to read about test results, that means I doubt they happened?
You are heroic to me. You really are.
god for bid someone questions posts how this insolvent company with a dubious history is on the threshold of greatness.
Oh, how many years have we been on this threshold?
What positive event happened that was not reported?
I do not follow the board closely enough to state the details. I may be wrong, but haven't you and others posted many times about the Bib being tested by the government. I do not have the capacity to recall all of the programs of which you name by their initials. I was hoping for some results from these tests, if in deed they are taken place.
You have talked a lot about these programs and testing events. Are there any results that you know about yet?
I for one think it's odd for someone who claims to know the officers to post on a public message board.
Again, with all the excuses.
Maybe if the company was supporting itself he wouldn't be selling.
Jeesh!!
A typical post from you. I never criticized what they are doing or how they are doing it. I just wonder what makes people think that this company can achieve its goals, respond to what I think are obvious pumps or question what people post contrary to what seems obvious to me.
I don't follow the board every day, nor do I claim to be an expert in the technology. So I don't care at all about the specifics. What should the company be doing? I don't have a clue, but a update would be nice. After 12 years I'm just hoping to get a little money back. That's what I am looking for. Do you hear me?
I don't understand it fully, but I'm sure there is manipulation.
My point is that no one would need to rationalize their predicament and blame something else if the company was supporting itself.
Since Leinwand you can add another five years of insolvency and empty promises. Back then we were supposedly on the cutting edge and we had all this potential. Now the government can turn to a host of unmanned solutions.
You mean little to no sales and insolvency has nothing to do with it?
My only hope is with the BIB and or Argus.
I don't think GTC will ever amount to anything.
Gsat does not need us, we need them.
By George, I think you got it. Or getting it?
Another question is if they are so good, why did LTA take a offer from a 2cent company?
Based on the laws of nature and rationality, I'm going with the "we're broke" option too, but I have faith in the super-natural.
More like sarcasm.
But you're a good guy, you take it as well as you dish it out.
Fascinating, everything is going our way.
It's not a matter of need. you don't have to be an expert to appreciate that.
Even if LTA technology is proven to be better, is this the company that will do it? In my opinion that's the $64,000 question and as been in my mind for a long time.
Your late.
Haven't you heard? This stock been breaking out for over ten years.
I cannot remember the company PR anything about going to the stratosphere in a long time. It seems like for years it been the STS ship and the Argus which are mid altitude.
Was he answering a question?
You mentioned that this company will likely be the leader in getting to the stratosphere. Or some other similar words or statement.
Who in the company has the expertise to do that?
The only way that would happen is Raytheon goes out of business.
But you never know, crazier things have happened....like this board.